Cmdr Bluefin USN Sherlock Holmes Legal Page : Plaintiffs The United States Navy, The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) “affidavit of probable cause” 18 U.S. Code § 1708 - “theft of international mail” Case Number:1:2020-cv-00277(Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. (Defendants) United States Supreme Court et al., past and present having a “Non- Amicable settlement process” criminal manipulation on all Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) | United States Courts in this conspirer against (Plaintiffs) United Kingdom, et al, (Plaintiffs) International Criminal Court, et al and (Plaintiffs) International Court Justice, et al vs Defendant: President Donald John Trump, Sr., et al

Honorable Fatou Bensouda

Because this “affidavit of probable cause” is being submitted for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause, (Plaintiffs) The United States Navy The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) (Cmdr. Bluefin US Navy MSS) have not included each and every fact known to (Plaintiffs) concerning concluding this international military investigation, (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr.

(Defendants) United States Supreme Court et al., directly past and present having a “Non- Amicable settlement process” physically being legally sought upon the parties to this extreme and outrageous “white supremacy crimes” of past illegal slave trade violation alleged dispute within all lawsuits filed against

(Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. (Defendants) United States Supreme Court et al., actually engaging honorable acting under color of law to physically consider find ways to resolve their false submitted judicial decree facts, international slavery data,

Confined in a mountain of false judicial statement(s) decrees over seen by (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. and (Defendants) United States Supreme Court et al., fruitless, trade less engaging non-honorable acting under color of law to physically other than committed to the same RICO pattern and practice of “whites supremacy” bully power to insure “obstruction of justice” other than a “friendly and non-contentious” way to actually achieved the possibility of a full or partial amicable settlement to the legal dispute of “captive slaves”

citing undersigned (Hamilton) Estate of Louis Charles Hamilton, II et al v. President Donald John Trump, Sr., et al (Defendants) acting under color of law engaging 18 U.S. Code § 1708 - “theft of international mail” Case Number:1:2020-cv-00277

Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Estate of Louis Charles Hamilton, II, BlackLivesMatter, et al, United Kingdom, et al, International Criminal Court, et al and International Court Justice, et al vs. Defendant: President Donald John Trump, Sr., et al Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization

Rather, (Plaintiffs) have set forth only those facts that (Plaintiffs) believe are sufficient to establish International Criminal Court, et al “Prosecutor” Honorable Fatou Bensouda the necessary foundation a judicial officer is available 24 hours a day to issue international warrants for the complaint (Plaintiffs) The United States Navy The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) (Cmdr. Bluefin US Navy MSS)

(Plaintiffs) United Kingdom, Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Emma Watson, Henry Charles Albert David, Estate of Chandra D Hamilton, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Estate of Louis Charles Hamilton II, Aaron Michael Halvorsen, Lalisa Manoban, Alexis Jemtrude, Bae Yoo-bin, Estate of Rachel Ann Hamilton II, Estate of Natasha C Hamilton, Vladimir Vladimirvich Putin and William Arthur Philip Louis “affidavit of probable cause”

Citing Fraud within (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. interception to further pursue criminal manipulation on all Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) | United States Courts in this conspirer against (Plaintiffs) United Kingdom, et al, (Plaintiffs) International Criminal Court, et al and (Plaintiffs) International Court Justice, et al vs Defendant: President Donald John Trump, Sr., et al

Honorable Fatou Bensouda (a) the jurisdiction of International Criminal Court, et al and International Court Justice, et al under complete manipulation in all thefts of international mail, hereby “ICC” International Criminal Court” having not established a proper Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) to allowed (b) all captive slaves (Plaintiffs) have set forth only those facts of international human Traficant that (Plaintiffs) believe are sufficient to establish International Criminal Court, et al “Prosecutor” individuals charged with the gravest crimes of concern to the international community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression, hereby

(Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. was born on January 27, 1955, in Buffalo, (Defendants) New York, ongoing false slavery data mail, wire fraud against undersigned “Pro Se” (Hamilton) herein (Plaintiffs) collective realleges and incorporates fully set forth all facts

(Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. attended Notre Dame Elementary School, then La Lumiere School, a small but affluent and academically rigorous Roman Catholic boarding school in La Porte, Indiana He graduated first in his class in 1973 (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. entered (Defendants) Harvard University while the illegal existences of the (Defendant) S=Confederate State of Mississippi concealing false slavery data within

(Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. sophomore (second-year) standing based on his glorifying this fraudulent white supremacy illiterate claimed “high achievement in high school” for separate but equals horse crap manipulations by white supremacy continue criminally RICO cultivating “13^th confederate states GOVERNMENT illegal existence for “whites citizenship only” upon FOLLOWING THIS CONTIUNE RICO PROPOGADAN (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr.

FRAUDUELNY majored in history (Defendants) Confederate State of Mississippi international wire fraud scheme including illegally join (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union on or about the 7th day of February 2013 not in past colonial America records of 1865 being a party to the (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union government and predecessor as international records under criminal manipulation “crimes against humanity” so claimed

While (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. became an adjunct professor at the Georgetown (Defendants) University Law Center During this time, (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court, prevailing in 25 of them “directly (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. “knowing and willing” conspire producing False judicial statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001), with other Federal Judges listed herein “wire, mail, computer, internet, concealing (Defendants) 13 Confederate States of America et al,

(Defendants) Confederate State of Mississippi never ratified the (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union government 13th Amendment freeing (all) (Plaintiffs) Negro Slaves on the exacts date of False slavery data, false classification collectively Continuing false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) submitted (Plaintiffs) not legally "Born Descendants" of 19th-century African-American slaves "but" actual living captive stateless ("Plaintiffs") slaves while timelessly wire fraud continuances (Defendants) John Glover Roberts Jr. illegally and quite fraudulent represented 19 states in United States v. Microsoft Those fraudulent cases include:

Options v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 March 22, 1995 May 22, 1995 Respondent

Adams v. Robertson, 520 U.S. 83 January 14, 1997 March 3, 1997 Respondent

Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 December 10, 1997 February 25, 1999 Petitioner

Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523 U.S. 340 January 21, 1998 March 31, 1998 Petitioner

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Smith, 525 U.S. 459 January 20, 1999 February 23, 1999 Petitioner

Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 October 6, 1999 February 23, 2000 Respondent

Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Mine Workers, 531 U.S. 57 October 2, 2000 November 28, 2000 Petitioner

TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23 November 29, 2000 March 20, 2001 Petitioner

Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 November 7, 2001 January 8, 2002 Petitioner

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302 January 7, 2002 April 23, 2002 bRespondent

Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 January 16, 2002 June 20, 2002 Petitioner

Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 April 24, 2002 June 20, 2002 Petitioner

Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co., 537 U.S. 149 October 8, 2002 January 15, 2003 Respondent

Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 November 13, 2002 March 5, 2003 Petitioner

First Options v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 March 22, 1995 May 22, 1995 Respondent