“Good and extremely
sufficient cause of action and reasoning exist, defendant(s) collectively
having “Legal appearance before The International Criminal Court (ICC), located
in The Hague, for prosecution of semi-genocide,
war crimes, and crimes against humanity directed at 44.5 “Million Negro race
Plaintiffs” “pro se” Plaintiff in his person subject to massive surveillance,
attempts at “wrongful loss of life” subject to foregin government “syping” as
being a “party to said “enslavement” fully targeted by theft of physical
evideance and actual acts of violence perpetrated by defendant (USA) agents direct
from official Cyber Targeted surveillance—of “pro se” Plaintiff in his person in
which defendant having governments monitor the communication of a specific nature
involving securing pro se plaintiff individual— basic international human
rights to even never have freedom of legal rights of law in expression, as “pro
se” Plaintiff in his person subject already to being falsey imprisonment in
2011 and drugged…? Being in direct determined in 2016 that such actions did violate
the official international law as described by
The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights is generally agreed to be the foundation of
international human rights law. Adopted in 1948, the UDHR has inspired a rich
body of legally binding international human rights treaties International Human
Rights Law By 1948, the United Nations’ new Human Rights Commission had
captured the attention of the world. Under the dynamic chairmanship of Eleanor
Roosevelt—President Franklin Roosevelt’s widow, a human rights champion in her
own right and the United States delegate to the UN—the Commission set out to
draft the document that became the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Roosevelt, credited with its inspiration, referred to the Declaration as the
“international Magna Carta for all mankind.” It was adopted by the United
Nations on December 10, 1948.
In its preamble
and in Article 1, the Declaration unequivocally proclaims the inherent rights
of all human beings: “Disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in
barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of
a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and
freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the
common people....All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and
rights.”
The Member States
of the United Nations pledged to work together to promote the thirty Articles
of human rights that, for the first time in history, had been assembled and
codified into a single document. In consequence, many of these rights, in
various forms, are today part of the constitutional laws of democratic nations.
The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights is an ideal standard held in common by nations
around the world, but it bears no force of law. Thus, from 1948 to 1966, the UN
Human Rights Commission’s main task was to create a body of international human
rights law based on the Declaration, and to establish the mechanisms needed to
enforce its implementation and use.
The Human Rights
Commission produced two major documents: the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Both became international law in 1976. Together
with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, these two covenants comprise
what is known as the “International Bill of Human Rights.”
The ICCPR focuses
on issues such as the right to life, freedom of speech, religion and voting.
The ICESCR focuses on food, education, health and shelter. Both covenants
proclaim these rights for all people and forbid discrimination.
Furthermore,
Article 26 of the ICCPR established a Human Rights Committee of the United
Nations. Composed of eighteen human rights experts, the Committee is
responsible for ensuring that each signatory to the ICCPR complies with its
terms. The Committee examines reports submitted by countries every five years
(to ensure they are in compliance with the ICCPR), and issues findings
based on a country’s performance.
Many countries
that ratified the ICCPR also agreed that the Human Rights Committee may
investigate allegations by individuals and organizations that the State has
violated their rights. Before appealing to the Committee, the complainant must
exhaust all legal recourse in the courts of that country. After investigation,
the Committee publishes the results. These findings have great force. If the
Committee upholds the allegations, the State must take measures to remedy the
abuse.
SUBSEQUENT UNITED
NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS DOCUMENTS
In addition to
the covenants in the International Bill of Human Rights, the United Nations has
adopted more than twenty principal treaties further elaborating human rights.
These include conventions to prevent and prohibit specific abuses such as
torture and genocide and to protect specific vulnerable populations such as
refugees (Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951), women
(Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,
1979), and children (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989). Other
conventions cover racial discrimination, prevention of genocide, political
rights of women, prohibition of slavery and torture.
Each of these
treaties has established a committee of experts to monitor implementation of
the treaty provisions by its State parties.
1. We are all
born free and equal
2. Don't
discriminate
3. The right to
life
4. No Slavery
5. No Torture
6. You Have
Rights No Matter Where You Go
7. We're All
Equal Before the Law
8. Your Human
Rights Are Protected by Law
9. No Unfair
Detainment
11. We're Always
Innocent Till Proven Guilty
12. The Right to
Privacy
13. The Freedom
to Move
14. The Right to
Asylum
15. Right to a
Nationality
16. Marriage and
Family
17. The Right to
Ownership
18. Freedom of
Thought
19. Freedom of
Expression
20. The Right to
Public Assembly
22. Social
Security
23. Workers’
Rights
24. The Right to
Play
25. Food and
Shelter for All
26. The Right to
Education
27. Copyright
28. A Fair and
Free World
29.
Responsibility
30. No One Can
Take Away Your Human Rights
The defendant (USA)
American Convention on Human Rights pertains to the inter-American states—the
Americas—and was entered into force in 1978, upon which from 1619 – 1978 (359)
years “Negro Slaves Plaintiffs” being “enslaved” and are always already “physically”
(Fucking) Slaves in 1978 timeline from 1865 (113) years delinquent passage of
the 13th amendment granting “Niggers” freedom from these “Whites
masters” 1865..? Which never ever even hhappen…? On a human right level of
international law…? As (RICO) criminal Defendant “United States of America et
al” grand whites (Mother Fu-ckers) and the special rules of white magic FRCP “Federal
Rules of Klansmen Procedures” and all described defendant herein conspired
fully to maintain direct violation of 1 -30 basic international human rights by
“secretly” maintaining “defendant USA “enslavement” of 44.5 Million Negro
Plaintiffs Slaves for additional
148 years after
1865 civil War” – 2013 when Defendant States of Mississippi and Defendant (KKK)
free “pro se” Plaintiff Hamilton II in his person already born into “slavery
servitude” on November 8th 1961 already (52) years a “Negro Slave”
property of all defendant (USA) Purest ever so extra special “Whites Race”never
equal, and better not go to their “special whites man”
(Mother Fu-cking)
RICO Slave Trade corrupted criminals GOP
Judicial Slave Trade 1619 – 2016 (December) Rouge “Killer” Lynching Niggers
Legacy Judges all conspiring in Niggers being a well kept “Supermeacy” controlled Klansmen
Secret…? (Crazy) in 2016 no (Fucking) less ongoing by a (Confused) hateful Race
of
Defendant USA
Congress “Whites Only” control (RICO) “Supermeacy” injecting the entire “international
community” as themselves defendant USA (whites only) to be proclaimed purest,
powerful, and ever so (Fucking) smarter over the “entire negro population, as
well as “Muslims, Hispanic, races among other “people of color” in the “entire
international community, while disable the entire “International Community”
Negro Race to be “property of Defendant (USA) as such even trickery in
immigration status by (Negro) race from foregin country to be “enslavement” by
their own free occurred…? To be now defendant in 1978 – 2013 still a foregin “Nigger
Slave” of defendant property “USA”…?
While defendant(s)
(USA) fully eliminated 1-30 Basic human international rights direct at all (PLANTIFFS
DNA NEGRO SLAVES) within the Jurisdiction of (USA) and the “entire world” collectively
in the direct cause of action after 1865 Civil War official destruction of the defendant
very own government sponsored “Freeman Bureau”, fully with intent to destroyed
just health care and all initiatives, destroyed just educational opportunities,
an all past, present and future educational knowledge program, future prosperty
by such defendant “para-military (KKK) in fliction massive wrongful loss of
life by straight out “murder” lynching, and ensuring racial terror lynching in
the past,” and present 1619 – 2013 (359) years of a direct cause of action for
Psychological damages
by way of , “killings of unarmed negro slaves plaintiffs, tortute, rape,
starvation, false improsment, imposed segregation poverty, constances to “persistence of a de facto residential
segregation in many of the metropolitan areas in the defendant “United States,”
as of this very undersigned notary seal date…? and psychological damages by way
of maintain “enslavement in unemployment
for Negro Race Slaves of DNA African Americans race “which in 2016 as always defendant
(USA) special elite whites only ensuring Negro stay proverty stricken” being
Negro almost twice the national unemployment rate.” vs. “whites Only” extra
special pure race of (USA)…? this enslavement and racial discrimination in the
colonies and the United States from 1619 to the present 2016 (359) continue
years while Defendfant steaing “Negro Slaves” inventions, technology and
conversion and transfer all for “Whites Only” still designed by their very own
Conquring ways forever destroyed any Negro Race past, present and future just financial
support, whiles these (Motherfu-ckers) Klansmen Stupid Greed Slow Hatful Asses always
hell bent upon forcing “enslavement” Negro Slave Plaintiffs from 1913 – 2013…?
RICO defendant (Sticky Greedy Whites Only Banker) conspiring Negro race paying off
all debt of defendant (USA) and their “whites Only” loans to defendant “Federal
Reserve bank” to maintain said oppression of “enslavement” against Negro Slaves
Plaintiffs herein very onw one’s self worth “past, preset and future proserty (all)
destroyed by cancellation of the basic human international rights of actual
freedom within defendant (USA)” which
has, since 1619 – 2016 “structural discrimination” that always creates
de facto barriers for people of Negro Slaves Plaintiffs African descent to
fully exercise any claimed basic international 1 - 30 “human rights”, as #
30. No One Can
Take Away Your Human Rights, is full of “Crap” Plaintiff Negro Slaves have no “Fuc-king
Civil Rights” Never… as their court keep lie’s to claim such existed when
factual “Defendant”
United States of America” having maintained “Slavery Servitude “Forever”, even
stealing immigrants of Negro Slaves Plaintiffs African descen as The first
Ellis Island Immigration Station officially opens on January 1, 1892, as three
large ships wait to land. Seven hundred immigrants passed through Ellis Island
that day, and nearly 450,000 followed over the course of that first year, being
some of “Negro Race” tricked, trapped, and imprisonment of there on self-doing
based on a front of false hood, in non-discloser the 13th and 14th Amendments
of The United States of America constitution is in existence’s and enforced on
behalf of Plaintiff(s) Negro Slaves herein when since
1892 (27) years
after the “Civil War” and precisely 124 years till January 2016 all Immigrants
first enter “Ellis Island Immigration Station” and other “Immigration Station”
within The United States of American being “Negro” DNA race, fully deprive of
the rights and privileges of citizenship in a continual (RICO) scheme of
“Slavery Servitude, Denaturalization for “Unjust Enrichments” of
All Defendant
being a party to said “Slave Regime”
Slave Trade of
the abducted Negros, now being the same for all US Immigration Services - US
Citizenship& Green Card, being forced unknowing into “Slavery Servitude”,
in violation among others 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. §
1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or
forced labor), for each and every Negro race officially residing under
immigration status since January 1st 1892 – June 2016
Negro Slave
Veteran Plaintiff(s) and Negro DNA Slave Plaintiff(s) collective require enjoying
such required TRO injunction being heard before (now) The International Criminal Court (ICC
or ICCt) on all Negro Race immigration status being banded and remain being
enforced immediately from entrances into defendant “United States of America”
Further denied
fully having any type of immigration status and remaining such Court Order enforced
until the completion of all International Criminal Court (ICC or ICCt) Trial
subject litigations matter of this human internation rights violation of
material factual circumstances of Defendant (USA) 1619 – 2016 never ending
Hostile act in all shape and legal forms of “whites only” race prosperty
residing off (Motherfu-cking) unjust enrichment, denied basic human rights over
this (RICO) “Slavery Servitude Trade” matter dealing with stolen citizenship of
the Negro race, being past, present and future denied compensations in law,
equity, no ever civil rights, and legal citizenship, 1619 - well in future control
of“Defendant “United States of America” et al affirmed correctely from the
exact additional date of January 1, 1892, - December 25th 2016 all “New
Arrival” DNA Negro Slave Plaintiffs herein residing in (USA) January 1st 1892 –
June 2016, being fully having No ever “Legal Citizenship” status, denied as
such being same as “White Only”, Americans As so indicated said TRO Injunction
to freeze international immigration of all Negro Race being having entrances
into United States of America to be Identified (secretly) as Official White
Only of (USA) Property and “Slaves” of (USA) in 2016 (December)”, haing no just
international basic human rights until this matter being clarified during a
hearing on “Negro Slaves Plaintiffs” denied Basic International Human Rights in
Law and Equity by defendant “United States of America et al
No comments:
Post a Comment