Thursday, November 17, 2016

Articles of Impeachment to Congress for the removal of 45th President of The United States of America, being the “Leadership” of The Knights of the Klu Klux Klansman (Dynasty) 1865- 2016 (December) 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. continue leadership RICO endeavor and “Forced Slavery Servitude” and being “Property owner of 44.5 Million Negro Slaves

+POTUS ㅤ +United Nations Human Rights Negro  Slaves Plaintiff “Freeman Bureau”, herein while collectively “Accordingly, Slave Negro United States Navy Veteran of said (USN) having determined that it is necessary charge before the assumed Honorable Court United States Justice, as stating the same before “JAG”
The International Community and The World Court Justices of The Hague, Defendant “United States of America et al”, Defendant “Federal Reserve Bank et al”, Defendant “Slave Trade Corporation et al” Chief Defendant GOP Government under direct leadership of the defendant “Knights of The Klu Klux Klansman Donald John Trump Sr. Commander on Chief” and  Co-Defendant Donald “Don” John Trump Jr. and the entire The Trump Organization Trump Tower 725 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 and the entire Eric Trump Foundation (ETF) 725 Fifth Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10022, collectively having committed to continue Criminal engaging in “RICO Slave Trade International Racket” and Civil Conspire against there very own rules of governing laws  
•                                 RICO Slave Trade Fraud
•                                 § 1581 - Peonage; obstructing enforcement
•                                 § 1582 - Vessels for slave trade
•                                 § 1583 - Enticement into slavery
•                                 § 1584 - Sale into involuntary servitude
•                                 § 1585 - Seizure, detention, transportation or sale of slaves
•                                 § 1586 - Service on vessels in slave trade
•                                 § 1587 - Possession of slaves aboard vessel
•                                 § 1588 - Transportation of slaves from United States
•                                 § 1589 - Forced labor
•                                 § 1590 - Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor
•                                 § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion
•                                 § 1592 - Unlawful conduct with respect to documents in furtherance of trafficking, peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor
•                                 § 1593 - Mandatory restitution
§ 1593A - Benefiting financially from peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons In direct violation of
 ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Article 7: Crimes against humanity continue the crime of (RICO) enterprise, bribery, theft of services, common law fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, as already destroyed in the past
The Plaintiff Freedmen’s Bureau was established by an act of defendant Congress on March 3, 1865, two months before Confederate General Robert Lee (1807-70) surrendered to the Union’s Ulysses Grant (1822-85) at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, effectively never did ending the Civil War as described in 2016 by this “Pro Se Negro Slave Louis Charles Hamilton II, being scuttled government GOP Records Mississippi ended Civil War 2013 7th day of February when ratified the 13th amendment being a DIRECT ISSUE in this civil action as Defendant U.S. District Chief Judge Ron Clark
U.S. District Judge Marcia A. Crone
U.S. District Judge Zack Hawthorn
U.S. District Judge David Hittner
U. S. District Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr.,
 U.S. District Judge James E. “Jeb” Boasberg
U.S. District Judge Keith F. Giblin
U.S. District Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon
U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett
U.S. District Judge” Vanessa D. Gilmore
U.S. District Judge Patrick A. Conmy
U,S. District Judge U.S. Federal Judge Karen Wells Roby,
 U.S Appeal Chief Judge Frank Hoover Easterbrook
U.S Appeal Circuit Judge Richard Allen Posner
U.S Appeal Circuit Senior Judge Daniel Anthony Manion
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON II, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
February 4, 2016.

Hamilton v. United States of America et al

Defendant: United States of America, State Of Texas and Harris County Texas
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II Case Number: 1:2011cv00122
Filed: March 9, 2011Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Beaumont Office County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Marcia A. Crone Referring Judge: Keith F. Giblin
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Hamilton v. U S America

Defendant: U S America Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Case Number: 1:2011cv00442 Filed: September 13, 2011
Court: Texas Eastern District Court Office: Beaumont Office
County: Jefferson Presiding Judge: Marcia A. Crone Referring Judge: Zack Hawthorn
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cause of Action: 18:1962
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Hamilton v. United States of America et al

Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II Defendant: United States of America and Andrew Johnson
Case Number: 1:2010cv00808 Filed: December 15, 2010
Court: Texas Eastern District Court Office: Beaumont Office
County: Jefferson Presiding Judge: Ron Clark Referring Judge: Keith F. Giblin
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Filed: May 11, 2016 as 4:2016mc01057
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Jeffery Tavery, Robert Vaughan and others
Defendant: United States of America et al "Chief Defendant, Untied States of America Congress, United States of America Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type: Other Statutes  Other
Filed: April 29, 2016 as 4:2016mc00956
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank, et al
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type: Other Statutes  Other
Filed: April 5, 2016 as 4:2016cv00994
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: Joe Czyzyk , U.S. Vets United States Veterans Initiative et al , US Vets Houston @ Midtown Terrace Suites et al and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Filed: April 4, 2016 as 4:2016cv00964
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: United States Of America, State Of Texas, Harris County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: Other Statutory Actions
Filed: September 13, 2011 as 1:2011cv00442
Defendant: U S America
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Filed: May 13, 2011 as 1:2011cv00240
Defendant: CVS/Caremark Corporation, UPS
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Filed: March 9, 2011 as 1:2011cv00122
Defendant: United States of America, State Of Texas, Harris County Texas
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Filed: January 5, 2011 as 1:2011cv00005
Defendant: Walter A Dennis, Willie M Zanders, Rosemary Dennis
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Filed: July 30, 2010 as 4:2010cv02709
Defendant: Marine Building LLC , Law Office of Harry C Arthur , Harry C Arthur
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.
The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F.Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
The Court has reviewed the complaint and finds that it is incomprehensible. It does not appear to state the grounds upon which this court's jurisdiction depends, or a statement of a cognizable claim showing plaintiff's entitlement to relief, or the basis of his demands for damages. As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a) and therefore it will be dismissed. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
All conspired while acting under color of law with defendant United States GOP Congress directly to keeping Slaver ongoing, well beyond 1865 – 2099 and benefit off the direct destruction of the Plaintiff “Freeman Bureau”, in the future 2010 – 2016 in court proceeding against this particular Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Slave (Hamilton) USNavy # 2712 further defendant(s) collectively as a Grand GOP Government Slave Trade “Unit” benefited off said destruction Plaintiff “Freeman Bureau”,  and being in 2010 – 2016 RICO scheme of things in the Monetary value, of said “Plaintiff Freeman Bureau”, being refused to being acknowledge as a cause of actions as stated in court records before this “Rouge” Judicial Government GOP Republican Party U.S. District Chief Judge Ron Clark, Defendant GOP Republican Party U.S. District Judge Marcia A. Crone and Defendant GOP Republican Party U.S. District Judge Zack Hawthorn Criminal engaging in
“RICO Slave Trade International Racket”, knowing the benefit of Plaintiff Freeman Bureau”, in the dates indicated in past court filing all to be wrongfully selfish denied and to maintain “enslavement” of the 44th Negro President and His direct Family (Obama) to be just that, defendant GOP Republican Party Slave Trade official benefit off the direct destruction of the Plaintiff “Freeman Bureau”, in the future 2010 – 2016, there is no just Judicial Government on behalf of “Slaves” in Defendant (USA) as described and destroyed in all court records, as this “Plaintiff Never allowd to have (Fucking) legal standing proceed ever, being a Slave trying to be free from “Slavery of defendant “United States of America” all  50 Listed States Defendant(s) Alabama – Wyoming and as such Motion to Strike” all bogus, fraudulent Constitution 50 Listed States Defendant(s) Alabama – Wyoming ...as all all  50 Listed States Defendant(s) aid and abetting in Plaintiff Freeman Bureau”, past, present and future destruction of Plaintiff Freeman Bureau”, and all past, present and future Negro Plaintiffs Slaves Just Prosperity, equal rights under law and equity derived thereof from the “Hostile” never de-activate Defendant (USA) GOP Para-Military (KKK), all killing “Negro Race” and insuring “whites supremacy” in the absolute 2016 Destruction of the Freeman Bureau”, as the “Special White Man” Magic Words FRCP as stated by this (Crooked) Bastard Klansman Judge JAMES E. BOASBERG, 

Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks.
However” 148 years of secret enslavement of 44.5 Million Niggers very hard to put in a short plain (White Man) understanding of there “Magic FRCP” other then Shut the Fuck up” and Go in a Ditch to official Die Lying always lynching niggers fucking GOP Crooked Judicial Government Bitches stealing taxes sorry whites supremacy (Klansmen), we are never meant to be equal in (USA) as such a direct cause for all direct damages caused to the Plaintiff Freeman Bureau”, past, present and future as described herein (again).




No comments:

Post a Comment