Friday, November 4, 2016

Strike” defendant FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation “United States of America et al” 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS,“De jure segregation” by FBI “Whites Supremacy” Klansman Federal Bureau of Investigation was Born, 1908

+United Nations Human Rights  +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters  +NATO  Respectfully Appearance furtherance's Slave Negro (Pro Se Plaintiff) Louis Charles Hamilton II herein (USN) #2712 before “Assumed Honorable United States District Court Justice” “JAG” and World Court Justices” of The Hague all described by this particular “Pro Se Slave Negro Plaintiff herein, with factual records of the defendant (USA) government being distorted, hidden, obscured, scuttled, propaganda and of whites supremacy public “bull shit horse print dating back clear to 1865 aftermath of the “wrongful death” of
 Negro Slave Plaintiff President “Wrongful Death” of Plaintiff Abe Lincoln herein whom was an American politician and lawyer who served as the 16th President of the defendant United States from March 1861 until his assassination in April 1865.  “Notice of Motion to Strike” defendant “United States of America et al” own governing rules of laws
18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS being criminal Statutes at Large Whites Supremacy GOP Government imposed forever “De jure segregation” in all legal society and government of defendant (USA) Whites Supremacy”Federal Bureau of Investigation was Born, 1908 - The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, was enacted by Congress in 1970, as which the defendant “United States of America et al FBI for exactly  (62) timeline already engaging in a “Mass Murder” acts  perpetrated by lynching, shooting, bombing, drowning, poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; fully  committed in the perpetration of whites supremacist GOP Government, and having not once institute per statue, ending the RICO Whites Only”, Slave Trade as a “whole” in direct violation as stated as follows:
·         § 1961 - Definitions
·         § 1963 - Criminal penalties
·         § 1964 - Civil remedies
·         § 1965 - Venue and process
·         § 1967 - Evidence
 It is unlawful for anyone employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) (West 1984). The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) was passed by Congress with the declared purpose of seeking to eradicate organized crime in the United States. Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 26-27, 104 S. Ct. 296, 302-303, 78 L. Ed. 2d 17 (1983); United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 589, 101 S. Ct. 2524, 2532, 69 L. Ed. 2d 246 (1981). A violation of Section 1962(c), requires (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity. Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 496, 105 S. Ct. 3275, 3285, 87 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1985).
A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment. United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 1011 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S. Ct. 1265, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1354 (1982).
An "enterprise" is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity. 18 U.S.C.A. §  1961(4) (West 1984). Many courts have noted that Congress mandated a liberal construction of the RICO statute in order to effectuate its remedial purposes by holding that the term "enterprise" has an expansive statutory definition. United States v. Delano, 825 F. Supp. 534, 538-39 (W.D.N.Y. 1993), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 55 F. 3d 720 (2d Cir. 1995), cases cited therein.
"Pattern of racketeering activity" requires at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within ten years of each other. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(5) (West 1984). Congress intended a fairly flexible concept of a pattern in mind. H.J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 492 U.S. 229, 239, 109 S. Ct. 2893, 2900, 106 L. Ed. 2d 195 (1989). The government must show that the racketeering predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity. Id. Racketeering predicates are related if they have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events. Id. at 240, 109 S. Ct. at 2901; Ticor Title Ins. Co. v. Florida, 937 F. 2d 447, 450 (9th Cir. 1991). Furthermore, the degree in which these factors establish a pattern may depend on the degree of proximity, or any similarities in goals or methodology, or the number of repetitions. United States v. Indelicato, 865 F. 2d 1370, 1382 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 811, 110 S. Ct. 56, 107 L. Ed. 2d 24 (1989).
Continuity refers either to a closed period of repeated conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition. H.J., Inc., 492 U.S. at 241-42, 109 S. Ct. at 2902. A party alleging a RICO violation may demonstrate continuity over a closed period by proving a series of related predicates extending over a substantial period of time. Id. Predicate acts extending over a few weeks or months and threatening no future criminal conduct do not satisfy this requirement as Congress was concerned with RICO in long-term criminal conduct. Id.
As to the continuity requirement, the government may show that the racketeering acts found to have been committed pose a threat of continued racketeering activity by proving: (1) that the acts are part of a long-term association that exists for criminal purposes, or (2) that they are a regular way of conducting the defendant's ongoing legitimate business, or (3) that they are a regular way of conducting or participating in an ongoing and legitimate enterprise. Id.
When a RICO action is brought before continuity can be established, then liability depends on whether the threat of continuity is demonstrated. Id. However, Judge Scalia wrote in his concurring opinion that it would be absurd to say that "at least a few months of racketeering activity. . .is generally for free, as far as RICO is concerned." Id. at 254, 109 S. Ct. at 2908. Therefore, if the predicate acts involve a distinct threat of long-term racketeering activity, either implicit or explicit, a RICO pattern is established. Id. at 242, 109 S. Ct. at 2902.
The RICO statute expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962. The government need not prove that the defendant agreed with every other conspirator, knew all of the other conspirators, or had full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy. Delano, 825 F. Supp. at 542. All that must be shown is: (1) that the defendant agreed to commit the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in two racketeering acts; (2) that he knew the general status of the conspiracy; and (3) that he knew the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role. United States v. Rastelli, 870 F. 2d 822, 828 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 982, 110 S. Ct. 515, 107 L. Ed. 2d 516 (1989).
As used in this chapter—
(1)
“racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 224 (relating to sports bribery), sections 471, 472, and 473 (relating to counterfeiting), section 659 (relating to theft from interstate shipment) if the act indictable under section 659 is felonious, section 664 (relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare funds), sections 891–894 (relating to extortionate credit transactions), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), section 1029 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with access devices), section 1084 (relating to the transmission of gambling information),
section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1344 (relating to financial institution fraud), section 1351 (relating to fraud in foreign labor contracting), section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or nationalization unlawfully), section 1426 (relating to the reproduction of naturalization or citizenship papers), section 1427 (relating to the sale of naturalization or citizenship papers), sections 1461–1465 (relating to obscene matter), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),
 section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1542 (relating to false statement in application and use of passport), section 1543 (relating to forgery or false use of passport), section 1544 (relating to misuse of passport), section 1546 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents), sections 1581–1592 (relating to peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons).,[1] sections 1831 and 1832 (relating to economic espionage and theft of trade secrets), section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 1953 (relating to interstate transportation of wagering paraphernalia), section 1954 (relating to unlawful welfare fund payments), section 1955 (relating to the prohibition of illegal gambling businesses), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity), section 1958 (relating to use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire), section 1960 (relating to illegal money transmitters), sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2260 (relating to sexual exploitation of children), sections 2312 and 2313 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen motor vehicles), sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen property), section 2318 (relating to trafficking in counterfeit labels for phonorecords, computer programs or computer program documentation or packaging and copies of motion pictures or other audiovisual works), section 2319 (relating to criminal infringement of a copyright), section 2319A (relating to unauthorized fixation of and trafficking in sound recordings and music videos of live musical performances), section 2320 (relating to trafficking in goods or services bearing counterfeit marks), section 2321 (relating to trafficking in certain motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts), sections 2341–2346 (relating to trafficking in contraband cigarettes), sections 2421–24 (relating to white slave traffic), sections 175–178 (relating to biological weapons), sections 229–229F (relating to chemical weapons), section 831 (relating to nuclear materials), (C) any act which is indictable under title 29, United States Code, section 186 (dealing with restrictions on payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501(c) (relating to embezzlement from union funds), (D) any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section 157 of this title), fraud in the sale of securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United States, (E) any act which is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act, (F) any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating to importation of alien for immoral purpose) if the act indictable under such section of such Act was committed for the purpose of financial gain, or (G) any act that is indictable under any provision listed in section 2332b(g)(5)(B);
(2)
“State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, any political subdivision, or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof;
(3)
“person” includes any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;
(4)
“enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity;
(5)
“pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity;
(6)
“unlawful debt” means a debt (A) incurred or contracted in gambling activity which was in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or which is unenforceable under State or Federal law in whole or in part as to principal or interest because of the laws relating to usury, and (B) which was incurred in connection with the business of gambling in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or the business of lending money or a thing of value at a rate usurious under State or Federal law, where the usurious rate is at least twice the enforceable rate;
(7)
“racketeering investigator” means any attorney or investigator so designated by the Attorney General and charged with the duty of enforcing or carrying into effect this chapter;
(8)
“racketeering investigation” means any inquiry conducted by any racketeering investigator for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person has been involved in any violation of this chapter or of any final order, judgment, or decree of any court of the United States, duly entered in any case or proceeding arising under this chapter;
(9)
“documentary material” includes any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material; and
(10)
“Attorney General” includes the Attorney General of the United States, the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, the Associate Attorney General of the United States, any Assistant Attorney General of the United States, or any employee of the Department of Justice or any employee of any department or agency of the United States so designated by the Attorney General to carry out the powers conferred on the Attorney General by this chapter. Any department or agency so designated may use in investigations authorized by this chapter either the investigative provisions of this chapter or the investigative power of such department or agency otherwise conferred by law.
(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title IX, § 901(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 941; amended Pub. L. 95–575, § 3(c), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2465; Pub. L. 95–598, title III, § 314(g), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2677; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§ 901(g), 1020, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2136, 2143; Pub. L. 98–547, title II, § 205, Oct. 25, 1984, 98 Stat. 2770; Pub. L. 99–570, title I, § 1365(b), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–35; Pub. L. 99–646, § 50(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3605; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§ 7013, 7020(c), 7032, 7054, 7514, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4395, 4396, 4398, 4402, 4489; Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, § 968, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 506; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, § 3560, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4927; Pub. L. 103–322, title IX, § 90104, title XVI, § 160001(f), title XXXIII, § 330021(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1987, 2037, 2150; Pub. L. 103–394, title III, § 312(b), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4140; Pub. L. 104–132, title IV, § 433, Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1274; Pub. L. 104–153, § 3, July 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1386; Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title II, § 202, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–565; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 601(b)(3), (i)(3), 604(b)(6), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3499, 3501, 3506; Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, § 813, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 382; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4005(f)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1813; Pub. L. 108–193, § 5(b), Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2879; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6802(e), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3767; Pub. L. 109–164, title I, § 103(c), Jan. 10, 2006, 119 Stat. 3563; Pub. L. 109–177, title IV, § 403(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 243; Pub. L. 113–4, title XII, § 1211(a), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 142; Pub. L. 114–153, § 3(b), May 11, 2016, 130 Stat. 382.)
Negro Plaintiffs Slaves Assert and fully legally declare On October 15, 1970, defendant own rules of governing laws (RICO) the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 became law. Title IX of the Act is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Statute (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968), commonly referred to as the "RICO" statute, as which defendant “United States of America et al FBI kept 44.5 “Million Negro Plaintiffs Slaves herein 1970 – February 7th 2013 (43) years direct cause of action defendant (FBI) enforced  their very own rules of governing laws directed at 44.5 Million Negro Slaves Plaintiffs in direct violation crimes against humanity under
18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor), leaving the Once again as stated above All in law and equity
 useless, voided, fraudulent, a “elite doctrine enterprise protection racket of the well established defendant GOP Government Judicial and Congress whites supremacist in having no enforcement or enjoyment from their criminal actions as described in the “Complaint” and ongoing Slave Trade actions of a hostile defendant (USA) et al exercising whites supremacy control under scheme of things in the actual design of The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, to never bring the defendant United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization, as defendant(s) as a “Unit” operation of a Slave Trade”, in direct violation of there very own rules of governing laws, 13th amendment  being criminal in actually a tool for continue terror intimidation, under defendant own rules of governing laws 18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts as chief defendant

 “Donald John Trump Sr. having protection by defendant it self (USA) actual own fraud upon the own court while physically acting directly under color of law defendant U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett committed to on or about 3rd day of August, 2016 “Aggravated Perjury”, Treason, Obstruction of Justice and aid and abetting the enemy of the United States of America in that  Pending before the Court the Plaintiff’s Motion(s) to 1.
(IFP), based upon the same “enslavement” of the (Plaintiffs) herein “However” the Chief Defendant “Donald John Trump Sr. being the subject matter direct cause of action for Fraud Chief Defendant “Donald John Trump Sr., The Trump Organization Trump Tower 725 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 involving the criminal acts of commit Violation of 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ... of treason · § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection · § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy · § 2385 ...
Violation of UCMJ Article 104 --Aiding the enemy
Article 99 --Misbehavior before the enemy
Article 94 --Mutiny and sedition
Article 116 --Riot or breach of peace
Article 121 --Larceny and wrongful appropriation
Article 81 -Conspiracy
Article 122 --Robbery
Article 123 --Forgery
Article 133 Conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman
18 U.S. Code § 1031 –“Fraud against the United States”, “The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,”
“Honest Services Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346”, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and major fraud against the United States, its US Department of Veterans Affairs, bogus Veterans fundraisers to include but not limited to Chief Defendant “Donald John Trump Sr., committed other criminal/civil (RICO) enterprise acts as follows: answer heard before especially (JAG) UCMJ Cause of actions for Said “Chief Defendant” Donald John Trump, Sr. and Donald Trump Jr. here in both on or about as described fully committed on dates of January 1st 2016 – 2099 did in fact engaging in conspire in violation of
Article 104 --Aiding the enemy (KKK) (ISIS) and (KGB)
Article 106 –Spies for (KKK) (ISIS) and (KGB)
Article 106a –Espionage(KKK) (ISIS) and (KGB)
THE PATRIOT ACT II: TERRORIZING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the_patriot_act_2_terrorizing_the_american_people.htmlAgainst “ “We Thee Entire  44.5 plus (American) 2016 “Negro Race”, to furtherance’s acts of incite a riot, organize, promote, encourage, and “civil conspire further in a nature being direct violation and aid and abetting of
18 U.S. Code § 2101 – Riots in a nature involving continual (RICO) enterprise pursuant to engaging in Direct violation of “Articles of Agreement Relating to the Surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia" April 10, 1865 to furtherance’s said (RICO) enterprise “scheme of things” directed at
“We Thee Entire  44.5 plus (American) 2016 “Negro Race” herein Said “Chief Defendant” Donald John Trump, Sr. herein to further aid and abetting in “Civil Conspirer” in a nature involving continual (RICO) enterprise pursuant to engaging in (RICO) enterprising nature in continual conspire in criminal acts of “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,
“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)
“Chief Defendant” Donald John Trump, Sr. here in January 1st 2000  – 2016 engaging in “Financing of Terrorism” of The “Knight of The Klu Klux Klan”, within the “United States of America” for privileged, polished, well financial secure in Billions “White Only” constitution of America continual
 “Slave Regime” forevermore “Unjust Enrichment” - legal and political means to Restore the Founders’ forever pursuant to
“Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) “Slavery”, further
chief defendant “Donald John Trump Sr. having protection by defendant it self (USA) actual own fraud upon the own court while physically acting directly under color of law defendant U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett committed “cover up” aid and abetting to (RICO) to violation of defendant (USA) own rules of governing laws pursuant to (RICO) statue 18 U.S.C. 1343 Use of Wires in Furtherance of the Execution of the Scheme Conspiracy of “Chief Defendant “Donald John Trump Sr. to Violate the Wire Fraud Statutes Transmissions, to violate 18 U.S. Code § 1341 - Frauds and swindles, direct in the fraud Veteran Fundraising scams, directed at the Negro Veteran Slave Plaintiff in their each and every person all occurred in 2016 as stated in said Complaint Hamilton v. Trump Filed: July 18, 2016 as 4:2016mc01633, upon which defendant “United States of America et al FBI on or about dated from 1966 and 1991

“Conceal all investigation, of  defendant Fred C. Trump (1905-1999) was a real estate developer and philanthropist, which this being from defendant FBI files, having full knowledge, possession and custody of material facts Fred C. Trump being the direct leadership of the Defendant “Knights of the Klu Klux Klansman, and being the direct party in “Political whites supremacist “Wrongful Death” of Rev. Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. as defendant FBI already having engaging in a “Mass Murder” acts perpetrated by lynching, shooting, bombing, drowning, poison, lying in wait, and concealing their (RICO) action(s) that the Para-Military defendant Knights of The Klu Klux Klansman  falsely no longer "represents an organized threat" to the Negro Plaintiffs, Slaves or the entire “international community” in 2016 (December) as Defendant  FBI from 1966 – 2016 (50) years concealing  Whites Supremacy defendant RICO Slave Trade GOP Government et al and their government  Para-Military defendant Knights of The Klu Klux Klansman, whom caused “mass murders and their upper crust direct (RICO) Slave Trade leadership past Commander in Chief of the (KKK) Fred C. Trump  over seeing defendant (USA), Defendant (FBI) secretly imposed forever “De jure segregation” by any means of killing, intimation ect in all legal society and government of defendant (USA), of the defendant whites supremacist Klu Klux Klansman 1865 – 2016 (December) Dynasty,

Defendant “United States of America et al” Federal Bureau Investigation since 1963 already having engaging concealing, masking, and scuttling  their (RICO) whites supremacist leadership action(s) that the Para-Military defendant Knights of The Klu Klux Klansman Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. with actually “Documents show that the defendant Donald John Trump Sr. company spent a minimum of $68,000 for its 1998 foray into Cuba at a time when the corporate expenditure of even a penny in the Caribbean country was prohibited without defendant U.S. government approval“ as defendant “United States of America et al”  (FBI) in the direct time line of 1998 – 2006  8 years scuttled all criminal actions of Chief Defendant Donald Trump Sr. International RICO Knights of The Klu Klux Klansman actions, even
 A Mexican official has filed a criminal tax complaint against Trump in Tijuana, Mexico, over yet another failed business venture – the Trump Ocean Resort, which collapsed before it even began construction.
But before the housing market and the rest of the global economy collapsed with the onset of the Bush Recession, Trump and his partners sold $32.5 million in future properties to unwitting customers since 2006 and leaving their investors in the lurch.

In addition, Donald Trump is accused of dodging an additional $32.5 million in taxes Evasion Lawsuit outside the Jurisdiction of defendant as the 32.5 Million, plus add not paying taxes total of $916 million in one year x 18 years = 16,488,000,000,.00 16.4 Billion Knights of The Klu Klux Klansman whites only Justice Donald John Trump Sr.


 “personally pocketed $5m” from his Trump University “scam”, as stated by New York’s attorney general…
 Texas Attorney General is now Republican Governor Greg Abbott. He ended the case against Trump University, then a few years later received $35,000 in campaign contributions as his reward. All told, Donald Trump was facing a settlement cost of $5,400,000, but Texas Republican Greg Abbott let him off the hook with nothing more than a promise to leave Texas, with a similar scam in Florida ect as Chief Defendant
Donald Trump and Kids Named in $250M Tax Scam that includes $100 million in profits and $65 million in real-estate transfer taxes from a Manhattan high rise project bearing his familiar name, now adding for just a “Direct known” total 457400000, plus not paying taxes total of $916 million in one year x 18 years = 16,488,000,000,.00 16.4 Billion Knights of The Klu Klux Klansman whites only Justice Donald John Trump Sr. for “Whites Superemacey” controlled “War Chest” in direct violations of 18 U.S. Code § 2101 – War Crimes “Global Financing of Terrorism” of The “Knight of The Klu Klux Klan”, and chief defendant Donald John Trump Sr. being fully double Hostile foreign government agents providing material support to a World International Terrorism Monetary Fund, directed against the defendant “United State of America et al” and Protected, conceal, scuttled, and part of the function o0f defendant (USA) Whites Supremacist Federal Bureau of Investigation, Secret Elite Klansman Society, against the Negro Plaintiff(s) Slaves as a “whole” as evidence being clear on or about
which the defendant (USA) FBI pursued Negro Slave Plaintiff Martin L. King Jr. as is disclosed in tens of thousands of defendant (USA) FBI memos from the 1960s. The Defendant (USA) FBI's interest in Negro Slave Plaintiff King intensified after the March on defendant Washington in August 1963, when Plaintiff Negro Slave King delivered his "I have a dream speech," which many historians consider the most important speech of the 20th century.
After the speech, defendant (USA) FBI memo called Negro Slave Plaintiff King the "most dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country of the defendant “United States of America et al." clear Negro Slave Plaintiffs under Direction of defendant (USA) FBI “Negro Slave Plaintiff 44.5 Million are not even ever since 1865 – 1963 (98) years consider a party to “White America Constitution governing rules of laws in August 1963, when RICO Statue was introduced, Passed in 1970, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the defendant United States, but defendant United States of America et al (RICO) statue never allows prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed by “whites supremacy”, Defendant “United States of America et al 1970 – 2013 (43) years of Slave Trade in collusion with defendant “State of Mississippi” upon which did free Negro Pro Se Plaintiff (Hamilton) and 44th defendant United States of America et al Negro President Slave Plaintiff Barack Obama and Negro Obama Presidential Family in there person(s) collectively from said born unto slavery servitude of defendant “United States of America et al” as defendant (USA) FBI having full knowledge of RICO violation of Chief Defendant
Klansmen Donald John Trump Sr. as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise, from 1970 – 2013 February 7 with Defendant Fred C. Trump all being “Scuttled”, Secured, Masked, and direct obstruction of Justice direct at Negro Slave Plaintiff(s) all been protected for simply “Hatchet Man” Commander in Chief of The Royal Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen, and Defendant (USA) FBI continue long history in obstruction of criminal investigations) of “whites supremacy” on behalf of defendant GOP Government Slave Trade and Defendant Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen having violated “United Nations”, Security Council resolution 1456 (2003):
[…]
6. States must ensure that any measure taken to combat terrorism comply with all their obligations under international law, and should adopt such measures in accordance with international law, in particular international human rights, refugee, and humanitarian law; as “pro se” Negro Plaintiff being thee direct party in his both person affirmed past, now being seals present all described herein in direct defendant “United States of America” et al own rules of governing laws Being secured by Chief Defendant Donald John Trump, Donald John Trump Jr. Defendant GOP Republican Government Party and U.S. GOP Republican Justices derived in a continue (RICO) criminal slave traders thereof support and being a party of Defendant Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen Dynasty 1865 – 2016 (December) “Commander in Chief Klansmen Chief Defendant Donald John Trump, Defendant Donald John Trump Jr. Defendant GOP Republican Government Party and Defendant U.S. GOP Republican Justices derived (RICO) criminal slave traders thereof
18 U.S. Code § 2101 – Riots in a nature involving continual (RICO) enterprise pursuant to engaging in Direct violation of “Articles of Agreement Relating to the Surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia" April 10, 1865 to furtherance’s said (RICO) enterprise “scheme of things” directed at “We Thee Entire 44.5 plus (American) 2016 “Negro Race” herein
Notwithstanding a [PL-413132] "phishing site found "operational" and targeting
attempted file Breach dated attack same of +NSA Agent copy hot line mark September 16, 2016 2:57 (PM) "cyber weapons” 192.185.30.211 - ns344 following (secured code) Marked +NSA Agent
Which Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s cause of action Officially Denaturalization cause of action and aggravated perjury in hiding these facts Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712 and
furtherance’s cause of action Officially Denaturalization cause of action contained in 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason of President Slave Negro Barack Hussein Obama Birth Certificate copy filed herein as “Exhibit (B) President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II furtherance’s cause of action Officially
Strike” defendant “United States of America et al” own governing rules of laws 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS, as described herein having no “Protection” or Legal Remedy” on the behalf of said Respectfully
Pro Se Plaintiff Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712
Plaintiff President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II
Plaintiff Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama
Plaintiff Negro Slave Natasha Obama,
Plaintiff Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama
Plaintiff Negro Slave Chandra D. Hamilton (Daughter)
Plaintiff Negro Slave Natasha Hamilton (Daughter)
Plaintiff Negro Slave Aaron Michael Halvorsen (Hamilton II) (Son)
Plaintiff Negro Slave Craig Robinson
Negro Slave Marian Shields Robinson
Plaintiff President Abe Lincoln
PresidentJohn Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy
Plaintiff Robert Francis "Bobby" Kennedy
Plaintiff Negro Slave Dred Scott
Plaintiff Negro Slave Harriet Tubman
Plaintiff Negro Slave Rev. Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.
Plaintiff Negro Slave Deadria Farmer-Paellmann
Plaintiff Negro Slave Plaintiff LeBron Raymone James
Plaintiff Negro Slave Colin Rand Kaepernick
Plaintiff Negro Slave Plaintiff Petty Officer 2nd Class Janaye Ervin,
Plaintiff Negro Slave Officer CPL. MONTRELL Jackson, 32, Baton Rouge Police Department,
Plaintiff Negro Slave Gavin Eugene Long
Plaintiff Negro Slave Micah Xavier Johnson
Plaintiff Negro Slave Plaintiff Philando Castile
Plaintiff Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Plaintiff Negro Slave Carnell Snell Jr.
Plaintiff Negro Slave Korryn Gaines
Plaintiff Negro Slave Keith Lamar Scott
Plaintiff Negro Slave Terence Crutcher
Plaintiff Negro Slave MarShawn M. McCarrel II
Plaintiff Negro Slave Philando Castile
Plaintiff Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Plaintiff Negro Slave Michael Brown
Plaintiff Negro Slave Malcolm X born Malcolm Little
Plaintiff Negro Slave Medgar Wiley Evers
Plaintiff Negro Slave Andrew Jackson Young, Jr.
Plaintiff Negro Slave Eric Marlon Bishop, “Jamie Foxx” (“Django”)
Plaintiff Negro Slave Samuel L. Jackson
Plaintiff Negro Slave Wesley Trent Snipes
Plaintiff Negro Slave Oprah Gail Winfrey
Plaintiff Negro Slave Caryn Elaine Johnson Whoopi Goldberg
Plaintiff Negro Slave Marion Hugh "Suge" Knight Jr
Plaintiff Negro Slave Eric Garner,
Plaintiff Negro Slave Michael Brown,
Plaintiff Negro Slave Tamir Rice,
Plaintiff Negro Slave Walter Scott,
Plaintiff Negro Slave Freddie Gray
Plaintiff Negro Slave Laquan McDonald.”
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Jeffery Tavery
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Robert Vaughan
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Keno Miller
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Avery Brown
Plaintiff “Freeman Bureau”
Plaintiff Slaves “Black Lives Matter”
 And
Co-Plaintiff Slave Negro US Veteran Exactly 1.8 (Million)

And all others “Current”42.7 Million of Negro Slaves Plaintiff

No comments:

Post a Comment