+BRITISH QUEEN +The British Monarchy Pro
Se Plaintiff Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN # 2712, “Plaintiffs Negro Slaves et al” collectively Further
appearances Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention,
disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s
cause of action Not Human Free Entity, but the
Property of Chief Defendant Donald John Trump
Sr., all (KKK) Card holders of the defendant (KKK) “Slave Trade Corporations et
al” from 1865 RICO to 2016 (December) through intimidation, force, briber, mass
murder, false imprisonment of a nature as follows: “Plaintiffs Negro Slaves et
al” and Negro Plaintiff DNA “immigrants slaves” are never a Human Free Entity,
but the
Property of Chief Defendant United States of
America et al, “since 1913 Defendant “Federal Reserve Bank et al” Slave Trade
Corporations et al” through intimidation, force, briber, mass murder, false imprisonment
of a nature
“State
Sponsored Defendant (USA) hosting a Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen “terrorist
organizations” fully both government and private fudung (even) by a “Nation-State”
which is involved in this “Wikileaks to influence the US Elections of defendant
(USA) as “State Sponsored Defendant (USA) hosting a Knights of the Klu Klux
Klansmen “terrorist organizations” having been finances because from a variety
of sources—such as other countries, supporting sympathizers, crime, or illegal legal
businesses “Nation-State” working with Chief
Defendant Donald John Trump Sr., very own
“Civilian
War Lord” of some RICO International Crimes spree in collaborations of being
(Trump) very own “Nation-State” (ISIS) among others “World-Terrorist groups profiting from Chief
Defendant Donald John Trump Sr., many “(International) crimes—such as black
mail, robbery, extortion, fraud, drug trafficking, etc all proven terrorist
assets, hidden in among other things
45th President elect Donald John
Trump Sr. refusal to release his taxes on his own occurred, even after saying
he do so If..? the “Election of 2016” was Won...? as all described against defendant 45th
President elect Donald John Trump Sr. constitutes 'secret terrorist activity”
and all assets and property derived thereof are widely defined by the 2000 Act
as; "Property or money that is likely to be used for the purposes of
terrorism (including any resources of an organization) with
Fraud in RICO Proceeds of the commission of
acts of terrorism against the defendant United States of America, Defendant
NATO, Defendant United Nations et al, against Plaintiff British Empire” among
other things defendant 45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. with “hidden
massive fraudulent international RICO Proceeds of acts actually carried out for
the purposes of terrorism in as already stated in violated US and UK United
Kingdom, The Trading with the Enemy Act 1914
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy Amendment Act 1914 (5 & 6 Geo 5 c 12)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy Amendment Act 1915 (5 & 6 Geo 5 c 79)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy (Extension of Powers) Act 1915 (5 & 6
Geo 5 c 98)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy Amendment Act 1916 (5 & 6 Geo 5 c 105)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy (Copyright) Act 1916 (6 & 7 Geo 5 c
32)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy and Export of Prohibited Goods Act 1916 (6
& 7 Geo 5 c 52)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy (Amendment) Act 1918 (8 & 9 Geo 5 c
31)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of “Plaintiff UK United
Kingdom”, The Trading with the Enemy Act 1939 (2 & 3 Geo 6 c 89)
Defendant
45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. defendant United States, defendant
Federal Reserve Bank et al, Slave Trade Corporations, Defendant Knights of the
Klu Klux Klansmen, all 50 States, all Corporations, Defendant GOP Republican
Party Federal/state/Local government fully, in direct “International cause of
Actions Pursuant to “Plaintiff British
Empire” collectively herein laws in this “outstanding” 2016 Abduction, of not
just 44.5 Million Negro Plaintiffs Slaves, but the entire British American
Immigrants all sentences to “Whites Supremacy” defendant (USA) RICO
slave trade
The
trade with Africa, including the trade in Negro Plaintiff DNA slaves, meant
much Plaintiff British government legislation to control the trade. At first,
this legislation was to limit the trade to certain companies and merchants (who
had paid for the privilege). Later, it was to improve the conditions of the Plaintiff
enslaved Africans in the ships crossing the Atlantic. At the end it was to
abolish the trade altogether In 1618, royal permission was given to the ‘Guinea
Companies’ to trade with West Africa.
The
main interest of the company was gold. The main supplies of gold were in the
areas where the Asante people lived. It was then called Guinea, now it is part
of Ghana, West Africa. In 1631, Plaintiff
British King Charles I sold the right to trade with Africa to a group of London
merchants.
In
1663, Plaintiff British King Charles II sold the control of African trade to
‘The Company of Royal Adventurers of England Trading to Africa’, Then the Royal
African Company was established in 1672, and was sold a monopoly of trade to
Africa.
There
was a demand from merchants outside Plaintiff British London to be allowed to
share in this profitable trade. This demand led to a change in its organization.
In 1698 the Royal African Company lost its monopoly (or control) over the
trade. This meant that any merchant could join in the trade to Africa.
The
Plaintiff British had established a number of colonies in defendant America and
the Caribbean. Defendant Virginia in southern defendant America was colonized
in 1607. St Kitts in 1623, Barbados in 1625 and Jamaica in 1655, all islands in
the Caribbean, were also colonized. In 1696, a government Board of Trade and
Plantations was set up to administer the growing number of overseas colonies.
The
Royal African Company (the London-based trading company) had lost its control over
African trade in 1698. However, it was allowed to continue to maintain the
trading forts which it had built on the West African coast. The company used
the forts as a trading base where enslaved Plaintiffs Africans could be held
and slave ships could anchor The other merchants now allowed to join the slave
trade had to pay a fee to the Royal African Company towards the maintenance of
these forts. In 1750, there were major changes to the way trade was organized
in West Africa. The Royal African Company was replaced by the Company of
Merchants trading to Africa. The Royal African Company had been run by Plaintiff
British London merchants. The new Company of
Merchants
Trading to Africa had a membership made up of 89 Plaintiff British Liverpool
merchants, Plaintiff British 157 London merchants and Plaintiff British 237
Bristol merchants. This meant that Plaintiff British London merchants no longer
had the most influence over the prosperous African trade.
From
about the 1770s, there was a growing debate about the slave trade. In 1778 the
House of Commons set up a committee to investigate the trade. Growing demand
for the end of the trade in slaves led to the first law relating to this. It
was called the Dolben Act, and it limited the number of slaves that could be
carried on a slave ship. This was an attempt to improve the conditions on board
ship for the enslaved Africans.
The
Liverpool slave ship, the Brookes, had carried over 600 Plaintiff slaves on one
voyage. Under the new Dolben Act, the Brookes could carry about 300 Plaintiff slaves.
In 1807, the Plaintiff British Parliament voted for the Abolition (the ending)
of the slave trade.
The
Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade,. The act, or new law, started on 1
May 1807. The penalty if caught slaving after that was a fine of £100 per Negro
Plaintiff slave (£5,000 today) and the loss of the ship. The Negro Plaintiff enslaved
Africans would be freed. Some slave traders continued trading in slaves
illegally after this date which is now a direct cause of action defendant “United
States of America et al”
1 May 1807 been in the business of back log
violations to ending the slave trade by 2013, (206) years defendant “United States of America et al” in
direct violation of the “Plaintiffs British Empire” International Laws The act,
or new law, started on 1 May 1807 The Act for the Abolition of the Slave
Trade,. And Defendant 45th President elect Donald John Trump Sr. violation of
“Plaintiff UK United Kingdom”, 1
May 1807
The Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade,
by adding all Plaintiff British DNA Negro Race Immigrants”, into forced Slavery
Servitude” with Plaintiffs Negro Slaves herein being “captive” since 1619
August 20th always “property of a (Crazy) Whites foolish defendant
(USA) Klansman. +DONALD TRUMP NEWS +POTUS ㅤ +Hillary Clinton +United Nations +Prince Harry +Meghan Markle +Russia +Peace Palace +Washington Post
No comments:
Post a Comment