Conclusion +President Donald Trump Official
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________
Nos.
05-3265, 05-3266, 05-3305 IN RE: AFRICAN-AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION.
APPEALS
OF: DEADRIA FARMER-PAELLMANN, et al., and TIMOTHY HURDLE, et al. ____________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern District. No. 02 C 7764—Charles R. Norgle, Sr., Judge.
____________ ARGUED SEPTEMBER 27, 2006—DECIDED DECEMBER 13, 2006 ____________
Before
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER and MANION, Circuit Judges.
Nos.
05-3265, 05-3266, 05-3305
Stated
by the Court:
A few of the plaintiff’s claims, however, as we noted at the
outset, are claims of subjection to involuntary servitude after it was outlawed
by the Thirteenth Amendment, and indeed into the twentieth century. Cain Wall,
Sr. claims that “during the time that [he] was enslaved”— which he contends
extended into the 1960s—“one or more of the defendants were doing business in
Mississippi or Louisiana. Some of the defendants had reason to know of the
enslavement of Cain Wall and yet failed to take steps to eliminate same, while
they continued to inure benefits from the illegal, but sanctioned system of
servitude post-emancipation.” But there is no claim that the defendants
subjected Wall (or any other class member) to
Nos.
05-3265, 05-3266, 05-3305 13
Involuntary servitude or did anything to perpetuate or
exacerbate his condition. The claim is that they took no steps to free him. The
briefs suggest no basis for thinking that there is any kind of Good Samaritan
legal duty to eliminate a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment committed by
someone else. The limitations that Article III places on the right to sue in a
federal court require us to affirm, on the basis of lack of standing, the
greater part of the district court’s judgment. But there are three qualifications.
First, although most
of the plaintiffs and class members are suing as descendants rather than as
representatives of their ancestors’ estates authorized to sue on those
ancestors’ behalf, a few do claim to be suing in such a representative capacity.
It is highly unlikely that the estate of anyone who died a century or more ago,
or indeed more than half a century ago (for although many former slaves
survived into the twentieth century, very few would still have been alive 50
years ago, which is to say in 1956,
91 years after the end of the Civil War), has not yet been
closed. But the district judge accepted that the purported representatives had
a right to sue on behalf of their ancestors, and the defendants offer only a
perfunctory rebuttal. We shall assume without deciding that some of the
plaintiffs are legal representatives of their slave ancestors. These plaintiffs
not only escape the objection to standing that the suits seek damages for
injuries actually suffered by third parties (the ancestors—no longer third
parties, but the real parties in interest, merely represented by the
plaintiffs), but have less to prove. They just have to prove the injury to the
ancestors; the trickle-down question is elided.
1.
APPEALS OF: DEADRIA
FARMER-PAELLMANN, et al., and TIMOTHY HURDLE, et al. ____________ Appeals from
the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern
District. No. 02 C 7764—Charles R. Norgle, Sr., Judge. ____________ ARGUED
SEPTEMBER 27, 2006—DECIDED DECEMBER 13, 2006, motion to “Strike this case is
filed, as Slavery Servitude ended Feburary 7th 2013, when “Mississippi”
Join the Union free the “Slaves” which this legally occurred some (7) years
later after the government Federal Judges, fraud of the Court instituted manipulation
of the judicial decree, of 1865 13th amendment ratification against DEADRIA
FARMER-PAELLMANN, et al.,
2.
. Cain Wall, Sr. claims that “during the time that [he] was
enslaved”— which he contends extended into the 1960s—“one or more of the
defendants were doing business in Mississippi or Louisiana. All cause of action
re: “enslavement” Is correct, as in 1960s Cain Wall, Sr. born a slave, as he
made the material facts which extended into the 1960s doing business in “Mississippi”
as for 53 years later in (2013) the 13th amendment outlawing “slavery
servitude” shall be agree upon by defendant state of “Mississippi” and legally
ratified in law and equity, and the Union is fully complete with all 50 states
being a Union, in 2013, not 1865 or even in the late 1900s as the fraud of the government
judicial decree against the plaintiffs, being kidnapped, well dating back to
1619, has merit, for a full hearing on these matters, as the corruption of the “court”
Stating:
First, although most of the plaintiffs and class members are
suing as descendants rather than as representatives of their ancestors’ estates
authorized to sue on those ancestors’ behalf, a few do claim to be suing in
such a representative capacity.,
The court had a fiduciary duty to disclose that the “Plaintiffs”
are indeed slaves themselves, and not a “cause of action” as past history class
members are suing as descendants or representatives of their ancestors’ estates,
which “the Court, knowing full well, as all Judges too, Dred Scott (c. 1799 – September 17, 1858) was an
enslaved African American man in the defendant United States who unsuccessfully
sued for his freedom, because of the “Corruption” of the defendant “Supreme
Court” Justices, Majority:
Taney, joined by Wayne, Catron, Daniel, Nelson, Grier, Campbell namely
defendant Roger Brooke Taney was
the fifth Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court, holding that office from 1836 until his death in 1864
Sandford, legal case in which the defendant U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free
state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to
his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the
defendant United States; whether free or slave, were not American
citizens and could not sue in federal court, as “pro se plaintiff” has brought
this matter before the “federal court”, which has no legal standing to rule
over an abducted never been a “citizen” slave, from a foreign country of origin,
giving “Plaintiffs” Black Lives Matter” legal standing before the (ICC) “International
Criminal Court”, furthermore, fraud by Judge Hanks Jr. dismissal on all “Immigrations”
TRO Cease Order, warrant “Merit” this matter be also hear before the (ICC) “International
Criminal Court”,
Further As a. 1619 – 1776 (157) years
defendant (USA) et al manipulation of “Slavery” against the Plaintiff peace,
will, dignity, and full rights to governing one own life occurred, as the “offer”
to ending this “unjust” crime occurred in a “tort” in 1776, as the Independence
War was gain, at the “lives” of the Plaintiff Military Slaves herein, which the defendant being
a “General (President Washington) breach said contract, for all slaves, freedom
directly after battle fought in defendant (USA) et al 1776, Independence was
settled, leaving still fraud against the “plaintiff whom residing still under legal
terms of “enslavement”
b.
1776 – 1865 (89) years defendant (USA)
et al manipulation of “Slavery” against the Plaintiff occurred, as the “offer”
to ending this “unjust” crime occurred in a “tort” on or about The 13th Amendment abolished slavery in 1865 falsely claimed To protect the rights of newly freed slave people,
defendant Congress enacted two additional Constitutional amendments. The 14th Amendment (1868) guaranteed Slave
Negro Black Lives matter African Americans citizenship rights and promised that
the federal government would enforce “equal protection of the laws.”, which “enforcing”
said laws of fully ratifying the 13th amendment occurred in 2013,
and
“Citizenship rights” of the 14th
amendment could not occurred until the 13th amendment of 1865 being
fully ratified some 148 years “later”, leaving from 1865 – 2013 all negro “plaintiff
whom residing (alive) still under legal terms of “enslavement”, once again “Civil
War” fought which a claimed “Union” of the defendant “United States of America
et al” was gain, at the “lives” of the Plaintiff Military Slaves herein, which the defendant (USA)
et al for additional (148) year committed to “whites supremacy” non-disclosure “again”
breach of contractual agreement in a “tort” of the 13th amendment occurred
for defendant (USA) et al manipulation of “Slavery History” against the
Plaintiff peace, will, dignity, and full rights of “Plaintiff slaves” herein
from 1865 to present time frame 2013 well into 2017 to governing one own life occurred,
as the “offer” to ending this “unjust” crime occurred in a “tort”, the
destroyed 13th amendment which never having any value, enforcement,
and a tool for capturing “immigrants” of a negro race whom had no say, as
defendant U.S. Founded on Land Stolen From Indians, Built on
Race-Based Slavery, and hostile
fraud court system to maintain “slavery”, well into 2013, as the court
manipulation of the Plaintiff case history, to make “pro se plaintiff” the
Born a Slave “Guilty” law suit happy frivolous
misguide scum party for filing action(s) of missing defendant (USA) et al 13th
amendment, destroyed 14th amendment, among other non- civil rights, 2
missing daughters ages 4 and 5, 1 fully DOA after ID missing dead wife body, to
include for mention in several actions being born a (dam) slave direct cause of action in a Federal Court,
in 1961 November 8th with entire Negro family and missing 2
daughters and 4 and 5 in complaints, being abused by the “whites only” fraudulent
court system against well back court records in 2010 for claims “among other
things” provision of the 13th amendment that had falsely claimed to
end slavery against the Plaintiff do not exist, “black codes,
Jim Crow laws, physical slavery is the law
of the USA and this also involving pro se plaintiff family, and approximately
44.5 Million Negro Slaves, and the very first “ever” Negro Slave President of
the United States of America Barack Obama also “water-head” born in 1961 same
as “pro se plaintiff” November 8th 1961 being document into court records
these material facts in 2010 – 2017, the Hostile court turning the Plaintiff
into the defendant and the government never did these crimes, to include the
bias of the court in favor of the
Chief defendant 45th President
Donald John Trump Sr. past high light viewed all of Trump's 4,095 lawsuits top
the list of 190 Government & Taxes
cases upon which Chief defendant Trump’s businesses have been involved
in at least 100 lawsuits and other disputes related to unpaid
taxes or how much tax his businesses owe, in addition to dozens of other court fights
with government agencies, Trump’s companies have been engaged in battles over
taxes almost every year from the late 1980s and into this year. In addition, at
least five Trump companies were issued warrants totaling more than
$13,000 for late or unpaid taxes in New
York state just since Trump declared his candidacy in June 2015, according to
state records, notwithstanding 14 Media
or Defamation cases, 85 Branding and Trademark cases, Just since his campaign
launched last summer, 17 Campaign cases Trump has faced at least six lawsuits directly
aimed at his campaign., He settled a copyright claim over his use of a
photographer’s image of a bald eagle in May, Trump faces a class action lawsuit
in federal court in Chicago over text messages his campaign sent out to people who say
they never signed up to receive them, 1,863 Casino cases 208 Contract Dispute cases, In addition to the prominent cases
tied to Trump University 130 Employment
cases
An employer of thousands, the Trump
Organization and companies under its umbrella have faced more than 100 disputes
over employment. In May, Trump Miami Resort Management LLC settled with 48 servers at his Miami golf resort over failing
to pay overtime for a special event,
The settlements averaged about $800 for each
worker and as high as $3,000 for one, according to court records. Some workers
put in 20-hour days over the 10-day Passover event at Trump National Doral
Miami, the lawsuit contends
63 Golf Club
cases Trump’s golf
courses have been at the center of several dozen lawsuits ranging from labor
and personal injury claims to disputes over membership and dues, Trump has been sued 134 times in federal court since he was sworn into office, Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr., will be “quite
legally” busy in fending off “International Criminal Courts” for among other
things financial crime, involving violations of The Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court, fending off,
U.S. Justice department, DOD, CIA, NSA, FBI and Interpol
among other law agencies being “committed to be stiff by the “obstruction of
Justice” of defendant Judicial government manipulation of decree in favor of
RICO, Fraud, fraud and fake due process
of law in supporting “money laundering off , aid and abetting “billions RICO
international fraud with this particular defendant long history continue in among other monetary massive
fraud, scheme involving grand larceny, within the jurisdiction of defendant
“United States of America et al, directed at
“Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter Military Veterans herein
being subject to Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. absconded in millions in
fake charitable foundation which has legally already admitted to the Internal
Revenue Service that it violated a legal prohibition against “self-dealing,”
“Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter”, required execution of
said motion for change of venue, with filed in support copy of “Judgment” of UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, Reavley, Dennis, and Higginson, Circuit
Judges for the Fifth Circuit, No. 17 – 40280 USDC No. 3: 16 –MC-16
Whom collectively with deleberation, factual materail
evideance did so civil/criminal engaing in RICO obstruction of Justice Facilitate
the concealment of the origins of (Billions) illegally obtained money by Chief
Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. et al, Trump Foundation et al
against the defendant United States” and all “Plaintiffs” herein,
Pro se Plaintiff Black Lives Matter vs. Defendant
Reavley, Dennis, Higginson, Circuit Judges Fifth Circuit U.S. Docket No.
3:17-MC-00003 AFFIDAVITS of Probable Cause And Issuance of an ARREST WARRANT
Count(s) singularly and collectively Co-conspirators and accessories after the
fact — or has reasonable grounds to believe , Chief Defendant 45th President
Donald John Trump Sr. being directly involved against Pursuant to 18 U.S. Code
§ 2339C - Prohibitions against the financing of terrorism, USA PATRIOT Act and
codified in title 18 of the United States Code, sections 2339A and 2339B
Count(s) singularly and collectively Co-conspirators and
accessories after the fact direct
violation of defendant (USA) et al rules of governing laws pursuant to 18 U.S.
Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law of “United States of
America Judicial Government Court under color of any law, statute, ordinance,
regulation, or custom, willfully subjects “pro se plaintiff” herein his both
person Cmdr. US Navy in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or
District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or
protected by the defendant Constitution of laws of United States et al, as legal
in law and equity
(Defendants)
Reavley, Dennis, and Higginson, Circuit Judges for the Fifth Circuit committed
to each Count(s) singularly and collectively as follows:
1. Obstruction of the Secret Service -- 18 U.S.C. § 3056(d)
2. Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2 – Principals, in the commission of civil/criminal crimes against The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-570) is a United States Act of Congress that made money laundering a federal crime, against the RICO Statue
3. Conspire to Violation of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-570) is a United States Act of Congress that made money laundering a federal crime. It was passed in 1986. It consists of two sections, 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and 18 U.S.C. § 1957.
4. Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2339 - Harboring or concealing terrorists |
5. Making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
4. Co-conspirators and accessories after the fact.— Chief Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. having been in a “long uncivilized history” in the process of making illegally-gained proceeds (i.e. "dirtymoney") appear legal (i.e. "clean") Co-conspirators and accessories after the fact.— or has reasonable grounds to believe , Chief Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. being directly involved against 18 U.S. Code § 2331 money laundering “international terrorism” and “domestic terrorism” to fully
1. Obstruction of the Secret Service -- 18 U.S.C. § 3056(d)
2. Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2 – Principals, in the commission of civil/criminal crimes against The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-570) is a United States Act of Congress that made money laundering a federal crime, against the RICO Statue
3. Conspire to Violation of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-570) is a United States Act of Congress that made money laundering a federal crime. It was passed in 1986. It consists of two sections, 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and 18 U.S.C. § 1957.
4. Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2339 - Harboring or concealing terrorists |
5. Making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
4. Co-conspirators and accessories after the fact.— Chief Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. having been in a “long uncivilized history” in the process of making illegally-gained proceeds (i.e. "dirtymoney") appear legal (i.e. "clean") Co-conspirators and accessories after the fact.— or has reasonable grounds to believe , Chief Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. being directly involved against 18 U.S. Code § 2331 money laundering “international terrorism” and “domestic terrorism” to fully
“Internationally” and “domestic” intimidate coerce all
civilian population “world – wide” as these; involve violent acts or acts
dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United
States, and “International Law of the (ICC) International Criminal Court.+POTUS Obama +Hillary Clinton +BRITISH QUEEN +Prince Harry +Meghan Markle +HMS Prince of Wales +British Parliament +USNavySEAL +Us Navy +Tina Fey +SNL Group +Alec Baldwins Forehead +BBC World Service +NBC Chicago +Washington Post +The Rachel Maddow Show +CBS This Morning +ABC World News Tonight +Yahoo News +Donald Trump News +President Donald Trump +North Korea +South Korea +Xi Jingping +Sherlock Holmes +United States Air Force +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +NATO +National Museum of American History +City of New York +BBC Africa +ABC NEWS +CBS Evening News +NBC News +Yahoo News +Jackie Chan +Samuel L Jackson +Black Lives Matter !!!!!!! +MLK jr. +Vladimir Putin +USSR Gov +Russia +Nasdaq +Washington Post +The Huffington Post UK +Art/is +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +National Museum of American History +Santa Claus +Pope Francis Visit USA +The British Royal Family
No comments:
Post a Comment