(“Defendants”) Hardy Cross Dillard Judge on the International Court of Justice 1970–1979 “collusion”, conspirer, facilitation of the same inhumane crimes

Further “Petition” filing before the (ICJ) “Honorable Justices” by undersigned council of record “Pro Se” hereby (“Plaintiffs”) Notice of “Motion to  Strike all fraudulent artifacts, false statements, omission during (“Defendants”) Hardy Cross Dillard judge on the International Court of Justice 1970–1979 Fraudulent International Published Artifacts” in each and (all) of (“Defendants”) Hardy Cross Dillard judge on the International Court of Justice written, printed, or electronic produced subject matter that provides information or evidence or that serves as an official record committed to teaching (“Plaintiffs”) Negro Slaves still fraudulent being concealed as “captive” human property against all fraudulent facts in this continuance manipulation of

(ICJ) International Courts system directly COMPLICITY COLLUSION Criminal COMMON DESIGN RICO CONSPIRACY acting “Principals”, “Co-conspirators” and “accessories” after the fact against the official “Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database thereby (“Defendants”) Hardy Cross Dillard factual being RICO whites supremacy individual party criminal actions in a common design “collusion”, conspirer, facilitation of the same inhumane crimes against (“Plaintiffs”) Negro Slaves with (“Defendants”)

 The Confederate States of America et al ongoing illegal criminal false statements, omission, fraudulent conspirer actions well into 2018 (December) in direct violation of statues (18 U.S.C. 1001) common design in law and equity, against (“Plaintiffs”) negro slaves freedom collective in all civil/criminal international fraud by non-disclosure, false statements, omission, scheme of things being a continuance direct cause of (“Plaintiffs) negro slaves endless international actions described herein by the “undersigned pro se council of record” continuance RICO scheme of things against the

(ICJ) and (ICC) International court system as is adequate under (“The Confederate States of America) FRCP Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ... enjoying Strike, and vacate all judgments (“Listed below”) as follows: as in international law and equity mention above. 

Case	Application date	ICJ category	Parties	Challenger	Defendant	Outcome favored	Opinion	Disposition	Appendment
[1] Nuclear Tests	9 May 1973	Contentious	NZ vs.  France	New Zealand	France	[2] France	Dissenting	App. nullified by Court	[3]Dissenting opinion (joint) [4]Declaration (joint)
[5] Nuclear Tests	20 December 1974	Contentious	Australia vs.  France	Australia	France	[6]  France	Dissenting	App. nullified by Court	[7]Dissenting opinion (joint) [8]Declaration (joint) [9]Declaration (joint)
[10]Fisheries Jurisdiction	14 April 1972	Contentious	UK vs.  Iceland	United Kingdom	Iceland	[11]  United Kingdom	Majority	Judgment on merits	[12]Separate opinion
[13]Fisheries Jurisdiction	22 November 1971	Contentious	Germany vs.  Iceland	Germany	Iceland	[14]  Germany	Majority	Judgment on merits	[15]Declaration
[16]Aegean Sea Continental Shelf	10 August 1976	Contentious	Greece vs.  Turkey	Greece	Turkey	[17]  Turkey	Majority	Judgment on jurisdiction	None
[18] ICAO Jurisdiction (appeal)	3 August 1971	Contentious	India vs.  Pakistan	India	Pakistan	[19]  Pakistan	Majority	Judgment on jurisdiction	[20]Separate opinion
[21]Western Sahara	3 January 1975	Advisory	Spain  Mauritania  Morocco Saharan nomadic tribes	N/A	N/A	[22]Saharan nomadic tribes (self determination)	Majority	Opinion on merits	[23]Separate opinion
[24] South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa)	5 August 1970	Advisory	South Africa  Namibia  UN	N/A	N/A	[25]  Namibia	Majority	Opinion on merits	[26]Separate opinion
[27] U.N. Administrative Tribunal (appeal of judgment no. 158)	28 June 1972	Advisory	UN, Mohamed Fasla	N/A	N/A	[28]Mohamed Fasla	Majority	Opinion on merits	[29]Separate opinion