68.All
Defendant(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit: First African
American First Lady of Defendant “United States of America et al” “Michelle
LaVaughn Robinson Obama” official Birth date of January 17th 1964, married to
The Official First Family of United States of America President Barack Obama
“Legally”
Born Under “Slavery Servitude” of Defendant United States of America et al after the passage of the Defendant (USA) herein Passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865 having giving “Birth to a “Slave Negro Daughter name “Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001,
Born Under “Slavery Servitude” of Defendant United States of America et al after the passage of the Defendant (USA) herein Passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865 having giving “Birth to a “Slave Negro Daughter name “Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001,
Defendant(s)
collectively 1000% official Admit it is 1000% humanly impossible out of the
question, unfeasible, impractical, The prima facie tort of the 14th amendment
of defendant (USA) to be granting “any and all” claimed ”Legal Negro Race Slave
Citizenship to
“Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, any and all future Child or Childers(s) if the case may be all born none “Citizenship” at all legal surrounding when at the same exact precise time of
“Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, any and all future Child or Childers(s) if the case may be all born none “Citizenship” at all legal surrounding when at the same exact precise time of
The Official First Family of United States of
America President Barack Obama Daughter “Natasha Obama” official Birth date of
June 10th 2001, she is a “Official Negro Slave” of the Defendant “United States
of America et al” when at the precise exact time when Defendant (USA) “State of
Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves
on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) and Defendant “United States of America et al official claim “Just” The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed,.
on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) and Defendant “United States of America et al official claim “Just” The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed,.
69.
All Defendant(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit:
The
official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, signed at the
Appomattox Court House of the Surrender at Appomattox, 1865 “Admitting” 100% the Defendant “United States
of America et al” violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops
to the Union Army, when at the precise exact time when Defendant (USA)
“State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
“State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
70.
All Defendant(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit: the
Defendant “United States of America et al”
as a result of violated said The
official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, when at the
precise exact time when Defendant (USA) “State of Mississippi” whom finally
free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever
to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) Defendant(s) collectively
1000%
official Admit it is 1000% humanly impossible out of the question,
unfeasible, impractical, The prima facie tort of the 14th amendment of
defendant (USA) to be granting “any and all” claimed ”Legal Negro Race Slave
Citizenship to “Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, any and
all future Child or Childers(s) if the case may be all born none
“Citizenship” at all legal surrounding when at the same exact precise time of The Official First Family of United States of America President Barack Obama Daughter
“Citizenship” at all legal surrounding when at the same exact precise time of The Official First Family of United States of America President Barack Obama Daughter
“Natasha Obama” official Birth date of July 4th
1998 she is a “Official Negro Slave” of the Defendant “United States of America
et al” when at the precise exact time when Defendant (USA) “State of
Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February
7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
and Defendant “United States of America et al official claim “Just” The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed,.
and Defendant “United States of America et al official claim “Just” The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed,.
71.
All Defendant(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit: the
Defendant “United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The
official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, when at the
precise exact time when Defendant (USA)
“State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)Defendant “United States of America et al, Congress, Supreme Court
“State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)Defendant “United States of America et al, Congress, Supreme Court
or some government function of Defendant
(USA) 1000% must produce, supply and require a “New official surrender document
of Lee's troops to the Union Army in order that The Official First Family of
United States of America President Barack Obama and (Wife) “Michelle LaVaughn
Robinson Obama” Daughter
“Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, whom “Already admitted by (Defendants) collectively she is a “Official Negro Slave” of the Defendant
“Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, whom “Already admitted by (Defendants) collectively she is a “Official Negro Slave” of the Defendant
“United States of America et al”, 1000% Admitting it is
1000% humanly impossible out of the question, unfeasible, impractical, The
prima facie tort of the 14th amendment of defendant (USA) to be granting “any
and all” claimed ”Legal Negro Race Slave Citizenship to “Natasha Obama”
official Birth date of June 10th 2001,
any and all future Child or Childers(s) if the case may be all being born none “Citizenship” at all legal surrounding the Defendant “United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army,
any and all future Child or Childers(s) if the case may be all being born none “Citizenship” at all legal surrounding the Defendant “United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army,
72.
All Defendant(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit: the
Defendant “United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The
official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, when at the
precise exact time when Defendant (USA)
“State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) President Barack Obama and (Wife) “Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama”
“State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) President Barack Obama and (Wife) “Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama”
Daughter “Natasha Obama” official
Birth date of June 10th 2001, “She Natasha Obama” is the Property of Defendant
United States of America et al
73.All
Defendant(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit: the Defendant
“United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The official surrender
document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, when at the precise exact time when
Defendant (USA) “State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the Negro Race
slaves on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs.
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
President Barack Obama and (Wife) “Michelle
LaVaughn Robinson Obama” Daughter “Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June
10th 2001, “She Natasha Obama” is the Property of Defendant United States of
America et al any and all future Child
or Childers(s)
if the case may be all being born none “Citizenship” at all legal surrounding the Defendant “United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, “Natasha Obama” Children’s will be born as example
if the case may be all being born none “Citizenship” at all legal surrounding the Defendant “United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, “Natasha Obama” Children’s will be born as example
(3) kids, being Slave Negro Child Property #1 of Defendant
United States of America et al Slave
Negro Child Property #2 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #3 of Defendant
United States of America et al because ”
as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to
the Union Army,
as a further future result in (2016) when at the precise exact
time when Defendant (USA) “State of Mississippi” whom finally free all the
Negro Race slaves on or about back in February 7th 2013 Pursuant forever to
“Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) and Defendant “United States of
America et al official claim “Just”
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed,. leaving “Natasha Obama” Children’s will be born as example (3) kids,
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed,. leaving “Natasha Obama” Children’s will be born as example (3) kids,
being Slave Negro Child Property
#1 of Defendant United States of America et al
Slave Negro Child Property #2 of Defendant United States of America et
al Slave Negro Child Property #3 of
Defendant United States of America et al
because ”
as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, as a further future result in (2016) as a result of any child of “Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, born on or after (December) 2016 being always Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, as a further future result in (2016) as a result of any child of “Natasha Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, born on or after (December) 2016 being always Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
as example (3) kids, (of) Mother “Natasha Obama” being Slave Negro Child Property #1 of
Defendant United States of America et al
Slave Negro Child Property #2 of Defendant United States of America et
al Slave Negro Child Property #3 of
Defendant United States of America et al
74. All
Defendant(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit: the Defendant
“United States of America et al” as a result of violated said The official
surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, “Natasha Obama”
Children’s will be born as example (3) kids, being Slave Negro
Child Property #1 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #2 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #3 of Defendant United States of America et al because ” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, as a further future result in (2016)
Child Property #1 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #2 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #3 of Defendant United States of America et al because ” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, as a further future result in (2016)
as a result
of any child of “Natasha Obama” born on or after (December) 2016 being always
Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) as example (3)
kids, (of) Mother “Natasha Obama” being
Slave Negro Child Property #1 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #2 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #3 of Defendant United States of America et al 1000% Defendant(s) collectively admitting ”any and all” Grand children of
Slave Negro Child Property #1 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #2 of Defendant United States of America et al Slave Negro Child Property #3 of Defendant United States of America et al 1000% Defendant(s) collectively admitting ”any and all” Grand children of
“Natasha Obama” Children’s, being already official Slave Negro Child
Property #1 of Defendant United States of America et al already official Slave Negro Child Property
#2 of Defendant United States of America et al
and already official Slave Negro Child Property #3 of Defendant United States
of America et al any and all future Grand Child or Childers(s) of
“Natasha
Obama” official Birth date of June 10th 2001, is the Property of Defendant
United States of America et al
Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) ” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army,
Pursuant forever to “Dred Scott” vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) ” as a result of violated said The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army,
No comments:
Post a Comment