Namely Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt officially Born March 2, 1948 (age 68), San Augustine County, Texas, TX was officially in the matter On or about January 12, 1996 United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68 (S.D.Tex. 1996) (48) years a Nigger/Negro Slave (Plaintiff) of United States of America

Pro Se Plaintiff Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN # 2712, “Plaintiffs Slaves et al” collective Further appearances Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s “Chad W. Cowan” Assistant United States Attorney, Southern District No. 938890, Texas Bar. No. 24082540 and Alabama Bar No. ASB-5272-C54C “Argument and Authorities”

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 281 F.3d 158 (5th Cir. 2001) RAMMING v. U.S and actually “Chad W. Cowan” Assistant United States Attorney, citing the case of “Honorable Court Justices” “Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge, herein as follows:

 In 1994, a federal jury indicted Appellant and several co-defendants on a 27-count indictment for bank fraud, wire fraud, and other offenses. The case was tried in a non-jury proceeding from November 1995 through January 1996. On January 12, 1996, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Kenneth M. Hoyt, J., granted Appellant's and co-defendants' motion for acquittal and dismissal on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct citing, inter alia, the following litany of misconduct in support thereof:

 • the government failed in its duty to be forthright in the disclosure of Brady materials;  • the government failed to produce . . . questionable materials so that the . . . rights of the defendants could be protected;  • the government intentionally failed or refused to comply with the law;  • the failing of the government, in its duty under the federal Constitution to not violate the Sixth Amendment rights of the defendants to a fair and open trial;  • the government made misrepresentations of facts to the Court. . . . At the very least, this conduct was reckless. At most, it was intended as a fraud on the Court;  • transcripts of the Grand Jury testimony . . . was [sic] wrought with statements that both supported the defendants' theory of the case and foiled that of the government;  • the testimony . . . supports the defendants' claim of innocence;  • the government's contentions of equal access, neutral evidence, that the defendants were aware of the information possessed by the Grand Jury, that the testimony was merely impeachment, and that they acted in good faith, is incredible. Only a person blinded by ambition or ignorance of the law and ethics would have proceeded down this dangerous path. United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996).

Pro Se Plaintiff Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN # 2712, “Plaintiffs Slaves et al” collective Further appearances Affirm, State and fully declare that United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996)

On January 12, 1996 the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Kenneth M. Hoyt, J., granted Appellant's and co-defendants' motion for acquittal and dismissal on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct “Plaintiff Slave Negro Race Herein being still under imposed “Slavery Servitude” with “Black Code Laws”, and

 “Jim Crow Laws “ of “United States of America” because Defendant State Mississippi “Join” the Union on or about February 7^th 2013 ultimately ending “Slavery Servitude”, Directed at “Plaintiffs” collectively as claimed by 1865 13^th Amendment of a Broken US Constitution, which now the waste of time citing  United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996) is

 “Broken” and premature, meaning on or about On January 12, 1996 the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Kenneth M. Hoyt, J., granted Appellant's and co-defendants' motion for acquittal and dismissal 

Namely Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt officially Born March 2, 1948 (age 68), San Augustine County, Texas, TX was officially in the matter On or about January 12, 1996 United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996) (48) years a Nigger/Negro Slave (Plaintiff) of United States of America

Pursuant to Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), and now “Both “Chad W. Cowan” Assistant United States Attorney, citing the case of “Honorable Court Justices” Negro “Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge, herein

Can dig both of them-selves out of this “Legal Slavery Servitude Hole” as described in Hamilton vs. United States of America et al U.S. Docket No. 4:2016-CV-01354 because

Slave Negro Pro Plaintiffs having non Legal (RICO) Standing in United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996) as always “Niggers/Negro Plaintiffs Slaves” need not apply to “White Man” laws in 1996, because in United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996)

Slave Negro Veteran Pro Se Plaintiff and Slave Negro Veteran Plaintiffs “Honorable Court Justices” Negro “Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge, herein Collectively including are Abused abducted not free until Mississippi Join the Union in 2013 No less until such time in 1996 (Plaintiffs) collectively are (RICO) marks Nigger Slaves paying rouge TAXES to RICO defendant Federal Reserve Bank as described in 2016 - 4:16-CV-01774 Hamilton et al vs. Federal Reserve Bank et al

As further August 20^th 1619 “Capture Slaves” denied 13^th and 14^th Amendment in have no Legal standing before any Federal Court of governing laws when On or about January 12, 1996 in United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996), providing sound legal 1000% unbias proof Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USA) herein not Stupid as assumed by “Counsel” for (USA) furthermore all “Legal” issue before the Court in law and equity, especially claimed by 1865

13th Amendment of a Broken US Constitution, which now the waste of time by all parties involved in citing  United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996) is “Broken” and premature, stupid having no merit or meaning when in factual legal circumstances on or about On January 12, 1996 the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Kenneth M. Hoyt, J., granted Appellant's and co-defendants' motion for acquittal and dismissal 

Namely Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt officially Born March 2, 1948 (age 68), San Augustine County, Texas, TX was officially in the matter On or about January 12, 1996 United States v. Ramming, 915 F.Supp. 854, 867-68  (S.D.Tex. 1996) was officially Prima Ficia Tort on behalf of “Plaintiffs” (48) years a Nigger/Negro Slave of United States of America

Pursuant to Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)