In The United States District Court
For The Southern District of Texas
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis
Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712
President Negro Slave Barack Hussein
(Water-Head) Obama II
Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn
Robinson Obama
Negro Slave Natasha Obama,
Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama
U.S. Docket No.
3:16-MC-00016
Plaintiff Rachel Ann Hamilton
(Wife)
Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal)
Negro Slave Chandra D. Hamilton
(Daughter) copy
of original exhibits A-8 -
Negro Slave Natasha Hamilton
(Daughter)
Negro Slave Aaron Michael Halvorsen
(Hamilton II)
Negro Slave Craig Robinson
Negro Slave Marian Shields Robinson
Negro Slave Rachel Meghan Markle
President Abe Lincoln
President John Fitzgerald
"Jack" Kennedy
Robert Francis "Bobby"
Kennedy
Negro Slave Dred Scott
Negro Slave Harriet Tubman
Negro Slave Rev. Doctor Martin Luther
King Jr.
Negro Slave Deadria Farmer-Paellmann
Negro Slave Plaintiff LeBron Raymone
James
Negro Slave Colin Rand Kaepernick
Negro Slave Plaintiff Petty Officer
2nd Class Janaye Ervin,
Negro Slave Officer CPL. MONTRELL
Jackson, 32, Baton Rouge Police Department,
Negro Slave Gavin Eugene Long
Negro Slave Micah Xavier Johnson
Negro Slave Plaintiff Philando
Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Carnell Snell Jr.
Negro Slave Korryn Gaines
Negro Slave Keith Lamar Scott
Negro Slave Terence Crutcher
Negro Slave MarShawn M. McCarrel II
Negro Slave Philando Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Michael Brown
Negro Slave Malcolm X born Malcolm
Little
Negro Slave Medgar Wiley Evers
Negro Slave Andrew Jackson Young, Jr.
Negro Slave Eric Marlon Bishop,
“Jamie Foxx” (“Django”)
Negro Slave Samuel L. Jackson
Negro Slave Oprah Gail Winfrey
Negro Slave Plaintiff Denzel Hayes
Washington Jr.
Negro Slave Caryn Elaine Johnson
Whoopi Goldberg
Negro Slave Wesley Snipes
Negro Slave Marion Hugh
"Suge" Knight Jr
Negro Slave Eric Garner,
Negro Slave Michael Brown,
Negro Slave Tamir Rice,
Negro Slave Walter Scott,
Negro Slave Freddie Gray
Negro Slave Laquan McDonald.”
Negro Slave Veteran Jeffery Tavery
Negro Slave Veteran Robert Vaughan
Negro Slave Veteran Keno Miller
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Avery Brown
“Plaintiff 1865 “Freeman Bureau”
“Plaintiff “Black Lives Matter”
Plaintiff Slave Negro US Veteran
Exactly 1.8 (Million)
Plaintiff Negro Slaves 42.7 Million
Plaintiff British Empire et al (Prince
Williams, Prince Harry & British Queen)
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave British
Empire Immigrants
Plaintiff (allies) Albania, -
Plaintiff (allies) Qatar
Plaintiff
Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Anguilla - Plaintiff Negro
DNA Slave “Immigrant” West Indies
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Algeria –
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Zimbabwe
- Negro Plaintiff Slaves DNA affirm of Absentee – shawneee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
Vs.
Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr.
et al
Defendant United States of America et
al
Before the Court”, Property
of the United States of America, Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol
Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964),
USPS First Class Mail 9400 1118 9922 3387 4828
41
Negro Slave Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal
Exhibit A-8 through out in support Slave Negro U.S Federal
Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964),
knowingly operated in violation of the law being described before the “Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to
obstruction of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully
misrepresentation all factual material evidenced before the Court records with
supporting evidenced filed in
PLAINTIFFS attached
exhibit A-7 herein Hamilton vs. United States of America et al dated the 11th
day of august 2016 “Chief Defendant “Melinda Harmon, United States District
Judge, denied factual material evidenced, and willfully fraudulent with
criminal intent misrepresentation material government records, while scuttling
such evidenced that “Mississippi free all Negro Plaintiffs Slaves in 2013, and
now as the “court fraudulent making hostile slave trade claims on behalf of
defendant GOP Republican Party Government Slavery in (USA) ended clear back
time line of the 1865 civil war 13th Amendment as one
Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks,
Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in
violation of the law being described before the “Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to obstruction of
justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all
factual material evidenced before the Court records with supporting evidenced
filed in support of this appeal “Plaintiffs attached exhibit A-8 filed upon the
official court records U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs
(Notice of Appeal) true and correct copy of the
30th of December 1854 Dred Scott Slave property
papers upon being
Property of the United States of America, Slave
Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of
USA in 1964), as said Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr.
continual to hold governing to this ruling against each and all “Plaintiffs”
In
this ruling, the defendant U.S. Supreme Court stated that Negro Plaintiff’s slaves
were not citizens of the United States and, therefore, could not expect any
protection from the defendant Federal Government or the defendant courts. The
opinion also stated that defendant Congress had no authority to ban slavery
from a defendant Federal territory.
In 1846 a slave named Negro Plaintiff Slave Dred Scott and his Negro
Plaintiff Slave wife, Harriet, sued for their freedom in a defendant St. Louis
city court. The odds were in their favor. They had lived with their owner, an
army surgeon, at Fort Snelling, then in the free Territory of Wisconsin. The Negro
Plaintiff Slave Scotts' freedom could be established on the grounds that they
had been held in bondage for extended periods in a free territory of defendant “United
States of America et al” and were then returned to a defendant slave state.
Courts had ruled this way in the past.
However, what appeared to be a straightforward lawsuit between two
private parties became an 11-year legal struggle that culminated in one of the
most notorious decisions ever issued by the defendant United States Supreme
Court.
On its way to the defendant
Supreme Court, the Negro Plaintiff Slave Dred Scott case grew in scope and
significance as slavery became the single most explosive issue in defendant American
politics. By the time the case reached the high court, it had come to have
enormous political implications for the entire nation.
On March 6, 1857, defendant
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney read the majority opinion of the Court, which
stated that slaves were not citizens of the defendant United States and,
therefore, could not expect any protection from the defendant Federal
Government or the courts. The opinion also stated that defendant Congress had
no authority to ban slavery from a defendant Federal territory. This decision
moved the nation a step closer to Civil War.
The decision of Scott v. Sanford, considered by
legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the defendant Supreme Court, and
Negro Plaintiff in 2017 under notary seal affirm this Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 was never overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the defendant Constitution,
a true and correct copy of the 13th
and 14th amendments being filed into
U.S. Docket No.
3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs”
Slave exhibit A- 9 copy of the original 13th amendment and “Plaintiffs”
Slave exhibit A- 10 copy of the original 14th amendment which never abolished
slavery and declared all persons born in the defendant United States to be
citizens of the defendant United States.
Plaintiff
President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1,
1863, announcing, being filed into U.S.
Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs”
Slave exhibit A- 11 copy of the original "that all
persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and
henceforward shall be free.", is fully voided into these proceeding which Emancipation
Proclamation on January 1, 1863, never abolished slavery as fraudulent official
declared all persons born of Negro Race in the defendant United States to be
citizens of the defendant United States, defendant “Mississippi” RICO
corruption slave trade free all “Negro
Plaintiffs slaves herein on or about February 7th 2013
Exactly before the Fifth Circuit Court of appeals” cause of direct
action Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery
servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in violation of the law being
described before the “Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th
day, committed to fraud of the court acting under color of law of the defendant
in continue 44.5 million plus counts of fraud of court records and decree, obstruction
of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all
factual material evidenced already filed before the Court records,
directed at the said Negro Plaintiffs Slaves herein
Plaintiff
President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation did factual on
January 1, 1863, announcing, being filed into U.S.
Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs”
Slave exhibit A- 11 copy of the original
"that all persons held as slaves"
within the rebellious areas "are, and henceforward shall be free.",
upon which Negro Plaintiffs Slaves assert such
freedom official records of defendant “United States of America, being held
hidden, scuttled and a party to this fraud against all current supporting
evidenced filed herein official copies in support of this appeal some 150 year later of the Plaintiff President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation
on January 1, 1863, that said "that
all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and
henceforward shall be free.", which
defendant “Mississippi” being said rebellious area
PLAINTIFFS attached exhibit A-7 herein Hamilton vs.
United States of America et al dated the 11th day of august 2016
“Chief Defendant “Melinda Harmon, United States District Judge, denied factual material
evidenced, and willfully fraudulent with criminal intent misrepresentation material
government records, being filed into U.S.
Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs”
Slave exhibit A- 12 copy of the original
Defendant State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A.
BARTH Director of the Federal Register
February 7,
2013 The Honorable C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr Secretary of State of Mississippi
401 Mississippi St. P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 Dear Secretary of State
Hosemann: On behalf of the Archivist of the United States, I acknowledge
receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 547 Resolution, adopted by the
Mississippi
Senate on February 16, 1995 and the Mississippi House of Representatives on
March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the
13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES
A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register, being in direct violation of being filed into U.S.
Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal)
“Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 13 copy of the
original “Charter of the United Nations” of June 26th 1945, as “Negro
Plaintiffs Slaves” fully being Slave Property” and not allowed to vote when
said being filed into U.S.
Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs”
Slave exhibit A- 15 civil right of 1964 copy
of the original, and being filed into U.S.
Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) copy of
the original, “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 16 “Voting Rights Act of 1965”
Cc: Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Elizabeth
Alexandra Mary,
Cc: Prince William,
Duke of Cambridge, KG, KT, PC, ADC (William Arthur Philip Louis)
Cc: Prince Henry of
Wales, KCVO, (Henry Charles Albert David)
Cc: Prime Minister
Theresa Mary May
The British
Consulate 1301 Fannin Street Houston Texas 77002-7014
USPS
First Class Mail 9400 1118 9922 3387 4848 90
No comments:
Post a Comment