Monday, April 3, 2017

CASE NO. 17-40280 “STRIKE” UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (pursuant) TO: Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II Cmdr. (USN),

                                          CASE NO. 17-40280

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

Plaintiff-Appellant Louis Charles Hamilton II Cmdr. USN # 2712

                                          Vs.

 Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr.-Appellees

ORIGINAL Plaintiff-Appellant NOTICE MOTION TO “STRIKE” UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (pursuant) TO:
 Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II Cmdr. (USN), further Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony,  Collectively “Plaintiffs BLACK LIVES MATTER”, further,
President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II
Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama
Negro Slave Natasha Obama,
Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama                                               
Plaintiff Rachel Ann Hamilton (Wife)                                     
Negro Slave Chandra D. Hamilton (Daughter)                 
Negro Slave Natasha Hamilton (Daughter)                                  
Negro Slave Aaron Michael Halvorsen (Hamilton II)           
Negro Slave Craig Robinson
Negro Slave Marian Shields Robinson
Negro Slave Rachel Meghan Markle
President Abe Lincoln
President John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy
Robert Francis "Bobby" Kennedy
Negro Slave Dred Scott
Negro Slave Harriet Tubman
Negro Slave Rev. Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.
Negro Slave Deadria Farmer-Paellmann
Negro Slave Plaintiff LeBron Raymone James
Negro Slave Colin Rand Kaepernick
Negro Slave Plaintiff Petty Officer 2nd Class Janaye Ervin,
Negro Slave Officer CPL. MONTRELL Jackson, 32, Baton Rouge Police Department,
Negro Slave Gavin Eugene Long
Negro Slave Micah Xavier Johnson
Negro Slave Plaintiff Philando Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Carnell Snell Jr.
Negro Slave Korryn Gaines
Negro Slave Keith Lamar Scott
Negro Slave Terence Crutcher
Negro Slave MarShawn M. McCarrel II
Negro Slave Philando Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Michael Brown
Negro Slave Malcolm X born Malcolm Little
Negro Slave Medgar Wiley Evers
Negro Slave Andrew Jackson Young, Jr.
Negro Slave Eric Marlon Bishop, “Jamie Foxx” (“Django”)
Negro Slave Samuel L. Jackson
Negro Slave Oprah Gail Winfrey
Negro Slave Plaintiff Denzel Hayes Washington Jr.
Negro Slave Caryn Elaine Johnson Whoopi Goldberg
Negro Slave Wesley Snipes
Negro Slave Marion Hugh "Suge" Knight Jr
Negro Slave Eric Garner,
Negro Slave Michael Brown,
Negro Slave Tamir Rice,
Negro Slave Walter Scott,
Negro Slave Freddie Gray
Negro Slave Laquan McDonald.”
Negro Slave Veteran Jeffery Tavery
Negro Slave Veteran Robert Vaughan
Negro Slave Veteran Keno Miller
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Avery Brown
“Plaintiff 1865 “Freeman Bureau”
“Plaintiff “Black Lives Matter”
Plaintiff Slave Negro US Veteran Exactly 1.8 (Million)
Plaintiff Negro Slaves 42.7 Million
Plaintiff British Empire et al (Prince Williams, Prince Harry & British Queen)
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave British Empire Immigrants 
Plaintiff (allies) Albania, - Plaintiff (allies) Qatar
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Anguilla - Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” West Indies 
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Algeria –
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Zimbabwe
Negro Plaintiff Slaves DNA affirm of Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico
          Negro Plaintiff Slaves DNA affirm of Absentee – shawneee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, being all present described in this “Notice of Motion” before the “Court”  to “Strike” fully with all declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony,  
The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure being legally Join as Necessary and Indispensable defendant “United States of America et al hostile law Party were by adopted by order of the Supreme Court on Dec. 4, 1967, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on Jan. 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968., as Presenting by: PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, Louis Charles Hamilton II
FROM THE JANUARY 5TH , 2017 JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3; 16-MC-00016,
          THE HONORABLE GEORGE C. HANKS Jr. PRESIDING
                                              _____________________

                                                CIVIL PROCEEDING

Defendant United States of America et al UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT
The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure was adopted by order of the Supreme Court on Dec. 4, 1967, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on Jan. 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968.
The Rules have been amended Mar. 30, 1970, eff. July 1, 1970; Mar. 1, 1971, eff. July 1, 1971; Apr. 24, 1972, eff. Oct. 1, 1972; Apr. 30, 1979, eff. Aug. 1, 1979; Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §210, 98 Stat 1987; Mar. 10, 1986, eff. July 1, 1986; Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7111, 102 Stat. 4419; Apr. 25, 1989, eff. Dec. 1, 1989; Apr. 30, 1991, eff. Dec. 1, 1991; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 29, 1994, eff. Dec. 1, 1994; Apr. 27, 1995, eff. Dec. 1, 1995; Apr. 23, 1996, eff. Dec. 1, 1996; Apr. 24, 1996, Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §103, 110 Stat. 1218; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998; Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002; Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003; Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009; Apr. 28, 2010, eff. Dec. 1, 2010; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011; in all laws derived thereof in the defendant
“United States of America et al” (MIA) 13th and 14th amendment fully Voided, The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in the said timeline against the civil rights of “Plaintiffs Black Lives mater”  and 1000% unconstitutional amendment provide therein, false material subject matter regarding “Slavery Rights” of Pro Se Plaintiff Slave (Hamilton) and “Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter Collectively” being defective Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure  Federal laws, directed at “Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter” actual slaves and not descendant thereof all derived in a Slave Regimes” of Defendant Whites Supremacy and all “Slave Laws derive since August 20th 1619 - February 7th 2013, including The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in the said timeline, Dec. 4, 1967, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on Jan. 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968.
The Rules have been amended Mar. 30, 1970, eff. July 1, 1970; Mar. 1, 1971, eff. July 1, 1971; Apr. 24, 1972, eff. Oct. 1, 1972; Apr. 30, 1979, eff. Aug. 1, 1979; Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §210, 98 Stat 1987; Mar. 10, 1986, eff. July 1, 1986; Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7111, 102 Stat. 4419; Apr. 25, 1989, eff. Dec. 1, 1989; Apr. 30, 1991, eff. Dec. 1, 1991; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 29, 1994, eff. Dec. 1, 1994; Apr. 27, 1995, eff. Dec. 1, 1995; Apr. 23, 1996, eff. Dec. 1, 1996; Apr. 24, 1996, Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §103, 110 Stat. 1218; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998; Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002; Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003; Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009; Apr. 28, 2010, eff. Dec. 1, 2010; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011;
AS such “Motion to Strike Defendant(s) “United States of America Entire The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, being on filed before Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Case. No. 17-40068, U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016, which the file do contain “Motion to Strike Defendant(s) “United States of America Entire
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended to December 1, 2015, (Civil Rights Act of 1964) in addition with “Strike” defendant “United States of America et al” entire US Constitution on behalf of 44.5 Million abused DNA “captured slaves” “Plaintiff Black Lives Matter” as before (defendant) own governing “Laws and equity
 “Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter” being in 2017 undersigned date actual living Millions of  Slaves herein needing not ever apply to said governing laws of a “Slave Regime” in the exact time frame of August 20th 1619 - February 7th 2013 further as the defendant “United States of America et al hostile white only Nation “Own” legal doings, “Motion to Strike” Defendant(s) “United States of America Entire The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is adequate under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
 And Vacate each and all Judgment fully defendant “United States of America” enter and executed  against the “Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter” herein to maintain said acts of actual “Force Slavery” with the Fraudulent “laws” derived thereof  among “The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and “non-existences” Defendant (USA) Constitution on behalf of 44.5 Million abused DNA “captured “Plaintiff Black Lives Matter slaves” as before Law and equity 1000% on defendant (USA) own accord “legally” and correct
“Voided” unconstitutional, fraudulent, based 100% illegally imposed by “Judicial Fraud of The US Courts and the laws derived of the United States of America et al from the exact date of August 20th 1619 - to the exact date of February 7th 2013 “pursuant” among other things (MIA) 13th and 14th amendment provision by congress insurance equality to defendant (USA) The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in the said timeline, “Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter” being “enslaved” as described by actual (USA) timeline Dec. 4, 1967, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on Jan. 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968.
The Rules have been amended Mar. 30, 1970, eff. July 1, 1970; Mar. 1, 1971, eff. July 1, 1971; Apr. 24, 1972, eff. Oct. 1, 1972; Apr. 30, 1979, eff. Aug. 1, 1979; Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §210, 98 Stat 1987; Mar. 10, 1986, eff. July 1, 1986; Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7111, 102 Stat. 4419; Apr. 25, 1989, eff. Dec. 1, 1989; Apr. 30, 1991, eff. Dec. 1, 1991; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 29, 1994, eff. Dec. 1, 1994; Apr. 27, 1995, eff. Dec. 1, 1995; Apr. 23, 1996, eff. Dec. 1, 1996; Apr. 24, 1996, Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §103, 110 Stat. 1218; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998; Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002; Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003; Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009; Apr. 28, 2010, eff. Dec. 1, 2010; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011; the governing Laws of the “Infamous Slave Trade Defendant “United States of America” et al from the exact date of issue Dec. 4, 1967, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on Jan. 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968.1964 – 2013 Archivist of defendant “United States of America et al 
“Charles A. Barth Director of the Federal Register”, acknowledge receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 574 Resolution, adopted by the defendant Mississippi Senate on February 16, 1995 and The Mississippi House of Representatives on March 16th 1995, as with this action, “Defendant”, The States of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the defendant “United States”   lasted until 2013…? As exhibit (A) attached herein “Charles A. Barth Director of the Federal Register”, dated February 7th 2013 filed in support to “strike” The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure as described by actual (USA) timeline Dec. 4, 1967, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on Jan. 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968.
The Rules have been amended Mar. 30, 1970, eff. July 1, 1970; Mar. 1, 1971, eff. July 1, 1971; Apr. 24, 1972, eff. Oct. 1, 1972; Apr. 30, 1979, eff. Aug. 1, 1979; Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §210, 98 Stat 1987; Mar. 10, 1986, eff. July 1, 1986; Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7111, 102 Stat. 4419; Apr. 25, 1989, eff. Dec. 1, 1989; Apr. 30, 1991, eff. Dec. 1, 1991; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 29, 1994, eff. Dec. 1, 1994; Apr. 27, 1995, eff. Dec. 1, 1995; Apr. 23, 1996, eff. Dec. 1, 1996; Apr. 24, 1996, Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §103, 110 Stat. 1218; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998; Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002; Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003; Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009; Apr. 28, 2010, eff. Dec. 1, 2010; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011; Slaves” have no rights in defendant (USA) when “physically”  The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted by order of the Supreme Court on Dec. 4, 1967 ... 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968.
Until legally free from “Slavery Servitude” of defendant when “Mississippi” finally freed the “Stupid Nigger Slave herein on or about February 7th 2013 Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),directed at in an nature surrounding Whites Supremacy” control of a (RICO) “Slave Regime” continual hidden secret undetectable financial slave trade conflicts of interest by this Judicial ongoing Fraud of the Courts” acting “Under color of law” requiring present  Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter “Slaves” to beholding to “White Man” The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure  Fraudulent hostile USA laws while same “White Man” committed to crimes being exempted forever from The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in ending said force 1865 Civil War continue acts of actual defendant (USA) Slavery against the “Plaintiff Black Lives Matter” in the legal timeline of defendant ” The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure as described by actual (USA) timeline Dec. 4, 1967, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on Jan. 15, 1968, and became effective on July 1, 1968.
The Rules have been amended Mar. 30, 1970, eff. July 1, 1970; Mar. 1, 1971, eff. July 1, 1971; Apr. 24, 1972, eff. Oct. 1, 1972; Apr. 30, 1979, eff. Aug. 1, 1979; Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §210, 98 Stat 1987; Mar. 10, 1986, eff. July 1, 1986; Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7111, 102 Stat. 4419; Apr. 25, 1989, eff. Dec. 1, 1989; Apr. 30, 1991, eff. Dec. 1, 1991; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 29, 1994, eff. Dec. 1, 1994; Apr. 27, 1995, eff. Dec. 1, 1995; Apr. 23, 1996, eff. Dec. 1, 1996; Apr. 24, 1996, Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §103, 110 Stat. 1218; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998; Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002; Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003; Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009; Apr. 28, 2010, eff. Dec. 1, 2010; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011; Defendant the “United States of America et al” Constitution having no legal sound “Backing” on its whole Legal face invalid, null, ineffective, nonviable, useless, worthless, by the evidence of “Charles A. Barth Director of the Federal Register”, acknowledge receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 574 Resolution, adopted by the defendant Mississippi Senate on February 16, 1995 and The Mississippi House of Representatives on March 16th 1995, as with this action, “Defendant”, The States of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the defendant “United States”   lasted until 2013 “rendering The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure as described by actual (USA) timeline Dec. 4, 1967, - , eff. Dec. 1, 2011; being 1000% forever defective on the behalf of said “Plaintiff” Black Lives Matter being made entry into the records Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Case. No. 17-40068 U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 corruption by Fraud in nature of “None- disclosure “, for and additional Dec. 4, 1967,  - February 7th 2013 (46) years The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure being a “direct party” to enforcing defendant (USA) Slaves of America against each and all Living Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter” as  this criminal RICO continue endeavor grand scheme involving the continual criminal acts of
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor), “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)
1790- 2016 (226) years control, against the claim civil rights, will, peace, dignity, right to life, and same prosperity as “white citizenship” of defendant “United States of America et al  in an ongoing future RICO crimes forever against “Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter” by the Defendant GOP “Judicial Branch of Government of Defendant ”United States of America et al” conspire to committed to the same “unjust enrichment, to enforcement  all Said  “Motion to Strike” “United States of America et al Constitution 100% invalid, null, ineffective, nonviable, useless, worthless, well into 2013 and officially in 2017 (December) on behalf of no-citizenship  “Plaintiff Black Lives Matter” Negro Slaves Plaintiffs collectively continual being official “Alive Human Slavery Property” born in the exact time frame of 1865 – February 7th 2013  and No Citizenship, just simple “Legal” Defendant “Supreme Court Ruling” a Slave Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), being in World-Wide “Human Rights Violation(s) kept secured by
Whites Supremacy Slave Regime sealed under court fraud of government decree “err” against their very own rules of governing laws “Pursuant to The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rules, established on or about 1938, 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006, being “Motion to Strike” in its entire defense directed at the Pro Se Slave Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II Cmdr. Secret Service USN #2712 as a not descendant of
August 20th 1619(Slavery) of defendant (USA) but legally a (Negro) living Slave born on November 8th 1961 whom have no rights, no citizenship which officially been denaturalization and such Massive governmental Fraud, in destroyed constitutional 13th and 14th amendments (MIA) with the official (FRCP) govern civil procedure, having no 14th amendment provide same equality for (Pro Se) Negro Hamilton held hostage in a defendant “United States of America a Slave regime, in 2017 (December) by The 1790 Naturalization Act reserves naturalized citizenship for whites only was fully enforced against the (Pro Se Plaintiff) the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros “Plaintiff Black Lives Matter” herein legally without legal citizenship after 1865 “civil war” trapped by this continual 1790 (RICO) Naturalization Act“ rendering The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure as described by actual (USA) timeline Dec. 4, 1967, - , eff. Dec. 1, 2011; a “RICO Hostile Law and “direct party”, “Broken Constitution” with the Vacated of all Civil/Criminal Judgment in each and every case separately In official light of a Criminal ongoing (RICO) schemes August 20th 1619 -  2016 (December) continual (RICO) racket Slavery Servitude surrounding peddling (MIA)  13th and 14th amendment rights, (RICO) Judicial Fraud of civil stole rights, continual Judicial Fraud under law and equity committed hostile-fashion by the defendant (USA) et al past, present well into future designed against (PLANTIFF BLACK LIVES MATTER NEGRO SLAVES) herein to be continual denied fairly, justly, and proper Honorable Honest in so heard legally before Justice in all matters as required by defendant “whites only” Law as such Motion to “Strike” the
“Entire” Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure as described by actual (USA) timeline Dec. 4, 1967, - , eff. Dec. 1, 2011; exhibit (B) filed herein derived from defendant United States of America Constitutions of Defendant “United States of America et al in law and equity as so be enter
“Certificate of Mailing Service” to: George C. Hanks, Jr. United States District Judge 601 Rosenberg, 6th Floor Galveston, TX 77550. 
“Certificate of Mailing Service” to:  Chief Defendant “45th President Donald John Trump Sr., The Trump Organization, 725 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10022 Is the correct mailing address on record
And a true and correct copy of each document(s) and attached exhibit(s) (A) and (B) described herein having been produce to said George C. Hanks, Jr. United States District Judge and Chief Defendant “45th President Donald John Trump Sr.,
Subscribed before a Public Notary, On this ____ Day of ______________ 2017
                                                                          ______________________
                                                                                  Public Notary
  ________________________________________
Plaintiff-Appellant Louis Charles Hamilton II Cmdr. (USN),
2724 61st street Ste. I-B Galveston, Texas. 77551
bluefinlch2@gmail.com 832-894-9465 832-344-7134

louishamilton2015@gmail.com



No comments:

Post a Comment