United States Marine, Inc. v. United States, 722 F. 3d 1360, 1365 (5th Cir. 2013) “Strike Colonial America” Attorney at Law David L. Miller Texas bar. No.14067300 Federal ID No. 34380

44.5 Plaintiff Black Lives Matter” Military Vets, And Active Duty Slaves Final Argument, expected decline in quality and any honorable effectiveness after the 1865 Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992) XIII ratified in 2013, The actual term "Expiration Date" refers to the last date ROA.17-20321.1009 any defendant

“United States of America et al” regulation, statute, enactment, act, bill, decree, edict, bylaw, rule, ruling, ordinance, dictum, command, order, directive, pronouncement, proclamation, dictate, fiat principle, rule, precept, directive, injunction, commandment, belief, creed, credo, maxim, tenet, doctrine, canon rule, regulation, principle, convention, instruction, guideline, precedent, common law, case law, case in point, act, case, charge, charter, code, constitution, decision, decree, legislation, mandate, order, requirement, ruling, statue, assize, behest, bidding, bylaw, canon, caveat, command, commandment, covenant,

“Stupid demand, dictate, divestiture, edict, enactment, equity, garnishment, injunction, institute, instruction, jurisprudence, notice, ordinance, precept, prescription, subpoena, summons, warrant, writ, decretum, due process and or reg.,

These hostile slave traders 1600s “white man” open his mouth and or committed to paper, volume, tome, publication, title; novel, storybook, anthology, treatise, manual; paperback, hardback, pocket book, e-book announcement, publishing, printing, notification, reporting, declaration, communication, proclamation, broadcasting, publicizing, advertising, distribution, spreading, dissemination, promulgation, issuance, appearance, fully invalid between the exact date defendant (USA) breach contractual agreement of  Hostile Independence for the “Slaves too, doing military conflict of

November 7, 1775, by John Murray, 4th Earl of Dunmore, royal governor of the British Colony of Virginia – throughout – said breach of 13th amendment 1865 “Civil War” still a “tort” being a direct cause for continual defendant (USA) et al ongoing hostile greed breach contractual agreement of  Hostile Independence for the “Slaves too, well into

February 7th 2013 ~,when defendant state of Mississippi ratified the 13th amendment  as “defendant(s) and their criminal actions collectively having a self imposed expiration date February7th 2013 as “Slave will not legally beholding to any “stupid white man” and His Senior Status Stupid Negro Slaves Master or Supreme Court associate status Slave laws of defendant never ending “legal physical in actions & Laws Colonial America of 1800s until defendant

“United States of America et al” can to actually recognized by law to on or about correct February 8th 2013 "all slave then have acquired a legal precedent
Expiration Date" therefore 1619 – 2013 that crap do matter to held hostage (American) slaves nor will it ever in law and equity has any legal binding to impose Colonial America of 1800s in 2017

Further in direct support of this Motion to Transfer Venue to The “International Criminal Court” (ICC) is mostly proper under the criminal actions of defendant (USA) et al

“Pro Se Plaintiff” never waived any rights to be before the “International Criminal Court (ICC) as Counsel suggest, with actual Hague Petition on file into the records of these actions since 2010 – 2011 as the Attorney of record with the “hostile criminal actions of the “Federal Judges” turning the rights to be free of Slavery of United States of America into some kind of vile disfigurement against the Plaintiff  in 2004 – 2017 based upon the criminal cover up, Accordingly defendant (USA) et al “Enslavement” expire dated is Official February 7^th 2013, as the “Attorney of Record being under RICO with the defendant rudeness in Citing “Colonial America Laws” 1800s “Slavery Laws” each being  official Strike “Entire Reply/Respond pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the “Plaintiffs 44.5 Million Negro Slaves where thereby still 1800s Colonial America  “Slaves” of defendant “USA” et al when these “Outlandish controlling Swindling, looting, plundering, murderous,

 Mastermind White Man magic case laws so came to be voided at that precise time in “law and equity” fully fraud and forever having no any kind of substances in “legal executed binding “ever” over the lives of 44.5 plus Million Negro Slaves held “captive” by State of Mississippi Colonial America Lynching (Negros) race HQ until set free in 2013 as follows:

1.     United States Marine, Inc. v. United States, 722 F. 3d 1360, 1365 (5^th Cir. 2013)

BACKGROUND USM is a Louisiana corporation that builds military boats. Sometime before mid-1993, as “Plaintiffs are still actual slaves in mid- 1993 USM working with VT Halter Marine, Inc., which was a subsidiary of Trinity Marine Group and also a shipbuilder, USM developed a design for a special-operations craft with a hull made out of composite materials. The companies developed the design — now called the "Mark V," a name covering several versions The companies developed the design — now called the "Mark V," a name covering several versions — for VT Halter to use in competing for the "MK V Special Operations Craft and Transporter System Contract" with the United States Navy. Before VT Halter submitted a bid to the Navy,

USM and VT Halter built a prototype of the special-operations craft, an operational "parent craft" that they could modify to meet the Navy's requirements if VT Halter secured the contract. The district court in this case found that the design and development of the craft did not rely on government funds. VT Halter also designed a version of the craft with an aluminum hull. Although the working relationship between USM and VT Halter initially was informal, a letter from Trinity Marine Group to USM in 1995 stated that the companies shared ownership of the Mark V design, which was confirmed in a later agreement reached after corporate changes, bankruptcy, and other proceedings.

In January 2010, the district court held a two-day bench trial on liability. On April 1, 2010, the court found that the Navy misappropriated Mark V design information by disclosing it to Maine Marine Manufacturing (and its contractors) without VT Halter's or USM's authorization. U.S. Marine, Inc. v. United States, No. 08-2571, 2010 WL 1403958, at *6 (E.D.La. Apr. 1, 2010).

Plaintiffs Black Lives could give a rats crap in January 2010 as defendant “United States of America et al, never disclosed the13th amendment had not been legally ratified “meaning” every Negro in 2010 are “physical slaves” further the the “district court” found that the defendant  whites supremacy

(DOD) Navy having in 2010 physical possession, custody and control over the lives of Plaintiff Black Lives Matter (DOD “Naval Military Slaves) being a party to these criminal/civil litigations in this misappropriated Mark V design information by disclosing it to Maine Marine Manufacturing, while defendant (DOD) Navy precisely in 2010 further fraudulent Failed to disclosed all active duty DNA Negro America are actually Slaves, 1865 Civil War”, with no citizenship as criminal Gov. of State of Mississippi, in 2010 had no (dam) intentions of freeing a single “Military Slave Negro Plaintiff Black Lives Matter Race from “enslavement”, while all this “fuss” over a funky “Misappropriated defendant (DOD) Naval Mark V design “more” prescendant the Humans being

All Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter DNA Slaves (Negros) not even allowed to walk into the Federal Court told “Frivilous, and failed to always forever state a Claimed against “white man” let alone sue any one over Mark V design let alone (Negro slave) have merit in 2010 to being defined as correct an actual “Slaves” and not descendant as in 2004

Criminal actions of Defendant  Charles R. Norgle, U.S District  Judge  with  Co-Defendant(s)  EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER and MANION, Circuit Judges  In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit “collectively” thereafter Nos. 05-3265, 05-3266, 05-3305 IN RE: AFRICAN-AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION. APPEALS OF: DEADRIA FARMER-PAELLMANN, et al., and TIMOTHY HURDLE, et al. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern District. No. 02 C 7764—Charles R. Norgle, Sr., Judge.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 27, 2006—DECIDED DECEMBER 13, 2006, which these “White Judicial Ever So Smart Legal White Supremacy Hostile Court” so failed, to disclosed factual that in September 27^th – deciding the “Navy lying crap case” December 13^th 2006 actual defendant

States of (Lynching) Mississippi was not a part of defendant United States of America et al, nor was (MIA) States of Mississippi part of the “Union” what claimed to be (United States of America et al) On April 1, 2010, when the “district court” found that the defendant (DOD) Navy misappropriated Mark V design, which means crap to Negro Pissed off poor Slaves in 2010 – 2013, until this sad defendant (DOD) Navy case reach the Appeal Court the same funky year Defendant “State of Mississippi” finally had enough of free unjust enrichment, and lynching (Negros) in 2013 which the last

“Lynching Negro Necks” for voting disfranchisement did actual occurred “Cold Case FBI file” in 2013, in the defendant State of (Lynching HQ) Mississippi, as the “White Man Only Courts” all “warm and fuzzy” about the criminal defendant (DOD) Navy misappropriated Mark V design but the “White Man Only Courts” failed “citing defendant (DOD) Navy in 2010 for its misappropriated of all activity Negro Slaves on these Military Slave Naval Ships around the World, since 1776 – 2010 (234) years of defendant (USA) et al Crimes against Humanity in this RICO International scheme of things of “enslavement”  everyone of Negro race off into

Plaintiffs Military Active Slave duty against, will, peace, and informed knowledge, and what exactly civil rights slaves had in 2010 (anyway)  and for these reason of  undisputed government records “Strike Colonial America”  United States Marine, Inc. v. United States, 722 F. 3d 1360, 1365 (5^th Cir. 2013) “So Sad”.

+President Obama +BRITISH QUEEN +Prince Harry +Meghan Markle +NATO +Vladimir Putin +Pope Francis +USNavySEAL +Us Navy +Black Lives Matter +MLK jr.

+HMS Prince of Wales +British Parliament +USNavySEAL +Us Navy +Tina Fey +SNL Group +Alec Baldwins Forehead +BBC World Service​ +NBC Chicago +Washington Post +The Rachel Maddow Show +CBS This Morning +ABC World News Tonight +Yahoo News +Donald Trump News +President Donald Trump Official +President Donald Trump +President John Fitzgerald Kennedy +Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum +North Korea +South Korea +Sherlock Holmes​ +United States Air Force​ +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +NATO +National Museum of American History +City of New York +BBC Africa +ABC NEWS +CBS Evening News +NBC New York +Yahoo News +Jackie Chan +Samuel L Jackson +Black Lives Matter +MLK jr.  +Vladimir Putin +USSR Gov +Russia +Nasdaq +Washington Post +HuffPost Live +Art/is +United Nations +The National Museum of Computing +Santa Claus +POPEI +FEDERAL BUREAU Investigation +NSA Agent +Mi6 +Secret Service +POLICE INTERPOL +US Senate +USS Ronald Reagan CVN 76 +USS JOHN S McCAIN DDG 56 +Pinky De Chavez