Tuesday, June 22, 2021

Judge Charles Ronald Norgle Sr. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (among others) accused of being "Extremists white supremacy persons" acting under color of law" criminal intent producing fraudulent judicial decrees containing “international false slavery data” Set forth in Count One 18 U.S. Code § 1028A - Aggravated identity theft of (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union government on the exact dates of April 15th of 1865 throughout on or about the 6th day of February 2013

            Accordingly, Honorable Fatou Bom Bensouda Chief Prosecutor International Criminal Court On or about the dates of May 22nd 2007 “Chief Defendant” John Glover Roberts Jr. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union government acting under color of law accused of being white supremacy persons criminal intent producing fraudulent judicial decrees containing “international false slavery data” (among others herein) denied “Petition filed by

(Plaintiffs) Deadria Farmer-Paellman on the material facts presented at issue is whether statues of limitations should be tolled to permit slave descendants to bring actions for “restitution against the (Defendants) Corporations “that illegally denied that they earned profits enslaving (Plaintiffs) Negro Slaves “entire populations” in violations of northern antislavery laws, with the “criminal fraudulent RICO obstruction of justice hostile dismissal of this actions by

“Chief Defendant” Judge Charles Ronald Norgle Sr. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois of (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union government acting under color of law accused of being white supremacy persons criminal intent producing fraudulent judicial decrees containing “international false slavery data” on the filed March 26th of  2002 18 U.S. Code § 1349 - Attempt and conspiracy to commit international wire fraud, submitting false slavery data against all (Plaintiffs) negro slaves international freedom rights as

fraudulent claimed by “Chief Defendant United Nations” General Assembly as Resolution 217 during its third session on 10 December 1948 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris, France

Hereby Honorable JUSTICE (PLAINTIFFS) collective continue cause of actions for overt acts (Conspiracy to Commit an offense against Plaintiffs United States of America Union government) set forth in Count One 18 U.S. Code § 1028A - Aggravated identity theft of (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union government on the exact dates of April 15th of 1865 throughout on or about the 6th day of February 2013 upon all Attempt and conspiracy described herein (Conspiracy to Commit an offense against Plaintiffs United States of America Union government) continue their after the dates of 6th of day of February 2013 throughout (December 25th of 2021) attempted to continue cover up these ungodly epic international crimes against

(Plaintiffs) negro slave’s international freedom rights as fraudulent claimed by The Universal Declaration of Human Rights international document adopted by the (Defendant) United Nations General Assembly that enshrines the rights and freedoms of all human beings (Exbibit A) mention herein paragraph below

   (Plaintiffs) collective realleges and incorporates fully set forth all facts (Defendant) United Nations General Assembly enshrines The Universal Declaration of Human Rights international document was never accepted by the (Defendants) Confederate State of Mississippi on or about the dates of 10th of  December 1948,  May 7th of 1999, May 3rd 2001, July 30th of 2010, December 15th of 2010, January 5th 2001, March 26th of 2002, May 22nd of 2007, March 9th of 2011, May 13th of 2011, September 13th of 201, December 2nd of 2011, March 30th of 2012, April 4th of 2012, involving (Plaintiffs) collectively and undersigned council of record (Hamilton) Federal Court Case within said dates mention herein

(Defendants) Confederate State of Mississippi acting under color of laws (agents) he/she did so Attempt and conspiracy to commit international wire fraud, scheme including illegally joining (Plaintiffs) United States of America Union government on or about the 7th day of February 2013 not in past colonial America records of 1865 civil war aftermath.

CIVIL ACTION # CV 02 1862, CLASS ACTION filed March 26, 2002 Farmer-Paellmann v. Fleetboston Financial Corp

COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

GARALJHS, Judge

Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, state, upon information and belief, as follows:

INTRODUCTION, JURISDICTION AND VENUE Introduction

1. Over 8,000,000 Africans and their descendants were enslaved in the United States from 1619 to 1865. The practice of slavery constituted an "immoral and inhumane deprivation of Africans' life, liberty, African citizenship rights, cultural heritage" and it further deprived them of the fruits of their own labor.

2. The first slave ship that sailed into Jamestown Harbor in Virginia in 1619 contained a handful of captive Africans, but by the end of the Atlantic slave trade, more than two centuries later, somewhere between 8 million and 12 million Africans had arrived in the New World in chains.

Brent Staples, African Holocaust, The Lessons of a Graveyard.

3. Historians estimate that one slave perished for every one who survived capture in the African interior and made it alive to the New World, meaning as many as 12 million perished along the way.

Ira Berlin, "Many Thousands Gone".

4. Although, it is a common perception that the South alone received the enslaved Africans, many of them arrived in the Dutch colonial city of New Amsterdam that later became New York City. Integral to the colony from the start. slaves helped build Trinity Church, the streets of the city and the wall, from which Wall Street takes its name, that protected the colony from military strikes.

Brent Staples, African Holocaust, The Lessons of a Graveyard.

5. These slaves in New York lived in attics, hallways and beneath porches, cheek to jowl with their master and mistresses. In death, these same slaves were banished to the Negro Burial Ground, which lay a mile outside the city limits and contained between 10,000 and 20,000 bodies by the time it was closed in 1794. Id..

6. Further research conducted by Howard University of 400 skeletons of these buried slaves revealed that 40 percent were children under the age of 15 and the most common cause of death was malnutrition. Most of the children had rickets, scurvy, anemia or related diseases. The adult skeletons show that many people died of unrelenting hard labor. Strain on the muscles and ligaments was so extreme that muscle attachments were commonly ripped away from the skeleton taking chunks of bone with them — leaving the body in perpetual pain. The highest mortality rate is found among women ages 15 to 20. Investigators have concluded that some died of illnesses acquired in the holds of slave ships or from a first exposure to the cold or from the trauma of being torn from their families and shipped in chains halfway around the globe. Moreover, the research has concluded that these women were worked to death by owners who could simply go out and buy a new slave.

 

Brent Staples, African Holocaust, Lessons from a Graveyard, quoting in part form Dr. Michael Blakey, Howard University.

7. But New Yorkers were not alone in the utilization of slaves, in fact, more recent research has revealed that many of our esteemed and celebrated institutions of learning had their origins in the profits derived from the slave trade. For instance, money from the slave trade financed Yale University's first endowed professorship, its first endowed scholarships and its first endowed library fund. Moreover, in the 1830's, Yale officials led the opposition that prevented the building of the first African American college, on the grounds that such an institution would have been "incompatible with the existence of Yale". Nicholas and John Brown, two of the founders of what became Brown University were slave traders. Likewise. Harvard Law School was endowed by money its founder earned selling slaves in Antigua's cane fields.

Kate Zernike, "Slave Trader's in Yale's Past Fuel Debate on Restitution", New York Times (August 13, 2001).

8. Many early American industries were based on the cotton, sugar, rice, tobacco, and other products African labor produced. Railroads and shipping companies, the banking industry and many other businesses made huge profits from the commerce generated by the output of enslaved labor.

9. Slaves built the U.S. Capitol, cast and hoisted the statue of freedom on top of its dome, and cleared the forest between the Capitol and the White House.

Randall Robinson, Compensate the Forgotten Victims of America's Slavery Holocaust.

10. Slavery fueled the prosperity of the young nation. From 1790 to 1860 alone, the U.S. economy reaped the benefits of as much as $40 million in unpaid labor. Some estimate the current value of this unpaid labor at 1.4 trillion dollars.

Tim Wise, "Breaking the Cycle of White Dependency" (5/22/02).

Tamara Audi, "Payback for Slavery; Growing Push for Reparations Tries to Fulfill Broken Promise", quoting Randall Robinson (9/18/00).

11. Not only did the institution of slavery result in the extinguishment of millions of Africans, it eviscerated whole cultures: languages, religions, mores, and customs, it psychologically destroyed its victims. It wrenched from them their history, their memories, and their families on a scale never previously witnessed.

12. When the institution finally ended, the vestiges, racial inequalities and cultural psychic scars left a disproportionate number of American slave descendants injured and heretofore without remedy.

13. Although the institution of slavery in the United States was officially outlawed in 1865, it continued, de facto, until as recently as the 1950's. National archive records reveal that in the 1920's and 1930's, the NAACP still received letters from African-Americans claiming to still be on plantations and forced to work without pay. Several claims were investigated and were found to be legitimate. Moreover, as late as 1954, the Justice Department prosecuted the Dial brothers in Sumpter County, Alabama because they held blacks in involuntary servitude.

Alistair Highet, "Will America Pay for the Sins of the Past, Slavery's Past". (February 14, 2002). The Hartford Adovate, quoting. Dr. Ronald Waters.

14. Even for those who were "freed", their lives remained locked in quasi-servitude, due to legal, economic and psychic restraints that effectively blocked their economic, political and social advancement.Id..

15. Hence, new measures called "Black Codes" guaranteed control of Blacks by white employers. As John Hope Franklin noted in From Slavery to Freedom:

the control of blacks by white employers was about as great as that which slaveholders had exercised. Blacks who quit their job could be arrested and imprisoned for breach of contract. They were not allowed to testify in court except in cases involving members of their own race; numerous fines were imposed for seditious speeches, insulting gestures or acts, absence from work, violating curfews and the possession of firearms. There was of course no enfranchisement of blacks and no indication that in the future they' could look forward to full citizenship and participation in democracy.

Franklin, John Hope. From Slavery to Freedom, New York; Knof(1947).

16. The post-Reconstruction Southern practices of peonage and sharecropping which continued well into the twentieth century were direct outgrowths of slavery that continued a system of complete control by the dominant culture. Peonage was a complex system where a black man would be arrested for "vagrancy", ordered to pay a fine that he could not afford, and then incarcerated. A plantation owner would then pay the fine and then hire him until he could afford to pay off the fine. The peon was forced to work, locked up at night and if he escaped, was chased by bloodhounds until recaptured.

Yuval Taylor, I was Born a Slave.

17. Likewise, during the 1920's, fortunate African-Americans became sharecroppers on land leased from whites whose grandparents had owned their forebearers. These African Americans were not allowed to vote, and were socially and economically relegated to the leftovers in education, earnings, and freedoms.

18. More recently, a 1998 census report shows that 26 percent of African American people in the United States live in poverty compared to 8 percent of whites. It also showed that 14.7 percent of African Americans have four-year college degrees, compared with 25 percent of whites. The same year, African American infant-mortality rates were more than twice as high as those among whites. Federal figures also show that a Black person born in 1996 can expect to live, on average, 6.6 fewer years than a white person born the same year.

 

19. African-Americans are more likely to go to jail. to be there longer, and if their crime is eligible, to receive the death penalty. They lag behind whites according to every social yardstick: literacy, life expectancy, income and education. They are more likely to be murdered and less likely to have a father at home.

20. Defendants, including, but not limited to FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, AETNA INC., CSX, through their predecessors-in-interest, conspired with slave traders, with each other and other entities and institutions (whose identities are not yet specifically identified, but which are described herein as CORPORATE DOES # 1-100) and other un-named entities and/or financial institutions to commit and/or knowingly facilitate crimes against humanity, and to further illicitly profit from slave labor.

21. Plaintiffs and the plaintiff class are slave descendents whose ancestors were forced into slavery from which the defendants unjustly profited. Plaintiffs seek an accounting, constructive trust, restitution, disgorgement and compensatory and punitive damages arising out of Defendants' past and continued wrongful conduct.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

22. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a) since the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 per plaintiff exclusive of interests and costs and there is diversity of citizenship.

23. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties in that the defendants conduct systematic and continuous business within the State of New York.

24. Venue is proper in this Court since the Defendants do business and may be found in the District within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (a).

25. Plaintiffs and the plaintiff class are African-American slave descendents.

26. Plaintiff is a New York resident whose ancestors were enslaved in the agricultural industry.

DEFENDANTS

27. Defendants and the other known and unknown defendants used and/or profited from slave labor and have retained the benefits and use of those profits and products derived from that slave labor. Defendants knew that the plaintiff class was subject to physical and mental abuse and inhuman treatment.

28. Defendants conspired with each other with intentions to violate Plaintiffs' ancestors' basic human rights from slavery in that and by so doing to profit from these violations.

29. Defendant FLEETBOSTON is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. It does continuous and systematic business in New York. FLEETBOSTON is the successor in interest to Providence Bank who was founded by Rhode Island businessman John Brown. Brown owned ships that embarked on several slaving voyages and Brown was prosecuted in federal court for participating in the international slave trade after it had become illegal under federal law. Upon information and belief, Providence Bank lent substantial sums to Brown, thus financing and profiting from the founder's illegal slave trading. Upon information and belief, FLEETBOSTON also collected custom fees due from ships transporting slaves, thus, further profiting from the slave trade.

30. Defendant CSX is a Virginia corporation with its principal place of business located at 901 E. Cary Street, Richmond, VA 23219. It is a successor-in-interest to numerous predecessor railroad lines that were constructed or run, at least in part, by slave labor.

Jim Cox, "Rail Networks Own Lines Bult with Slave Labor" USA TODAY (02/21/02)

31. Defendant AETNA INC. ("AETNA") is a corporation with its principal place of business located at 151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, Connecticut 06156. Upon information and belief, AETNA's predecessor in interest, actually insured slave owners against the loss of their human chattel. AETNA knew the horrors of slave life as is evident in a rider through which the company declined to pay the premiums for slaves who were lynched or worked to death or who committed suicide. Additionally, AETNA insured enslaved Africans who worked in the agricultural industry of which Plaintiff's enslaved. AETNA, therefore, unjustly profited from the institution of slavery.

32. Defendants CORPORATE DOES NOS. 1-100 are other companies, industrial, manufacturing, financial and other enterprises that, like the named Defendants, its/their predecessors, affiliates and/or assigns unjustly profited from slave labor. The designation CORPORATE DOES NOS. # 1-100 is used until such time as the specific identity of such additional companies, as they relate to this action, is ascertained through discovery and/or other means.

CLASS ALLEGATIONS

33. This action is brought and may properly be maintained as a class action pursuant to the provision of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a), 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3). Plaintiffs seek certification of the following class: all African-American slave descendants.

34. The exact number of Plaintiff class members is not known. Plaintiffs estimate that the class includes millions of African-American slave descendants and the Plaintiffs estimate that the class is so numerous that joinders of individual members is impracticable. The number and identities of the class members can only be ascertained through appropriate investigation and discovery.

35. Questions of fact and law are common with respect to each class member. Common questions of fact and law include:

a. Whether Defendants knowingly, intentionally and systematically benefited from the use of enslaved laborers;

b. Whether Defendants wrongly converted to their own use and for their own benefit, the slave labor and services of the Plaintiffs' forebearers. as well as, the products and profits from such slave labor;

c. Whether the Defendants knew or should have known that they were assisting and acting as accomplices in immoral and inhuman deprivation of life and liberty;

d. Whether Defendants have been unjustly enriched by their wrongful conduct; and

e. Whether, as a result of this horrific and wrongful conduct by the Defendants, the Plaintiff class is entitled to restitution or other equitable relief, or to compensatory or punitive damages.

36. The claims of the individually named Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Plaintiff Class Members. Plaintiffs and all members of the Plaintiff Class have been similarly affected by the Defendants common course of conduct and the members of each class have similar claims against the Defendants. The claims of all class members depend on a showing of the Defendants' common course of conduct. as described herein, which gives Plaintiffs, individually and as class representative, the right to the relief sought herein.

37. There is no conflict as between Plaintiffs and the other members of the class with respect to this action or the claims for relief. Plaintiffs know and understand their asserted rights and their roles as class representatives.

38. Plaintiffs and their attorneys are able to and will fairly, and adequately, protect the interest of the Class. Several of Plaintiffs' attorneys are experienced class action litigators who are or will be able to conduct the proposed litigation. Plaintiffs' attorneys can vigorously prosecute the rights of the proposed class members.

39. Prosecution of separate actions by individual Plaintiffs will create the risk of inconsistent and varying adjudications and will establish incompatible standards of conduct for Defendants in that different Courts may order Defendants to provide different types of accounting or take other inconsistent actions.

40. Prosecutions of separate actions by individual plaintiffs of other proposed class members not party to the adjudications will substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interest in that, for example, Defendants may exhaust their available funds in satisfying the claims of earlier plaintiffs to the detriment of later plaintiffs.

41. Defendants have acted and/or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the proposed class, making final injunctive relief and correspondent declaratory relief appropriate with respect to the class as a whole in that Defendants have been unjustly enriched by participation in acts that were known to be immoral and inhumane, and Defendants: (a) prevented and or refused restitution to the proposed class members, (b) prevented and/or refused to disgorge wrongfully gained and/or earned profits and benefits, or (c) refused to provide a full and complete accounting and disclosure of the extent of their aforesaid actions.

 

42. Common questions of law and fact predominate in the claims of all class members, including the named Plaintiff. These claims depend on proving Defendants are liable for their acts and/or omissions based, in part, on evidence of a common scheme. Plaintiffs' and the plaintiff class members; proposed evidentiary showings would be based on the same documents and testimony concerning the Defendants' actions.

43. A class action is superior to the other available methods for the fair, just and efficient adjudication of the controversy. Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff class members have no interest in individually controlling the prosecution of separate actions and, instead are on the whole incapable as practical matter of pursuing individual claims. Even if individual class members had the resources to pursue individual litigation, it would be unduly burdensome to the Courts in which the individual litigation would proceed. Individual litigation magnifies the delay and expenses to all parties in that the Court system of resolving the controversies engendered by Defendants/individual and/or common course of conduct. The class action device allows a single court to provide the benefits of unitary adjudication, judicial economy and the fair and equitable handling of all plaintiffs; claims in a single forum. The conduct of this action as a class action conserves the resources of the parties and of the judicial system, and reserves the rights of each class member. Furthermore, for most class members, a class action is the only feasible mechanism that allows them an opportunity for legal redress and justice. A large concentration of proposed class members is estimated to reside in this District and nearby states. The management of the litigation as a class would pose few problems for this Court.

44. Certification of the Plaintiff class is appropriate under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and also under 23(b)(2), 23(b)(3).

EQUITABLE TOLLING

45. The plaintiffs have been unable to secure records with regards to their ancestors due to the failure of most to be able to reliably access ship manifestos, or human cargo lists that directly connect them to their descendants. Moreover, family names were changed once the Africans arrived in America making it nearly impossible to accurately trace records. Recent advances in Internet and computer databases have made these records more accessible to the average African-American.

46. Likewise, corporate histories and records have also been extremely difficult and inaccessible to most people. Hence, research tracing the monetary benefit derived by American corporations from the slave trade has only been accessible and discussed by prominent researches within the last year.

47. Moreover, efforts to attempt to raise the issue of reparations for African-Americans in an attempt to secure easier access to information have stalled in Congress. Representative John Conyers from Michigan has for the last 11 years attempted to propose a resolution, No. 40, seeking to set aside $8 million dollars to study the effects of slavery and come up with a formula for reparations. His resolution has died in committee for each of these past eleven years.

 

48. Moreover, with the advent of litigation related to reparations for holocaust victims from government entities and corporations, more emphasis has been placed on the viability of lawsuits for reparations for human rights violations.

49. Finally, the action of each of the Defendants by their failure to provide an accounting to the plaintiff constitutes a continuing tort that tolls the statute.

COUNT I — CONSPIRACY

50. Each of the Defendants acted individually and in concert with their industry group and with each other, either expressly or tacitly, to participate in a plan that was designed in part to commit the tortious acts referred to herein.

51. For instance, each industry group was co-dependant on each other and operated as joint enterprise, designed in part, to maintain and continue a system of inhumane servitude. The shipping and railroad industry benefited and profited from the transportation of the slaves. The railroad industry utilized slave labor in the construction of rail lines. These transportation industries were dependent upon the manufacturing and raw materials industry to utilize the slaves they shipped. The cotton, tobacco, rice and sugar industries thrived on profits generated from their use of slave labor, and relied upon financial and insurance industries to finance and insure the slaves that they utilized and owned. All industries: raw market, retail, financial, insurance, and transportation, benefited from the reduced costs of slave-produced goods.

COUNT II — DEMAND FOR AN ACCOUNTING

52. Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all other descendants who are similarly situated, re-allege as if fully set forth, each and every allegation contained into the preceding paragraphs.

53. The Defendants knew or should have know of the existence of corporate records that indicate their profiting from slave labor. Plaintiffs and the public have demanded that the Defendants reveal their complete corporate records regarding same and that a just and fair accounting be made for profits derived from the slave trade.

54. Defendants have failed to provide said records and have failed to comply with plaintiffs' demand.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment: (a) requiring defendants make a full disclosure of all of their corporate records that reveal any evidence of slave labor or their profiting from same; (2) seeking the appointment of an independent historic commission to serve as a depository for corporate records related to slavery and; (3) directing defendants to account to plaintiffs for any profits they derived from slavery.

COUNT III — HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

57. Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all other descendants who are similarly situated, re-allege as if fully set forth, each and every allegation contained into the preceding paragraphs.

 

58. The Defendants participated into the activities of the institution of slavery and in so doing furthered the commission of crimes against humanity, crimes against peace, slavery and forced labor, torture, rape, starvation, physical and mental abuse, summary execution. Specifically, the defendants profited from these wrongs.

59. Defendants knowingly benefited from a system that enslaved, tortured, starved and exploited human beings, so as to personally benefit them. In the process, the Defendants directly or indirectly subjected the plaintiffs' ancestors to inhumane treatment, physical abuse, torture, starvation, execution and subjected the plaintiffs to the continued effects of the original acts, including but not limited to: race discrimination, unequal opportunity, poverty, substandard health care, substandard treatment, substandard housing, substandard education, unjust incarceration, racial profiling, and inequitable pay.

60. The above referenced actions by the Defendants were in violation of international law.

61. As a result of the above referenced violations of international law, Plaintiffs and members of the Plaintiff class have suffered injury and are entitled to compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial.

COUNT IV — CONVERSION

62. Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all other slave ancestors who are similarly situated, re-allege as if fully set forth, each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs.

63. As a result of Defendants' failure and refusal to account for, acknowledge and return to Plaintiffs and the members of the Plaintiff class, the value of their slave labor, Defendants have willfully and wrongfully misappropriated and converted the value of that labor and its derivative profits into Defendants' own property.

64. Defendants have never accounted for or returned the value of Plaintiffs ancestors' slave labor and the profits Defendants derived from said slave labor.

65. As a result of Defendants' wrongful acts and omissions, Plaintiffs and members of the Plaintiffs' class have been injured and demand judgment against the Defendants jointly, severally and/or in the alternative on this cause of action for, amongst other things: (a) an accounting of the slave labor monies, profits and/or benefits derived by Defendants; (b) a constructive trust in the value of said monies, profits and/or benefits derived by Defendants use of slave labor; (c) full restitution in the value of all monies, profits, and!or benefits derived by Defendants' use of slave labor; (d) equitable disgorgement of all said monies, profits, and/or benefits derived by Defendants' exploitation of slave labor; and (e) other damages in an amount in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this Court and to be determined at the trial herein, together with interest, exemplary or punitive damages, attorney's fees and costs of this action.

 

COUNT V — UNJUST ENRICHMENT

66. Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all other slave descendants who are similarly situated, re-allege as if fully set forth, each and every allegation contained into the preceding paragraphs.

67. Defendants have improperly benefited from the immoral and inhumane institution of Slavery in the United States.

68. Defendants have failed to account for and or return to Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff class the value of their ancestors' slave labor and or the profits and benefits the Defendants derived therefrom and Defendants have concealed the nature and scope of their participation in the Institution.

69. As a result of the Defendants' wrongful acts and omissions as described above, Defendants have been unjustly enriched.

70. Defendants have been unjustly enriched at the expense of Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs' class. Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs' class therefore demand restitution and judgment against the Defendants jointly, severally and/or in the alternative, in an amount in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this Court and to be determined at the trial herein, together with interest, exemplary or punitive damages, attorney's fees and the costs of this action.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs' class demand a jury trial and judgment and damages against the Defendants, jointly, severally and/or in the alternative, as follows:

(1) For an order certifying the Plaintiff class alleged herein;

(2) For an accounting;

(3) For the appointment of an independent historic commission;

(4) For the imposition of a constructive trust;

(5) For restitution of the value of their descendants' slave labor;

(6) For restitution of the value of their unjust enrichment based upon slave labor;

(7) For disgorgement of illicit profits;

(8) For compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by trial together with interest;

(9) For exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial;

(10) For attorneys' fees; and

(11) For the cost of this action.

 

Edward D. Fagan By:___________________________ EDWARD D. FAGAN, ESQ. (EF-4125) FAGAN ASSOCIATES 301 South Livingston Avenue Livingston, New Jersey 07039 (973) 994-2908

Roger S. Wareham By:_________________________ ROGER S. WAREHAM, ESQ. (RW 4751) JOMO SANGA THOMAS, ESQ. (JT 7544) THOMAS WAREHAM RICHARDS 572 Flatbush Avenue, Suite 2 Brooklyn, New York 11225 (718) 941-6407

                                                            (B)

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an international document adopted by the United Nations General Assembly that enshrines the rights and freedoms of all human beings. It was accepted by the General Assembly as Resolution 217 during its third session on 10 December 1948 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris, France.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Preamble

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable

rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice

and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous

acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world

in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom

from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common

people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last

resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be

protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between

nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their

faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person

and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote

social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation

with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of

human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the

greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, therefore,

The General Assembly,

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of

achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and

every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by

progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and

effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States

themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article I

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are

endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a

spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration,

without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion,

political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political,

jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person

belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other

limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of person.

Article 4

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be

prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment

or punishment. Article 6

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal

protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any

discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such

discrimination.

Article 8

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals

for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent

and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any

criminal charge against him.

Article 11

1. Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed

innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he

has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

2. No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or

omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or

international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal

offence was committed.

Article 12

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home

or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has

the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the

borders of each State.

2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to

return to his country.

Article 14

1. Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from

persecution.

2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely

arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and

principles of the United Nations.

Article 15

1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to

change his nationality.

Article 16 1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality

or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled

to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

2. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the

intending spouses.

3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is

entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17

1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with

others.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right

includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in

community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in

teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes

freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart

information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21 1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country,

directly or through freely chosen representatives.

2. Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.

3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government;

this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall

be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by

equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled

to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in

accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic,

social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development

of his personality.

Article 23

1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and

favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal

work.

3. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration

ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity,

and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

4. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of

his interests.

Article 24

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of

working hours and periodic holidays with pay. Article 25

1. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and

well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing

and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security

in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or

other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All

children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social

protection.

Article 26

1. Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the

elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be

compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made

generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all

on the basis of merit.

2. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human

personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and

fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and

friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further

the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be

given to their children.

Article 27

1. Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the

community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and

its benefits. 2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests

resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the

author.

Article 28

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and

freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29

1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full

development of his personality is possible.

2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only

to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of

securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others

and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the

general welfare in a democratic society.

3. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the

purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or

person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the

destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

  Subscribed and sworn before Public Notary Public on this _____ day of __________ 2021

                                                                        _________________________
        Public Notary

                           Respectfully ________________________________________

 Estate of Louis Charles Hamilton II Cmdr. US Navy MSS (Pro Se Plaintiff) 2724 61st Street, Suite 1-B17, Galveston, TX 77551

CC: Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, KG, KT, PC, ADC (William Arthur Philip Louis) Prince Henry of Wales, KCVO, (Henry Charles Albert David), Prime Minister Boris Johnson The British Consulate 1301 Fannin Street #2400 Houston Texas 77002-7014

CC: Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Christopher A. Wray, FBI Headquarters 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

CC: United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres United Nations Headquarters 405 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017

CC: Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. 46th and current “President of the United States 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500

CC: International Criminal Court “Honorable Mrs. Fatou Bensouda

  #ICC #Honorable #Ms #Fatou #Bensouda #pursuant #to #Nuremberg #Nazi #Criminals #Trials  #™Cmdr. #Bluefin 

#Sherlock #Holmes #Caseof #The #Crooked #Dead #President #LouisCharlesHamiltonII #TrumpFraud #Scam #GOP #Russia #Election #Fraud #Republican #Corruption #FBI #Investigaton #RedHen #BlackLivesMatter #USSR #GRU #NSA #NCIS #NIS #Navy #USMC #SecretService #ABC #CBS #NBC #MSNBC #CNBC #BBCNews #CNN #Utah #Mormon #Racist #USNavyseals #JAG #UnitedNations #Peace #Palace #ICC #ICJ #International #Courts #MLKjr #Obama #Hillary #NATO #PinkyRoseDeChavez #TinaFeyWifeSwap 
#Hashtagstupidniggers #France #Mexico #Canada #Popefrancis #Law #SupremeCourt #WhiteOnly #Slaves #Africa #Egypt #Syria #Iran #FoxNews #BritishQueen #PrinceWilliams #PrinceHarry #BritishRoyalFamily #PrimeMinsterMay #MI5 #MI6 #BCI #BCA #FargoND #Utah #Texas #Genocide #Slavery #Hatecrimes #Negro #Immigration #Crimesagainsthumanity #PortArthurTexas #Ninja #NASA #Space #Marines #FlyNavy #CmdrBluefin

+CNBC+FEDERAL BUREAU Investigation#Mueller #The #Shame :  )
Tina Fey
Prince Harry Windsor
Will Smith
Bill and Hillary Clinton
Megyn Kelly
Cara Delevingne
Samuel L Jackson
Jerry Springer show
Jerry Seinfeld
China Turkey
Israel
North Dakota
British Royal Family
President Barack Obama
United States Navy Seals
Will Ferrell
Derek Zoolander
The View
Jimmy Fallon
Bill Muhar
Fox News Live
BBC World News
Dixie Chicks bitches
Sen. Ted Cruz
NATO
Nobel Prize
ABC NBC CBS
India
Tiwain
Texas
Supreme Court
Sarah Palin
Bristol Palin
Track Palin
Star Trek
Star Wars
It always sunny in Philadelphia
As the world turns
Days of our lives
LA Clippers
British Parliament
Inspector Callahan
David and Charles Koch
Africa
Thailand
Bill Gates Bill Cosby
Cheers
Big Bang Theory
30 Rock
Alec Baldwin
Clint Eastwood
Tom Cruise
Tom Jones
Jimmy Kimmel
Jimmy Carr
Jimmy Hendrix
Japan
Soviet Union
Madonna
Cher
Chris Isaac
Oscar
Conan Congress
Washington DC
Texas
Alaska Air
The Beetles
Johnny Depp
Johnny Cash
Pirates of the Caribbean
Super Mario Bros
Victoria Secret
NASA Space Station
Hogwarts
Kim Kardashian
Jim Carrey
Jim Morrison
Courtney Love
The Who
James Brown
Black Lives Matters
Michael Jackson
Michael Jordan
Cobey Bryant
Olivia Newton John
Track Morgan
United States Marshal
UPS FedEx
PTSD
US Marines
US Army
US Coast Guard
British Royal Navy
Harvard University
Jesus Christ LDS
Pope
Vatican City
Middle East
Hong Kong
Tabitha
Black History
Martin Luther King Jr
Malcolm X
Barnie Sanders
Sen. Ted Cruz
Penelope Cruz
Mission impossible
Days of our lives
Married with children
I Love Lucky
MASH
Dred Scott
Catholics
Jew
Syria
Iran
CBS News
NBC News
ABC News
CNN
Hot News
The Daily Beast
Jebb Bush
Sheldon Cooper
Rushi Barot
Geeta International Inc.
Harry Potter
Harry C. Arthur Esq.
Jesus Christ
Holy Bible
Allah
Samsung Galaxy S3
BBC Radio
BBC Technology
Samsung Galaxy A5
Rick Santorum
Mobile Gallery
Germany
Portugal
France
Italy
Mitsubishi
Toyota
Ford Trucks
Jeep Eagles
Pearl harbor Hawaii
Lady Gaga
Libya
Google
Apple
Bill Gates
Cher
Verizon
At&T
Sprint
Ben Carson dumped
Deep Sea Horizon
Enron
Hezbollah ISIS
Military
British Columbia University
British Columbia
British Vogue
Bill Murray
Stephen Colbert
Stephen Hawking
Boris Johnson
Beijing
Solar panels
Pegasus
Native Americans
Mexico
United States
Apple iPad
Maia Shibutani
California
New York City
New Jersey Shore
Abraham Lincoln
Twitter
National Geographic
David Beckham
David Cameron
Cameron Diaz
Drew Barrymore
Justin Bieber
Marco Rubio
Eva Longoria
London
King Kong
David Spade
Ben Stiller
Adel
Dallas Cowboys
John Mayer
John Saseen
Iowa
Angela Mcglowan
Rajinder Singh Dhiman
Dr Seuss
Dr Pepper
Dr Piper
Europe
Locheed Martin
Martin Lawrence
Jack Black
Jaguar
BMW
Mariah Carey
Chiang Rai
Baltimore
British India
Jarad Leto
Tom Hanks
Tom Hardy
The Hollywood Reporter
John Lennon
John Kerry
Ash Carter
Republican Party
Russia
Chicago
Kristen Stewart Samuel L Jackson
Kevin Hart
Kevin Durant
Jay Z
Kareem Abdul Jabar
Lakers
NBA
Republican party
Selena Gomez
Will Smith
Thailand
Fox Sports
Charles Barkley
Jerry Springer
Jerry Seinfeld
North Dakota
Hollywood
Oscar
Nobel Prize
British Parliament
Switzerland
Geniva
Paris Hilton
Paris
Donald Trump
Sen Ted Cruz
It's always sunny in Philadelphia
Derek Zoolander
Ben Stiler
Owen Wilson
Jackie Chan
Chris Tucker
Canada
Mexico
Russia
Egypt
Africa
Will Ferrell
Isreal
Saudi Arabia
Morgan Freeman
Spike Lee
AL Sharpton
Tonya Lewis Lee 
Donald John Trump Jr. 
Rex Marsav
Melissa Whitley
Joe Czyzyk
Linda Adewole 
Mitt Romney 
United States Veterans Initative
Sen. Orrin Hatch
Sen. Jeff Sessions
Sen. Lindsey Graham
Sen. John Cornyn
Sen. Mike Lee
Sen. Ted Cruz
Sen. Jeff Flake
Sen. David Vitter
Sen. David Perdue
Sen. Thom Tillis
David Duke
Jessie Jackson
NAACP
ACLU
NSA
William McCants
Sigmar Gabriel
Professor Roger Griffin
Ivana Trump
Marla Maples
Ben Carson
Candy Carson
Chris Rock
Vanessa D Gilmore
Willie M Zanders
Karen Wells Roby
Danny Devito
Ray Romano
Amy Poehler
Ashton Kutcher
President Donald Trump
Ellen DeGeneres
Pinky Rose De Chavez
Prince Harry Windsor
Lalisa Manoban

Emma Watson
#Slavery #ObstructionofJustice #Fraud #CrimesagainstHumanity #Falseslaverydata #Humanrights

No comments:

Post a Comment