Slave Negro Louis
Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712 Pro Se Plaintiff, and “44.5 Million Negro
Plaintiffs Slaves et al”
Further
appearances Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention,
disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s
cause of action as follows:
As stated in all court
filing since 2010 Hamilton v. United States of America et al chief defendant(s)
among many others:
U.S. District
Chief Judge Ron Clark
U.S. District
Judge David Hittner
U. S. District
Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr.,
U.S. District
Judge James E. “Jeb” Boasberg
U.S. District
Judge Keith F. Giblin
U.S. District
Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon
U.S. District
Judge Alfred H. Bennett
U.S. District
Judge” Vanessa D. Gilmore
U.S Appeal Chief
Judge Frank Hoover Easterbrook
U.S Appeal
Circuit Judge Richard Allen Posner
U.S Appeal
Circuit Senior Judge Daniel Anthony Manion
In at the lease
between the exact date of 2005 – 2013 starting back dating to the official leading
(RICO) obstruction of Justice, with
Dred Scott's
fight for freedom against The Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen Dynasty before
conception the infamous “Whites Supremacy” Future Chief Defendant U. S.
District Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr.,controlling RICO action, fraudulent
concealment of ongoing Enslavement directed against at the defendant (USA) own
rules of governing Laws Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights
Under Color of Law ...
And violation of Title
18, U.S.C., Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; in his dismissal of a
Enslave active Pro Se Plaintiff (Hamilton) in his person in 2005 (RICO) crimes ongoing
in 2005, not clear back in 1865 “Civil War” fight for the passage of the 13th
amendment which took affect in 2013 Mississippi free the Pro Se Plaintiff
(Hamilton) in his person
Forever masked
criminally in favor of all defendant USA and Third Party Whites Only Slave
Trade Corporations et al Obstruction of Justice Klansmen ongoing hidden slave regime
victory against Just Claims of still held enslaved Plaintiffs 1865 – 2013 herein
Pro Se Slave
(Hamilton DOB November 8th 1961 official Enslaved Plaintiff with
exhibit (D) Enslaved Plaintiff President Negro Slave Barack Obama 1961 – 2013
As dating with 1846
– 1857 Dred Scott first went to
trial to sue for his freedom in 1847. Ten years later, after a decade of
appeals and court reversals, his case was finally brought before the (RICO) Defendant
United States Supreme Court,
The nine justices of the defendant Supreme
Court of 1856 certainly had biases regarding slavery. Seven had been appointed
by pro-slavery presidents from the South, and of these, five were from
slave-holding families.
Still, if the
case had gone directly from the state supreme court to the federal supreme
court, the federal court probably would have upheld the state's ruling, citing
a previously established decision that gave states the authority to determine
the status of its inhabitants
But, in his attempt to bring his case to the
federal courts, Scott had claimed that he and the case's defendant (Mrs.
Emerson's brother, John Sanford, who lived in New York) were citizens from
different states.
The main issues
for the Supreme Court, therefore, were whether it had jurisdiction to try the
case and whether Scott was indeed a citizen.
The decision of
the court was read in March of 1857. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney -- a staunch
supporter of slavery -- wrote the "majority opinion" for the court.
It stated that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had
no right to sue.
Now future Slaver
still ongoing as Chief Defendant having U. S. District Judge Charles R. Norgle,
Sr., “Whites Supremacy” controlling RICO
action, fraudulent concealment of ongoing Enslavement against the claimed just
judicial fiber directed at the defendant (USA) own rules of governing Laws
Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; forever in favor of all defendant United
States of America et al and all acting “third party” Whites Supremacy
Corporation Slave Trade unjust enrichment civil/criminal (RICO) ongoing hidden
slave regime until Mississippi Join the “Union on February 7th 2013
ending official enslavement victory against Just Claims of still held enslaved Plaintiffs
1865 – 2013 herein which the courts will strike, kill, and protect their “Slave
Regime” even since the birth of
Pro Se Slave
(Hamilton DOB November 8th 1961 official Enslaved Plaintiff with exhibit (D)
Enslaved Plaintiff President Negro Slave Barack Obama 1961 – 2013 (Plaintiff) herein Martin L. King Jr. was
killed by Republican Party and their Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen engaging
in fully “Judicial Government protected racket of physically engaged in (RICO)
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) in direct criminal
violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1589
(forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery,
involuntary servitude, or forced labor),
“Slavery
Servitude” money laundering statutes,
18 U.S.C. 1956
and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18
U.S.C. § 1961(1), direct with intent and deliberate conscious did Prima Facial
Tort committed to
Judicial Fraud
and Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, Judicial bias, and having a direct
interest in the out-come of said “Whites
Supremacy” controlling RICO action, fraudulent concealment of ongoing
Enslavement against the claimed just judicial fiber directed at the defendant
(USA) own rules of governing Laws controlled by the destroyed
Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; forever in favor of all defendant
United States of America et al “Federal Republican and some Democrats Justices
fully in direct violation of
insider trading,
stock manipulation schemes, embezzlement by supply and demand in Slave Trade
with stockbrokers, and SEC violations Since State of Texas 1890s Black Codes August 26th,
1866 being institute as Defendant “United States of America et al
State and federal
prison population has increased from 316,000 to 1.2 million, and by the year
2002 the inmate population is expected to increase by another 400,000 as (Pro
Se) Plaintiff already being abducted by Texas to maintain in 2011 “Slavery
Servitude” and Texas Black codes, while
Human rights
organizations, as well as political and social ones, are condemning what they
are calling a new form of inhumane exploitation in the United States, where
they say a prison population of up to 2 million – mostly Negro Slaves Black Plaintiffs’
herein since the institute of “Black Codes Laws” and now a growing Hispanic
labor – are working for various industries for a pittance
For the whites Supremacy
defendant (USA) RICO corporation’s tycoons who have invested in the prison
industry, it has been like finding a pot of gold. They don’t have to worry
about strikes or paying unemployment insurance, vacations or comp time. All of
their workers are full-time, and never arrive late or are absent because of
family problems; moreover, if they don’t like the pay of 25 cents an hour and
refuse to work, they are locked up in isolation cells,
In addition to
Chief Defendant U.S. Justices listed above conspire direct and indirectly in achieving
false materially misleading to fail to disclose, or inadequately by design to
disclosed the truthful transactions of the Defendant “United States of America
destroyed 13th and 14th Amendment which has a direct
cause of continual action for false imprisonment of the “Slaves Negro
Plaintiffs herein when
There are
approximately 2 million inmates in state, federal and private prisons
throughout the country. According to California Prison Focus, “no other society
in human history has imprisoned so many of its own citizens.”
The figures show
that the defendant United States has locked up more people than any other
country: a half million more than China, which has a population five times
greater than the defendant U.S. Statistics reveal that the defendant United
States holds 25% of the world’s prison population, with Plaintiff Negro Slaves
herein the official larges population in the (USA) defendant “Prisons” but United
States of America is only 5% of the world’s people.
From less than
300,000 inmates in 1972, the jail population grew to 2 million by the year
2000. In 1990 it was one million.
Ten years ago there were only five private
prisons in the country, with a population of 2,000 inmates; now, there are 100,
with 62,000 inmates. Mostly “Slaves Plaintiffs leading the Labor force”,
“The private
contracting of prisoners for work fosters incentives to lock people up. Prisons
depend on this income. Corporate stockholders who make money off prisoners’
work lobby for longer sentences, in order to expand their workforce. The system
feeds itself,” says a study by the Progressive Labor Party, which accuses the
prison industry of being “an imitation of Nazi Germany with respect to forced
slave labor and concentration camps.”
The prison
industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States
and its investors are on Wall Street. “This multimillion-dollar industry has
its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet
catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, and
construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply
companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large
variety of colors.”
All Defendant fully
aware and even made aware, as being such Now future Slaver still ongoing as
Chief Defendant having U. S. District Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr., “Whites Supremacy” controlling RICO action,
fraudulent concealment of ongoing Enslavement against the claimed just judicial
fiber directed at the defendant (USA) own rules of governing Laws
Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; forever in favor of all defendant
United States of America et al and all acting “third party” Whites Supremacy
Corporation Slave Trade unjust enrichment civil/criminal (RICO) ongoing hidden
slave regime until Mississippi Join the “Union on February 7th 2013 ending
official enslavement victory against Just Claims of still held enslaved
Plaintiffs 1865 – 2013 herein which the courts will strike, kill, and protect
their “Slave Regime even since the birth of
Pro Se Slave
(Hamilton DOB November 8th 1961 official Enslaved Plaintiff with exhibit (D)
Enslaved Plaintiff President Negro Slave Barack Obama 1961 – 2013 (Plaintiff) herein Martin L. King Jr. was
killed by Republican Party and their Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen engaging
in
fully “Judicial
Government protected racket of physically engaged in (RICO) The Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) in direct criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1589
(forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery,
involuntary servitude, or forced labor),
“Slavery
Servitude” money laundering statutes,
18 U.S.C. 1956
and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18
U.S.C. § 1961(1), direct with intent and deliberate conscious did Prima Facial
Tort committed to
Judicial Fraud
and Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, Judicial bias, and having a direct
interest in the out-come of said “Whites
Supremacy” controlling RICO action, fraudulent concealment of ongoing
Enslavement against the claimed just judicial fiber directed at the defendant
(USA) own rules of governing Laws controlled by the destroyed
Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; forever in favor of all defendant
United States of America et al “Federal Republican and some Democrats Justices
fully in direct violation of
insider trading,
stock manipulation schemes, embezzlement by supply and demand in Slave Trade
with stockbrokers, and SEC violations Since State of Texas 1890s Black Codes
August 26th, 1866 being institute as Defendant “United States of America et al
as between the exact date of The first Ellis Island Immigration Station
officially opens on January 1, 1892, as three large ships wait to land. Seven
hundred immigrants passed through
Ellis Island that
day, and nearly 450,000 followed over the course of that first year, being some
of
“Negro Race”
tricked, trapped, and imprisonment of there on self-doing based on a front of
false hood, in non-discloser the 13th and 14th Amendments of The United States
of America constitution is in existence’s and enforced on behalf of
Plaintiff(s) Negro Slaves herein when since
1892 (27) years
after the “Civil War” and precisely 124 years till January 2016 all Immigrants
first enter “Ellis Island Immigration Station” and other “Immigration Station”
within
The United States
of American being “Negro” DNA race, fully deprive of the rights and privileges
of citizenship in a continual (RICO) scheme of “Slavery Servitude,
Denaturalization for “Unjust Enrichments” of
All Defendant
being a party to said “Slave Regime”
Slave Trade of
the abducted Negros, now being the same for all US Immigration Services - US
Citizenship& Green Card, being forced unknowing into “Slavery Servitude”,
in violation among others
18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. §
1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or
forced labor), for each and every Negro race officially residing under
immigration status since January 1st 1892 – June 2016 as Pro Se Slave Negro
Louis Charles Hamilton II USN #2712 SS as described in exhibit (C) declared on
this 11th day of August 2016 signed by “Melinda Sue Harmon”,
United States of America Federal Judge as
stated as follows: “The Complaint and other filings appear to seek an injunction
barring “any further DNA Negro race from any other country of origin having
entrances into the “Sovereign Nation of United States of America, or except of
be a party thereof the US Immigration Services-US Citizenship & Green Card
[sic]”
and from having
the same Denaturalization Non-Citizenship Slave Negro Status same all ‘Negro
American Verans Plaintiffs Legally Affirmed [sic].” #1 at pp. 1 and 3 declared on this 11th day of August
2016 signed by “Melinda Sue Harmon”, whom the same Chief Defendant in the same
exhibit (C) declared on this 11th day of August 2016 signed by “Melinda Sue
Harmon”, United States of America Federal Judge as stated as follows:
“The Court has
liberally construed Plaintiff’s pleading with appropriate deference, but
concludes the claims should be dismissed as frivolous.
The allegation
are irrational, incomprehensible, and lacking an arguable basis in law,
apparently claiming that Plaintiffs are literally enslaved African American
Veterans even though slavery was abolished in this country by the Thirteenth
Amendment of the Constitution. Accordingly, the court “Orders that this case is
dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 € (2) (B) (1)
As official 1960’s
forevermore Card Holder Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen Melinda Sue Furche of
Port Arthur Texas (77640) declining in mental ability severe enough to
interfere with daily life as acting 2016 U.S. District Judge Melinda Sue
(Furche) Harmon, in maintain her role in without a doubt in law and equity 100%
Guilt as Charge Judicial Fraud and Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power,
Judicial bias, and having a direct interest in the out-come of said “Whites Supremacy” controlling RICO action,
fraudulent concealment of ongoing Enslavement against the claimed just judicial
fiber directed at the defendant (USA) own rules of governing Laws controlled by
the destroyed
Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; forever in favor of all defendant
United States of America et al “Federal Republican” destroyed rights of the
Immigration Status of all precisely 124 years till January 2016 all Immigrants
first enter “Ellis Island Immigration Station” and other “Immigration Station”
within defendant
The United States
of American being “Negro” DNA race, fully deprive of the rights and privileges
of citizenship in a continual (RICO) scheme of “Slavery Servitude,
Denaturalization for “Unjust Enrichments” of being unknown to their best legal
interest a party to said “Slave Regime” from 1892 – 2013 official Enslaved
Immigrants a party of continual Slavery Servitude against the Plaintiff well
into 2016 (December) with destroyed
14th
Amendment citizenship status as Defendant “United States of America et al Chief
Defendant U. S. District Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr., and also Identified as
(Slaves Plaintiffs) Expert Witness on Slavery 101 as exhibit Chief Defendant U.
S. District Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr.,
A federal judge
July 7, 2005 with direct (RICO) intent having a direct interest in the out-come
of said “Whites Supremacy” controlling
RICO action, fraudulent concealment of ongoing Enslavement against the claimed
just judicial fiber directed at the defendant (USA) own rules of governing Laws
controlled by the destroyed
Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; served a blow to the modern slavery
reparations movement by tossing out a lawsuit asking corporations that reaped
profits from slave labor to pay up,
In a 104-page
opinion, Chief Defendant U.S. District Judge Charles R. Norgle said slavery has
caused "tremendous suffering and ineliminable scars," but an attempt
by slave descendants to seek reparations "more than a century after the
end of the Civil War and the formal abolition of slavery fails."
Chief Defendant
U.S. District Judge Charles R Norgle's decision, the second legal defeat since
last year, slams the door on the case in District Court. Plaintiffs can appeal
to the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The lawsuit, filed in 2002,
sought to hold 17 corporations -- including JP Morgan Chase, R.J. Reynolds
Tobacco and Loews, among others -- liable for benefits reaped from slave labor
during the pre- and post-Civil War era.
Lionel
Jean-Baptiste, local lead counsel to the plaintiffs, said he was bitterly disappointed
and promised an appeal,
"This is
only the beginning for African-American descendants of laves who for 200 years
had been forced to give their lives, their labor, their children, their
culture, their religion and their traditions," Jean-Baptiste said.
"There will not be any slowing down of the efforts to get these corporations
to pay back what they have amassed on the backs of millions of Africans."
Lawsuit too late
But Norgle said plaintiffs in the case had to
prove they were personally injured by slavery, adding that a genealogical tie
to slaves is not enough to show that injury. He also ruled the lawsuit was
brought too late and, citing long-standing legal doctrine Chief Defendant U.S. District Judge
Charles R Norgle argued that a decision over reparations isn't proper for the
courts. It's an issue that should be decided by the president or Congress, he
said,
"Claims
asserting harms against groups of long-dead victims, perpetrated by groups of
long-dead wrongdoers, are particularly difficult to bring in modern American
courts of law," he wrote.
Chief Defendant
U.S. District Judge Charles R Norgle said the plaintiffs failed to show that
they had experienced any "concrete and particular" suffering that
wasn't true of African Americans in general. He also said those suing failed to
allege any conduct by the 17 defendants that personally affected any of the
plaintiffs.
'Plaintiffs offer
unsupported conclusions'
Excerpts from Chief
Defendant Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.'s 104-page opinion:
"It is
undisputed that Congress has taken the initiative to deal with issues arising
from the slave trade in the decades after the Civil War. Congress has
considered and rejected Representative Conyers' calls for the establishment of
a commission to study the effects of slavery. . . . This district court will
therefore not substitute its judgment for that of Congress on the matter of
slave reparations."
"Reparations
are justified, advocates argue, on several grounds . . . however, there are a
number of cogent arguments against reparations, including the arguments that
present day Americans are not morally or legally liable for historical
injustices, that the debt to African Americans has already been paid, and that
reparations talk is divisive, immersing African Americans in a culture of
victimhood."
"Courts of
law . . . are constrained by judicial doctrine and precedent. . . . For that
reason, advocates of slave reparations may resolve to bring their concerns and
demands to the legislative and executive branches of government.
"Plaintiffs
face insurmountable problems in establishing that they have suffered concrete .
. . individualized harms at the hands of defendants."
"Plaintiffs
offer unsupported conclusions wrapped in legally significant terms, such as
'intentional misrepresentation' and 'unjust enrichment,' which are insufficient
to establish standing."
"Plaintiffs
cannot establish a personal injury sufficient to confer standing by merely
alleging some genealogical relationship to African Americans held in slavery
over one-hundred, two-hundred, or three-hundred years ago."
“Pro Se Plaintiff
requesting service of said legal summon and official complaint filed herein
with document(s) exhibits(s) as required by law, served upon the each chief defendant,
listed above as they are without a doubt in law and equity 100% Guilt as
Charge, a party of continual Slavery Servitude, Black Codes Laws, Jim Crow
Laws,
Denied Legal Citizenship, Monetary Fraud to
deprive Slaves Plaintiff of Just Compensation in direct enslavement damages
since each and every Birth until 13th amendment of defendant
constitution was DOA and laid to rest on the 7th Day of February
upon legal ratification as required by defendant own rules of governing laws of
“Slavery Servitude” as described in attached exhibit (C) dated 11th
day of August 2016 describing 13th amendment abolished against the
peace, will, dignity, well- being prosperity, equality as the same as “White
Only America, officially effecting the
Slave Pro Se Plaintiff
in his person and his entire DNA Negro family described in all legal Court
filing 2010 well into 2016 (December) Plaintiffs, as described… not a “allegation
are irrational, incomprehensible, material factual status of ongoing “Slavery
Servitude” and Black Codes Law” Law in 2 US Case Law Hamilton v United States
of America 2011 Class Actions all to be Republican Slave Trade
when factual “Melinda
Sue Furche Whites Only” High school Denton County, Texas, United States forevermore
Card Holder Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen attacking Niggers of the 1960’s –
1978 of Port Arthur Texas (77640) past activities directed at Pro Se Plaintiff
(Hamilton) in his person from 1960s among many other Negro Races such Legal
expert Law Degree in mental ability
severe enough against Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under
Color of Law ...
Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements; forever in favor of all defendant
United States of America et al to (RICO)
Whites Supremacy now being unbiased interfere
with daily life as acting 2016 U.S. District Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon,
Now legally
further defendants collective U.S. Justices and Defendant United States of
America UNIT criminal (RICO) Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law official insider
SEC Secured on absolute Immunity for whites only from being prosecuted in this
complex Judicial Insider Slave Trade Regime affairs in the Defendant
(Rouge) Hostile Republican Bigotry Race Hate
Crime Judicial Government department heads in charge with criminal intent in
their own person acting under color of law directed wrongfully with intent and
legal deliberation at 44.5 Million Slave Plaintiffs and DNA Negro Immigrants as
stated legally being declared affirmed as further complaint as follows:
No comments:
Post a Comment