In
The United States District Court
For
The Southern District of Texas
Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II USN SS # 2712
Pro Se Plaintiff, and “44.5 Million Negro Plaintiffs
Slaves et al”
Further appearances Federal
Civil Complaint
Jury Fully Demanded
Vs.
U.S. District Chief Judge
Ron Clark
U.S. District Judge David
Hittner
U.S. District Judge
James E. “Jeb” Boasberg
U.S. District Judge Keith
F. Giblin
U.S. District Judge Melinda
Sue (Furche) Harmon
U.S. District Judge Alfred
H. Bennett
U.S. District Judge”
Vanessa D. Gilmore
U.S Appeal Chief Judge Frank
Hoover Easterbrook
U.S Appeal Circuit Judge Richard
Allen Posner
U.S Appeal Circuit Senior Judge
Daniel Anthony Manion
United States of America
et al
“Chief Defendant(s) et al” herein (RICO)
enterprise listed and Identified each above files with the above Honorable U.S.
District Court, direct with intent and deliberate conscious did Prima Facial
Tort committed to
Judicial
Fraud and Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, Judicial bias, and having a
direct interest in the out-come “Keeping 44.5 Million (Slaves) in 2016 without
any “Legal Citizenship of the 14th Amendment of the United States of
America fully physically engaged in the “Official Capacity” as U.S. Judges did
so criminally with full intent engaging in among other things (RICO) The
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) in direct criminal
violation of
18
U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to
peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor),
“Slavery
Servitude” money laundering statutes,
18
U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO
statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), directed at Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
Pro Se Plaintiff USN # 2712 SS
and
44.5 Million
Still Negro American slaves, (Plaintiff) collectively since abduction August 20th
1619 been living off next to nothing in process still “Property” seeking Legal
Citizenship as all Slaves Freedom from all defendant Conquering controlling
Judicial Fraud Justices herein and United States of America et al being still
(RICO) enterprise in False Imprisonment slave labor endeavor in 2016 (December),
direct at (Pro Se Plaintiff Negro Slave) and 44.5 Million Still Forgotten
Abused Slaves herein denied “Legal Citizenship, after freedom on or about the 7th
Day of February 2013 when
“Mississippi free
Pro Se Plaintiff Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II in his person since
birth of November 8th 1961 Born into “Slavery Servitude” of United
States of America et al fully official Government records signed off physical
by:
U.S. District
Chief Judge Ron Clark
U.S. District
Judge David Hittner
U.S. District
Judge James E. “Jeb” Boasberg
U.S. District
Judge Keith F. Giblin
U.S. District
Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon
U.S. District
Judge Alfred H. Bennett
U.S. District
Judge” Vanessa D. Gilmore
U.S Appeal Chief
Judge Frank Hoover Easterbrook
U.S Appeal
Circuit Judge Richard Allen Posner
U.S Appeal
Circuit Senior Judge Daniel Anthony Manion
To maintaining
Slavery Servitude direct at the Pro Se Slave Plaintiff (Hamilton) in his person
and all other similarly the same, Negro Race with U.S. District Judge David
Hittner enforcing both “Slavery Servitude and “State of Texas” 1890s Black
Codes as so being Official on or about “October 9th 2012 direct at Pro
Se Slave Plaintiff (Hamilton) in his person
“Exhibit (A)
filed herein support of this Official Complaint as all further state before a Court
of law as follows:
Introduction
My Name is Louis
Charles Hamilton II Born November 8th 1961, Commander of The United
States of America Navy Secret Service, my Duty is to Protect the Presidential
Seal of The Office of Commander in Chief of United States of America, and the
Two British Queen of England Grand Babies Prince William and Prince Harry, “However”
Nobody on earth ever was raised to Believes in a “ Nigger Slave”.
The legal basis
for the DNA Negro Slaves plaintiffs' collective federal claim is pursuant 42
U.S.C. § 1982, which provides that “all citizens of the United States shall
have the same right, in every State and Territory, this by rights mean the
Constitution, as “Slaves Plaintiffs’” having the full enjoyment of all 27
Amendment of the Constitution *see Exhibit (B) filed herein Slave Negro Louis
Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712,Pro Se Plaintiff, and “44.5 Million Negro
Plaintiffs Slaves et al “Official Notice of Motion to Strike, and Motion to
Vacate The Entire United States of America Constitution 27 Amendment
as stated by Chief
Defendant, United States of America et al, passage of the 13 and 14th
amendment which required both “Freedom from official Slavery Servitude, of Chief
Defendant and all third parties involved, not herein Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II USN SS # 2712,Pro Se Plaintiff, born on November 8th
1961 into enslavement of Chief Defendant Entire United States of America
Constitution 27 Amendment, as exhibit (C) Judicial RICO Fraud by Chief
Defendant Federal Judge Melinda Sue Harmon,
Exhibit C
declared on this 11th day of August 2016 signed by “Melinda Sue Harmon”, United
States of America Federal Judge as stated as follows:
“The Court has
liberally construed Plaintiff’s pleading with appropriate deference, but
concludes the claims should be dismissed as frivolous.
The allegation
are irrational, incomprehensible, and lacking an arguable basis in law,
apparently claiming that Plaintiffs are literally enslaved African American
Veterans even though slavery was abolished in this country by the Thirteenth
Amendment of the Constitution. Accordingly, the court “Orders that this case is
dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 € (2) (B) (1)
Slaves Plaintiff
and First Presidential Negro Slaves Family (Plaintiffs) and all 44. 5 Million
Plaintiff(s) officially affirmed collectively being under the direct control of
the (KKK) as Facts: Until February 7, 2013, the state of Mississippi had never
submitted the required documentation to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment,
meaning it never officially had abolished slavery.
The amendment was
adopted in December 1865 after the necessary three-fourths of the then 36
states voted in favor of ratification.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/02/mississippi-officially-abolishes-slavery-ratifies-13th-amendment/
This not fiction
Two medical school colleagues, one an immigrant from India, the other a
life-long Mississippian, joined forces to resolve a historical oversight that
until this month had never officially been corrected.
The oversight was
no small one either. Until February 7, 2013, the state of Mississippi had never
submitted the required documentation to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment,
meaning it never officially had abolished slavery.
The amendment was
adopted in December 1865 after the necessary three-fourths of the then 36
states voted in favor of ratification. Mississippi, however, was a holdout; at
the time state lawmakers were upset that they had not been compensated for the
value of freed slaves.
Dr. Ranjan Batra,
professor of Neurobiology and Anatomical sciences at the University of
Mississippi Medical Center, told ABC News he was inspired to investigate the
history of the Thirteenth Amendment in his state after a viewing of the film
"Lincoln."
"At the end
of the story there was an open question about how the ratification process
proceeded," he said. "Living in the South as I do, I found that a
pretty big open question."
So Batra
proceeded to do some investigating of his own, noticing on the website
usconstitution.net, that there was an asterisk next to the state of Mississippi
in connection with the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment.
"Mississippi
ratified the amendment in 1995, but because the state never officially notified
the US Archivist, the ratification is not official," reads the statement
on the website. Batra felt compelled to act to rectify the clerical oversight.
"Mississippi
gets a lot of bad press about this type of stuff and I just felt that it is
something that should be fixed, and I saw every reason that could be
done," he said. "Everyone here would like to put this part of
Mississippi's past behind us and move on into the 21 st century rather than the
19th."
So Batra enlisted
the help of University of Mississippi Medical Center colleague Ken Sullivan,
who took an immediate interest in the story, calling the national archives to
confirm that they had in fact never received the proper paperwork. Sullivan
then took a trip to the state archives to acquire a copy of the bill.
"The last
paragraph [of the bill] directs the Secretary of State of Mississippi to inform
the national archives of the law of the ratification which is exactly the way
ratification is supposed to proceed, but that hadn't been done for whatever
reason," said Batra.
Sullivan took his
family to see "Lincoln," and told ABC News the film inspired him
further to correct this historical oversight. "I had that information when
I went to see 'Lincoln' that weekend, I knew really what I was fixing to be a
part of and it was overwhelming," he said.
"It was
humbling to know that such a big part of the nation's history and a huge part
of my state's history was involved in this, people stood up and applauded at
the end of the movie, the first time I have ever seen that for any movie,"
said Sullivan.
Sullivan then
contacted the office of the Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann, who quickly
agreed to file the required documentation to the National Archives and make the
ratification official. On February 7, Director of the Federal Register Charles
A. Barth wrote that he had received the notification, "With this action,
the State of Mississippi has ratified the Thirteenth Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States," he wrote.
"For me it
was just important that this part of history was done from our state,"
said Sullivan. "I know we have some dark spots in our history through the
south, it still affects people's opinions about Mississippi today."
Sullivan also
remarked on the unlikely pairing of an immigrant from India and a life-long
southerner working together to resolve the oversight.
"You have
Dr. Batra, who is the immigrant and me who is the native-born, life-long
resident of Mississippi, it was a unique pair," he said.
Sullivan and
Batra are thankful the ratification question has finally been resolved; now
that asterisk next to Mississippi can finally be removed.
So We Plaintiff
Slave Negro have a Void 14th Amendment being premature when Mississippi had
ratified the (MIA) 13th Amendment in 2013 and as always a controlling “Lynching
Lying Hostile Whites Only Judicial Republican Fraudulent Judge Klu Klux
Klansmen’s Card holder who could give a fuck about her actual real lifetime
RICO enterprise
“Owner-ship of
44.5 Millions of Nigger American Slaves, that includes her Nigger Slaves President
Barack Obama and Family, as Mr. President Slave Negro Barack Obama Birth Certificate
copy filed herein as “Exhibit (D)
Slaves Plaintiffs
collectively affirm, assert dispute and legally out right officially (RICO) declare
that defendant “United States of America The 13th Amendment to the
Constitution, of the Defendant which abolished slavery, was ratified in 1865.
Lawmakers in Defendant Mississippi, however, only got around to officially
ratifying the amendment February 7th 2013 -- 148 years later --
thanks to the movie "Lincoln."
As this was with
direct continual “whites Supremacy” intent to the Defendant “United States of
America Mississippi “Black Codes” which Defendant United States of America
Mississippi the “only” state substituted the word “Freeman” for “Slaves” aimed
to secured the To maintaining Slavery Servitude direct at the Pro Se Slave
Plaintiff (Hamilton) in his person and all other similarly the same, Negro Race
namely Exhibit (D) the 44th physical acting Negro Slave President of
United States of America and Negro Slave acting Commander in Chief of Defendant
United States of America, born August 4th 1961
into Slaver
Servitude as Exhibit (C) Judgment declared on this 11th day of August 2016
signed by Chief Defendant United States of America Federal Judge “Melinda Sue
Harmon”, Judicial Fraudulent non-disclosure and (RICO) continual denial of enslavement
of the
(Slave Plaintiff) 44th physical acting Negro
Slave President of United States of America and Negro Slave acting Commander in
Chief of Defendant United States of America, born August 4th 1961, Negro Slave
Barack Hussein Obama for 52 years a “American slave from date of birth till the
13th amendment was ratified on February 7th 2013 by
Defendant “Mississippi" and Fraudulent non-disclosure and (RICO) continual
Judgment declared on this 11th day of August 2016 signed by
Chief Defendant
United States of America Federal Judge “Melinda Sue Harmon”, Judicial Fraud and
(RICO) continual denial of enslavement of Negro Slave Louis Charles Hamilton II
Born November 8th 1961 being in direct conflict of legal law and equity and
truth being Present by the Defendant “United States of America” U.S. District Judge Melinda Sue (Furche)
Harmon, and as legally stated this U.S. District Judge with full intent and
direct knowledge and legal expert dealing in law 1000% (RICO) criminal conspire
to conceal to defendant United States of America et al Mississippi Para-Military
Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen direct violation
of
Articles of
Agreement Relating to the Surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia. April 10,
1865., to free said (Slave Plaintiff) 44th physical acting Negro Slave
President of United States of America and Negro Slave acting Commander in Chief
of Defendant United States of America, born August 4th 1961, Negro Slave Barack
Hussein Obama for 52 years a “American slave from date of birth till the 13th
amendment was ratified on February 7th 2013 by Defendant “Mississippi", as
Defendant “United States of America”
U.S. District Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon, officially with deliberate
intent enfored and securing always directed at “44.5 Million Slaves Plaintiffs’
herein Defendant Laws of
The
Naturalization Act of 1790 Passed into law less than one year after the
Constitution came into effect, stating:
the
Naturalization Act of 1790 stipulated that only “free whites” could become
citizens of the United States (Defendant) US Constitution specifies that the US
will value people of color at a mere fraction of the value of its white male
citizens, as Defendant “United States of America” U.S. District Judge Melinda Sue (Furche)
Harmon, officially with deliberate intent enforcing in 2016 and securing always
directed at “44.5 Million Slaves Plaintiffs’ herein Defendant Laws of
The 1890s: Black
Codes Code of Criminal Procedure for the State of Texas, approved August 26th,
1866,
At the 1866 Constitutional Convention, Texans
imposed restrictive laws, known as Black Codes, upon African Americans that
limited their autonomy.
The Codes
outlined a status for African Americans not too much removed from their earlier
condition as slaves. African Americans without jobs often were assigned to
white guardians for work without pay.
The penalty for quitting often included
imprisonment for breach of contract. Other laws prevented freedmen from having
free access to public facilities. Stiff fines were levied against African
Americans for violating curfews, possessing firearms, or displaying
objectionable public behavior (harsh speeches or insulting gestures), “Plaintiff
Negro Slaves were not allowed to testify against whites, serve on juries or in
state militias, or to vote, After the Civil War, of defendant (United States of
America) et al Texas white supremacists in the South as still (RICO)
enterprising determined to hinder any
social or political progress by the Slave Plaintiff(s) Negro/Nigger African-American
populace herein this undersigned
Notary seal date in a nature official 1000%
slave owner(s) of Plantations, industries, business, companies, corporations,
shipping, raw materials, rail roads, Main infrastructure power grid, agency,
private/public social infrastructure jointly from exploitation of said Free
Force “Slave Labor” enterprise for “Unjust enrichment” 1619 - 7th day of February 2013 when the
13th Amendment of Defendant Mississippi was officially legally
declared ratified as described in exhibit (C) declared on this 11th day of
August 2016 signed by “Melinda Sue Harmon”, United States of America Federal
Judge as stated as follows:
“The Court has liberally construed Plaintiff’s pleading with
appropriate deference, but concludes the claims should be dismissed as
frivolous.
The allegation are irrational, incomprehensible, and lacking an
arguable basis in law, apparently claiming that Plaintiffs are literally
enslaved African American Veterans even though slavery was abolished in this
country by the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution. Accordingly, the court
“Orders that this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 € (2) (B) (1)
Yet Plaintiffs
Slaves assert criminal conspiring civil rights violation under the (FRCP) in
this continual (RICO) conspired declared on this 11th day of August 2016 signed
by “Melinda Sue Harmon”, United States of America Federal Judge whom kept for exactly
11th of May 2016 – August 11th 2016 for a total of (90)
days: Hamilton et al v. United States of America et al Filed: May 11, 2016 as
4:2016mc01057 Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Jeffery Tavery, Robert
Vaughan and others
Defendant: United
States of America et al "Chief Defendant, United States of America Congress, United States of
America Supreme Court Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas
Southern District Court Type: Other Statutes › Other
Chief Defendant “Melinda
Sue Harmon”, Defendant “United States of America et al” Federal Judge Obstruction of Justice, Abuse of
Power, Denied 6th and 14th
Amendment rights of 44.5 (Millions Negro Slave Plaintiffs” herein Case (RICO) enterprising
hidden concealed, secret, undercover, invisible, unseen, from Service of
process for (90) days being an essential step in commencing a civil lawsuit
against the Chief defendant RICO “Slave Regime” of United States of America”
whom was never afforded to produce a response or reply to ever..” in 3 months…?
To the “Negro 44.5 Million Slaves having no
legal Citizenship as described in U.S. Docket No.4:2016-CV-01354 Hamilton v.
United States of America et al officially filed on or about 11th day
of May 2016
Slave Negro Louis
Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712,Pro Se Plaintiff, and “44.5 Million Negro
Plaintiffs Slaves et al “Official” filed herein attached Notice of Motion to
Strike, and Motion to Vacate, Defendant United States of America et al, Dred
Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
State of Texas
1890s Black Codes, August 26th, 1866 – 2016 (December), CONSTITUTION OF THE
STATE OF TEXAS, The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA),
The Civil Rights
Act of 1964, (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964), The original
Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts were adopted by order of the
Supreme Court on Dec. 20, 1937, transmitted to Congress by the Attorney General
on Jan. 3, 1938, and became effective on Sept. 16, 1938.
The Rules have
been amended Dec. 28, 1939, eff. Apr. 3, 1941; Dec. 27, 1946, eff. Mar. 19,
1948; Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949; Apr. 30, 1951, eff. Aug. 1, 1951; Apr.
17, 1961, eff. July 19, 1961; Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963; Feb. 28, 1966,
eff. July 1, 1966; Dec. 4, 1967, eff. July 1, 1968; Mar. 30, 1970, eff. July 1,
1970; Mar. 1, 1971, eff. July 1, 1971; Nov. 20, 1972, and Dec. 18, 1972, eff.
July 1, 1975; Apr. 29, 1980, eff. Aug. 1, 1980; Oct. 21, 1980, Pub. L. 96–481,
title II, §205(a), (b), 94 Stat. 2330; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–462, §§2–4, 96
Stat. 2527–2530, eff. Feb. 26, 1983; Apr. 28, 1983, eff. Aug. 1, 1983; Apr. 29,
1985, eff. Aug. 1, 1985; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Aug. 1, 1987; Apr. 25, 1988, eff.
Aug. 1, 1988; Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§7047(b), 7049, 7050,
102 Stat. 4401; Apr. 30, 1991, eff. Dec. 1, 1991; Dec. 9, 1991, Pub. L.
102–198, §11, 105 Stat. 1626; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 27, 1995, eff.
Dec. 1, 1995; Apr. 23, 1996, eff. Dec. 1, 1996; Apr. 11, 1997, eff. Dec. 1,
1997; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998; Apr. 26, 1999, eff. Dec. 1, 1999; Apr.
17, 2000, eff. Dec. 1, 2000; Apr. 23, 2001, eff. Dec. 1, 2001; Apr. 29, 2002,
eff. Dec. 1, 2002; Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003; Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec.
1, 2005; Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007;
Apr. 23, 2008, eff. Dec. 1, 2008; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009; Apr. 28,
2010, eff. Dec. 1, 2010; Apr. 2013, eff. Dec. 1, 2013; Apr. 25, 2014, eff. Dec.
1, 2014; Apr. 29, 2015, eff. Dec. 1, 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment