Thursday, July 6, 2017

Attorney at Law Diane F. Burgess Texas Bar No. 24036594, Attorney at Law David L. Miller Texas Bar No.14067300, 6525 Washington Ave, Houston, TX 77007 (Attorney for Defendant) Joe Czyzyk, et al (0:17-usc-20321) CEO, Board of Directors U.S. Vets United States Veterans Initiative et al.

Attorney at Law Diane F. Burgess Texas Bar No. 24036594, Attorney at Law David L. Miller Texas Bar No.14067300, 6525 Washington Ave, Houston, TX 77007 (Attorney for Defendant)
Take legal Notice pending legal action against defendant (USA) et al UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, Reavley, Dennis, and Higginson, Circuit Judges for the Fifth Circuit with deliberation, conscious technical assistance being under color of law intent further being a “civil/criminal RICO “party” to direct violation of “International Law” of United Nations Global Programme against Money Laundering, Proceeds of Crime, and the Financing of Terrorism (GPML) as Reavley, Dennis, and Higginson, Circuit Judges for the Fifth Circuit engaged directly as “Principles” in Facilitate the concealment of the origins of illegally obtained money of
` Chief Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. on
Notice of Motion for “Change of Venue” pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1404 - Change of venue advance Order to Show Cause and directed all defendant (USA) et al legal proceeding to The International Criminal Court (ICC or ICCt) for (USA) et al hostile violations of their own rules of governing laws pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law Long ungodly extreme gross” Fraud of the defendant “United States of America Judicial Government Court under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects “pro se plaintiff” herein his both person Cmdr. US Navy in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the fraudulent Constitution of  laws of the defendant United States et al, as legal in law and equity each Count(s) as follows:
1.     Hamilton, Louis Charles II (pla) Hamilton v. Cass County Courthouse NDDCE 3: 1998 -CV-00110 date filed 10/05/1998 “seeking” among other things” Constitutional claims as Noted on TV News (plaintiffs) rights to the 6th Amendment of defendant (USA) et al Constitutional, being absolute Judicial Fraud as defendant “State of Mississippi” free all “Slaves plaintiff herein (Hamilton) of  defendant United States of America Slavery crimes on or about February 7th 2013 (exactly) 15 years later after filing of  Hamilton, Louis Charles II (pla) Hamilton v. Cass County Courthouse NDDCE 3: 1998 -CV-00110 date filed 10/05/1998  as such being against “white supremacy government of white only constitution by a gang of criminals “pro se plaintiff” being official ratified in law free by the 13th Amendment of 1865 148 years delinquent as “Once again hostile Judicial government (USA) et al absolute “whites supremacy” GOP Republican Party Judicial forever Fraud acting under color of law working for a “Slave Regime” defendant (USA) et al with no 13th amendment rights in 1998 as “RICO ” The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor), “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957 means nothing to this “pack of  Judicial Slave Master dogs” in dealing government decree of massive “kidnapping” enslavement fraud of the Court in Hamilton v. Cass County Courthouse NDDCE 3: 1998 -CV-00110 clearly (all) Federal Judges) “Black and White” so far direct criminal actions bias in RICO “Obstruction of Justice refuse to separate itself from the Fraud “whites supremacy” GOP Republican Party Judicial forever “Slave History August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 Fraud acting under color of law defendant (USA) et al which under rules of common law, one cannot be Born into “Slavery Servitude” on November 8th 1961 (plaintiff) herein while having 14th amendment (clamed) Citizenship same as special skin privilege “Klansmen  “White Man” as the defendant (USA) et al governing laws of The Naturalization Act of 1790 Passed into law less than one year after the fraudulent Constitution came into effect, being all laws derived thereof Further” having filed (already)  Notice of Motion to “Strike” defendant (USA) et al  (RICO) enterprise by The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) govern civil procedure (i.e. for civil lawsuits) in United States district (federal) as each and every single Rules, established on or about, 1938 , 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006,  in the “Sovereignty Nation of defendant  “United States of America, Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),  “pro se Plaintiff “ in the “timeline” of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) govern civil procedure (i.e. for civil lawsuits)  1938 , 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006,  being not a descendant but an actual slave (Plaintiff) having a cause of action and “merit” not abuse or frivolous of the “Slave Master Whites Supremacy Federal Court System” being in law and equity official Slavery Servitude United States of America ended not in 1865 13th amendment ratification “meaning” Judge loving ruling in “err” We thee Just Abused Negro 44.5 plus enslaved (DNA) “Black Lives Matter” Race back date to august 20th 1619  been denationalized of all “Claimed Citizenship” of the 14th amendment, since date of birth and having no ratified 13th amendment provisions well into the direct year of 2013 as required by said “fraudulent constitution  in Hamilton, Louis Charles II (pla) Hamilton v. Cass County Courthouse NDDCE 3: 1998 -CV-00110 date filed 10/05/1998,  “hostile (USA) et al Judicial court “obstruction of Justice” on behalf of a “Slave” born on November 8th 1961 as the “hostile federal court criminal RICO intent being “criminal err” against among others “Laws” pursuant to defendant (USA) et al own rules of governing laws  Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Motion to Strike  refusal to hear  ” Notice of Motion to "Strike" Hamilton v. Cass County Courthouse NDDCE 3: 1998 -CV-00110 and Notice of Motion (filed) to Vacate Judgment Hamilton v. Cass County Courthouse NDDCE 3: 1998 -CV-00110and for just cause for Change of Venue Pro Se Slave Negro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, in his both person(s) Cmdr. of Defendant (USA) et al entire Armed Service … state, declare, affirm and fully contends, change of “Venue is Proper” against all further “Bias, Fraud of Court of  defendant UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT (USA) et al  “Direct at Pro Se Slave Negro Cmdr. US Navy Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II   

No comments:

Post a Comment