#Supreme #Court +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +Black Lives Matter Hamilton, Louis
Charles II (pla) Hamilton v. Arthur et al 4:2010 –CV-02709 date filed
07/30/2010 “seeking” among other things” why is this “Hostile White Funky
Greedy Crooked Scrooge Attorney” Harry C Arthur Esq. and “The Hole in the Wall
Gang” of Greedy (Attorneys) et al defaming “pro se plaintiff in his both
persons while attempting with the usage of mass media committed to “wire Fraud
among other things (Stealing) just before “Christmas Holiday” from a 1900s (Government
Sponsored) Houston Texas Cathedral soup “Kitchen” involving “pro se plaintiff” (Hamilton)
now forced to be Homeless
(By) Fraud of The
Federal Court involving “Hurricane Katrina corruption of the New Orleans
Federal Courthouse fully $90,000.00 (Zero) balance upon due thereof
“Breach of Construction Contract funds by the Court fraud on being a “party” to
defendant (USA) et al Relief for Housing FEMA missing Insufficient funds
(missing) as contracted out of pro se plaintiff pocket fully $90,000.00 Attorney Willie M. Zander Defendant Rosemary
Dennis, Defendant Walter A. Dennis, Defendant Defendant(s) et al Plaintiff -
Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II Defendant - Appellee: WILLIE M ZANDERS,
Attorney at Law, WALTER A. DENNIS and ROSEMARY DENNIS Case Number: 11-40839
Filed: August 8, 2011 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit,
Now this defendant Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)Defendant Law office of Harry C.
Arthur et al Co- Defendant(s) Marine Building, L.L.C. et al Co-Defendant(s)
being “privilege whites supremacy Esq.” at it best having the full rights to “Texas
Black Codes”, “Jim Crow Laws”, and Never ending “Slavery Laws” of defendant
(USA) et al in 2010 no -less as “pro se plaintiff” physically learn the USA government
been operating at this point with no (dam) 13th amendment to their fraudulent
Constitution, and the 14th amendment being destroyed and “Slavery in
Texas” still never ended, as “white man” just can do what-ever the “Hell” he so
wishes until you forced to “kill him”, as “Negro Abused Slaves” have no civil
rights, in defendant “United States of America et al” and The Federal
Courthouse (really) do not exist, for the “pro se negro race or even a real
negro attorney still the same (Slavery and rule of white man laws only) as
explained to “President Barack Obama”, in 2010 “pro se plaintiff” (Secret
Service) Naval Cmdr. simply after 25 years gone enter defendant State of Texas “air
space” to return home to parents and family, to retire and file for missing (2)
Daughters, and missing dead wife body still all (three) missing 23 yeas
undersigned herein
since 1994 in
defendant strong hold Mormon “State of Utah” as the “Magic White Christian Fine
Klansmen Citizenship GOP World Only monopoly RICO hate crimes for “unjust
enrichment enterprise “Merit” for a real change of Venue to the World Court for
impartial un-bias Judgment of this continue collusion of the Federal Courthouse
in its “protection racket” of each and every (defendant) civil/criminal deceitful
commitment and conspirer to commit to
Discriminatory, Invidious
Discrimination &
Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of
Justice, Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial proceeding with
Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to defendants financial
business survival, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and
possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding ,
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding and Fraud upon a Texas
Honorable District Court, as so legally occurred as stated “pro se format”:
United States
District Court
Southern District of Texas
Houston Division
Louis Charles Hamilton II
Pro Se Plaintiff Complaint
Jury Demand
Vs.
Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)
Defendant
Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al
Co- Defendant(s)
Marine Building, L.L.C. et al
Co-Defendant(s)
1.
Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby files a Complaint with the above Honorable Court and for Cause of Action(s)”
The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court all facts as follows:
2.
The Plaintiff seeks cause of actions for each described Defendant(s) Herein knowing, wanton, licentious, and immoral intentionally committed, conspire, prepare or directed and orchestrated,
Primarily all extreme and outrageous acts and actions in conscious disregards for Violations committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of the Plaintiff
3.
To include but not limited to each said defendant(s) Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Defendant, Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al, Co- Defendant(s) and Marine Building, L.L.C. et al, Co-Defendant(s) herein knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to organize, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and abetting , Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing,
And orchestrated primarily all extreme unprovoked, and outrageous acts and actions described herein with a total conscious disregards for (among other things) Violations by said defendant(s) being committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein;
4.
With further cause of actions Plaintiff will show giving rise to this Honorable U.S. District Court Civil suit filed by the said Pro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
For each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial proceeding with Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to defendants financial business survival, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding , (Aggravated Perjury),
Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts, Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding and Fraud upon a Texas Honorable District Court, among other cause of actions;
All dedicated, devoted and committed against the Plaintiff legal rights as a United States Citizen base primarily because of the Plaintiff race of African American, and base also solely because of Plaintiff Disability, economic & education status
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, bogus sham structure to downgrade & depreciate first the property belong to (Christ) and the surrounding area,
Then second this scheme of the Defendant(s) collectively shamelessly sought to impose permanent closure on the property of (Christ),
Then their after said civil malicious tort having been put into effect, impose and enforce on the property belong to (Christ)
Defendant(s) collectively further sought to apply if needed further full/semi- Hostile course, approach, ploy, device, maneuver and tactic to take further over of the property of (Christ) and to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & )Jachieve property belonging to (Christ Church Cathedral Beacon operation) in Houston Texas (here after name and all interest thereof) (“Christ”.)…(
For each defendant(s) herein financial gain in a “New Retrofitted Legal” office complex & expansion of a Deli”
With the division of all of the ill-gotten pilferage of (Christ) federal, private, donated, funds in excess of $250,000.00 dollars Defendant (Arthur) finally makes with his majority share needed building repairs by way of Painting”,
And finally after “(3) SOME PLUS” years defendant (Arthur) finally can afford to pay to clean the “Mummified human waste (Crap) matter of platter stains on the “Marine Building L.L.C.” on a “National Historic Property” sight in Houston Texas
And or alternatively the Plaintiff will show quite easy to the Honorable Court that the “Chief Organizer” & designer of the “Malicious Civil Tort” and all Fraudulent material facts involved therein;
Defendant (Arthur) having some other hidden third party conglomerate real estate developer(s) company(s) in the waiting position ranks to further take over the property of (Christ) with profits distribution, sharing, and benefit(s) in favor of all the Defendants collectively herein in some form or manner as this organization precisely agreed upon;
With the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) collectively finally having the Professional Ruthless legal repute reputation of having shut down (Christ) at the expense of (Christ) and the Plaintiff and other similar the same as the Plaintiff
And (Arthur) gluttonous, greedy materialistic pockets are effusive abundantly & fully line with gold.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Plaintiff was held secretly against & in opposition to his will, and was to be required in the full participation of victimizations of all numerous phases in order that all of the defendant(s) entire collectively scheme of things was enforced up to the point the Plaintiff being evicted wrongfully from (Christ) and the final scheme of things move forward as plan.
5.
Plaintiff herein file for a Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively wrongful, deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage because of the Plaintiff is a mental disable person or a persons cover under (ADA) American with disability act; to include but not limited to
6.
Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue with false oaths and claims to aid in the scam of the defendant(s) as describing herein this complaint under (RICO) statue,
To include but not limited to the Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant did in fact commit collective violation(s) of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (as amended 1994 and 1996) for fraudulent wide spread media coverage in connection with a “Financial crime”, conspiracy in connection thereof, unauthorized access and fraudulent providing false and misleading “Material Facts Through a protected computer” Media Computer(s), “Internet”, public records and all court: txed via-
All judicial records & Media records, recordings thereof, and access device to provide tremendous amounts of personal/business information which were used in a fraudulent way to fraud for monies and obstruction of justice in connection thereof.
To include defendant(s) collective said wrongful abuse of the computer fraud and abuse act to provide fraudulent public and court records
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public records and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of the Plaintiff economic status; to include but not limited to
7.
Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO Statue), (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public records and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of because of the Plaintiff education status;
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination, & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated as the same race as the Plaintiff herein (African American)
And or those similar minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include but not limited to all person/persons cover against such Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice & False oaths and claims under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s)
The Defendant(s) collectively being most all (Attorneys at law) no less calculated and orchestrated primarily and then prepared and directed, participated collectively each to committing each said “extreme and outrageous” acts and actions bases upon Plaintiff race, disability, economic & educations status to take advantage of the Interest of (Christ) for a scheme In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s action to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
;
8.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein as a Mental disable person and or a other person/person(s) cover under (ADA) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
9.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of others economic status;
10.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of others education status; to include but not limited to;
11.
Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff, and others similarly situated the same as the Plaintiff, to include but not limited to;
12.
All defendant herein Collectively united in a Conspiracy to execute several sham’s of a well devised charade, deception(s), façade, con’s, act(s), and bogus sham(s) structure to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft, and divided Fund of “Federal Funded programs” designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest in "A day center providing hot meals, clothing, private shower and lavatory facilities, laundry services, and case management to people living on the streets of Houston."
To include but not limited “ungodly pilferage” federal funds for Homeless Youth Street Outreach Project which
this program provides case management and licensed mental health counseling services to homeless youth living in the Houston area.
To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” federal Funds for;
Brigid’s Hope
This program provides transitional housing and supportive services to homeless women who have left the Texas prison or jail system. The goal of Brigid's Hope is to reduce the number of women returning to the criminal justice system by giving women the tools needed to become self-sufficient and to secure a safe and productive life.
To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” Federal funds for;
Cathedral Justice Project
The Cathedral Justice Project provides pro-bono legal services to Houston’s street community. To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage federal funds for;
Cathedral Clinic
This clinic combines primary health care and psychiatric treatment/mental health counseling with intensive case management to address the unique needs of men, women and children living on Houston’s streets
By all-above identified Defendants herein cartel, syndicate & combine together in a well “Legal organization” to master mind such collective hostile acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham of fraudulent Misrepresentation(s), of a infamous, notorious fashion
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
In which all was done in a hostile civil tort fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff not limited to other factors
In that the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law no less, in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to; all defendant(s) herein acting in full performance recital, and concert to collectively attempt to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral”.
Which the Plaintiff will further be able to respectfully & “Honestly” provide a lethal compiling of evidence showing venomous contempt of how each and every defendant described herein
“Did not” at any time frame past nor present or future take separate efforts to decline, refuse, repudiate, rebuff, reject, make a effort, file a official protest and simply put just “say no” to their well executed gluttonous, greedy, materialistic individual described rolls in carrying out as a organization(s) of “cut throats buccaneers” counselors of law;
To include but not limited to each defendant(s) organization of “Ill-Legal Eagles” jointly holding steadfast to;
13.
A further sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to Committing in Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of “Private Donation & Charitable” funded programs designated for “Christ Church Cathedral”
Each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff self interest by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham
And fraudulent Misrepresentation in a sham of a well devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
To the extent the Defendant(s) collectively willing to take such legal calculated measures in “court room drama” & “media exposure” risk(s).
In which all was done in such a “Civil Tort” hostile fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff,
14.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of Federal Funded programs
Designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein
15.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain
And or commit to conspiracy of theft of Private Donation & charitable funds programs designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff by Defendants collective acts
And actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein to include but not limited to all defendants herein committed acts and actions of as listed additionally in paragraph (16) below;
16.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that each of the Defendant(s) each herein committed in concert, collusion act(s) and action(s) under the following:
“Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort” for personal monetary gain (with not probable cause and no proper investigations), (Failure to join all proper Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’)
Breach of Fiduciary Duty to the integrity of the Judicial System and to the State Bar of Texas association governing Attorney and Counselors in and for the State of Texas disciplinary codes, the Courts, and to each Attorneys personal fiduciary duty to him/her self professional code of ethics, To wit: each Defendant (s) acted out in a total disregard for such a professional standard of legal care and each did in fact breach their fiduciary duty;
Obstruction of Justice by way of preventing the honest flow of the truth, corruptly or influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede in the truth in all manner surrounding “materials facts” during a judicial proceeding filed in Defendant(s) “Tort” in its entire fashion;
And “obstruction of justice” in Defendant(s), (Arthur) reply to Plaintiff “Interrogatories and request for admission questions” in regards to actual “owner ship” of the deposition conducted on Defendant (Arthur), by claiming Attorney-client privileges and work product doctrine.
Perjury in the presentation of all material facts in official court records in regards to the Defendants business financial dire situation,
Fraud upon a Judicial Proceeding and fraud upon the courts,
Fraud in the suppression of truth to deceive all material facts during a legal Judicial Proceeding before an Honorable District Court of Law
In which all was done against the legal civil protected right(s) of the Plaintiff
17.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court further each defendant Identified above is civilly require to be also charge in Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
18.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant identified above is civilly required to be also charge Assisting and “participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing” to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of’
In which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
19.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to
20.
Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices under (RICO) statue,
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the Defendant(s) willfully, wanton, and aggressively committed collectively “Mail Fraud & Wire Fraud” for the defendant desire scheme of things in violation of and completely under (RICO) statue
To wit: each said described defendant(s) herein commit to Falsifying false material facts in a “Tort” for Harris County District Court records in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to all public records, media broadcast records (Both in print form and Live Video and “Internet publications), and all judicial proceeding records and documentations there involved in said multiple “Mail & Wire Fraud scheme and pattern in a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral for personal future gain
Which said “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme of things also involved to cast the bogus unjust impression of the Plaintiff being totally:
“Nasty, filthy, grimy, grubby, dirty, rude, immoral, indecent, smutty, soiled, mucky, stupid, slow, brainless, dim, unintelligent, unwise, foolish, silly, daft, deprived, meager, destitute, impoverished, penniless & poor before the National Public News to carry the defendants collective scheme of things to first “Ungodly pilferage Fund of “Federal Funded programs” “Private funded programs and (Christ) congregations donations designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest, then defendants collective scheme of things was to next use said “Mail and Wire Fraud”
To devalue the property of (“Christ”), and all of the real estate in the surrounding downtown Houston, Texas area in a “Hostile Real estate development/take over” scheme to include devalue of all property in the area for the future Interest Especially of the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) Interest (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) development;
To include but not limited to misrepresentation of all material facts in this “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme in regards to defendants financial business records, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during a Legal Judicial proceeding
In which all was done while in the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law, in and for the State of Texas, against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff and “others similar situated” as the same race, disability, education status, and poverty status as the Plaintiff herein.
21.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to in addition of all of the above, also Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort for personal wrongful fraudulent gain, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Obstruction of Justice, Perjury, Fraud of a Judicial Proceeding & Fraud upon the court, in which all was done also against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein.
22.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s), in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
23.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to Assisting and participating to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
24.
With Plaintiff respectfully stating before the Honorable Court a further cause of actions against all defendant(s) for Intentional Infliction of Emotional distress and Mental Anguish,
Punitive/exemplary awards, declaratory judgment, special, consequential, incidental, excess, actual, compensatory, discretionary, necessary, proximate, non-pecuniary, future,
And treble damages being levy against each described defendant herein under (RICO) Statue; with full Interest incurred from date of injury throughout both (pre and post) judgments;
For all of which each defendant herein collectively inspire to achieve in an extreme, offensive, contemptible, despicable and outrageous nature which is of a civil/criminal shameful notoriety shocking inexplicable type nature committed against the legal rights of the Plaintiff
In which said Plaintiff never did at any time frame both past and present, “bring about”, “trigger” or being a source of provoke of probable cause
To render such proximate injury to cause the defendant(s) collectively to act against the Plaintiff with such force’ and
Reasoning that the Plaintiff being held accountable for the defendant(s) initially and collectively to take such aggravated, inflamed and incited acts, actions, and circumstances of ill-deeds directed at the Plaintiff in a devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
25.
Parties
Pro Se Plaintiff
Louis Charles Hamilton II, African American Male, Currently Homeless U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Citizen protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; And also minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary State of Texas, P.O. Box 20126 Houston, Texas 77225
26.
Defendant
Harry C. Arthur Esq.
A Houston Personal Injury Attorney
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200
Houston, Texas 77002
Advertisement states:
CALL THE FIRM THAT CARES!
27.
Co- Defendant(s)
Law offices of Harry C. Arthur
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) (Personal Injury Attorney) suite 200
Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200
Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200
Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200
Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200
Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200
28.
Co- Defendant(s)
Marine Building, L.L.C. et al
1305 Prairie Street Houston, Texas 77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) suite 200
(Tenants)
1.AA Quick Bond suite 100
2.Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101
3.Lacey’s Deli
4.Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102
5.Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103
6.Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200
7.The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300
8.The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300
9.Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300
10.Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney)
11.Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300
12.Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
13.Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300
14.F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
15.Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
16.Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300
29.
Jurisdiction
The Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully Asserts the above Honorable U.S. District Court has proper Jurisdiction venue over all subject matters involving Federal Question(s); in which the (Government) is not a party.
The amount of monetary fund’s in controversy exceed the Jurisdictional limits of $75,000.00,
30.
Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Honorable U.S. District Court has subject matter Federal Jurisdiction over all Matters involving:
Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization
Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 152 (relating to concealment of assets; false oaths and claims
"Enterprise" is defined to include "any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity."
Violations of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030, to knowingly accessing a protected computer with the intent to defraud and there by obtaining anything of value and knowingly and with the intent to defraud, trafficking in a password or similar information through which a computer may be accessed without authorization;
Violation under Title VII has been supplemented with legislation prohibiting pregnancy, age, and disability discrimination; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990).
Violations of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964 prohibit Discrimination base upon race, age, gender and sexual orientation
With further committed combine Violations of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986
To include but not limited to all defendants herein collectively in concert, conspire, and committed: Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Fraud upon the court and the Public through the Media
Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
To include hostile Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial preceding with Misrepresentation of all material facts therein a “Tort” in regards to defendant’s collective “financial business/personal survival, endurance thereof, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding to include
(Aggravated Perjury), knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to organizes, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and Abetting, Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing to commit among other things
Fraud against the dignity & rights of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
And take the Plaintiff name in a manner to cheat all legal interest in (Christ) for the Defendant “Master Fraudulent Plans”.
Venue.
31.
Venue is proper before the Honorable Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court in that all parties reside within Harris County, Houston Texas when all incident(s) as described herein occurred.
All defendant(s) in their individual persons and their places of Professional business are located within Harris County, Houston Texas;
32.
Fact(s).
“Houston we have a Problem”…!
Chapter I
(“Hostile Take Over”)
To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful material facts herein before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making declaration under penalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit:
The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) hereafter named (Law office of Harry C. Arthur)
And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) instituted a malicious civil action tort against Christ Church Cathedral Naming the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of actions namely aim to shut down (Christ);
Which capture “News Head lines” as breaking news story local and nation wide through transmitting via device such as newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as “Derelict town” “USA” and the Defendant “Sir Arthur C. Harry Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put a handle on things and toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff to boot.
33.
Media Coverage
Lawsuit aims to shut down homeless shelter in downtown Houston
by khou.com staff
khou.com
Posted on December 7, 2009 at 6:30 PM
HOUSTON—A homeless shelter in downtown Houston is fighting attempts to shut it down.
The Beacon, located on Prairie Street, is run by Christ Church Cathedral.
An attorney who works in a building across the street says all the homeless people are a nuisance and has filed a lawsuit to close The Beacon for good.
On Monday, shelter officials held a pep rally of sorts for the homeless, promising to do everything or is it?
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/houston/843607-lawyer-sues-close-soup-kitchen-2.html#ixzz4mKsttmJa
Southern District of Texas
Houston Division
Louis Charles Hamilton II
Pro Se Plaintiff Complaint
Jury Demand
Vs.
Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)
Defendant
Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al
Co- Defendant(s)
Marine Building, L.L.C. et al
Co-Defendant(s)
1.
Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby files a Complaint with the above Honorable Court and for Cause of Action(s)”
The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court all facts as follows:
2.
The Plaintiff seeks cause of actions for each described Defendant(s) Herein knowing, wanton, licentious, and immoral intentionally committed, conspire, prepare or directed and orchestrated,
Primarily all extreme and outrageous acts and actions in conscious disregards for Violations committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of the Plaintiff
3.
To include but not limited to each said defendant(s) Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Defendant, Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al, Co- Defendant(s) and Marine Building, L.L.C. et al, Co-Defendant(s) herein knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to organize, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and abetting , Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing,
And orchestrated primarily all extreme unprovoked, and outrageous acts and actions described herein with a total conscious disregards for (among other things) Violations by said defendant(s) being committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein;
4.
With further cause of actions Plaintiff will show giving rise to this Honorable U.S. District Court Civil suit filed by the said Pro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
For each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial proceeding with Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to defendants financial business survival, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding , (Aggravated Perjury),
Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts, Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding and Fraud upon a Texas Honorable District Court, among other cause of actions;
All dedicated, devoted and committed against the Plaintiff legal rights as a United States Citizen base primarily because of the Plaintiff race of African American, and base also solely because of Plaintiff Disability, economic & education status
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, bogus sham structure to downgrade & depreciate first the property belong to (Christ) and the surrounding area,
Then second this scheme of the Defendant(s) collectively shamelessly sought to impose permanent closure on the property of (Christ),
Then their after said civil malicious tort having been put into effect, impose and enforce on the property belong to (Christ)
Defendant(s) collectively further sought to apply if needed further full/semi- Hostile course, approach, ploy, device, maneuver and tactic to take further over of the property of (Christ) and to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & )Jachieve property belonging to (Christ Church Cathedral Beacon operation) in Houston Texas (here after name and all interest thereof) (“Christ”.)…(
For each defendant(s) herein financial gain in a “New Retrofitted Legal” office complex & expansion of a Deli”
With the division of all of the ill-gotten pilferage of (Christ) federal, private, donated, funds in excess of $250,000.00 dollars Defendant (Arthur) finally makes with his majority share needed building repairs by way of Painting”,
And finally after “(3) SOME PLUS” years defendant (Arthur) finally can afford to pay to clean the “Mummified human waste (Crap) matter of platter stains on the “Marine Building L.L.C.” on a “National Historic Property” sight in Houston Texas
And or alternatively the Plaintiff will show quite easy to the Honorable Court that the “Chief Organizer” & designer of the “Malicious Civil Tort” and all Fraudulent material facts involved therein;
Defendant (Arthur) having some other hidden third party conglomerate real estate developer(s) company(s) in the waiting position ranks to further take over the property of (Christ) with profits distribution, sharing, and benefit(s) in favor of all the Defendants collectively herein in some form or manner as this organization precisely agreed upon;
With the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) collectively finally having the Professional Ruthless legal repute reputation of having shut down (Christ) at the expense of (Christ) and the Plaintiff and other similar the same as the Plaintiff
And (Arthur) gluttonous, greedy materialistic pockets are effusive abundantly & fully line with gold.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Plaintiff was held secretly against & in opposition to his will, and was to be required in the full participation of victimizations of all numerous phases in order that all of the defendant(s) entire collectively scheme of things was enforced up to the point the Plaintiff being evicted wrongfully from (Christ) and the final scheme of things move forward as plan.
5.
Plaintiff herein file for a Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively wrongful, deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage because of the Plaintiff is a mental disable person or a persons cover under (ADA) American with disability act; to include but not limited to
6.
Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue with false oaths and claims to aid in the scam of the defendant(s) as describing herein this complaint under (RICO) statue,
To include but not limited to the Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant did in fact commit collective violation(s) of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (as amended 1994 and 1996) for fraudulent wide spread media coverage in connection with a “Financial crime”, conspiracy in connection thereof, unauthorized access and fraudulent providing false and misleading “Material Facts Through a protected computer” Media Computer(s), “Internet”, public records and all court: txed via-
All judicial records & Media records, recordings thereof, and access device to provide tremendous amounts of personal/business information which were used in a fraudulent way to fraud for monies and obstruction of justice in connection thereof.
To include defendant(s) collective said wrongful abuse of the computer fraud and abuse act to provide fraudulent public and court records
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public records and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of the Plaintiff economic status; to include but not limited to
7.
Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO Statue), (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public records and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of because of the Plaintiff education status;
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination, & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated as the same race as the Plaintiff herein (African American)
And or those similar minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include but not limited to all person/persons cover against such Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice & False oaths and claims under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s)
The Defendant(s) collectively being most all (Attorneys at law) no less calculated and orchestrated primarily and then prepared and directed, participated collectively each to committing each said “extreme and outrageous” acts and actions bases upon Plaintiff race, disability, economic & educations status to take advantage of the Interest of (Christ) for a scheme In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s action to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
;
8.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein as a Mental disable person and or a other person/person(s) cover under (ADA) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
9.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of others economic status;
10.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of others education status; to include but not limited to;
11.
Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff, and others similarly situated the same as the Plaintiff, to include but not limited to;
12.
All defendant herein Collectively united in a Conspiracy to execute several sham’s of a well devised charade, deception(s), façade, con’s, act(s), and bogus sham(s) structure to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft, and divided Fund of “Federal Funded programs” designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest in "A day center providing hot meals, clothing, private shower and lavatory facilities, laundry services, and case management to people living on the streets of Houston."
To include but not limited “ungodly pilferage” federal funds for Homeless Youth Street Outreach Project which
this program provides case management and licensed mental health counseling services to homeless youth living in the Houston area.
To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” federal Funds for;
Brigid’s Hope
This program provides transitional housing and supportive services to homeless women who have left the Texas prison or jail system. The goal of Brigid's Hope is to reduce the number of women returning to the criminal justice system by giving women the tools needed to become self-sufficient and to secure a safe and productive life.
To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” Federal funds for;
Cathedral Justice Project
The Cathedral Justice Project provides pro-bono legal services to Houston’s street community. To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage federal funds for;
Cathedral Clinic
This clinic combines primary health care and psychiatric treatment/mental health counseling with intensive case management to address the unique needs of men, women and children living on Houston’s streets
By all-above identified Defendants herein cartel, syndicate & combine together in a well “Legal organization” to master mind such collective hostile acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham of fraudulent Misrepresentation(s), of a infamous, notorious fashion
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
In which all was done in a hostile civil tort fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff not limited to other factors
In that the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law no less, in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to; all defendant(s) herein acting in full performance recital, and concert to collectively attempt to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral”.
Which the Plaintiff will further be able to respectfully & “Honestly” provide a lethal compiling of evidence showing venomous contempt of how each and every defendant described herein
“Did not” at any time frame past nor present or future take separate efforts to decline, refuse, repudiate, rebuff, reject, make a effort, file a official protest and simply put just “say no” to their well executed gluttonous, greedy, materialistic individual described rolls in carrying out as a organization(s) of “cut throats buccaneers” counselors of law;
To include but not limited to each defendant(s) organization of “Ill-Legal Eagles” jointly holding steadfast to;
13.
A further sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to Committing in Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of “Private Donation & Charitable” funded programs designated for “Christ Church Cathedral”
Each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff self interest by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham
And fraudulent Misrepresentation in a sham of a well devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
To the extent the Defendant(s) collectively willing to take such legal calculated measures in “court room drama” & “media exposure” risk(s).
In which all was done in such a “Civil Tort” hostile fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff,
14.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of Federal Funded programs
Designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein
15.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain
And or commit to conspiracy of theft of Private Donation & charitable funds programs designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff by Defendants collective acts
And actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein to include but not limited to all defendants herein committed acts and actions of as listed additionally in paragraph (16) below;
16.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that each of the Defendant(s) each herein committed in concert, collusion act(s) and action(s) under the following:
“Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort” for personal monetary gain (with not probable cause and no proper investigations), (Failure to join all proper Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’)
Breach of Fiduciary Duty to the integrity of the Judicial System and to the State Bar of Texas association governing Attorney and Counselors in and for the State of Texas disciplinary codes, the Courts, and to each Attorneys personal fiduciary duty to him/her self professional code of ethics, To wit: each Defendant (s) acted out in a total disregard for such a professional standard of legal care and each did in fact breach their fiduciary duty;
Obstruction of Justice by way of preventing the honest flow of the truth, corruptly or influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede in the truth in all manner surrounding “materials facts” during a judicial proceeding filed in Defendant(s) “Tort” in its entire fashion;
And “obstruction of justice” in Defendant(s), (Arthur) reply to Plaintiff “Interrogatories and request for admission questions” in regards to actual “owner ship” of the deposition conducted on Defendant (Arthur), by claiming Attorney-client privileges and work product doctrine.
Perjury in the presentation of all material facts in official court records in regards to the Defendants business financial dire situation,
Fraud upon a Judicial Proceeding and fraud upon the courts,
Fraud in the suppression of truth to deceive all material facts during a legal Judicial Proceeding before an Honorable District Court of Law
In which all was done against the legal civil protected right(s) of the Plaintiff
17.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court further each defendant Identified above is civilly require to be also charge in Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
18.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant identified above is civilly required to be also charge Assisting and “participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing” to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of’
In which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
19.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to
20.
Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices under (RICO) statue,
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the Defendant(s) willfully, wanton, and aggressively committed collectively “Mail Fraud & Wire Fraud” for the defendant desire scheme of things in violation of and completely under (RICO) statue
To wit: each said described defendant(s) herein commit to Falsifying false material facts in a “Tort” for Harris County District Court records in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to all public records, media broadcast records (Both in print form and Live Video and “Internet publications), and all judicial proceeding records and documentations there involved in said multiple “Mail & Wire Fraud scheme and pattern in a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral for personal future gain
Which said “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme of things also involved to cast the bogus unjust impression of the Plaintiff being totally:
“Nasty, filthy, grimy, grubby, dirty, rude, immoral, indecent, smutty, soiled, mucky, stupid, slow, brainless, dim, unintelligent, unwise, foolish, silly, daft, deprived, meager, destitute, impoverished, penniless & poor before the National Public News to carry the defendants collective scheme of things to first “Ungodly pilferage Fund of “Federal Funded programs” “Private funded programs and (Christ) congregations donations designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest, then defendants collective scheme of things was to next use said “Mail and Wire Fraud”
To devalue the property of (“Christ”), and all of the real estate in the surrounding downtown Houston, Texas area in a “Hostile Real estate development/take over” scheme to include devalue of all property in the area for the future Interest Especially of the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) Interest (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) development;
To include but not limited to misrepresentation of all material facts in this “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme in regards to defendants financial business records, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during a Legal Judicial proceeding
In which all was done while in the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law, in and for the State of Texas, against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff and “others similar situated” as the same race, disability, education status, and poverty status as the Plaintiff herein.
21.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to in addition of all of the above, also Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort for personal wrongful fraudulent gain, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Obstruction of Justice, Perjury, Fraud of a Judicial Proceeding & Fraud upon the court, in which all was done also against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein.
22.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s), in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
23.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to Assisting and participating to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
24.
With Plaintiff respectfully stating before the Honorable Court a further cause of actions against all defendant(s) for Intentional Infliction of Emotional distress and Mental Anguish,
Punitive/exemplary awards, declaratory judgment, special, consequential, incidental, excess, actual, compensatory, discretionary, necessary, proximate, non-pecuniary, future,
And treble damages being levy against each described defendant herein under (RICO) Statue; with full Interest incurred from date of injury throughout both (pre and post) judgments;
For all of which each defendant herein collectively inspire to achieve in an extreme, offensive, contemptible, despicable and outrageous nature which is of a civil/criminal shameful notoriety shocking inexplicable type nature committed against the legal rights of the Plaintiff
In which said Plaintiff never did at any time frame both past and present, “bring about”, “trigger” or being a source of provoke of probable cause
To render such proximate injury to cause the defendant(s) collectively to act against the Plaintiff with such force’ and
Reasoning that the Plaintiff being held accountable for the defendant(s) initially and collectively to take such aggravated, inflamed and incited acts, actions, and circumstances of ill-deeds directed at the Plaintiff in a devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
25.
Parties
Pro Se Plaintiff
Louis Charles Hamilton II, African American Male, Currently Homeless U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Citizen protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; And also minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary State of Texas, P.O. Box 20126 Houston, Texas 77225
26.
Defendant
Harry C. Arthur Esq.
A Houston Personal Injury Attorney
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200
Houston, Texas 77002
Advertisement states:
CALL THE FIRM THAT CARES!
27.
Co- Defendant(s)
Law offices of Harry C. Arthur
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) (Personal Injury Attorney) suite 200
Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200
Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200
Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200
Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200
Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200
28.
Co- Defendant(s)
Marine Building, L.L.C. et al
1305 Prairie Street Houston, Texas 77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) suite 200
(Tenants)
1.AA Quick Bond suite 100
2.Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101
3.Lacey’s Deli
4.Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102
5.Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103
6.Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200
7.The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300
8.The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300
9.Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300
10.Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney)
11.Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300
12.Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
13.Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300
14.F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
15.Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
16.Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300
29.
Jurisdiction
The Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully Asserts the above Honorable U.S. District Court has proper Jurisdiction venue over all subject matters involving Federal Question(s); in which the (Government) is not a party.
The amount of monetary fund’s in controversy exceed the Jurisdictional limits of $75,000.00,
30.
Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Honorable U.S. District Court has subject matter Federal Jurisdiction over all Matters involving:
Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization
Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 152 (relating to concealment of assets; false oaths and claims
"Enterprise" is defined to include "any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity."
Violations of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030, to knowingly accessing a protected computer with the intent to defraud and there by obtaining anything of value and knowingly and with the intent to defraud, trafficking in a password or similar information through which a computer may be accessed without authorization;
Violation under Title VII has been supplemented with legislation prohibiting pregnancy, age, and disability discrimination; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990).
Violations of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964 prohibit Discrimination base upon race, age, gender and sexual orientation
With further committed combine Violations of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986
To include but not limited to all defendants herein collectively in concert, conspire, and committed: Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Fraud upon the court and the Public through the Media
Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
To include hostile Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial preceding with Misrepresentation of all material facts therein a “Tort” in regards to defendant’s collective “financial business/personal survival, endurance thereof, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding to include
(Aggravated Perjury), knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to organizes, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and Abetting, Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing to commit among other things
Fraud against the dignity & rights of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
And take the Plaintiff name in a manner to cheat all legal interest in (Christ) for the Defendant “Master Fraudulent Plans”.
Venue.
31.
Venue is proper before the Honorable Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court in that all parties reside within Harris County, Houston Texas when all incident(s) as described herein occurred.
All defendant(s) in their individual persons and their places of Professional business are located within Harris County, Houston Texas;
32.
Fact(s).
“Houston we have a Problem”…!
Chapter I
(“Hostile Take Over”)
To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful material facts herein before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making declaration under penalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit:
The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) hereafter named (Law office of Harry C. Arthur)
And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) instituted a malicious civil action tort against Christ Church Cathedral Naming the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of actions namely aim to shut down (Christ);
Which capture “News Head lines” as breaking news story local and nation wide through transmitting via device such as newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as “Derelict town” “USA” and the Defendant “Sir Arthur C. Harry Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put a handle on things and toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff to boot.
33.
Media Coverage
Lawsuit aims to shut down homeless shelter in downtown Houston
by khou.com staff
khou.com
Posted on December 7, 2009 at 6:30 PM
HOUSTON—A homeless shelter in downtown Houston is fighting attempts to shut it down.
The Beacon, located on Prairie Street, is run by Christ Church Cathedral.
An attorney who works in a building across the street says all the homeless people are a nuisance and has filed a lawsuit to close The Beacon for good.
On Monday, shelter officials held a pep rally of sorts for the homeless, promising to do everything or is it?
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/houston/843607-lawyer-sues-close-soup-kitchen-2.html#ixzz4mKsttmJa
“Pro Se Plaintiff seeking to include Constitutional claims of
(plaintiffs) rights to the (MIA) 13th 14th and (Bloody Equality) of the entire
Amendment of defendant (USA) et al Constitutional, being absolute Judicial
Fraud as defendant “State of Mississippi” free all “Slaves plaintiff herein
(Hamilton) of defendant United States of America Slavery crimes on or about
February 7th 2013 (exactly) 3 years later after filing of Hamilton, Louis
Charles II (pla) Hamilton v. Arthur et al 4:2010 –CV-02709 date filed
07/30/2010 as such being against “white supremacy government of white only
constitution by a gang of criminals “pro se plaintiff” being official ratified
in law free by the 13th Amendment of 1865
148 years delinquent as “Once again hostile Judicial government (USA) et al absolute “whites supremacy” GOP Republican Party Judicial forever Fraud acting under color of law working for a “Slave Regime” defendant (USA) et al with no 13th amendment rights in 1998 as “RICO ” The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor), “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957 means nothing to this “pack of Judicial Slave Master dogs” in dealing government decree of massive “kidnapping” enslavement fraud of the
Court in Hamilton v. Arthur et al 4:2010 –CV-02709 date filed 07/30/2010 clearly (all) Federal Judges) “Black and White” so far direct criminal actions bias in RICO “Obstruction of Justice refuse to separate itself from the Fraud “whites supremacy” GOP Republican Party Judicial forever “Slave History August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 Fraud acting under color of law defendant (USA) et al which under rules of common law, one cannot be Born into “Slavery Servitude” on November 8th 1961 (plaintiff) herein while having
14th amendment (claimed) Citizenship same as special skin privilege “Klansman “White Man” as the defendant (USA) et al governing laws of The Naturalization Act of 1790 Passed into law less than one year after the fraudulent Constitution came into effect, being all laws derived thereof Further” having filed (already) Notice of Motion to “Strike” defendant (USA) et al (RICO) enterprise by The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) govern civil procedure (i.e. for civil lawsuits) in United States district (federal) as each and every single Rules, established on or about, 1938 , 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006, in the “Sovereignty Nation of defendant “United States of America, Pursuant to:
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), “pro se Plaintiff “ in the “timeline” of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) govern civil procedure (i.e. for civil lawsuits) 1938 , 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006, being not a descendant but an actual slave (Plaintiff) having a cause of action and “merit” not abuse or frivolous of the “Slave Master Whites Supremacy Federal Court System” being in law and equity official Slavery Servitude United States of America ended not in 1865 13th amendment ratification “meaning” Judge loving ruling in “err” We thee Just Abused Negro 44.5 plus enslaved (DNA) “Black Lives Matter” Race back date to august 20th 1619 been denationalized of all
148 years delinquent as “Once again hostile Judicial government (USA) et al absolute “whites supremacy” GOP Republican Party Judicial forever Fraud acting under color of law working for a “Slave Regime” defendant (USA) et al with no 13th amendment rights in 1998 as “RICO ” The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor), “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957 means nothing to this “pack of Judicial Slave Master dogs” in dealing government decree of massive “kidnapping” enslavement fraud of the
Court in Hamilton v. Arthur et al 4:2010 –CV-02709 date filed 07/30/2010 clearly (all) Federal Judges) “Black and White” so far direct criminal actions bias in RICO “Obstruction of Justice refuse to separate itself from the Fraud “whites supremacy” GOP Republican Party Judicial forever “Slave History August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 Fraud acting under color of law defendant (USA) et al which under rules of common law, one cannot be Born into “Slavery Servitude” on November 8th 1961 (plaintiff) herein while having
14th amendment (claimed) Citizenship same as special skin privilege “Klansman “White Man” as the defendant (USA) et al governing laws of The Naturalization Act of 1790 Passed into law less than one year after the fraudulent Constitution came into effect, being all laws derived thereof Further” having filed (already) Notice of Motion to “Strike” defendant (USA) et al (RICO) enterprise by The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) govern civil procedure (i.e. for civil lawsuits) in United States district (federal) as each and every single Rules, established on or about, 1938 , 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006, in the “Sovereignty Nation of defendant “United States of America, Pursuant to:
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), “pro se Plaintiff “ in the “timeline” of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) govern civil procedure (i.e. for civil lawsuits) 1938 , 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006, being not a descendant but an actual slave (Plaintiff) having a cause of action and “merit” not abuse or frivolous of the “Slave Master Whites Supremacy Federal Court System” being in law and equity official Slavery Servitude United States of America ended not in 1865 13th amendment ratification “meaning” Judge loving ruling in “err” We thee Just Abused Negro 44.5 plus enslaved (DNA) “Black Lives Matter” Race back date to august 20th 1619 been denationalized of all
“Claimed Citizenship”
of the 14th amendment, since date of birth and having no ratified 13th
amendment provisions well into the direct year of 2013 as required by said
“fraudulent constitution in Hamilton, Louis Charles II (pla)
Hamilton v. Arthur et
al 4:2010 –CV-02709 date filed 07/30/2010 “hostile (USA) et al Judicial court
“obstruction of Justice” on behalf of a “Slave” born on November 8th 1961 as
the “hostile federal court criminal RICO intent being “criminal err” against
among others “Laws” pursuant to defendant (USA) et al own rules of governing
laws Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Motion to Strike refusal
to hear ” Notice of Motion to "Strike"
Hamilton v. Arthur et
al 4:2010 –CV-02709 date filed 07/30/2010 and Notice of Motion (filed) to
Vacate Judgment Hamilton v. and for just cause for Change of Venue Pro
Se Slave Negro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, in his both person(s) Cmdr.
of Defendant (USA) et al entire Armed Service … state, declare, affirm and
fully contends, change of “Venue is Proper” against all further “Bias, Fraud of
Court of defendant UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, COURT OF
APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT (USA) et al “Direct at Pro Se Slave Negro Cmdr. US Navy
Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II
+POTUS Obama +Hillary Clinton +BRITISH QUEEN +Prince Harry +Meghan Markle +HMS Prince of Wales +British Parliament +USNavySEAL +Us Navy +Tina Fey +SNL Group +Alec Baldwins Forehead +BBC World Service +NBC Chicago +Washington Post +The Rachel Maddow Show +CBS This Morning +ABC World News Tonight +Yahoo News +Donald Trump News +President Donald Trump +North Korea +South Korea +Xi Jingping +Sherlock Holmes +United States Air Force +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +NATO +National Museum of American History +City of New York +BBC Africa +ABC NEWS +CBS Evening News +NBC News +Yahoo News +Jackie Chan +Samuel L Jackson +Black Lives Matter !!!!!!! +MLK jr. +Vladimir Putin +USSR Gov +Russia +Nasdaq +Washington Post +The Huffington Post UK +Art/is +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +National Museum of American History +Santa Claus +Pope Francis Visit USA +The British Royal Family
No comments:
Post a Comment