Saturday, July 14, 2018

(“Defendants”) Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Fraudulent International Published Artifacts” scheme false statements against Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database (18 U.S.C. 1001)


(“Defendants”) Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition, the oldest and largest international fraudulent artifact moot competition in the world, attracting participants from almost 700 law schools in more than 90 countries, all being the same scheme of RICO enterprise “racket” of false statements, fraudulent artifacts,  involves arguing a hypothetical case on issues of international law as if before the International Court of Justice, but with a smaller complement of judges (three instead of 15), while “concealing”
 (“Defendants”) The Confederate States of America March 11th 1861 while the moot was founded in 1960, when (“Defendants”) State of Mississippi never ratified the 13th Amendment while no winners were declared for the first three editions of the competition, in 1960s while (“Plaintiffs”) Negro Slaves herein “enslaved”, denationalization of all legal international citizenship, fully concealed fraudulent by 
(“Defendants”) Philip C. Jessup conspire in violation of Section 2 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 doing so under fraudulent international legal leadership, criminal RIOC enterprise objectives in “fraudulent non-disclosure nature, deceptive and did suppression the truth of “whites supremacy” illegal engaging very fraudulent in production of Fraudulent Artifacts against the (“Plaintiffs”) Negro Slaves actual freedom”, hereby (“Defendants”) Philip C. Jessup conspire all (America History), and (Slavery History) official enslavement (entire negro DNA International race) RICO international scheme false statements against Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database (18 U.S.C. 1001)
subject matter of international law competition when only first open to countries outside of the (“Defendants”) The Confederate States of America in 1968, during the same time (“Defendants”) GOP Political Party paramilitary “Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen, insuring the disfranchisement of an “entire Negro race, Negro Immigrants, fully continuance “captured as property” in 1968
(“Plaintiffs United States of America Union Government” don’t exist… while these fraudulent artifacts, in all (Schools) of Higher education’s concealing “enslavement of the Plaintiffs Negro slaves” even outside of North America in 1970, (“Defendants”) The Confederate States of America fully illegally operating a “scheme of things” dishonorable forever before
International Law Moot Court Competition, when the first fraudulent artifacts “bogus international awards” were handed out in 1972, as (“Defendants”) State of Mississippi”, was not a party to
(“Plaintiffs”) United States of America “Union Government until February 7th 2013 hereby the (“Defendants”) The Confederate States of America first introduction of fraudulent artifacts before “innocents international community” being criminal RICO enterprise, non-disclosure, scheme of “Defendants” Confederate Nation (GOP) Political party criminal intent consciously very professionally being “underhanded dishonorable, extreme fraudulent in all international law and equity appearance fully direct cause of actions before the (ICJ) and (ICC) International Court systems such numerous said “Fraud Artifacts” introduced since 1960s – 2018 (“December”) continuance during
(“Defendants”) Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition, Pre-international era (1960–1967) further hereby respectfully
(“Plaintiffs”) The United States of America Union government “original” (“Plaintiffs”) herein enjoying Strike, and vacate all judgments is adequate under (“The Confederate States of America) FRCP Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ... Hereby further (“Plaintiffs”) undersigned files a joining “Notice of Motion” to Vacate Year Champion Runner-up Semi-finalists Memorial winners No. of teams1960
No Champion Declared———21961
No Champion Declared———41962
No Champion Declared———61963
Columbia University ( United States) University of North Carolina (United States) Overall: Columbia University (United States) 81964
University of Texas (United States)—Overall: University of Texas (United States) 151965
Columbia University (United States)University of Virginia (United States) Overall: Columbia University (United States)161966
University of Texas (United States) University of Wisconsin (United States) Overall: University of Texas (United States) 271967
Vanderbilt University (United States) Harvard University (United States) Overall: Vanderbilt University (United States) 35
Further “Petition” filing before the (ICJ) “Honorable Justices” by undersigned council of record “Pro Se” hereby (“Plaintiffs”) Notice of “Motion to  Strike all fraudulent artifacts, false statements, omission during (“Defendants”) Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition,  “Fraudulent International Published Artifacts” Pre-international era (1960–1967) listed (“above”) further hereby (“Plaintiffs”) Notice of “Motion to  Strike all fraudulent artifacts, false statements, omission during (“Defendants”) Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Fraudulent International Published Artifacts” (“Listed below”) as follows:
Year
Champion
Runner-up
Semi-finalists
Memorial winners[11]
No. of teams worldwide
No. of teams at international rounds[12]
Exhibition round winner (no. of teams)
1968
Duke University(United States)
University of Miami (United States)
Overall: Duke University (United States)
32
6
1969
Rutgers University(United States)
University of Michigan(United States)
Overall: California Western University(United States)
40
8
1970
University of Miami (United States)
University of Kentucky(United States)
Overall: University of Miami (United States)
56
9
1971
University of Texas (United States)
Overall: Vanderbilt University (United States)
73
9
1972
University of Miami (United States)
Overall: Haile Selassie I University (Ethiopia)
99
16
1973
West Virginia University(United States)
94
17
1974
University of Texas (United States)
Haile Selassie I University (Ethiopia)
Evans Award: University of Nigeria (Nigeria)
103
18
1975
Georgetown University(United States)
Evans Award: University of Toronto (Canada)
119
20
1976
University of Toronto (Canada)
American University(United States)
Evans Award: University of Toronto (Canada)
134
22
1977
University of Kansas(United States)
University of Toronto (Canada)
Overall: University of Toronto (Canada)
157
29
1978
Brooklyn Law School (United States)
University of Toronto (Canada)
Applicant: University of Toronto (Canada)
Respondent: University of Toronto (Canada)
154
20
1979
Northwestern University(United States)
Applicant: University of the Philippines(Philippines)
Respondent: University of the Philippines (Philippines)
187
34
1980
Georgetown University (United States)
Applicant: University of Washington (United States)
Respondent: University of Washington (United States)
196
35
1981
Applicant: University of Georgia (United States)
Respondent: Washington and Lee University(United States)
181
28
1982
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
University of the Pacific (United States)
Applicant: National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Respondent: Fordham University(United States)
197
29
1983
University of Kansas (United States)
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Applicant: Fordham University (United States)
Respondent: Fordham University (United States)
206
30
1984
Applicant: Freie Universitaet(Germany)
Respondent: Freie Universitaet (Germany)
197
33
1985
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Applicant: Monash University(Australia)
Respondent: Monash University (Australia)
213
36
1986
Boston College(United States)
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Applicant: Boston College (United States)
Respondent: Boston College (United States)
214
38
1987
Georgetown University (United States)
Applicant: National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Respondent: National University of Singapore (Singapore)
268
40
1988
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Applicant: Southern Illinois University(United States)
Respondent: Southern Illinois University (United States)
265
39
1989
University of Melbourne (Australia)
Applicant: University of British Columbia (Canada)
Respondent: University of British Columbia (Canada)
259
39
1990
University of Georgia (United States)
University of Toronto (Canada)
Applicant: South Texas College of Law (United States)
Respondent: University of Melbourne (Australia)
253
40
1991
University of Georgia (United States)
Applicant: University of Georgia (United States)
Respondent: University of Georgia (United States)
243
42
1992
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Applicant: University of the Pacific (United States)
Respondent: University of Washington (United States)
242
33
1993
University of Melbourne (Australia)
University of Hawaii (United States)
261
43
1994
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
University of Melbourne (Australia)
Applicant: International Islamic University(Malaysia)
Respondent: University of Alabama (United States)
269
47
1995
University of the Philippines (Philippines)
Applicant: University of Alabama (United States)
Respondent: University of Hawaii (United States)
259
49
1996
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Applicant: National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Respondent: University of Vienna(Austria)
300
54
1997
Evans Award: University of Vienna (Austria)
280
55
1998
Australian National University (Australia)
Applicant: University of Hawaii (United States)
Respondent: University of Hawaii (United States)
275
57
1999
Applicant: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium)
Respondent: University of Saskatchewan (Canada)
275
62
2000
University of Melbourne (Australia)
Universidad Catolica Andres Bello (Venezuela)
Applicant: University of Alabama (United States)
Respondent: International Islamic University (Malaysia)
287
67
2001
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Universidad Catolica Andres Bello (Venezuela)
Applicant: New England School of Law (United States)
Respondent: University of Vienna (Austria)
309
68
2002
University of Western Australia (Australia)
Harvard University (United States)
University of Otago (New Zealand)
Applicant: University of Otago (New Zealand)
Respondent: Harvard University (United States)
384
75
2003
University of Western Australia (Australia)
Columbia University (United States)
Universidad Catolica Andres Bello (Venezuela)
Applicant: Universidad Catolica Andres Bello (Venezuela)
Respondent: Bond University(Australia)
481
83
2004
Ateneo Law School(Philippines)
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (Mexico)
University of Vienna (Austria)
Applicant: Universidad Catolica Andres Bello (Venezuela)
Respondent: University of Queensland(Australia)
524
94
2005
University of Queensland (Australia)
International Islamic University (Malaysia)
Universidad de Buenos Aires(Argentina)
American University (United States)
Applicant: Universidad Catolica Andres Bello (Venezuela)
Respondent: Columbia University (United States)
543
103
2006
Columbia University (United States)
Universidad Catolica Andres Bello (Venezuela)
Applicant: Hong Kong University(Hong Kong)
Respondent: University of Kiel(Germany)
565
101
2007
University of Sydney (Australia)
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
University of Queensland (Australia)
Applicant: Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)
Respondent: Washington University in Saint Louis (United States)
101
(7)
2008
University College London (UK)
National Law School of India University (India)
Applicant: Ateneo de Manila University (Philippines)
Respondent: University of Ottawa (Canada)
110
2009
University College London (UK)
Aristotle University(Greece)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)
Applicant: King's College London (UK)
Respondent: University of Sydney (Australia)
2010
Australian National University (Australia)
Columbia University (United States)
NALSAR University of Law (India)
University of Ljubljana(Slovenia)
Applicant: National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Respondent: Australian National University (Australia)
127
(14)
2011
University of Sydney (Australia)
Columbia University (United States)
National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Norman Manley Law School (Jamaica)
Applicant: Universidad de los Andes (Colombia)
Respondent: Xiamen University(China)
2012
Columbia University (United States)
University of the Philippines (Philippines)
Auckland University(New Zealand)
Applicant: National Law School of India University (India)
Respondent: Columbia University (United States)
605
137
Singapore Management University (Singapore) (36)
2013
National Law School of India University (India)
Singapore Management University (Singapore)
Columbia University (United States)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)
Applicant: Universite de Luxembourg(Luxembourg)
Respondent: National Law University, Delhi(India)
632
2014
University of Queensland (Australia)
Singapore Management University (Singapore)
Columbia University (United States)
King's College London (UK)
Applicant: University of Queensland (Australia)
Respondent: Universitas Pelita Harapan(Indonesia)
675
124
Universidad de los Andes (Colombia) (10)
2015
University of Sydney (Australia)
Oxford University(UK)
University of Western Australia (Australia)
Applicant: University of National and World Economy (Bulgaria)
Respondent: University of Pennsylvania(United States)
127
Ateneo Law School (The Philippines) (14)
2016
Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)
University of Pennsylvania (United States)
Columbia University (United States)
King's College London (UK)
Applicant: Columbia University (United States)
Respondent: Columbia University (United States)
132
Universidad de los Andes (Colombia) (20)
2017
University of Sydney (Australia)
Norman Manley Law School (Jamaica)
Applicant: University of the Philippines (Philippines)
Respondent: University of Queensland (Australia)
650
143
2018
University of Queensland (Australia)
National Law School of India University (India)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (Chile)
over 600
145
(14)







#Sherlock #Holmes #Caseof #The #Crooked #Dead #President #LouisCharlesHamiltonII


No comments:

Post a Comment