For The Southern District of Texas
Black Lives Matter
Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand
v.
Donald John Trump Sr. 45th President
United States of America et al
Defendant
Complaint
Plaintiffs, Black Lives Matter, appearing Pro Se Louis Charles Hamilton II, United States Navy Cmdr. Secret Service # 2712, brings this action against Defendant "Donald John Trump Sr. 45th President, United States of America et al,
Parties
1. Plaintiffs "Black Lives Matter" being Slavery Servitude victim of defendant Donald John Trump Sr. 45th President United States of America et al official timeline
August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 upon the Archivist of defendant “United States of America et al
“Charles A. Barth Director of the Federal Register”, acknowledge receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 574 Resolution, adopted by the defendant "United States State of Mississippi Senate on February 16, 1995 and The Mississippi House of Representatives on March 16th 1995, as with this action,
“Defendant”, United States The States of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the defendant “United States"
Plaintiffs are "Black Lives Matter" whom have been criminally by defendant 45th President of United States, and Co-Defendant United States, instituted against "Plaintiffs Black Lives matter any citizenship of the 14th amendment upon which "Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter" collectively having been Denaturalization of all claimed citizenship by the Naturalization Act of 1798.
The Naturalization Act, passed by the United States Congress on June 18, 1798 (1 Stat. 566), increased the period necessary for immigrants to become naturalized citizens in the United States from 5 to 14 year
Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment of United States of America Constitution had been ratified on Feb 7th 2013 ending “Slavery” against the Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter some 215 years after the“Original” Naturalization Act of the Naturalization Act of 1798 being imposed
The Naturalization Act, passed by the United States Congress on June 18, 1798 (1 Stat. 566), increased the period necessary for immigrants to become naturalized citizens in the United States from 5 to 14 year
Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment of United States of America Constitution had been ratified on Feb 7th 2013 ending “Slavery” against the Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter some 215 years after the“Original” Naturalization Act of the Naturalization Act of 1798 being imposed
thereafter13th Amendment of defendant United States of America Constitution had been ratified on Feb 7th 2013, each 44.5 Million Negro Black Lives Matter Plaintiffs, listed herein having been Denationalization of all legal citizenship, which never existed, being “Actual August 20th 1619 – 2013 February 7th “Forced false imprisonment Slaves” never having the “enjoyment of the defendant United States of America Constitution 14th Amendment which was fully defeated in designed by the destruction of the 13th amendment of defendant United States of America
Plaintiffs "Black Lives Matter" Official Denationalization herein “Strike” the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to "any alien, being a free white person" who had been in the U.S. for two years. In effect, it left out indentured servants, Negro Forced Chattel Plaintiffs "Black Lives Matter 44.5 million slaves, and most women furtherance
Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment of United States of America Constitution had been ratified on Feb 7th 2013 ending “Slavery” against the Plaintiffs some 223 years after the “Original” Naturalization Act of 1790 thereafter 13th Amendment of defendant United States of America Constitution had been ratified on Feb 7th 2013, further leaving each 44.5 Million
Negro Black Lives Matter Plaintiffs, listed herein having been Denationalization of all legal citizenship, which never existed, being “Actual August 20th 1619 – 2013 February 7th legally by defendant United States of America et al" “Forced false imprisonment Black Lives Matter Slaves” never having the “enjoyment of the defendant United States of America Constitution 14th Amendment which was fully defeated in designed by the destruction of the 13th amendment of defendant United States of America Constitution and "Black Lives Matter Plaintiffs never having the enjoyment of all 50 States 14th amendment due to the defeated 13th amendment as listed:
Negro Black Lives Matter Plaintiffs, listed herein having been Denationalization of all legal citizenship, which never existed, being “Actual August 20th 1619 – 2013 February 7th legally by defendant United States of America et al" “Forced false imprisonment Black Lives Matter Slaves” never having the “enjoyment of the defendant United States of America Constitution 14th Amendment which was fully defeated in designed by the destruction of the 13th amendment of defendant United States of America Constitution and "Black Lives Matter Plaintiffs never having the enjoyment of all 50 States 14th amendment due to the defeated 13th amendment as listed:
AL
|
December 14, 1819 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 “Strike” the 13th Amendment until ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
AK
|
January 3, 1960 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
AZ
|
February 14, 1912 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
AR
|
June 15, 1836 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
CA
|
September 9, 1850 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
CO
|
August 1, 1876 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
CT
|
January 9, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
DE
|
December 7, 1787 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
FL
|
March 3, 1845 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
GA
|
January 2, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
HI
|
August 21, 1959 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
ID
|
July 3, 1890 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
IL
|
December 3, 1818 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
IN
|
December 11, 1816 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
IA
|
December 28, 1846 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
KS
|
January 29, 1861 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
KY
|
June 1, 1792 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
LA
|
April 30, 1812 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
ME
|
March 15, 1820 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
MD
|
April 28, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
MA
|
February 6, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
MI
|
January 26, 1837 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
MN
|
May 11, 1858 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
MS
|
December 10, 1817 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
MO
|
August 10, 1821 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
MT
|
November 8, 1889 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
NE
|
March 1, 1867 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
NV
|
October 31, 1864 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
NH
|
June 21, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
NJ
|
December 18, 1787 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
NM
|
January 6, 1912 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
NY
|
July 26, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
NC
|
November 21, 1789 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
N
|
November 2, 1889 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
OH
|
March 1, 1803 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
OK
|
November 16, 1907 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
OR
|
February 14, 1859 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
PA
|
December 12, 1787 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
RI
|
May 19, 1790 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
SC
|
May 23, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
SD
|
November 2, 1889 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
TN
|
June 1, 1796 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
TX
|
December 29, 1845 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 185713th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
UT
|
January 4, 1896 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
VT
|
March 4, 1791 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
VA
|
June 25, 1788 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
WA
|
November 11, 1889 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
WV
|
June 20, 1863 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
WI
|
May 29, 1848 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
WY
|
July 10, 1890 Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 13th Amendment ratified on Feb 7th 2013
| |||
Defendant is the 45th President of Defendant United State of America et al, acting both in an individual and official capacity residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington DC 20006, with his personal principal place of business in New York, New York,
Jurisdiction and Venue
Jurisdiction and Venue
This Court already has subject matter over this action pursuant to Louis Charles Hamilton, II Plaintiff- Appellant v. Donald John Trump, Sr., 45th President Defendant- Appellee "Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals" Case No. 17-40068 as Stated:
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712
President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II
Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama
Negro Slave Natasha Obama,
Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016
Plaintiff Rachel Ann Hamilton (Wife) Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal)
Negro Slave Chandra D. Hamilton (Daughter)
Negro Slave Natasha Hamilton (Daughter)
Negro Slave Aaron Michael Halvorsen (Hamilton II)
Negro Slave Craig Robinson
Negro Slave Marian Shields Robinson
Negro Slave Rachel Meghan Markle
President Abe Lincoln
President John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy
Robert Francis "Bobby" Kennedy
Negro Slave Dred Scott
Negro Slave Harriet Tubman
Negro Slave Rev. Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.
Negro Slave Deadria Farmer-Paellmann
Negro Slave Plaintiff LeBron Raymone James
Negro Slave Colin Rand Kaepernick
Negro Slave Plaintiff Petty Officer 2nd Class Janaye Ervin,
Negro Slave Officer CPL. MONTRELL Jackson, 32, Baton Rouge Police Department,
Negro Slave Gavin Eugene Long
Negro Slave Micah Xavier Johnson
Negro Slave Plaintiff Philando Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Carnell Snell Jr.
Negro Slave Korryn Gaines
Negro Slave Keith Lamar Scott
Negro Slave Terence Crutcher
Negro Slave MarShawn M. McCarrel II
Negro Slave Philando Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Michael Brown
Negro Slave Malcolm X born Malcolm Little
Negro Slave Medgar Wiley Evers
Negro Slave Andrew Jackson Young, Jr.
Negro Slave Eric Marlon Bishop, “Jamie Foxx” (“Django”)
Negro Slave Samuel L. Jackson
Negro Slave Oprah Gail Winfrey
Negro Slave Plaintiff Denzel Hayes Washington Jr.
Negro Slave Caryn Elaine Johnson Whoopi Goldberg
Negro Slave Wesley Snipes
Negro Slave Marion Hugh "Suge" Knight Jr
Negro Slave Eric Garner,
Negro Slave Michael Brown,
Negro Slave Tamir Rice,
Negro Slave Walter Scott,
Negro Slave Freddie Gray
Negro Slave Laquan McDonald.”
Negro Slave Veteran Jeffery Tavery
Negro Slave Veteran Robert Vaughan
Negro Slave Veteran Keno Miller
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Avery Brown
“Plaintiff 1865 “Freeman Bureau”
“Plaintiff “Black Lives Matter”
Plaintiff Slave Negro US Veteran Exactly 1.8 (Million)
Plaintiff Negro Slaves 42.7 Million
Plaintiff British Empire et al (Prince Williams, Prince Harry & British Queen)
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave British Empire Immigrants
Plaintiff (allies) Albania, - Plaintiff (allies) Qatar
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Anguilla - Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” West Indies
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Algeria –
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Zimbabwe
Negro Plaintiff Slaves DNA affirm of Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico
- Negro Plaintiff Slaves DNA affirm of Absentee – shawneee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
Vs.
Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. et al
Defendant United States of America et al
Before the Court”, Property of the United States of America, Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964),
USPS First Class Mail 9400 1118 9922 3387 4828 41
Negro Slave Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal through support Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in violation of the law being described before the
“Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to obstruction of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all factual material evidenced before the Court records with supporting evidenced filed in
PLAINTIFFS attached exhibit A-7 herein Hamilton vs. United States of America et al dated the 11th day of august 2016 “Chief Defendant “Melinda Harmon, United States District Judge, denied factual material evidenced, and willfully fraudulent with criminal intent misrepresentation material government records, while scuttling such evidenced that
“Mississippi free all Negro Plaintiffs Slaves in 2013, and now as the “court fraudulent making hostile slave trade claims on behalf of defendant GOP Republican Party Government Slavery in (USA) ended clear back time line of the 1865 civil war 13th Amendment as one
Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in violation of the law being described before the “Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to obstruction of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all factual material evidenced before the Court records with supporting evidenced filed in support of this appeal
“Plaintiffs attached exhibit A-8 filed upon the official court records U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) true and correct copy of the
30th of December 1854 Dred Scott Slave property papers upon being
Property of the United States of America, Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), as said Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. continual to hold governing to this ruling against each and all “Plaintiffs”
In this ruling, the defendant U.S. Supreme Court stated that Negro Plaintiff’s slaves were not citizens of the United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from the defendant Federal Government or the defendant courts. The opinion also stated that defendant Congress had no authority to ban slavery from a defendant Federal territory.
In 1846 a slave named Negro Plaintiff Slave Dred Scott and his Negro Plaintiff Slave wife, Harriet, sued for their freedom in a defendant St. Louis city court. The odds were in their favor. They had lived with their owner, an army surgeon, at Fort Snelling, then in the free Territory of Wisconsin.
The Negro Plaintiff Slave Scotts' freedom could be established on the grounds that they had been held in bondage for extended periods in a free territory of defendant “United States of America et al” and were then returned to a defendant slave state. Courts had ruled this way in the past.
However, what appeared to be a straightforward lawsuit between two private parties became an 11-year legal struggle that culminated in one of the most notorious decisions ever issued by the defendant United States Supreme Court.
On its way to the defendant Supreme Court, the Negro Plaintiff Slave Dred Scott case grew in scope and significance as slavery became the single most explosive issue in defendant American politics. By the time the case reached the high court, it had come to have enormous political implications for the entire nation.
On March 6, 1857, defendant Chief Justice Roger B. Taney read the majority opinion of the Court, which stated that slaves were not citizens of the defendant United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from the defendant Federal Government or the courts. The opinion also stated that defendant Congress had no authority to ban slavery from a defendant Federal territory. This decision moved the nation a step closer to Civil War.
The decision of Scott v. Sanford, considered by legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the defendant Supreme Court, and Negro Plaintiff in 2017 under notary seal affirm this Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 was never overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the defendant Constitution, a true and correct copy of the 13th and 14th amendments being filed into
U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 9 copy of the original 13th amendment and “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 10 copy of the original 14th amendment which never abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the defendant United States to be citizens of the defendant United States.
Plaintiff President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, announcing, being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 11 copy of the original "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and henceforward shall be free.", is fully voided into these proceeding which
Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, never abolished slavery as fraudulent official declared all persons born of Negro Race in the defendant United States to be citizens of the defendant United States, defendant “Mississippi” RICO corruption slave trade free all “Negro Plaintiffs slaves herein on or about February 7th 2013
Exactly before the Fifth Circuit Court of appeals” cause of direct action Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in violation of the law being described before the “Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to fraud of the court acting under color of law of the defendant in continue
44.5 million plus counts of fraud of court records and decree, obstruction of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all factual material evidenced already filed before the Court records, directed at the said Negro Plaintiffs Slaves herein
Plaintiff President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation did factual on January 1, 1863, announcing, being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 11 copy of the original
"that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and henceforward shall be free.", upon which Negro Plaintiffs Slaves assert such freedom official records of defendant “United States of America, being held hidden, scuttled and a party to this fraud against all current supporting evidenced filed herein official copies in support of this appeal some 150 year later of the Plaintiff President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, that said "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and henceforward shall be free.", which defendant “Mississippi” being said rebellious area
PLAINTIFFS attached exhibit A-7 herein Hamilton vs. United States of America et al dated the 11th day of august 2016 “Chief Defendant “Melinda Harmon, United States District Judge, denied factual material evidenced, and willfully fraudulent with criminal intent misrepresentation material government records, being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 12 copy of the original
Defendant State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register
February 7, 2013 The Honorable C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr Secretary of State of Mississippi 401 Mississippi St. P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 Dear Secretary of State Hosemann: On behalf of the Archivist of the United States, I acknowledge receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 547 Resolution, adopted by the
Mississippi Senate on February 16, 1995 and the Mississippi House of Representatives on March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register, being in direct violation of being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal)
“Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 13 copy of the original “Charter of the United Nations” of June 26th 1945, as “Negro Plaintiffs Slaves” fully being Slave Property” and not allowed to vote when said being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 15 civil right of 1964 copy of the original, and being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) copy of the original, “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 16 “Voting Rights Act of 1965”
Cc: Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Elizabeth Alexandra Mary,
Cc: Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, KG, KT, PC, ADC (William Arthur Philip Louis)
Cc: Prince Henry of Wales, KCVO, (Henry Charles Albert David)
Cc: Prime Minister Theresa Mary May
The British Consulate 1301 Fannin Street Houston Texas 77002-7014
USPS First Class Mail 9400 1118 9922 3387 4848 90
Venue is furtherance appropriated pursuant to all actions arise against "Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter" occurred by
Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. acting 45th President of the United States of America directed criminal with intent to all
"PLANTIFFS" BLACK LIVES MATTER some 44.5 Million plus Counts of Libel, Slander, Defamation, Terrorism, threats, harassments, inciting rioting, voting disfranchisement, discrimination, cyber bullying, racial bigotry to be the same unwanted ritual of "whites supremacy" as such in a position of power continue escalated organized hate crimes directed at
PLAINTIFFS BLACK LIVES MATTER to create continue fear from all these verbal threats while still holding economic power over PLANTIFFS BLACK LIVES MATTER installing feeling of continue alienation, helplessness, fear from such continue Liable Plaintiffs "BLACK LIVES MATTER" as "Enemy" and not being welcome in defendant (USA) as stated publicly:
Defendant The White House’s webpage on civil rights has been deleted, just hours after defendant Donald John Trump Sr. was inaugurated as President.
The new White House website went live following Donald Trump’s inauguration Friday, and it contained a bracing message implicitly directed to supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement: Your kind is not welcome in Trump's America.
+POTUS ㅤ +BRITISH QUEEN +Prince Harry +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +GOP +Peace Palace +USNavySEAL +NSA Agent +Central Intelligence Agency +FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION +Washington Post +The New York Times
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712
President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II
Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama
Negro Slave Natasha Obama,
Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016
Plaintiff Rachel Ann Hamilton (Wife) Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal)
Negro Slave Chandra D. Hamilton (Daughter)
Negro Slave Natasha Hamilton (Daughter)
Negro Slave Aaron Michael Halvorsen (Hamilton II)
Negro Slave Craig Robinson
Negro Slave Marian Shields Robinson
Negro Slave Rachel Meghan Markle
President Abe Lincoln
President John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy
Robert Francis "Bobby" Kennedy
Negro Slave Dred Scott
Negro Slave Harriet Tubman
Negro Slave Rev. Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.
Negro Slave Deadria Farmer-Paellmann
Negro Slave Plaintiff LeBron Raymone James
Negro Slave Colin Rand Kaepernick
Negro Slave Plaintiff Petty Officer 2nd Class Janaye Ervin,
Negro Slave Officer CPL. MONTRELL Jackson, 32, Baton Rouge Police Department,
Negro Slave Gavin Eugene Long
Negro Slave Micah Xavier Johnson
Negro Slave Plaintiff Philando Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Carnell Snell Jr.
Negro Slave Korryn Gaines
Negro Slave Keith Lamar Scott
Negro Slave Terence Crutcher
Negro Slave MarShawn M. McCarrel II
Negro Slave Philando Castile
Negro Slave Alton Sterling
Negro Slave Michael Brown
Negro Slave Malcolm X born Malcolm Little
Negro Slave Medgar Wiley Evers
Negro Slave Andrew Jackson Young, Jr.
Negro Slave Eric Marlon Bishop, “Jamie Foxx” (“Django”)
Negro Slave Samuel L. Jackson
Negro Slave Oprah Gail Winfrey
Negro Slave Plaintiff Denzel Hayes Washington Jr.
Negro Slave Caryn Elaine Johnson Whoopi Goldberg
Negro Slave Wesley Snipes
Negro Slave Marion Hugh "Suge" Knight Jr
Negro Slave Eric Garner,
Negro Slave Michael Brown,
Negro Slave Tamir Rice,
Negro Slave Walter Scott,
Negro Slave Freddie Gray
Negro Slave Laquan McDonald.”
Negro Slave Veteran Jeffery Tavery
Negro Slave Veteran Robert Vaughan
Negro Slave Veteran Keno Miller
Plaintiff Negro Slave Veteran Avery Brown
“Plaintiff 1865 “Freeman Bureau”
“Plaintiff “Black Lives Matter”
Plaintiff Slave Negro US Veteran Exactly 1.8 (Million)
Plaintiff Negro Slaves 42.7 Million
Plaintiff British Empire et al (Prince Williams, Prince Harry & British Queen)
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave British Empire Immigrants
Plaintiff (allies) Albania, - Plaintiff (allies) Qatar
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Anguilla - Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” West Indies
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Algeria –
Plaintiff Negro DNA Slave “Immigrant” Zimbabwe
Negro Plaintiff Slaves DNA affirm of Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico
- Negro Plaintiff Slaves DNA affirm of Absentee – shawneee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
Vs.
Defendant 45th President Donald John Trump Sr. et al
Defendant United States of America et al
Before the Court”, Property of the United States of America, Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964),
USPS First Class Mail 9400 1118 9922 3387 4828 41
Negro Slave Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal through support Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in violation of the law being described before the
“Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to obstruction of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all factual material evidenced before the Court records with supporting evidenced filed in
PLAINTIFFS attached exhibit A-7 herein Hamilton vs. United States of America et al dated the 11th day of august 2016 “Chief Defendant “Melinda Harmon, United States District Judge, denied factual material evidenced, and willfully fraudulent with criminal intent misrepresentation material government records, while scuttling such evidenced that
“Mississippi free all Negro Plaintiffs Slaves in 2013, and now as the “court fraudulent making hostile slave trade claims on behalf of defendant GOP Republican Party Government Slavery in (USA) ended clear back time line of the 1865 civil war 13th Amendment as one
Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in violation of the law being described before the “Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to obstruction of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all factual material evidenced before the Court records with supporting evidenced filed in support of this appeal
“Plaintiffs attached exhibit A-8 filed upon the official court records U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) true and correct copy of the
30th of December 1854 Dred Scott Slave property papers upon being
Property of the United States of America, Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), as said Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. continual to hold governing to this ruling against each and all “Plaintiffs”
In this ruling, the defendant U.S. Supreme Court stated that Negro Plaintiff’s slaves were not citizens of the United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from the defendant Federal Government or the defendant courts. The opinion also stated that defendant Congress had no authority to ban slavery from a defendant Federal territory.
In 1846 a slave named Negro Plaintiff Slave Dred Scott and his Negro Plaintiff Slave wife, Harriet, sued for their freedom in a defendant St. Louis city court. The odds were in their favor. They had lived with their owner, an army surgeon, at Fort Snelling, then in the free Territory of Wisconsin.
The Negro Plaintiff Slave Scotts' freedom could be established on the grounds that they had been held in bondage for extended periods in a free territory of defendant “United States of America et al” and were then returned to a defendant slave state. Courts had ruled this way in the past.
However, what appeared to be a straightforward lawsuit between two private parties became an 11-year legal struggle that culminated in one of the most notorious decisions ever issued by the defendant United States Supreme Court.
On its way to the defendant Supreme Court, the Negro Plaintiff Slave Dred Scott case grew in scope and significance as slavery became the single most explosive issue in defendant American politics. By the time the case reached the high court, it had come to have enormous political implications for the entire nation.
On March 6, 1857, defendant Chief Justice Roger B. Taney read the majority opinion of the Court, which stated that slaves were not citizens of the defendant United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from the defendant Federal Government or the courts. The opinion also stated that defendant Congress had no authority to ban slavery from a defendant Federal territory. This decision moved the nation a step closer to Civil War.
The decision of Scott v. Sanford, considered by legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the defendant Supreme Court, and Negro Plaintiff in 2017 under notary seal affirm this Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 1857 was never overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the defendant Constitution, a true and correct copy of the 13th and 14th amendments being filed into
U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 9 copy of the original 13th amendment and “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 10 copy of the original 14th amendment which never abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the defendant United States to be citizens of the defendant United States.
Plaintiff President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, announcing, being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 11 copy of the original "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and henceforward shall be free.", is fully voided into these proceeding which
Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, never abolished slavery as fraudulent official declared all persons born of Negro Race in the defendant United States to be citizens of the defendant United States, defendant “Mississippi” RICO corruption slave trade free all “Negro Plaintiffs slaves herein on or about February 7th 2013
Exactly before the Fifth Circuit Court of appeals” cause of direct action Slave Negro U.S Federal Judge George Carol Hanks, Jr. (born into slavery servitude of USA in 1964), knowingly operated in violation of the law being described before the “Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” did on or about the 5th day, committed to fraud of the court acting under color of law of the defendant in continue
44.5 million plus counts of fraud of court records and decree, obstruction of justice,, and scuttled all material facts, willfully misrepresentation all factual material evidenced already filed before the Court records, directed at the said Negro Plaintiffs Slaves herein
Plaintiff President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation did factual on January 1, 1863, announcing, being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 11 copy of the original
"that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and henceforward shall be free.", upon which Negro Plaintiffs Slaves assert such freedom official records of defendant “United States of America, being held hidden, scuttled and a party to this fraud against all current supporting evidenced filed herein official copies in support of this appeal some 150 year later of the Plaintiff President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, that said "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are, and henceforward shall be free.", which defendant “Mississippi” being said rebellious area
PLAINTIFFS attached exhibit A-7 herein Hamilton vs. United States of America et al dated the 11th day of august 2016 “Chief Defendant “Melinda Harmon, United States District Judge, denied factual material evidenced, and willfully fraudulent with criminal intent misrepresentation material government records, being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 12 copy of the original
Defendant State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register
February 7, 2013 The Honorable C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr Secretary of State of Mississippi 401 Mississippi St. P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 Dear Secretary of State Hosemann: On behalf of the Archivist of the United States, I acknowledge receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 547 Resolution, adopted by the
Mississippi Senate on February 16, 1995 and the Mississippi House of Representatives on March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register, being in direct violation of being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal)
“Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 13 copy of the original “Charter of the United Nations” of June 26th 1945, as “Negro Plaintiffs Slaves” fully being Slave Property” and not allowed to vote when said being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 15 civil right of 1964 copy of the original, and being filed into U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016 Slave Plaintiffs (Notice of Appeal) copy of the original, “Plaintiffs” Slave exhibit A- 16 “Voting Rights Act of 1965”
Cc: Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Elizabeth Alexandra Mary,
Cc: Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, KG, KT, PC, ADC (William Arthur Philip Louis)
Cc: Prince Henry of Wales, KCVO, (Henry Charles Albert David)
Cc: Prime Minister Theresa Mary May
The British Consulate 1301 Fannin Street Houston Texas 77002-7014
USPS First Class Mail 9400 1118 9922 3387 4848 90
Venue is furtherance appropriated pursuant to all actions arise against "Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter" occurred by
Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. acting 45th President of the United States of America directed criminal with intent to all
"PLANTIFFS" BLACK LIVES MATTER some 44.5 Million plus Counts of Libel, Slander, Defamation, Terrorism, threats, harassments, inciting rioting, voting disfranchisement, discrimination, cyber bullying, racial bigotry to be the same unwanted ritual of "whites supremacy" as such in a position of power continue escalated organized hate crimes directed at
PLAINTIFFS BLACK LIVES MATTER to create continue fear from all these verbal threats while still holding economic power over PLANTIFFS BLACK LIVES MATTER installing feeling of continue alienation, helplessness, fear from such continue Liable Plaintiffs "BLACK LIVES MATTER" as "Enemy" and not being welcome in defendant (USA) as stated publicly:
Defendant The White House’s webpage on civil rights has been deleted, just hours after defendant Donald John Trump Sr. was inaugurated as President.
The new White House website went live following Donald Trump’s inauguration Friday, and it contained a bracing message implicitly directed to supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement: Your kind is not welcome in Trump's America.
“The Trump Administration will be a law and order administration,” reads a page on the website titled "Standing Up for Our Law Enforcement Community." It continues: “President Trump will honor our men and women in uniform and will support their mission of protecting the public. The dangerous anti-police atmosphere in America is wrong. The Trump Administration will end it.”
In case it wasn’t clear who and what the Trump administration blames for this “anti-police atmosphere,” the website clarified: “Our job is not to make life more comfortable for the rioter, the looter, or the violent disrupter.”
Given the endorsement Trump received from the Fraternal Order of Police and his consistent praise of police officers on the campaign trail, it’s not surprising that he feels revved up about being a “law and order” president who will defend the honor of the nation’s men and women in blue.
Still, it was chilling to see such unambiguous evidence of his contempt for those who've protested against police violence—and the strength of his apparent resolve to snuff out their movement—appear on the official White House website just minutes after he officially became president.
Still, it was chilling to see such unambiguous evidence of his contempt for those who've protested against police violence—and the strength of his apparent resolve to snuff out their movement—appear on the official White House website just minutes after he officially became president.
How this contempt will be turned into policy remains to be seen. But insofar as the Obama administration was an ally to Black Lives Matter—and it was, if only through the Justice Department’s series of scathing reports on systemic racism and misconduct in police departments in Ferguson, Missouri; Baltimore; and Chicago—Trump has now promised, in his official capacity as the 45th president of the United States, to be its enemy.
This criminal action of Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. continue having occurred days after Judicial fraud of the Court in regards to the already complaint filed on behalf of among others
"Plaintiff BLACK LIVE MATTERS" against Donald John Trump Sr. filed before becoming "President of the Defendant "United States of America et al" alleges of being under acts of organization Terrorization, threats, inciting rioting, promoting, and theft in billions of dollars with real acts of real violence having occurred and lost of life of "BLACK LIVES MATTER by the actions of "Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. as described in U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016
Now 44.5 Million plus BLACK LIVES MATTER "Plaintiffs " collectively as of this undersigned date having additional acts of violence in now 2017 after Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. became acting President of defendant "United States of America" hosting, financing of organization acts of Terrorism, threats, harassments, inciting rioting, voting disfranchisement, discrimination, cyber bullying, racial bigotry to be the same unwanted ritual of
RICO endeavor, and envious hostile 2017 "whites supremacy "to include another assassination attempt upon the BLACK LIVES MATTER "Plaintiffs " Pro Se Plaintiffs (Attorney of Record) herein on January 10th 2017 as stated in the Notice of appeal all being realleges and incorporates all facts in the appeal fully set forth herein.
This criminal action of Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. continue having occurred days after Judicial fraud of the Court in regards to the already complaint filed on behalf of among others
"Plaintiff BLACK LIVE MATTERS" against Donald John Trump Sr. filed before becoming "President of the Defendant "United States of America et al" alleges of being under acts of organization Terrorization, threats, inciting rioting, promoting, and theft in billions of dollars with real acts of real violence having occurred and lost of life of "BLACK LIVES MATTER by the actions of "Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. as described in U.S. Docket No. 3:16-MC-00016
Now 44.5 Million plus BLACK LIVES MATTER "Plaintiffs " collectively as of this undersigned date having additional acts of violence in now 2017 after Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. became acting President of defendant "United States of America" hosting, financing of organization acts of Terrorism, threats, harassments, inciting rioting, voting disfranchisement, discrimination, cyber bullying, racial bigotry to be the same unwanted ritual of
RICO endeavor, and envious hostile 2017 "whites supremacy "to include another assassination attempt upon the BLACK LIVES MATTER "Plaintiffs " Pro Se Plaintiffs (Attorney of Record) herein on January 10th 2017 as stated in the Notice of appeal all being realleges and incorporates all facts in the appeal fully set forth herein.
+POTUS ㅤ +BRITISH QUEEN +Prince Harry +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +GOP +Peace Palace +USNavySEAL +NSA Agent +Central Intelligence Agency +FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION +Washington Post +The New York Times
No comments:
Post a Comment