Cmdr Bluefin USN Sherlock Holmes Legal Page : Criminal Defendant(s) General George Washington. co-defendant Benjamin Franklin, co-defendant Alexander Hamilton, co-defendant John Jay, co-defendant Thomas Jefferson, co-defendant James Madison, co-defendant John Adams,continue breach of contract civil/criminal ongoing Slavery Servitude “Tort” UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, CASE No. 17

Interrogatory 8

Defendant (USA) et al having made Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document “Exhibit E Dunmore's Proclamation Copy of the original official Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document Dunmore's Proclamation upon legal records indicate actual

Proclamation issued offering freedom to (plaintiffs) negro slaves et al Slave Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, pursuant to second and foremost agreement by said “Slaves” pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al counter agreement of a incident of “Military nature upon which collectively freedom was offer as said slave whom agreed to fight for the British Empire on or about Admissions request to admit the genuineness all having occurred

In November of 1776, whereby granted “legal citizenship”, Criminal defendant(s) George Washington. co-defendant Benjamin Franklin, co-defendant Alexander Hamilton, co-defendant John Jay, co-defendant Thomas Jefferson, co-defendant James Madison, and co-defendant John Adams, to be more precise to the point and somewhat redundant as the “legal matter” do in this matter unfolds at the hands of defendant (USA) continue breach of contract civil/criminal ongoing Slavery Servitude “tort” RICO whites supremacy Chief Criminal defendant(s) General George Washington, now acting

“Executive Officer” and “Commander in Chief” of Defendant (USA) et al “Armed Forces”, upon the real legal matter on “appeal” is precisely After Lord Dunmore’s proclamation of freedom for all “enslaved” Negro Plaintiff slaves herein DNA, on the exact day of November 7^th 1776 why if defendant (USA) et al first President of the defendant United States from 1789 to 1797 and was one of the Founding Slave Trade Fathers of the defendant “United States”, upon Chief Defendant President George Washington “Death” defendant (USA) et al explaining in detail how its not a cause of action for breach of contract of military services in 1776 fight for freedom by said “Plaintiffs Slaves agreement” in delivery what is “Now” (USA) et al from “Great Britain” as now in law and equity of epic crimes against humanity, continue force crude free labor breach of contract, scheme of things Criminal defendant(s)

General George Washington, some 23 years later after offer of freedom in this aftermath of “Declaration of defendant (USA) et al Independence 1776 to “counter offer” Exhibit E Dunmore's Proclamation issued offering freedom to (plaintiffs) negro slaves et al thereby After Lord Dunmore’s proclamation of freedom, which said Negro Plaintiff herein DNA not ever descendants but actual continue slave until 13^th amendment fully ratified in February 7^th 2013 slave history “time line” as exhibit

A showing “Plaintiff are indeed military slaves race DNA black lives matter being as military slaves legal in law and equity as RICO property of defendant (USA) et al being such since 1776 “enslaved” troops into the army, of Defendant General George Washington” under false promise, premeditated breach of future contract”, racially, discriminated, and hate crimes motivated against said statue violation before “written” law existed Defendant General George Washington” co-defendant Benjamin Franklin, co-defendant Alexander Hamilton, co-defendant John Jay, co-defendant Thomas Jefferson, co-defendant James Madison, and co-defendant John Adams took legal precise action to bring under “fraud” Negro Plaintiff Slaves herein DNA slaves race DNA black troops introduce under their own will, life and limb in hopes of being free Slaves of equality within defendant (USA) et al

Jurisdiction did join into the army, of defendant (USA) et al defeated British army, of sorts as which the record do indicate, “Admitted” further by Defendant (USA) et al or “deny” actual slavery history of defendant (USA) et al timeline 1776 - 2013 when defendant State of Mississippi ratified the 13^th amendment granting actual legal citizenship as described in “Exhibit A all said Negro Plaintiff herein DNA slaves race DNA being healthy black troops introduce under their own free will in hopes of being free Slaves did join into the army of defendant (USA) et al under fraud by non- disclosure of this contract being never honor, and a life to continue being by force “enslavement” for 237 years from

1776 as this “tort” continue defendant(s) (USA) et al collectively explaining in detail(s) how is it possible Defendant General George Washington” with direct knowledge thereof by collusion, conspire complicity with criminal co-defendant Benjamin Franklin, co-defendant Alexander Hamilton, co-defendant John Jay, co-defendant Thomas Jefferson, co-defendant James Madison, and co-defendant John Adams

Defendant General George Washington” being in the “Legal Criminal Custody” having 100% Physical “Control” and “direct ownership” and full legal possession of (123) Negro Plaintiff Slaves In 1799, as “exhibit” H “Slave Possession Papers” of defendant President George Washington showing exactly the year of his death, defendant George Washington drew up this inventory of slaves at Mount Vernon Exhibit H attached herein copy of the original official document upon legal records indicate actual Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit to the genuineness of said document the genuineness of the text, and dates of “Exhibit H” defendant George Washington drew up this inventory of slaves at Mount Vernon in reference to His will stated that all 123 Negro Plaintiff Slave accumulated after “Lord Dunmore's Proclamation” defendant George Washington drew up Legal action of freedom counter agreement of a incident of “Military Hostile Nature” upon which collectively freedom was offer for giving service of “life and limb” as said Negro Plaintiff slave whom agreed to fight for the British Empire on or about Admissions request to admit the genuineness all having occurred In November of 1775, received said freedom however defendant George Washington he owned 123 Negro Plaintiff Slave were to be freed on the death of Martha Washington his wife

Being in law of defendant (USA) et al very own (RICO) rules of governing “slave laws” a direct cause of action herein for an continue tort breach of contract, enslavement of “Pro Se Plaintiff” herein Louis Charles Hamilton II into the “Military US Navy fully a “Slave” being a direct action for defendant (USA) et al RICO Slavery Servitude violations, crimes against humanity continue “tort” by Chief Defendant President George Washington well whites supremacy propaganda in 2017 False publication defendant (Washington) had been a slave owner for fifty-six years, of not descendant but “slaves” in direct violation of said original offer of freedom by defendant “General George Washington false promise, premeditated civil/criminal fraud scheme of things trickery of actual freedom from defendant (USA) et al Slave System”, criminal actions against the “just lives of plaintiff slaves” dating back well document staring in 1776 as being

Undisputed “Proof” submitted by Requests of Admission defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for further Admissions request to admit to the genuineness of said document “Exhibit E Dunmore's Proclamation admitting the genuineness of the text, and dates of “Exhibit H” 7^th day of November 1776 and the genuineness of a document “Exhibit G The National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) Military Personnel Records DD Form 214, Discharge Papers and Separation Documents of Pro Se Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant herein, being “military enslaved” as admitted or deny “Exhibit A. the 13^th amendment ratification by defendant “States of Mississippi” in 2013.

Interrogatory 9

Defendant (USA) et al having made Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document(s) listed as exhibit A – H attached herein copy of the original official document upon legal records indicate actual Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit to the genuineness of said document the genuineness of the text, and dates as in 2017

Plaintiff as stated by the “Court” ruling in “err” legacy the court:

Hamilton brought this suit on behalf of, inter alia, approximately fifty black celebrities (living and dead), 42.7 million Negro slaves, the British Empire, and thirty-seven allied countries:

Being “HALF” correct the records Affirmed now respectfully before defendant UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT CASE No. 17 – 20313Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant as being an actual Cmdr. of defendant (United State Naval Secret Service) Defendant (USA) et al supply rely/ response order to show cause why you believe that the plaintiffs having not been enslaved during the precise legal event timeline of defendant (USA) et al further explaining in detail why that the time to file the action for being a Slave had passed in 2010 - 2013."

10.

Defendant (USA) et al supply response to order to show cause Explain in detail For the following claimed having been made, past, present and future by defendant (USA) et al a “Statue of Limitation, Judicial and Government Immunity”, and a “estoppels” being a rule of evidence which precludes a person from denying the truth of some statement previously made by (USA) himself". Explaining this action of legal against a “slave tort” defendant Being proper in a legal remedy against Pro Se Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) all just slavery force issues and false imprisonment claims cause of direct actions of force abducted from “homeland” into ungodly murderous “white man” free labor and profiteering monetary crimes against humanity scheme/scam system of defendant (USA) et al for “unjust enrichments” off said “Negro Race Slaves” since year 1619 - 2013

Explain and order to show cause how exactly all “Statue of Limitation, Judicial and Government Immunity”, and a “estoppels” being in law and equity of white supremacy governing rule of defendant (USA) et al legal against a physical “Slaves” in 2013.

11.

Defendant (USA) et al supply rely/ response order to show cause Explain in detail ever act precisely within said timeline of events, circumstances listed below “Plaintiffs Slaves herein and “Pro se Plaintiff” himself physically in law and equity free from being actual in law and equity of “whites supremacy” never being actual “Enslaved” by defendant “United States of America” Slave Codes, Black Codes, and Jim Crow laws and freedom occurred by the 13^th amendment as listed below in defendant (USA) et al upon freedom being rely and respond of a Negro Slave race not at the enslavement claimed rights of law being legal by said “whites supremacy” defendant (USA) et al herein never written Slave Laws, Black Codes, Jim Crow Laws never being their own rules of governing laws (USA) et al and no enslavement was involved during each time period:

Interrogatory 12

Defendant (USA) et al order to show cause explains in detail, supply exhibits if the need may arise. why you each collectively and individually believe that the plaintiffs Slaves (Hamilton) not entitled to monetary compensation related to The “whites supremacy Judicial manipulation government decree propaganda in a imposed fraudulent Statute of Limitations with the defendant “GOP” Judicial Slave Trade Courts RICO framing against “Plaintiff” claim of being a “Slave” as a demand for damages in tort: the defendant statute of limitations, which sets a finite number of years during which a claim may be brought, being most in the Jurisdiction of defendant (USA) Most statute of limitations for tort claims are between one and six years after the victim (or his survivor) discovers the wrongful act by the defendant (USA) et al noting for these “Slave Claims” for these that period of time has not come and gone being fraud of the court and direct manipulation “Pro Se Plaintiff assert Granted, a statute of limitations may be extended if the defendant has actively concealed his wrongdoing which concealing the 13^th amendment never been ratified since 1865 author well into 2013 being cause of action. And it may even be the case that by all rights, the statute of limitations for the torts of defendant (USA) et al criminal actions of forced “slavery” should be extended because Plaintiffs being African-Americans were not allowed access to the courts in any meaningful way for many, many years — even long after the defendant claimed the Thirteenth Amendment was passed — but a court would probably find that, at least by the 1970's, Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter African-Americans can be said to have had reasonably fair court access. And even in 1970s starting the clock ticking then would mean many of the statutes have run, leaving the question for defendant(s) “USA” et al.

Defendant (USA) et al explain why In 1995, the defendant (USA) et al Appeal Court Ninth Circuit affirmed that the Federal Tort Claims Act — which waives the government's "sovereign immunity" having any legal standing against the peace, will, dignity and civil rights of “Plaintiffs” being “enslaved” since the year 1619 and not entitled to compensation for each and every year, there after 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 as exhibit A involving more than a mere political questions claim “bars the court from deciding” the issue of slavery reparations, on a descendant and or ancestors of the 1700s and 1800s an issue that has been historically and constitutionally committed by fraud acting under color of law by the defendant (USA) et al legislative and executive branches.” Yet the “Plaintiff” (Hamilton) assert, affirm in laws of defendant (USA) et al own rules of governing laws applicable statutes of limitations for slavery claims” being fraudulent 100% premature in even the 1900s and directly had not lapsed as defendant (USA) et al Slavery Servitude ended on or about Februarys 7^th 2013 as defendant “State of Mississippi” for whatever reason committed to additional acts of gross negligence; in ratification of the 13^th amendment join the “Union” of defendant 50 State some criminal/civil RICO 148 years delinquent…? Freeing all said “Slave Plaintiffs…? On or about Februarys 7^th 2013 And Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both “person” Cmdr. of defendant (United States Naval Services).

Motion for Production of Document

Defendant (USA) et al You are requested to produce, a copy of a unknown “civil complaint” being assert by the defendant (USA) et al Judicial Court of the Fifth Court of Appeals purported a “tort” claimed made by “pro se plaintiff” Louis Charles Hamilton II herein leading to a judicial decree court official government record that is kept, in defendant (USA) et al “Unknown” Federal District Court USDC SDTX, and defendant Judicial Court of the Fifth Court of Appeals records claiming to made, or used to show said government judicial decree involving VLADIMIR VLADIMIRVICH PUTIN (physical) PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA in said complaint, under a “tort” situation seeking a direct cause of action, involving VLADIMIR VLADIMIRVICH PUTIN being 2017 (physical)

PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA as said “complaint” made in lieu of seeking some action which monetary, declaratory, and direct/indirect compensation, reliefs in defendant (USA) being sought by “pro se plaintiff (Hamilton) herein this “unknown Complaint” being actual legal

Judicial Government decree records of defendant (USA) et al “attest further” government records by official: Lyle W. Cayce “Clerk of The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit” By: Dawn M. Shulin, Deputy Clerk entered at the direction of the court Certified as true copy and issued as the mandate on Sep 09, 2016 in the matter No. 16- 20559

Louis Charles Hamilton II Plaintiff – Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Chief Defendant; United States OF AMERICA CONGRESS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPREME COURT; VLADIMIR VLADIMIRVICH PUTIN Defendants – Appellees, proving said “complaint” made against VLADIMIR VLADIMIRVICH PUTIN PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA, listing defendant (USA) et al admit, and or explained further the exact nature and details Hamilton vs. VLADIMIR VLADIMIRVICH PUTIN (physical) PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA providing the production of originals or clear, readable copies of the said complaint derived from the mandate on Sep 09, 2016 in the matter No. 16- 20559 to be produced at Pro Se Plaintiff’s counsel’s office of record on or before thirty (30) days from the date of service herein. Such request is continuing up to and at the time of trial in Hamilton vs. (USA) et al in three complaint(s).

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(g) (1) (C) and 27 (d) (2) (A), I certify that Plaintiff-Appellant Louis Charles Hamilton II

Motion for “Cease and Desist Order”, TRO “Temporary Restraining Order” “Preliminary Injunction” Rules 33, 34, 36, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Motion for Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions and Request for Production of document accompany, “Order to Show Cause”, and Joining MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE in excess of word count 5200

(1) Was prepared using 14-point Times New Roman font;

(2) Is proportionally spaced; and

(3) Contains 29, 815 words

On this ____ Day of ________2017

__________________________

Public Notary

___________________________________

Louis Charles Hamilton II, Cmdr. USN #2712

Pro Se Plaintiff/Appellee,