Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Motion for “Cease and Desist Order”, TRO “Temporary Restraining Order” “Preliminary Injunction” Rules 33, 34, 36, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Motion for Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions and Request for Production of document accompany “Order to Show Cause”, request all counsel of records upon “Oral Argument before the “Appeal Court Fifth Circuit” to be in law and equity a slave before the court so heard UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT CASE No. 17 – 20313

Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, his Plaintiff - Appellant Negro Slave Family, and “Plaintiffs” Black Lives Matter 44.5 Million plus herein collectively slaves of the defendant “United States of America et al” In the above entitled matter of this “hostile appeal” forced by the defendant “United States of America Judicial Government “District Court et al” RICO Fraud under color of law direct refusal in law and equity justly  
Foremost consolidate, all civil action(s) being ruled in RICO obstruction of Justice “err” now before the Court of appeals (3) case as the Court “err” officially hostile in never even allow discovery of the genuineness of a undisputed document(s) already government records of “Slave Trade” defendant (USA) being fraud of court acting under color of law against a “pro se negro slave plaintiff” peace, will civil rights and dignity vs. the entire USA et “legal professional” Supreme Court et al, Congress et al , Executive Office of defendant (USA) et al as the “Plaintiffs Black Lives matter” collective “Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton a Slave pursuant to defendant (USA) et al forever young own rules of governing laws pursuant Rules 33, 34, 36, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions and Request for Production of document made official answer/reply furtherance  into the records  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT CASE No. 17 – 20313 appeal records Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff  - Appellant hereby propound the following Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document  and Request for Production of document from Defendant(s) USA et al:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy,  pursuant to first and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit D Copy of the original official The Naturalization Act of 1790 Passed into law less than one year after the Constitution came into effect, Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document  “Exhibit D attached herein for examination in stating in law and equity of defendant (USA) et al: The Naturalization Act of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to two years of residency, proof of good moral character, and an oath to support the Constitution. It also mandated that one must "absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign Prince, Potentate, State or Sovereignty."
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy,  pursuant to second and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit E Dunmore's Proclamation Copy of the original official Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document Dunmore's Proclamation upon legal records indicate actual
Proclamation issued offering freedom to (plaintiffs) negro slaves et al collectively who agreed to fight for the British Empire on or about Admissions request to admit the genuineness all having occurred In November of 1775, Virginia's royal governor, John Murray, fourth earl of Dunmore, issued a proclamation in response to information that the colonists had begun forming armies and attacking British troops. Dunmore wanted to put a quick end to the fighting and other activities he considered traitorous.
 Known as "Dunmore's Proclamation," the governor's announcement created fervor among the populace and may have actually helped secure the alignment of many moderate or undecided white Virginians against the British government. The proclamation declared Virginia in a state of rebellion and placed the colony under martial law. But the most offensive portion of the document was the section that offered freedom to slaves and bonded servants of patriot sympathizers and forces if they were willing to bear arms and fight for the British.
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy,  pursuant to third and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit F The 13th Amendment to the Constitution Copy of the original official Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document upon legal records indicate actual declared that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the defendant United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction, further defendant(s) collectively Admissions request to admit the genuineness text, and dates of a document
The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the defendant United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In defendant Congress, it was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865.
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy,  pursuant to fourth and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit G The National Personnel Records Center (NPRC)  Military Personnel Records  DD Form 214, Discharge Papers and Separation Documents of Pro Se  Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff  - Appellant herein attached Copy “Exhibit G of the original official of a document upon legal records indicate actual Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document “Exhibit G Discharge Papers and Separation Documents of Pro Se  Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff  - Appellant herein on or about date of birth Nov 8th 1961 date entry into defendant (US Navy)  1980 March 12th separated date from defendant (US Navy)  February 12th 1982 .
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy,  pursuant to fifth and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit A of a document upon legal records indicate actual Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document “Exhibit A copy of the original Defendant  CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register, defendant State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the defendant United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register
February 7, 2013 The Honorable C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr Secretary of State of Mississippi 401 Mississippi St. P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 Dear Secretary of State Hosemann: On behalf of the Archivist of the United States, I acknowledge receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 547 Resolution, adopted by the
Mississippi Senate on February 16, 1995 and the Mississippi House of Representatives on March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register, further defendant(s) (USA) et al collectively Admissions request to admit the genuineness text, and dates of a document CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register February 7, 2013



No comments:

Post a Comment