Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Clerk of Court: Lyle W. Cayce
Re: Case No. 17-20321;
Louis Charles Hamilton, II v. Joe Czyzyk, et al “Notice of Appearance for David
L. Miller Texas bar. No. 14067300 (Copy attached) and “Notice of Appearance for
Diane F. Burgess Texas Bar No. 24036594 (copy attached)
1.
Plaintiff-Appellant
Louis Charles Hamilton II being “pro se” not
afford by the “whites supremacy” Judicial Government having the legal “due
process” in being a “Party” to determining the rights and liabilities of the “plaintiffs
parties “ having “input” in offering a chance at
“Calendaring
priority” under 5th Cir. R. 47.7, in light of “new, novel, groundbreaking, revolutionary unprecedented event defendant
“United
States of America et al” having never ratified the 13th amendment
and Plaintiff-Appellant
Louis Charles Hamilton II having “been” since 2011 – 2017 past the (hostile) test
for federal question jurisdiction
*see “Franklin
v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227 n.6 (9th Cir. 1984) Reece V.
Washinton, 310 F.2d 139, 140 (9th Cir. 1962) (per curiam)
Further Plaintiff-Appellant
Louis Charles Hamilton II affirm, declare and dispute fraud of court “err” upon
the complaint filed “Plaintiffs” Black Lives Matter” having direct damages,
compensation being “enslavement” against, peace, will, and dignity past “whites
supremacy” forced
1865 “Civil War”
direct at the lives of “captured slaves since years 1619 for statement of a
claim for relief which can be granted
*see, e.g.,
Malone v. Colyer, 710 F.2d 258, 260 – 61 (6th Cir. 1983),
As during these case citing the 13th
amendment of the “Framing Founding Whites Supremacy Slave Master Fathers” of
the “Plaintiffs” Black Lives Matter” herein “arising under the constitution,
laws, or treaties of defendant
“USA” as the
“plaintiffs” being monkey around, bully on “slavery in part and whole adding
the requirement that the “federal question must be “substantial” as the court,
stated up to date in 2017 as follows:
Hamilton brought
this suit on behalf of, inter alia, approximately fifty black
celebrities (living and dead), 42.7 million Negro slaves, the British Empire,
and thirty-seven allied countries. This suit was brought against the
President-Elect and his family, Trump Tower, several defense agencies, the
Republican Party, and the
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. Hamilton seeks to
prevent President-Elect Trump and various U.S. embassies from continuing their
“ongoing campaign of cyberenabled operations” aimed at “attacking critical
infrastructure networks [and] military intelligence services to compromise and
exploit networks . . . associated with the U.S.elections . . . .”
Hamilton also
seeks the release of the President-Elect’s tax information prior to the
inauguration.
Courts should
liberally construe pro se actions, which, “however inartfully pleaded, must be
held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.”
Santos v. Holder, Civil Action
No. H-11-0546, 2011 WL 901842, at *2 (S.D.Tex. Mar. 13, 2011) (quoting Erickson
v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)).
2.
As being
“conclude” by George C. Hanks, Jr. United States District Judge
President-Elect’s tax information prior to the inauguration aimed at “attacking
critical infrastructure networks [and] military intelligence services to
compromise and exploit networks . . . associated with the U.S.
3.
Plaintiff-Appellant
Louis Charles Hamilton II being “pro se” and
official Cmdr. of The defendant United States Navy (Secret Service) assert “Chief Defendant” 45th
President Donald John Trump Sr. having in 2017 already compromised U.S.
military intelligence services Since it’d been a
few days since we (NSA) learned the defendant
45th President Donald John Trump
Sr. had given away information he shouldn’t, as “lose lips” in design defendant
“Donald Trump” recently bragged during a phone call with Philippines president
Rodrigo Duterte that the U.S. has two nuclear submarines stationed off the coast of
North Korea, which goes against
standard policy of not saying where submarines are
4.
Plaintiff-Appellant
Louis Charles Hamilton II being “pro se” and
official Cmdr. of The defendant United States Navy (Secret Service) assert
already President Trump boasted about highly classified intelligence in
a meeting with the Russian foreign minister and ambassador last week, providing
details that could expose the source of the information and the manner in which
it was collected, a current and a former American government official said
Monday.
The intelligence
disclosed by Mr. Trump in a meeting with Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign
minister, and Sergey I. Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States,
was about an Islamic State plot, according to the officials. A Middle Eastern
ally that closely guards its own secrets provided the information, which was
considered so sensitive that American officials did not share it widely within
the United States government or pass it on to other allies.
Mr. Trump’s disclosure
does not appear to have been illegal — the president has the power to
declassify almost anything. But sharing the information without the express
permission of the ally who provided it was a major breach of espionage
etiquette, and could jeopardize a crucial intelligence-sharing relationship.
In fact, the ally has
repeatedly warned American officials that it would cut off access to such
sensitive information if it were shared too widely, the former official said.
In this case, the fear is that Russia will
be able to determine exactly how the information was collected and could
disrupt the ally’s espionage efforts.
5.
Plaintiff-Appellant
Louis Charles Hamilton II being “pro se” and
official Cmdr. of The defendant United States Navy (Secret Service) as the
“court” George C. Hanks, Jr. United States District Judge claiming must be held to less stringent
standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, at what precisely “less
stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers “being submitted
by the “Court” of legal in law and equity standards of one
“Official Slave Negro
born (1964), 51 years a slave of defendant “United States of America et al
namely George C. Hanks, Jr. United States District Judge 601 Rosenberg, 6th
Floor Galveston, TX 77550,
RICO committed to massive
“Obstruction of Justice” whom acting under color of law fraudulent on many
counts dismissed this case in “light” of what “Chief Defendant” 45th
President Donald John Trump Sr. having further committed too as described in
paragraph in addition as what fully
described in the complaint before becoming “President of The Defendant” (USA) as
being “conclude” by George C. Hanks, Jr. United States District Judge Hamilton
brought this suit on behalf of, inter alia, approximately
fifty black celebrities (living and dead),
which George C. Hanks, Jr. United States District Judge “left out the material
facts” surrounding fifty black celebrities (living and dead), are “born slaves”
of “United States of America” by the “manipulation” of the government judicial decree
“slavery History” as before
George C. Hanks, Jr.
United States District Judge, federal questions as stated in the jurisdiction
of “USDC” are legal inquires, on the factual allegations of the complaint are
accepted true, in “light” defendant “State of Mississippi” Join the Union in
2013, freeing all slaves being the test for
Federal question and
statement of a claim for current slave’s Alive meaning,
what is unprecedented: never having happened or existed in the past when
falsely claimed the 13th amendment was completely ratified 148 years
ago in 1865 “Civil War” fight for freedom “Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter”
ordeal
6.
“Notice of Appearance
for David L. Miller Texas Bar. No. 14067300 (Copy attached) and “Notice of
Appearance for Diane F. Burgess Texas Bar No. 24036594 (copy attached) is
incomplete, in Re: to defendant Joe Czyzyk, et al, is listed in case 3: 16 –mc-
00016 Document 5-4 filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 page 2- of 86 Complaint and Jury
Demand ROA – 40068.523 – 607 being before the
Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals Case No. 17 – 40068 Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff – Appellant
v. Donald John Trump, Sr., 45th President, Defendant as both
David L. Miller Texas Bar.
No. 14067300 and Diane F. Burgess Texas Bar No. 24036594 “Not being forth
right” fully lacking judicious and quite shameful legally in law and
equity of defendant own rules of governing laws David L. Miller Texas bar. No.
14067300 and
Diane F. Burgess Texas
Bar No. 24036594 “not truthful” as “Exhibit” A Truth be told
should clear these precise matter before the before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 17-
20321, being defendant(s)
Joe Czyzyk, et al, is
listed in case 3: 16 –mc- 00016 “elementary”
having previous legal engagements
pending (Now) before Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 17- 40068 of a high
missing 13th amendment ratification nature continue fraud,
non-disclosure, acts involving “unjust enrichment” prosperity in physical
“slavery” crimes against humanity against
“Plaintiffs Black Lives Matter Active and Plaintiff past Vets
Slaves herein concerned with the live
ongoing racial terrorization, domination, fraud of Judicial Government “Holocaust of a gang of systematic GOP Political
party individuals elite being unfetter secured in execution of any and all RICO
crimes endeavor against defendant very own law.
7
Clerk
of Court: Lyle W. Cayce please find the number and style of the related
case now pending before the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals “exhibit B” attached herein involving “Not being forth right” fully
lacking “judicious and quite shameful”
legally in law and equity of defendant own rules of governing laws
David
L. Miller Texas Bar. No. 14067300 and Diane F. Burgess Texas Bar No. 24036594 “not truthful” as
“Exhibit” A Truth be told as to any such case now
pending in the court, which involves the same, substantially the same, similar
or related issue (s), which also there is this addition matter before the
District Court within the Circuit would like in
corruption acting under color of law appeal to Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals,
which “Amend Complaint” having just recent being filed
In The United States District Court
For The Southern District of Texas
Black
Lives Matter
Plaintiffs
Amend Complaint and Jury Demand
Vs. U.S. Docket No.
3:17-MC-00003
Donald
John Trump Sr. 45th President
(Chief
Defendant)
Co-
Defendant(s)
U.S.
Government Publishing Office
732 North Capitol St NW, Washington, DC 20401
Co-
Defendant(s)
U.S.
Federal Senior Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt
United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Co-
Defendant(s)
U.S.
Federal George C. Hanks, Jr.
United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
601
Rosenberg, 6th Floor Galveston, TX 77550.
Co- Defendant(s)
Clerk of
Court Lyle W. Cayce et al
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT 600 S. Maestri Place New Orleans,
La 70130
Co- Defendant(s)
Clerk of Court David J. Bradley, et
al United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas. 515 Rusk St, Houston, TX 77002
Co-
Defendant(s)
United
States of America et al Defendant(s)
Clerk of
Court Lyle W. Cayce et al Plaintiff-Appellant Louis Charles Hamilton II being “pro se” seeks a “Calendaring priority” date
and hearing for “Oral Arguments” if need be the case under 5th Cir.
R. 47.7, in light of “new”, “novel”, RICO “groundbreaking”, “revolutionary unprecedented slavery events” defendant “United
States of America et al” “defendant
GOP Republican Party and their (KKK) Para-Military “whites
supremacy” fools having never completed the ratified freedom ending to all
“Black Lives Matter” a/k/a slaves of the 13th amendment of the USA
Constitution back in 1865, further
Joe
Czyzyk, et al Joe Czyzyk, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer of United States Veterans Initiative; United States Veterans
United States Veterans Initiative, et al, Chief Defendant; United States
Veterans Initiative, et al, United States Veterans Houston @ The DeGeorge ;
United States Veterans Services Center “Employee” John Doe One; United States
Veterans Services Center “Employee”, John Doe Two; United States Veterans
United States Veterans Initiative, et al,
Program Manager “Rex Marsav”; United States Veterans Service
Center Coordinator, Melissia Whitley”;
United States Veteran Service Center, Linda Adewole” B.A.;
United States Veterans Service Center “Employee” Jane Doe Three; United States
Veterans Service Center “Employee” John Doe Four; United States Veterans Service
Center “Employee” John Doe Five; United States Veterans Houston at the
Degeorge,
Being joined to the records Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Case No. 17 – 40068 Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff – Appellant v. Donald
John Trump, Sr., 45th President, Defendant in addition case and
style No. 17- 20313: Louis Charles Hamilton, II vs. United States of America,
et al,.
Certificate
of Mailing Service
CC: Attorney at Law Diane F. Burgess Texas Bar No.
24036594
CC: Attorney at Law David L. Miller Texas bar. No.
14067300
MILLER, SCAMARDI AND
CARRABBA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 6525 Washington Avenue Houston Texas,
77007 – 2112 is the correct mailing address on record with
UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, and a true and correct copy of each document(s) and
attached exhibit(s) described herein having been produce to said
Attorney at Law Diane
F. Burgess Texas Bar No. 24036594 Attorney at Law David L. Miller Texas bar.
No. 14067300
Submitted:
On this ____
Day of ________2017
___________________________
Public
Notary
Respectfully
__________________________________________
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
Cmdr. (USN), Secret Service # 2712
832-894-9465 832-344-7134
2724 61st street Ste. I-B Galveston, Texas. 77551
Cc: Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Elizabeth
Alexandra Mary,
Cc: Prince William,
Duke of Cambridge, KG, KT, PC, ADC (William Arthur Philip Louis)
Cc: Prince Henry of
Wales, KCVO, (Henry Charles Albert David)
Cc: Prime Minister
Theresa Mary May
The British Consulate 1301 Fannin Street
Houston Texas 77002-7014
+POTUS ㅤ +BRITISH QUEEN +Prince Harry +Meghan Markle +FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION +NSA Agent +Central Intelligence Agency +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +NATO +British Parliament +Donald Trump News +Hillary Clinton
No comments:
Post a Comment