Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both
person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, his Plaintiff - Appellant Negro Slave Family,
and “Plaintiffs” Black Lives Matter 44.5 Million plus herein collectively
slaves
of the defendant “United States of America et al” In
the above entitled matter of this “hostile appeal” forced by the defendant “United
States of America Judicial Government “District Court et al” RICO Fraud under
color of law direct refusal in law and equity justly
Foremost consolidate, all civil action(s) being ruled in RICO
obstruction of Justice “err” now before the Court of appeals (3) case as the
Court “err” officially hostile in never even allow discovery of the genuineness
of a undisputed document(s) already government records of “Slave Trade”
defendant (USA) being fraud of court acting under color of law against a “pro
se negro slave plaintiff” peace, will civil rights and dignity vs. the entire
USA et “legal professional” Supreme Court et al, Congress et al , Executive
Office of defendant (USA) et al as the “Plaintiffs Black Lives matter”
collective “Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton a Slave pursuant to defendant
(USA) et al forever young own rules of governing laws pursuant Rules 33, 34,
36, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Interrogatories, Requests
for Admissions and Request for Production of document made official answer/reply
furtherance into the records UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT
CASE No. 17 – 20313 appeal records Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant hereby
propound the following Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of a document and Request for Production of
document from Defendant(s) USA et al:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both
person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, pursuant
to first and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit D Copy of the
original official The Naturalization Act of 1790 Passed into law less than one
year after the Constitution came into effect, Requests
defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of a document “Exhibit D attached herein for
examination in stating in law and equity of defendant (USA) et al: The
Naturalization Act of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to two years of
residency, proof of good moral character, and an oath to support the
Constitution. It also mandated that one must "absolutely and entirely
renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign Prince,
Potentate, State or Sovereignty."
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both
person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, pursuant
to second and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit E Dunmore's
Proclamation Copy of the original official
Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions
request to
admit the genuineness of a document Dunmore's Proclamation upon
legal records indicate actual
Proclamation
issued offering freedom to (plaintiffs) negro slaves et al collectively who
agreed to fight for the British Empire on or about
Admissions request to admit the genuineness all having
occurred In November of 1775, Virginia's royal governor, John Murray, fourth
earl of Dunmore, issued a proclamation in response to information that the
colonists had begun forming armies and attacking British troops. Dunmore wanted
to put a quick end to the fighting and other activities he considered
traitorous.
Known as "Dunmore's Proclamation,"
the governor's announcement created fervor among the populace and may have
actually helped secure the alignment of many moderate or undecided white
Virginians against the British government. The proclamation declared Virginia
in a state of rebellion and placed the colony under martial law. But the most
offensive portion of the document was the section that offered freedom to
slaves and bonded servants of patriot sympathizers and forces if they were
willing to bear arms and fight for the British.
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both
person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, pursuant
to third and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit F The 13th Amendment to the Constitution Copy
of the original official Requests defendant
(USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of a document upon legal records indicate actual declared
that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within
the defendant United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction,
further defendant(s) collectively Admissions
request to
admit the genuineness text, and dates of a document
The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the
defendant United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary
servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In defendant Congress, it was
passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865.
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both
person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, pursuant
to fourth and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit G The National Personnel Records Center
(NPRC) Military Personnel Records DD Form 214, Discharge Papers and Separation
Documents of Pro Se Louis
Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff -
Appellant herein attached Copy “Exhibit G of the original
official of a document upon legal records
indicate actual Requests defendant (USA) et al
collectively and individually for Admissions request to admit the
genuineness of a document “Exhibit G Discharge Papers and Separation
Documents of Pro Se Louis
Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff -
Appellant herein on or about date of birth Nov 8th
1961 date entry into defendant (US Navy)
1980 March 12th separated date from defendant (US Navy) February 12th 1982 .
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff - Appellant in his both
person(s) Cmdr. OF DEFENDANT US Navy, pursuant
to fifth and foremost pursuant to Defendant (USA) et al “Exhibit A
of a document upon legal records indicate actual
Requests defendant (USA) et al collectively and
individually for Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document
“Exhibit
A copy of the original Defendant CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal
Register, defendant State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the
Constitution of the defendant United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH
Director of the Federal Register
February
7, 2013 The Honorable C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr Secretary of State of Mississippi
401 Mississippi St. P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 Dear Secretary of State
Hosemann: On behalf of the Archivist of the United States, I acknowledge
receipt of Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 547 Resolution, adopted by the
Mississippi
Senate on February 16, 1995 and the Mississippi House of Representatives on
March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the
13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ~ Sincerely, CHARLES
A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register, further
defendant(s) (USA) et al collectively Admissions
request to
admit the genuineness text, and dates of a document
CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register February 7, 2013
Plaintiffs’
motion to compel answers to Interrogatory with documents exhibit(s) A –G
attached herein defendant(s) (USA) et al collectively
having made Admissions
request to
admit the genuineness text, and dates of a document(s) exhibit(s)
A –G
Instructions
1.
Unless otherwise specified, these interrogatories are limited to the time
period from 1776 – 2013, to and including the date of service of these
interrogatories.
2.
Unless otherwise specified, the information called for by these interrogatories
is limited in scope to information relating to “Slavery, Enslaving free labor Constitution amendments decree, proclamations
fully published supplying,
manufacturing, distributing, selling, or advertising or promoting propaganda by
defendant the United States as the information called for includes all
information in your possession, custody or control maintained in both the
United States or in any other country.
3.
Where knowledge, information, or documents are requested, such request
encompasses knowledge, information or documents in your possession, custody or
control, or in the possession, custody or control of your staff, agents,
employees, representatives and, unless privileged, attorneys, or any other
person who has possession, custody or control of your proprietary knowledge,
information or documents.
4.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e), you are under a duty seasonably to amend any
answer to these interrogatories for which you learn that the answer is in some
material respect incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective
information has not otherwise been made known to pro se plaintiff (Hamilton)
5.
For any interrogatory or part of an interrogatory which you refuse to answer
under a claim of privilege, submit a sworn or certified statement from your
counsel which you identify the nature of the information withheld; specify the
grounds of the claimed privilege and the paragraph of these interrogatories to
which the information is responsive; and identify each person to whom the
information, or any part thereof, has been disclosed.
6.
Answer each interrogatory fully. If you object to any interrogatory, state the
reasons for objection and answer to the extent the interrogatory is not
objectionable. If you are unable to answer an interrogatory fully, submit as
much information as is available, explain why your answer is incomplete, and
identify or describe all other sources of more complete or accurate
information.
7.
For any record or document responsive or relating to these interrogatories
which is known to have been destroyed or lost, or is otherwise unavailable,
identify each such document by author, addressee, date, number of pages, and
subject matter; and explain in detail the events leading to the destruction or
loss, or the reason for the unavailability of such document.
8.
No agreement, understanding, or stipulation by the defendant (USA) et al its
legal Department of Justice or any of its representatives purporting to modify,
limit, or otherwise vary these interrogatories shall be valid or binding on the
defendant (USA) et al its legal Department of Justice unless confirmed or
acknowledged in writing (or made of record in open court) by a duly authorized
representative thereof.
Defendant (USA) et al please
set forth the factual basis for your defenses of:
Interrogatory 1
Defendant (USA) et al why you
believe that the plaintiffs having failure to state a
claim; in Hamilton vs. United States of America et al US Docket No. 1: 2010
–CV-00808 including all Federal case (Hamilton)
filed from the time frame 2011 –
February 5th 2013 * Hamilton vs. North Texas State Hospital et al 7
: 2012 –CV-00053 as defendant(USA)
et al Slavery Servitude ended on or
about feburary 7th 2013 as defendant State of Mississippi for
whatever reason committed to additional acts of gross negligence; in
ratification of the 13th amendment join the “Union” of defendant 50
State some criminal/civil RICO 148 years delinquent..?
Interrogatory 2
why you believe that the plaintiffs
having a statute of limitations imposed in 2011 as defendant(USA) et al Slavery Servitude ended on or about feburary 7th
2013 as defendant State of Mississippi for whatever reason committed to
additional acts of gross negligence; in ratification of the 13th
amendment join the “Union” of defendant 50 State some criminal/civil RICO 148
years delinquent…?
Interrogatory 3
Defendant (USA) et al why you
believe that the plaintiffs Slaves not entitled to monetary compensation related
to the claimed of defendant (USA) et al OFFICIAL Slavery Servitude timeline 1619 physically ended
in 2013 as defendant State of Mississippi for whatever reason committed to
additional acts of gross negligence; in ratification of the 13th amendment
148 years delinquent “Joining” the defendant 50th state as a
complete “Union” what called United States of America et al
Interrogatory 4
Defendant (USA) et al what evidence you intend to offer on
either of these subjects;
Interrogatory 5
Defendant (USA) et al And if the evidence is in the form of
expert testimony, what expert will so testify, giving a summary of the opinion,
as well as the basis for that opinion.
Interrogatory 6
Defendant (USA) et al Having made Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of a document “Exhibit G Discharge
Papers and Separation Documents of Pro Se Louis
Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff -
Appellant herein on or about date of birth Nov 8th
1961 date entry into defendant (US Navy)
1980 March 12th separated date from defendant (US Navy) February 12th 1982 , explain how
was “Plaintiff (Hamilton) not “enslaved”
by defendant (USA) et al from the exact dates of birth Nov. 8th –
until discharged from defendant (USA) Navy February 12th 1982 on as motion
to compel answers to Interrogatory herein with documents
“Exhibit
A of a document
upon legal records indicate actual Requests
defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of a document said “Exhibit A
copy
of the original Defendant CHARLES A.
BARTH Director of the Federal Register, Re: defendant State of Mississippi has
ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the defendant United States
as legal in law and equity “claimed it was
passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865.
“However” defendant (USA) et al
~
Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register on or about February
7, 2013 The Honorable C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr Secretary of State of Mississippi
401 Mississippi St. P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 Dear Secretary of State Hosemann:
On behalf of the Archivist of the United States, I acknowledge receipt of
Senate Concurrent Resolution Number 547 Resolution, adopted by the
Mississippi
Senate on February 16, 1995 and the Mississippi House of Representatives on
March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the
13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ending “Slavery
Servitude” as further on as motion to compel answers to Interrogatory with
documents “Exhibit G The National
Personnel Records Center (NPRC) Military
Personnel Records DD Form 214, Discharge
Papers and Separation Documents of Pro Se Louis
Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff -
Appellant herein Copy
of the original official of a document
upon legal records indicate actual Requests
defendant (USA) et al collectively and individually for Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of text, and dates of a document
DD
Form 214, Discharge Papers and Separation Documents of Pro Se Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff
- Appellant herein released from Military services “enslaved”
long before defendant State of Mississippi having ratified said 13th
amendment ending Slavery Servitude “Exhibit F The 13th
Amendment to the Constitution Copy of the original
official Requests defendant (USA) et al
collectively and individually for
Admissions request to admit the genuineness of a document
upon legal records indicate actual declared that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as
a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall
exist within the defendant United States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction, further defendant(s) collectively Admissions
request to
admit the genuineness text, and dates of a document The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the
defendant United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary
servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In defendant Congress, it was
passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865.
Explaining in detail how possible Plaintiff as claimed by the US District
Courts not having a cause of action for
not being legally “enslaved by defendant (USA) et al as (Hamilton) born on
November 8th 1961 some 52 years after the passage of “exhibit A Mississippi
Senate on February 16, 1995 and the Mississippi House of Representatives on
March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the
13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ending “Slavery
Servitude” ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal Register on or
about February 7, 2013 TO:
The
Honorable C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr Secretary of State of Mississippi 401
Mississippi St. P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205
Interrogatory 7
Defendant (USA) et al Having made Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of a document “Exhibit “Exhibit D
attached herein for examination in stating in law and equity of defendant (USA)
et al: The Naturalization Act of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to
two years of residency, proof of good moral character, and an oath to support
the Constitution explaining by defendant (USA) et al how possible “Plaintiff”
Hamilton two years after birth date of November 8th 1961 as
established exhibit G defendant (USA) et al
collectively and individually having admitted for Admissions request to
admit the genuineness of text, and dates of a document DD Form 214,
Discharge Papers and Separation Documents of Pro Se
Louis
Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff -
Appellant herein released
from Military services, further explaining how possible The Naturalization Act
of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to two years of “legal residency
and “citizenship” of Pro Se Louis
Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff -
Appellant herein after
November 8th 1961 but legally some 52
years after the passage of “exhibit A defendant Mississippi
Senate on February 16, 1995 and the defendant Mississippi House of
Representatives on March 16, 1995. With this action, the State of Mississippi
has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ending
“Slavery Servitude” ~ Sincerely, CHARLES A. BARTH Director of the Federal
Register on or about February 7, 2013 leaving Pro
Se Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Plaintiff
- Appellant herein Not enslavement by this The Naturalization Act
of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to two years of “legal residency
and “citizenship” after birth…?
+POTUS Obama +Hillary Clinton +BRITISH QUEEN +Prince Harry +Meghan Markle +HMS Prince of Wales +British Parliament +USNavySEAL +Us Navy +Tina Fey +SNL Group +Alec Baldwins Forehead +BBC World Service +NBC Chicago +Washington Post +The Rachel Maddow Show +CBS This Morning +ABC World News Tonight +Yahoo News +Donald Trump News +President Donald Trump +North Korea +South Korea +Xi Jingping +Sherlock Holmes +United States Air Force +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +NATO +National Museum of American History +City of New York +BBC Africa +ABC NEWS +CBS Evening News +NBC News +Yahoo News +Jackie Chan +Samuel L Jackson +Black Lives Matter !!!!!!! +MLK jr. +Vladimir Putin +USSR Gov +Russia +Nasdaq +Washington Post +The Huffington Post UK +Art/is +UNITED NATIONS Headquarters +National Museum of American History +Santa Claus +Pope Francis Visit USA +The British Royal Family
No comments:
Post a Comment