Which Affirm,
State and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation,
argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s cause of action
defendant U.S. Says It Has Withdrawn From World Judicial Body
Prompted by an
international tribunal's decision last year ordering new hearings for 51
Mexicans on death rows in the United States, the State Department said
yesterday that the United States had withdrawn from the protocol that gave the
tribunal jurisdiction to hear such disputes he withdrawal followed a Feb. 28
memorandum from President Bush to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales
directing state courts to abide by the decision of the tribunal, the
International Court of Justice in The Hague. The decision required American
courts to grant "review and reconsideration" to claims that the
inmates' cases had been hurt by the failure of local authorities to allow them
to contact consular officials.
The memorandum,
issued in connection with a case the United States Supreme Court is scheduled
to hear this month, puzzled state prosecutors, who said it seemed inconsistent
with the administration's general hostility to international institutions and
its support for the death penalty, The withdrawal announced yesterday helps
explains the administration's position, Darla Jordan, a State Department
spokeswoman, said the administration was troubled by foreign interference in
the domestic capital justice system but intended to fulfill its obligations
under international law But Ms. Jordan said, "We are protecting against
future International Court of Justice judgments that might similarly interfere
in ways we did not anticipate when we joined the optional protocol."
Peter J. Spiro, a
law professor at the University of Georgia, said the withdrawal was unbecoming,"It's
a sore-loser kind of move," Professor Spiro said. "If we can't win,
we're not going to play."
Ms. Jordan
emphasized that the (defendant) United States was not withdrawing from the
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations itself, which gives people arrested
abroad the right to contact their home countries' consulates.
But the (Defendant)
United States is withdrawing, she said, from an optional protocol that gives
the International Court of Justice in The Hague, the principal judicial organ
of the United Nations, jurisdiction to hear disputes under the convention,"While
roughly 160 countries belong to the consular convention," she said,
"less than 30 percent of those countries belong to the optional protocol
By withdrawing from the protocol, the United
States has joined the 70 percent of the countries that do not belong. For
example, Brazil, Canada, Jordan, Russia and Spain do not belong."
Among the
countries that have signed the protocol are Australia, Britain, Germany and
Japan.
Ms. Jordan said
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice informed Kofi Annan, the secretary general
of the United Nations, of the move on Monday.
Harold Hongju
Koh, the dean of the Yale Law School and a former State Department official in
the Clinton administration, said the Bush administration's strategy was
counterproductive.
"International
adjudication is an important tool in a post-cold-war, post-9/11 world,"
Dean Koh said, For 40 years, from 1946 to 1986, the United States accepted the
general jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in all kinds of
cases against other nations that had also agreed to the court's jurisdiction,
After an unfavorable ruling from the court in 1986 over the mining of
Nicaragua's harbors, the United States withdrew from the court's general
jurisdiction But it continued to accept its jurisdiction under about 70
specific treaties, including the protocol withdrawn from on Monday, said Lori
F. Damrosch, a law professor at Columbia,
The other
treaties cover subjects like navigation, terrorism, narcotics and copyrights,
and they are unaffected, (Defendant) The United States Supreme Court is
scheduled to hear the case of José Ernesto Medellín, a Mexican on death row in
Texas, on March 28. Mr. Medellín asks the court to enforce last year's judgment
of the international tribunal Texas opposes the request, When the federal
government filed its supporting brief for Texas in the case at the end of last
month, it appended the memorandum from the president to the attorney general, Before
the administration's strategy came into focus, international law professors
greeted the memorandum with amazement, "This is a president who has been
openly hostile to international law and international institutions knuckling
under, and knuckling under where there are significant federalism concerns,"
Professor Spiro said, As it turned out, Dean Koh said, the government had
"an integrated strategy." "Element1," he continued,
"was to take the bat out of the Supreme Court's hand."
Lawyers for Mr.
Medellín reacted cautiously. In a motion filed in the Supreme Court yesterday,
Donald F. Donovan, a lawyer with the New York law firm Debevoise &
Plimpton, asked the court to put off hearing argument until Texas state courts
could consider Mr. Medellín's claim, For their part, Texas prosecutors have not
conceded that the president has the power to force courts there to reopen the
Medellín case, In a statement, Jerry Strickland, a spokesman for Attorney
General Greg Abbott of Texas, questioned the president's authority, "The
State of Texas believes no international court supersedes the laws of Texas or
the laws of the United States," Mr. Strickland said. "We respectfully
believe the executive determination exceeds the constitutional bounds for
federal authority."Sandra Babcock, a Minnesota lawyer who represents the
government of Mexico, said she had no doubt that the president was authorized
to instruct state courts to reopen Mr. Medellín's case and 50 others."The
law is on our side," Ms. Babcock said. "The president is on our side.
I keep having to slap myself."
As in The
Republic of Nicaragua v. The United States of America (1986) ICJ 1 is a public
international law case decided by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The
ICJ ruled in favor of Nicaragua and against the United States and awarded
reparations to Nicaragua.
The ICJ held that
the U.S. had violated international law by supporting the Contras in their
rebellion against the Nicaraguan government and by mining Nicaragua's harbors. (Defendant)
The United States refused to participate in the proceedings after the Court
rejected its argument that the ICJ lacked jurisdiction to hear the case.
The (Defendant) “White
Supermeacy” (KKK) U.S. also blocked enforcement of the judgment by the United
Nations Security Council and thereby prevented Nicaragua from obtaining any
compensation Nicaragua, under the later, post-FSLN government of Violeta
Chamorro, withdrew the complaint from the court in September 1992 following a
repeal of the law which had required the country to seek compensation The Court
found in its verdict that the United States was "in breach of its
obligations under customary international law not to use force against another
State", "not to intervene in its affairs", "not to violate
its sovereignty", "not to interrupt peaceful maritime commerce",
and "in breach of its obligations under Article XIX of the Treaty of
Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the Parties signed at Managua on 21
January 1956."
The Court had 16
final decisions upon which it voted. In Statement 9, the Court stated that while
the U.S. encouraged human rights violations by the Contras by the manual
entitled Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare, this did not make such acts
attributable to the U.S.
Which Affirm,
State and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation,
argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s Negro Slaves Plaintiffs
herein concern in 1992 The
(Defendant) “White Supermeacy” (KKK) United States of America also blocked
enforcement of the judgment by the United Nations Security Council, from 1619 –
1992 (373) defendant (USA) already fully violated Slavery International laws,
and with the use of “para-military force to maintain such (373) years of
continue “enslavement” of 44.5 Million plus Negro Slaves Plaintiff whom never
free in 1992 until 2013 (21) years later when Defendant Knights of The Klu Klux
Klansmen and Defendant “States of Mississippi” decide to free “pro se”
Plaintiff (Hamilton) USN herein his direct “Live” person after the passage of
the 13th amendment of 1865 Civil War”, requiring same (KKK) Crooked
hateful bigito terrorizing Lynching “Niggers forever” to maintain control pure honest
“White Klansmen Bastards” already destroyed all Negro race Slave Plaintiff sovereignty", under customary international law not
to use force against another human to maintain Child Slavery, as this being the
case, since 1865 – 1960s (94) Years of forced by The Vagrancy Act of 1866, of
defendant “United States of America” to maintain “Human Rights” Violation
directed at the entire “World Population” for being discriminated against base
solely for being “Negro” race regadless of foregin country of orgin, once
arrived The first Ellis Island Immigration Station officially opens on January
1, 1892, as three large ships wait to land
From 1892 – 1960s
for approximately (68) years all foregin Negro race having arrived within the “Jurisdiction
of the (KKK) Defendant “Whites Supermacy” they too, being abducted, Lynched and
pursuant to Years of still (RICO) Slave Trade forced by The Vagrancy Act of
1866, of defendant “United States of America” et al to maintain “International
Massive Human Rights” Violation directed at the entire
“World
Population” of negros race from all countries of foregin orgin being (RICO)
Para-Military (KKK) kidnaped and abducted by this Shame, and criminal actions as
anyone other then “White Man” with common sense can see, but must render to the
Klansmen American continue 2016 Judical Government Rouge Justice Courthouse “Kick
Back” Slave Trade built on absolute Immunity (Klansmen) free to murder, extortion,
intimadtion, bully hostile with FRCP years of “aggravated perjury” by mainly defendant
GOP Republiccan Judicial Government to (Fu-cking) just write empty laws of
abduction, whites only fully conspiring in the slave trade corporations to even
approve of this free force labor forever crap, and exercise Captiol punishment to
capitalized on continue (secret) enslavement paying off a (RICO) loan to
defendant “Federal Reserve Bank” by a dysfunction murderous 1619 – 2016 wanted
and still at large whites supermacey uncoth Mississippi Lynch town USDA
backwood red neck government of GOP Republican Klansmen Priates, bring this
action before “World Court Justices” of The Hague with its obligations under
customary international law to protect the actual lost stolen, kidnaped,
murder, abused and fully violated “sovereignty", of 44.5 Million Negros
Plaintiffs residing in 2016 (December) without legal citizenship, abducted and
held by large whites supermacey uncoth Mississippi Lynch town USDA backwood red
neck government of GOP Republican Klansmen Priates.
No comments:
Post a Comment