The Defendant Charles Wasko in his person Mayor of West
York Pennsylvania being also criminal “Legacy Lynching” (RICO) defendant card
holder of defendant Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen herein Professional
Defendant also being Mayor of Philadelphia is the chief executive of the
government of defendant Philadelphia pursuant to “White Only” forever,
Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60
U.S. 393 (1857) violation of hates crimes staute 18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate
crime acts (a)In General.—
(1)Offenses
involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national
origin.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes
bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous
weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury
to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or
national origin of any person—
(A)shall
be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or
both; and
(B)shall
be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this
title, or both, if—
(i)death
results from the offense; or
(ii)the
offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or
an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.
(2)Offenses
involving actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual
orientation, gender identity, or disability.—
(A)In
general.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance
described in subparagraph (B) or paragraph (3), willfully causes bodily injury
to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an
explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person,
because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual
orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person—
(i)shall
be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or
both; and
(ii)shall
be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this
title, or both, if—
(I)death
results from the offense; or
(II)the
offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or
an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.
(B)Circumstances
described.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the circumstances described in
this subparagraph are that—
(i)the
conduct described in subparagraph (A) occurs during the course of, or as the
result of, the travel of the defendant or the victim—
(I)across
a State line or national border; or
(II)using
a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce;
(ii)the
defendant uses a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign
commerce in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A);
(iii)in
connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A), the defendant
employs a firearm, dangerous weapon, explosive or incendiary device, or other
weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; or
(iv)the
conduct described in subparagraph (A)—
(I)interferes
with commercial or other economic activity in which the victim is engaged at
the time of the conduct; or
(II)otherwise
affects interstate or foreign commerce.
(3)Offenses
occurring in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the united
states.—
Whoever,
within the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States,
engages in conduct described in paragraph (1) or in paragraph (2)(A) (without
regard to whether that conduct occurred in a circumstance described in
paragraph (2)(B)) shall be subject to the same penalties as prescribed in those
paragraphs.
(4)Guidelines.—
All
prosecutions conducted by the United States under this section shall be
undertaken pursuant to guidelines issued by the Attorney General, or the
designee of the Attorney General, to be included in the United States
Attorneys’ Manual that shall establish neutral and objective criteria for determining
whether a crime was committed because of the actual or perceived status of any
person.
(b)Certification
Requirement.—
(1)In
general.—No prosecution of any offense described in this subsection may be
undertaken by the United States, except under the certification in writing of
the Attorney General, or a designee, that—
(A)the
State does not have jurisdiction;
(B)the
State has requested that the Federal Government assume jurisdiction;
(C)the
verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to State charges left demonstratively
unvindicated the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence; or
(D)a
prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to
secure substantial justice.
(2)Rule
of construction.—
Nothing
in this subsection shall be construed to limit the authority of Federal
officers, or a Federal grand jury, to investigate possible violations of this
section.
(c)Definitions.—In
this section—
(1)the
term “bodily injury” has the meaning given such term in section 1365(h)(4) of
this title, but does not include solely emotional or psychological harm to the
victim;
(2)the
term “explosive or incendiary device” has the meaning given such term in
section 232 of this title;
(3)the
term “firearm” has the meaning given such term in section 921(a) of this title;
(4)the
term “gender identity” means actual or perceived gender-related
characteristics; and
(5)the
term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other
territory or possession of the United States.
(d)Statute
of Limitations.—
(1)Offenses
not resulting in death.—
Except
as provided in paragraph (2), no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished
for any offense under this section unless the indictment for such offense is
found, or the information for such offense is instituted, not later than 7
years after the date on which the offense was committed.
(2)Death
resulting offenses.—
An
indictment or information alleging that an offense under this section resulted
in death may be found or instituted at any time without limitation.
(Added
and amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, §§ 4707(a), 4711, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat.
2838, 2842.)
The Defendant
“Charles Wasko” fuuly with intent of a conscious nature fully deliberately engaged
(RICO) racket “White Supremacy” Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S.
393 (1857), dismissed said action In maintaining Slavery Servitude”
1. “Slavery Servitude August 20th 1619,
- 2016 (December)
2. Slave Trade” Naturalization Act of 1790
stipulated that only “free whites” could become citizens of the United States
(Defendant) – 2016 (December)
3. Vagrancy Act of 1866, - 2016
4. State of Texas 1890s Black Codes August
26th, 1866 – 2016,
5. and “Jim Crow Laws”, - 2016 directed
fraud upon the court at also birth certificate of Barack Hussein (water-head) Obama II First
Negro African American 44th President of The United States of America, and his
entire Negro (Obama) Family,
and City of West York State of “Pennsylvania Black Codes August 26th, 1866 – 2016,, “Jim Crow Laws”, - 2016
racist posts insuring among other things continue whites supermacey
intimidation, sparks of real violence and racial discrimination, direct at
Plaintiffs President Negro Slave Barack Hussein
(Water-Head) Obama II, Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, Negro
Slave Natasha Obama, and Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama in their just person being
born already wrongfully into “slavery servitude” of Defendant “United States of
America” et al as
“Plaintiffs
negro slaves President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II, Negro
Slave Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, Negro Slave Natasha Obama, and Negro
Slave Malia Ann Obama in their just person herein between the parties
Defendant Pennsylvania direct/compensatory/exemplary
damages of $150,000,000.00 U.S. Dollars with 6% incurred since date of actual
injuries occurred on or about Month of September 2016 and being continued the same
discrimination directed at all described 44.5 “Million Negro Plaintiffs herein
with such Racial Hate direct at Presidential First Family of defendant (USA)
based solely on race of being abducted negro slave.
President
Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II, Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn
Robinson Obama, Negro Slave Natasha Obama, and Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama in
their just person
Defendant
City of West York Pennsylvania direct/compensatory/exemplary damages of $150,000,000.00
U.S. Dollars with 6% incurred since date of
actual injuries occurred on or about Month of September 2016 and being continued the same discrimination directed at all
described 44.5 “Million Negro Plaintiffs herein with such Racial Hate direct at
Presidential First Family of defendant (USA) based solely on race of being
abducted negro slave.
And
President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II, Negro Slave
Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, Negro Slave Natasha Obama, and Negro Slave
Malia Ann Obama in their just person
Defendant
Charles Wasko in his person Mayor of West York Pennsylvania direct/compensatory/exemplary
damages of $150,000,000.00 U.S. Dollars with 6% incurred since date of actual
injuries Occurred on or about Months of August - September 2016 and being continued
the same discrimination patter and practices of hate crimes nature directed at
all described 44.5 “Million Negro Plaintiffs slaves herein with such
Racial Hate crimes patter and practices direct
at Presidential First Family of defendant (USA) based solely on race of being abducted
negro slave, direct cause of action seal under notary this undersigned dated
herein first before a assumed “Honorable Court…? In “United States of America,
as being required to further advacnce herein appear before the
“World
Court Justices of The Hague to rid of these hostile rouge, lawless, corrupted Defendant
bully, enslavement of the “entire Negro race of planet “Earth, pursuant to
“White Only” forever, Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).
Defendant
Pennsylvania, having direct cause of action for being the“structural
discrimination that creates de facto barriers for people of Plaintiffs Negro
Slave African descent to fully “not” exercise their human rights.”, civil
rights or have any dignity involved thereof
Even directed at Negro Slave Plaintiff 44th
President of defendant “United States of America Barack Obama and Negro
Presidential first family being disgraced, attacked with HATE crimes violation,
intimdation and even hostile out right race bace “violence” no less fuled by “Commander
in Chief of Defendant Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen Donald John Trump Sr.
and second in Command Defendant Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen,. Beint he “primary,
past Dynasty 186 – 2016 December RICO Para-Military “Killers, extortion,
briber, mab bomber, lynching parties, looting and pluder to include raping of
the entire 44.5 “Million Negro Slaves Plaintiffs herein being since 1619 – 2016
official property of all card KKK holders property and defendant
“Federal Reserve Bank”, Perpoerty working of a
RICO enslavement Masterbanking fraud “rolls and robberies committed to said “Negro
Slaves Plaintiffs herein since Fed Bank 1913 – 2016 (December) safe and sound
scamming with defendant USA Good Old “lynching niggers” Party Congress as
described in further “United Nation Reports all being ignmored by the
Controlled Klansmen Government of a Rouge
Nation directed all interest in maintain “enslament of 44.5 million Negro
Plaintiffs forever..”
White
(moterfuckers) defendant GOP Republican Party Lie throught the teeth, protect
them self from murderous para-military KKK crimes to destroyed claimed just
laws and settle all treaties, written in whites supermacey honey and milk rejoicing
in prosperty of whites only defendant (USA) against the “World” control, seal
in FRCP. Klansmen stronghold absolute immunity Judicial government… all negro
slaves Plaintiffs herein dehumanized like its 1865 all over again without even “pro
se” plaintiff Hamilton in his person allowed fair party to the corrupted government
right to address such a
Human
right violation of a world violation scale fully all DNA negro races coming
within the jurisdiction of defendant (USA) from all further countries of other
orgin being subject to same RICO 2016 “enslavement” no citizenship, mass wrongful
deaths of a forced whites supermacey nature, and no legal tanding before funky
white man Federal Klansmen Government courthouse never
as
Africa is the world's second-largest and second-most-populous continent, Population:
1.216 billion (2016), representing approximately 15% of the world's
population, upon whch the DNA Negro race been wrrtten off as forever “enslavement”
property of defendant “United States of America” et al and all described RICO
deparments, and corporations both government and private being a party thereof
even overseas conquring still upon “unjust enrichments insuring proverty and being
in the position to fully cause the dispare,
oppression
and profiteering unjust enrichement thereof being “whites Only USA inbred
Klansmen “trade and stock” of the defendant after civil war of 1865 – 2016 (December)
GOP (KKK), United States of America, Slave Trade Corporations, Federal Reserve
Bank, and the Hostile Klansmen strong Federal Courthouse being described
(United Nations)
As
US cited for police violence, racism in scathing UN review on human rights
US’
second review before UN Human Rights Council dominated by criticism over police
violence against black men
May
11, 2015 5:04PM ET
by
Natasja Sheriff
The
United States was slammed over its rights record Monday at the United Nations’
Human Rights Council, with member nations criticizing the country for
police violence and racial discrimination, the Guantánamo Bay Detention
Facility and the continued use of the death penalty.
The
issue of racism and police brutality dominated the discussion on Monday during
the country’s second universal periodic review (UPR). Country after country
recommended that the U.S. strengthen legislation and expand training to
eliminate racism and excessive use of force by law enforcement.
"I'm
not surprised that the world's eyes are focused on police issues in the
U.S.," said Alba Morales, who investigates the U.S. criminal justice
system at Human Rights Watch.
"There
is an international spotlight that's been shone [on the issues], in large part
due to the events in Ferguson and the disproportionate police response to even
peaceful protesters," she said.
Anticipating
the comments to come, James Cadogan, a senior counselor to the U.S. assistant
attorney general, told delegates gathered in Geneva, "The tragic deaths of
Freddie Gray in Baltimore, Michael Brown in Missouri, Eric Garner in New York,
Tamir Rice in Ohio and Walter Scott in South Carolina have renewed a
long-standing and critical national debate about the even-handed administration
of justice. These events challenge us to do better and to work harder for
progress — through both dialogue and action."
All
of the names he mentioned are black men or boys who were killed by police
officers or died shortly after being arrested. The events have sparked
widespread anger and unrest over the past year.
Cadogan
added that the Department of Justice has opened more than 20 investigations in
the last six years — including an investigation into the Baltimore Police
Department — as well as the release of a report of the Presidential Task
Force on 21st Century Policing in March, which included more than 60
recommendations.
But
advocates like Morales say the U.S. could do much more.
"Use
of excessive force by police was a major part of this year's UPR, and the fact
that we still don't have a reliable national figure to know how many people are
killed by police or what the racial breakdown is of those people is a
travesty," she said. "A nation as advanced as the U.S. should be able
to gather that number."
The
Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment.
Although
the problems are not new, the death of young men like Gray and Brown and
the unrest that followed their killings in U.S. cities over the past year has
attracted the attention — and criticism — of the international community.
"Chad
considers the United States of America to be a country of freedom, but recent
events targeting black sectors of society have tarnished its image," said
Awada Angui of the U.N. delegation to Chad.
The
U.S. responded to questions and recommendations from 117 countries during a
three-and-a-half-hour session in Geneva on Monday morning, with the high level
of participation leaving each country just 65 seconds to speak.
Among
the various concerns raised by U.N. member states was the failure to close the
Guantánamo Bay detention facility, the continued use of the death penalty, the
need for adequate protections for migrant workers and protection of the rights
of indigenous peoples.
Member
states also called on the U.S. to end child labor, human trafficking and sexual
violence against Native American and Alaska Native women and to lift
restrictions on the use of foreign aid to provide safe abortion services for
rape victims in conflict areas.
Pakistan,
Russia, China and Turkey were among the most vociferous of the member states,
with Russia informing the U.S. that "the human rights situation in the
country has seriously deteriorated recently" before presenting seven
recommendations to the U.S. delegation.
Pakistan
Ambassador to the U.N. Zamir Akram told the delegation that Pakistan
has "serious concerns about the human rights situation in the U.S."
Akram’s
eight recommendations included calls for the U.S. to use armed drones in line
with international norms and to compensate innocent victims of drone strikes
with cash. He also said the U.S. should end police brutality against
African-Americans, cease illegal detentions at Guantánamo Bay and prosecute CIA
operatives responsible for torture.
The
March findings of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on torture
were not overlooked by international delegates. Many echoed the concerns of the
Danish delegate, Carsten Staur, who recommended that the U.S. "further
ensures that all victims of torture and ill treatment, whether still in U.S.
custody or not, obtain redress and have an enforceable right to fair and
adequate compensation and as full rehabilitation as possible, including medical
and psychological assistance."
Under
the UPR, every U.N. member state is subject to the same peer-review of its
human rights record on a four-year cycle.
The
UPR was created as part of the mandate of the Human Rights Council, established
by the U.N. General Assembly in 2006 to replace the widely discredited Human
Rights Commission, which included among its members some of the world's most
egregious human rights abusers.
The
council consists of elected members which, when electing new members, according
to the resolution that created it, should "take into account the
candidates' contribution to the promotion and protection of human rights and
their voluntary pledges and commitments made thereto."
Still,
according to Freedom House — an organization advocating for democracy and
human rights — repressive regimes nonetheless gain council membership and can
weaken the effectiveness of the council and the UPR. And the process is not
without hypocrisy, as countries that frequently abuse the rights of their
citizens line up to offer their critiques of and recommendations for other
member states.
"Obviously,
everybody has improvements they can make to their human rights record. We do
believe that everybody from the most powerful country on down should be called
to task on their rights records, and we value the opportunity to do so,"
said Morales.
"We
like to focus on the substance of the comments rather than the source of
them," she added.
The
U.S. faced its first review in 2010, when member states presented the
delegation with 240 recommendations; it accepted 171. According to Human Rights
Watch, the U.S. has failed to act on many of those recommendations.
About
a fifth of the 2010 recommendations urged the U.S. to ratify or withdraw
reservations on a slew of international human rights treaties and conventions.
After
that review, the U.S. accepted recommendations to consider ratifying key human
rights conventions, including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women and the Convention on the Rights of the
Child. But according to Human Rights Watch, no new human rights treaties have
been signed or ratified.
A
representative for the State Department was unavailable to comment on U.S.
progress on ratification of these treaties.
Recommendations
accepted by the U.S. in 2010 include a commitment to “find a solution for all
persons detained at Guantánamo Bay” — yet 122 men are still detained at the
facility.
The
execution of three Mexican nationals in Texas since 2011 also appeared to
undermine a U.S. agreement to "resolve the obstacles that prevent the full
implementation of the Avena Judgment," which requires a review of death
sentences handed to foreign nationals who were denied their right to consular
notification of their detention.
A
majority of countries pushed the U.S. to establish a moratorium on the death
penalty at the federal level, with a view to full abolition. While the number
of executions taking place in the U.S. has been declining, member states raised
concerns about the use of lethal injection in light of botched
executions over the past year.
While
rejecting recommendations to establish a moratorium, the U.S. agreed to
"take all necessary steps to comply with minimum standards under
international law relating to the death penalty." However, people with
serious mental shortcomings continue to be executed — most recently in
March 2015, when 74-year-old Cecil Clayton, who had lost part of his brain in a
sawmill accident, was executed via lethal injection.
No comments:
Post a Comment