94.
“Plaintiffs
Slaves et al”
Further
appearances Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention,
disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s
cause of action as follows:
The
Federal Reserve Bank et al, The Federal Reserve System et al, The Federal
Reserve et al, The Fed et al “Chief Defendant(s) et al” herein
Since
its inception in 1913 the Federal Reserve System has been subjected to a
variety of financial and performance audits by Congress, the executive branch,
and private accounting firms, although responsibility for this task has shifted
from time to time.
From 1913 to 1921 the Board of Governors, then
known as the Federal Reserve Board which sets monetary policy and regulates the
activities of the Federal Reserve Banks, was audited annually by the U.S.
Treasury Department. In 1921 Congress
created the Government Accounting Office (GAO) and assigned it to audit the
Board until 1933.
In the Banking Act of 1933, Congress voted
specifically to remove the Board from the GAO's jurisdiction. From 1933 to 1952 audit teams from the twelve
Federal Reserve Banks performed the annual examination of the BOG's books.
From
1952 to 1978, the Board, under authorization from Congress, decided to employ
nationally recognize accounting firms to conduct the audits of itself to insure
independent oversight. This provided an
external evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the examination
procedures.1
In
1978 Congress passed the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (31 USCA §714). It placed the Federal Reserve System back
under the auditing authority of the GAO.
The Act significantly increased the access of
the GAO to the Federal Reserve Banks, the Board, and the Federal Open Market
Committee (the FOMC).
Since then, the GAO has conducted over 100
financial audits and performance audits of the three Federal Reserve bodies.
95.
“Plaintiffs
Slaves et al”
Further
appearances Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention,
disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s
cause of action as follows:
The
Federal Reserve Bank et al, The Federal Reserve System et al, The Federal
Reserve et al, The Fed et al “Chief Defendant(s) et al” herein
The
Fed also has never had a black “PLANTIFFS” DNA Negro race African American president
at one of its regional banks.
96.
“Plaintiffs
Slaves et al”
Further
appearances Affirm, State and fully declare all allegation, contention,
disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully furtherance’s
cause of action as follows:
The
Federal Reserve Bank et al, The Federal Reserve System et al, The Federal
Reserve et al, The Fed et al “Chief Defendant(s) et al” herein
Occurring
to Public record:
“Federal
Chief’s” battle of GDP accuracy
It’s
a cage match with slide rules between Bill Dudley and Dennis Lockhart over measuring
gross domestic product.
Dudley,
the New York Fed chief, is locking horns with Lockhart, the Atlanta Fed
president, over accuracy.
This
is the most excitement that we geeks have had in a long time.
Apparently
the New York Fed has been suffering some serious GDP envy over Lockhart’s GDP Now,
a real-time gauge of growth (or not) in the US.
So
Dudley’s crew decided to compete directly with its Atlanta sibling by
publishing its brand-new “Nowcasting Report” last week.
We
all know the economy is of vital importance in the upcoming presidential
election.
As
I’ve said for years, an accurate GDP is the most important — and best —
measurement of economic health of a nation.
In
global politics, size matters, and GDP figures prominently in determining that
size.
Now
here’s the rub.
The
New York Fed’s first “Nowcasting Report” calls for first-quarter GDP growth to
be 0.8 percent on Friday.
That’s
0.5 percentage points more than the extraordinarily accurate Atlanta Fed’s GDP
Now estimate of 0.3 percent.
How
do two Federal Reserve banks — using the same data — come up with such
disparate readings for first-quarter economic growth, even though both are
dreadfully low?
I
hope Dudley’s rosier forecast isn’t a covert audition for a role on a
presidential candidate’s economic team after the election in November.
Because
only politicians like big, bold forecasts and seemingly couldn’t care less when
they don’t come to fruition.
The
rest of us geeks like our predictions to be accurate.
But
then again, the Federal Reserve chiefs for the past seven years have predicted
3 percent annual growth, which never materialized.
97.
As “PLANTIFFS”
affirm, state, declare Chief Defendant The Federal Reserve Bank et al, The
Federal Reserve System et al, The Federal Reserve et al, The Fed et al “Chief
Defendant(s) et al” herein and “Third Party” Namely
“United
States of America” et al civil grand (RICO) conspire against own rules of
governing laws, pursuant to engaging in (RICO) enterprising nature in continual
criminal acts of
“Slavery
Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,
“Slavery
Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) for
privileged, polished, well financial secure in Billions “White Only”
constitution of America continual
“Slave Régime” forevermore “Unjust
Enrichments” - legal and political means to Restore the Founders’ forever
pursuant to
“Dred
Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) “Slavery” against a Negro Race for
Slave Trade Profit
Pro Se
Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), and all “PLANTIFFS” et al herein
reincorporates and State fully all of the above set forth herein paragraph (s),
further reincorporates and State fully all of the exhibit(s) as full enforced and
Identified each for said “Individually and Collectively causes of
Actions against the , peace, civil rights,
dignity, human life, and mental health as described herein said complaint all
facts and actions described
“PLANTIFFS”
collectively with Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) # 2712,
herein seeks actual, accumulative, compensatory, consequential, continuing,
expectation damages, foreseeable,
Future,
incidentals, indeterminate, reparable, lawful, proximate, prospective, special,
speculative, substantial, exemplary/punitive, and permanent damages
Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) # 2712, herein seeks direct
“Declaratory Judgment” being made into the records of this action against
Chief
Defendant The Federal Reserve Bank et al, The Federal Reserve System et al, The
Federal Reserve et al, The Fed et al
No comments:
Post a Comment