Chief Defendant Donald John Trump in direct violation of Section 201 (relating to bribery), (robbery) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. : Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Justice Elena Kagan. Justice Clarence Thomas

136. All Defendants(s) collectively herein required 1000% official Admit:  

Chief Defendant Donald John Trump in direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1031 –“Fraud against the United States”, “The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,”

“Honest Services Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346”, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and major fraud against the United States, in further admitting ... Chief Defendant Donald John Trump in direct violation of Section 201 (relating to bribery), (robbery) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) further ... Chief Defendant Donald John Trump to furtherance’s “monetary funding all

 Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen acts of incite a riot, organize, promote, encourage, and “civil conspire further in a nature being direct violation and aid and abetting of committing to Criminal Bribery Racket involving in a nature to cover up funding (KKK) surrounding (Trump) conspire and funding for violation of

18 U.S. Code § 2101 – Riots in a nature involving continual (RICO) enterprise pursuant to engaging in Direct violation of “Articles of Agreement Relating to the Surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia" April 10, 1865 fully knowing, with intent by

“Chief Defendant” Donald John Trump, Sr. conspiracy to commit Violation of UCMJ Article 122 –Robbery and conspiracy to commit Violation of UCMJ Article 121 --Larceny and wrongful appropriation as stated in the News Media as follows:

Governor Greg Abbott's top consumer attorneys built a $5.4M case against Donald Trump, but it never happened

The Trump University debacle just took another nasty turn for the presumptive GOP candidate for president and a new report shows that Trump resorted to bribing politicians in order get away with scamming Americans.

The Associated Press reports that Donald Trump allegedly donated $35,000 to Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s 2012 gubernatorial campaign after then-Texas Attorney General Abbott dropped the state’s case against Trump University.

As Texas’ AG, Abbott’s office had opened a civil investigation into Trump U’s “possibly deceptive trade practices” in the state, but agreed to quietly drop the case after the organization agreed to leave Texas. Abbott’s office built a $5.4 million settlement case against Trump’s organization for duping Texan Trump U students out of $2.6 million, but the case was never filed.

Subsequently, after the case was quietly buried, Trump dropped the sizeable donation into Abbott’s campaign coffers.

But the plot thickens. Abbott wasn’t the only Republican Attorney General to receive a large campaign donation after dropping the case against Trump U.

Pam Bondi, Florida’s Republican Attorney General, also once considered joining a multi-state suit against Trump’s organization.

But just three days after Bondi’s spokesperson publicly said they were reviewing the case, the Donald J. Trump Foundation dropped $25,000 into Bondi’s campaign Super PAC for her re-election and Bondi said she wouldn’t pursue the matter due to lack of evidence.

And Trump himself also admitted earlier last year as he was getting his presidential campaign started that large donations like these mean he can get a politician to do anything he wants,

Put simply, Trump is a con artist who has benefited greatly by being wealthy enough to manipulate the American justice system. But once again, just like with his fake business school, he is duping Americans into believing he has their best interests at heart, when really, he’s just looking out for himself as usual.

Because Trump can’t bribe his way out of his federal civil fraud suit this time, it’s no wonder he’s resorting to racist attacks against U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel. It’s Custer’s last stand,.

John Owens, former deputy director of Abbott’s Consumer Protection Division, alleges the decision was purely political that left Texas consumers “high and dry” with no recourse:

1000% legally all defendants each and every one herein admitted you say not.