Cmdr Bluefin USN Sherlock Holmes Legal Page : Federal Reserve Bank, et al Pro Se Plaintiff Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) “Aggravated Perjury Charges” Chief Defendant David Hittner‘United States District Judge” Civil Action H-16-1774

In The United States District Court

For The Southern District of Texas

Houston Division

Louis Charles Hamilton II Notice of Motion for

Pro Se Plaintiff “Aggravated Perjury Charges”

Vs. Civil Action H-16-1774

The Federal Reserve Bank, et al Chief Defendant David Hittner

‘United States District Judge”

Comes Now Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Respectfully Appearance (Pro Se Plaintiff) Louis Charles Hamilton II herein (USN) before the Honorable Court, the special vulnerability of the victim being still “enslaved” since August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 ‘United States District Court” Houston Division Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to on or about 25^th day of July, 2016 “Aggravated Perjury”, Order as stated: Pending before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate (Document #7). Having Considered the motion and the applicable law, the court determines that the foregoing motion should be denied, Accordingly, the Court hereby Order that the Motion to Consolidate (Document #7) is Denied Signe at Houston, TX on the 25^th Day of July, 2016 David Hittner United States District Judge (White Ruler of the World)

“Aggravated Perjury”, in direct violation of Sec. 37.03. knowingly making a false entry to further aid and abetting the Chief Defendant U.S. District Judge David Hittner collectively together hide, abscond, and scuttle an entire civil action on behalf of the Defendant Federal Reserve Bank et al U.S. Docket No. 4:16-CV-1774 from the Defendant themselves (Federal Reserve Bank)…? Officially being an ongoing still 2016 (RICO) criminal “Third Party” in the official August 20th 1619 – 2013 hiding the “physical human rights violation of enslavement” of the “Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II since the date of

Birth November 8th 1961 in his person, The President of The United States of America Negro race Barack Obama and Negro race first family, and amazing 44.5 DNA Abused Million Negro Race Slaves since August 20th 1619 being now in 2016 (December) a grand slavery servitude “continue” RICO enslavement civil rights violation whites supremacy scheme of things

As 44.5 Million human Negro race in 2013 no less Official property of the (United States of America), The Federal Reserve Bank and the Defendant State of Mississippi” Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen fully (RICO) criminal violation surrounding circumstances of “Whites Supremacy” and the direct destruction of the 13th Amendment of the United States of America et al while insuring the destroyed the 14th amendment to enslave 44.5 Million Negro Race since the 1865 Civil War which the surrender being violated by 148 years later when Mississippi Free this Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) #2712 SS in his person

During which at the same time frame of several USA Complaint in regards to being among other things “Enslaved” by the Federal Reserve Bank, while paying taxes…? Since births for 52 years “pro se” enslaved in his person, as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore “actually” legally born into Slavery Servitude of the defendant United States of America et al To wit: on or about Chief Defendant refusal to let “pro se” Plaintiff proceed (IFP) in forma pauperis, for the charges levy against the defendant Federal Reserve Bank, for enslaving 44.5 Million Negro Race, with United States of America and all Corporations from the exact time frame of August 20th 1619 – 2013 which

U.S. District Judge” Vanessa D. Gilmore and Chief Defendant U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett on August 3rd 2016 Hamilton v. Donald John Trump Sr. both, Negro Race Judges criminal RICO under color of law against 44.5 Million Negro Plaintiffs”, engaging in “Aggravated Perjury” to cover up “enslavement” of missing provision of a destroyed 14th amendment denied “Citizenship rights since 1865 Civil War of Defendant (USA) as claimed in each complaint before the court in well detail “English” no (fucking) less with supporting exhibit(s) of defendant (USA) own government records as a whole civil rights violation of a destroyed

13th and 14th amendment as these two (Negro) race defendant U.S. Justices (Bennett) and (Gilmore) with deliberate concisions, having full knowledge of all absent material facts of a missing voided 13th and 14th amendment supporting at the Least” (IFP) , 28 U.S. Code § 1915 -

Proceedings in forma pauperis on (IFP) Application being fully grated in law and equity governing the actual legal facts as claimed in each Complaint”, Mississippi free the “Pro Se Slave (Hamilton) in his person and

President of The United States of America Negro race (Barack Obama) when the 13th amendment officially ratified completely whole legal fashion being granting “actual” legalized freedom on or about the 7th day of February 2013 as Chief Defendant Vanessa D. Gilmore aid and abetting in cover up

the “Enslavement” of the Negro Plaintiff(s) collectively appearing before the “court” to continue under color or law denied on the 2nd day of May 2016 Order filed herein as exhibit (A) stating: The Court finds that the Petitioner can make no rational argument in law or fact to support his claim for relief…signed “Vanessa D. Gilmore” whom Order “pro se” Plaintiff to pay $400.00 US Dollars in order the defendant “Federal Reserve Bank” et al being process said complaint and served a summon in accordance’s with the Court orders and the “infamous (FRCP) upon which, Chief Defendant Vanessa D. Gilmore in “her” Aggravated Perjury” state officially (RICO) stolen $400.00 U.S. Dollars and had the funds filed in a different account other than the defendant (Federal Reserve Bank) to aid and abetting in cover up the “Enslavement” of the Negro Plaintiff(s) collectively with a Judicial Fraud upon the Court”, official “Blind Eye” insensitive, slow, obtuse, uncomprehending, to the constitutional Missing provision of equality provision in the void 14th amendment at the own occurred of the criminal “lynching murderous” acts from 1866 – 2013 as Chief Defendant U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett in (RICO) conspired on August 3rd 2016 to the same criminal conduct as Chief Defendant

U.S. District Judge” Vanessa D. Gilmore both, criminal RICO under color of law working in the Professional Position as Judges for the United States of America against 44.5 Million Negro Plaintiffs”, and the First Presidential Negro Family (Obama) being a party to said civil action (Judges) greedy, rouge, stupidity, and aggressively committed without even a second thought aggravated perjury falsely hostile in denied (2) IFP pursuant to the actual standards set for a “poor” person asking Constitutional Questions as a matter of law and the content of Constitutional question, as being destroyed 13th and 14th amendment violation (screamed) massively within the documentation, with the duty of care being kick aside as defendants,

(Federal U.S. Claimed Honorable) Justices many years in legal law expert capacity having facts all material factual sound and true from defendant own laws, not far fetch fairy tales but (RICO) true to support the defendant very own rules of governing laws that only to “Whites Only” The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) govern civil procedure (i.e. for civil lawsuits) in United States district (federal) courts, 28 U.S. Code § 1915 - Proceedings in forma pauperis on (IFP) Application as further Stated Notice of Appeal on (IFP) Application Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 U.S. Docket No.4:2016-MC-01633

Negro Slave Judge Vanessa D Gilmore in 2016 (57) years a “Negro Slave of America since exact date of birth October 1956 – February 7th 2013 when

Chief Defendant U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett born 1965 (48) years already himself enslave by defendant (USA) being precisely criminal RICO under color of law against 44.5 Million Negro Plaintiffs”, and his very own “Negro Enslave family wife and two sons, having no legal 14th amendment of Citizenship, absolutely Denaturalization by among other defendant “The Federal Reserve Bank” money laundering and Slavery scheme with (United States of America) upon which

same as complaint stated but denied IFP based on the no-constitutional question(s) surrounding defendant namely (USA) Mississippi freed officially Slave Negro Judge Vanessa D Gilmore herein herself whom in future time frame in 2016 being (57) years a “Negro Slave” of defendant America since actual birth without any legal citizenship after February 7th 2013 when defendant (USA) Mississippi freed officially

Slave Negro Judge Vanessa D Gilmore in said (RICO) sham aid and abetting corruption and Treason direct at President Barack Obama and His First Presidential Family all having no citizenship, being destroyed by the (KKK) conduct of defendant own “Judicial Republican Party Judges Whites Supremacy Klansmen 1865 – 2016 (December) continual (RICO) Slave Trade” control over

“Enslaves (Plaintiffs) collectively herein for an extra 148 years (delinquent) with defendant (Federal Reserve Bank) since 1913 continue profiting in unjust enrichments off “enslave” 44.5 Million Negros race with no just citizenship, just poverty and abuse being a direct actual legal cause of action fully officially as described in all 4 cases filed in 2016 Hamilton v. United States of America primary denied as

Chief Defendant” Vanessa D. Gilmore (RICO) in the “Aggravated Perjury” in abduction of $400.00 filing fee never ever served to Defendant (Federal Reserve Bank as of this very undersigned seal Notary date, engaging further in a conspire nature with denied further a “pro se” Plaintiff Motion to

“Consolidation being rejected without “cause or reason” nor has the Defendant actual being a party to this action (Federal Reserve Bank) as the Co-Chief Defendant David Hittner” as recent having in 2012 honor the preservation of this continual collusion of the defendant (USA) The 1790 (RICO) Naturalization Act, in that “Legally and 1000% physically” having full conscious knowledge and professional legal expert fiduciary responsibility Republican Judges are on duty first and foremost is protect their “Property” the 44.5 Million enslavement (Plaintiffs) herein as

Namely Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen who officially kept the Civil War alive by violation of the article of agreement The official surrender document of Lee's troops to the Union Army, signed at the ... on

April 9, 1865, criminally in 2016 (December) against the peace, will, dignity, civil rights, constitutional rights, freedom, equality, and future prosperity beholding against now current time frame 44.5 plus Million “Negro Slaves Plaintiffs herein past present descendants DNA with all future Slave Negro youth and all family involved therein enslaved timeline as already Chief Defendant herein David Hittner, committed to further criminal

(RICO) acts on or about October 9th 2012 the enforcement of “Black Codes” Act to establish a Code of Criminal Procedure for the State of Texas, approved August 26th, 1866,

Directed at “pro se” Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property of the State of Mississippi within jurisdiction of United States of America et al

Until February 7th 2013 And “pro se” Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property o The Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen (1865 – 2016) “Slave Trade Dynasty” as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore, committed to on or about May 2nd 2016 further (RICO), Obstruction of Justice, concealment, aid and abetting, concert of action Surrounding hiding the “summon and complaints for (Defendant)Federal Reserve Bank et al U.S. Docket No. 4:16-CV-1774 (stolen) $400.00 US Dollars from a “SSI Check” poor man check of the “pro se” Plaintiff to process this complaint further all which is hidden, and now under the control of

“Whites Only” Judge David Hittner” whom already officially enslaved “pro se” Plaintiff Hamilton in his Person physically on October 9th 2012 no less still being “enslaved” as Chief Defendant Vanessa D. Gilmore engaging in “Aggravated Perjury” surrounding a denied (IFP) rights of a “enslave” and the abduction of $400.00 U.S. Dollars filing fee to have Federal Reserve Bank complaint hiding in the (Bank Vault) as the court clamming “foolishly and RICO 44.5 Million Negro enslave since 1913 December in a money laundering scheme of things with “Slave Trade Corporations, and Chief Defendant “United States of America” et al

148 years after the 1865 Civil War, being Crooked as described in 4 Complaints all being RICO against to include the recent (Bombing) attempt of the Houston Texas Library directed at among many others, “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) himself, as Martin Luther King Jr. being a party to this action for his forced wrongful death due in large part Republican Judicial Party still “pimping and pandering” in Slave Trade of 44.5 Million Negro race against their will, as the Court itself in the Crooked element in the continual 2016 (December) violations of The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,” ” as Chief Defendant Vanessa D. Gilmore engaging in “Aggravated Perjury” in conspire in destroyed 14th Amendment rights

False Imprisonment DNA Negro Slaves in connection with additional “fraud upon the court” action(s) with Judge “Melinda Harmon” in U.S. Docket No. 4:2016-CV-01354 direct “Aggravated Perjury” direct to all 44.5 Million Negro race (Plaintiffs) past, present and future being “kept” secretly under a continual (RICO) “Slavery Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,

“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), Conversion, Civil Conspirers, Collusion concert of action in violation 18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank fraud, Fraud and Willful Misrepresentation, 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Material Misrepresentation / Fraud,

“Fraudulent Void defendant 18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts, in connection with Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to further criminal (RICO) acts on or about October 9th 2012 Judicial duties performed in direct Violation under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... and “Honest Services Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346”, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud, and major fraud against the United States, False Statements, Concealment—18 U.S.C. § 1001, Further affirm “Aiding & Abetting”, “Assisting or Encouraging”, “Assistant & Participating”, “Concert of Actions” massive 2011

Civil conspire directed at (pro se) Hamilton being cover up acts of killing of one human being by another “Homicide” as Pro Se Plaintiff hidden and legally declared Dead in a wrongful death(s), wrongful death of (Plaintiff unborn fetus),

Religious prosecution, Custodial Interference, Child abduction/Child Theft, Theft of Body, grave robber, scheme of things in Utah. Which Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to further criminal (RICO) acts on or about October 9th 2012 Judicial duties performed in direct Fraud Non-Disclosure, Common law fraud, Fraud upon the court,

Judicial Fraud and Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, Judicial bias, intentional infliction of emotional distress, aid and abetting, in the cover up several Federal Civil Actions and having a direct interest in the out-come “Keeping 44.5 Million (Negro DNA Race American still Slaves) in 2011 without any “Legal Citizenship of the 14th Amendment of the United States of America, while hiding such “enslavement” in 2011 directed at the acting President of The United States of America (Obama) and entire Negro Family enslaved by among others said

Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to on or about October 9th 2012 further (RICO), while committed to “Treason” in hate crimes of insurances human rights World Violation criminal acts of continual august 20th 1619 continual in 2011 forced “enslavement” for unjust enrichment directed at the

President Barack Obama and his Negro (Obama) Presidential First Family and continual “Aggravated Perjury”, in (RICO) endeavor 2011 forced “enslavement” for unjust enrichment directed at 44.5 Million Negro and the “Pro Se” Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein his person

Enslaved since date of birth November 8th 1961 by “United States of America et al as described in said complaint be made fully physically continual in 2011 same forced “enslavement” for unjust enrichment by one Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, whom also committed to mutable counts of

“Aggravated Perjury”, on or about October 9th 2012 engaged in the “Official Capacity” as U.S. Judges as he did so criminally with full intent and perceived knowledge engaging in among other things (RICO) The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) in direct criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,

18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), directed at Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff USN # 2712 SS in his person and indirectly 44.5 Million Still Negro American slaves, (Plaintiff) collectively since abduction August 20th 1619 been living off next to nothing in process still “Hidden Enslavement Property” no Legal Citizenship in 2012 as Slaves have no civil rights

all “Aggravated Perjury”, Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, and defendant(s) collectively being Conquering controlling Judicial Republican Party committed to Slave Trade still 1619 RICO Fraud herein 2012 cover up “Enslavement False Imprisonment slave labor endeavor well into 2013 David Hittner ‘United States District Judge” having full conscious knowledge and professional legal expert fiduciary responsibility that:

The 1790 Naturalization Act reserves naturalized citizenship for whites only was fully enforced against the (Pro Se Plaintiff) the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally without legal citizenship after 1865 “civil war” trapped by this continual 1790 (RICO) Naturalization Act.

Articles of Agreement Relating to the Surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia. April 10, 1865, was fully violated and that “Mississippi” never freed the (Pro Se Plaintiff) the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally without legal citizenship after 1865 “civil war” trapped by this continual collusion of the defendant (USA) The 1790 (RICO) Naturalization Act. ” as Chief Defendant Vanessa D. Gilmore engaging in “Aggravated Perjury” direct officially at protection of Defendant “Federal Reserve Bank et al” enslavement for profit with the destroyed

The 13th amendment to the “United States of America” which factual legal circumstances was destroyed, annihilate, wipe out, and fully obliterate, fully in law and equity” official in leaving (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally born between the exact dates of August 20th 1619 - February 7th 2013 “Slaves of The United States of America”, as so legally Born unto “Slavery Servitude”.

The 14th amendment to the “United States of America” was also destroyed, annihilate, wipe out, and fully obliterate, fully in law and equity” official in leaving (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama)

And 44.5 Million Negros legally born between the exact dates of February 7th 2013 – 2099 pursuant to “Elite Secret Whites Only” Judicial Government The 1790 Naturalization Act reserves naturalized citizenship for whites only having “officially” denaturalization (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first

Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally born between the exact dates of February 7th 2013 – 2099 “Leaving” (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and

44.5 Million Negros “without” any legal citizenship, any just equal claim legal standing before any Federal Court of Law, and “official property” of all “card-holders” of the Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen, and United States of America et al forevermore, Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),

That august 20th 1619 “Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully “Enforced” On or about “October” 9th 2012 (RICO) enterprise and all three “Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros) running concurrently in 2016 this undersigned date, pursuant to “Elite Secret Klansmen Whites Only” Judicial Government securing The 1790 Naturalization Act reserves naturalized citizenship for whites only having “officially” denaturalization (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally born between the exact dates of 1790 – 2099

That august 20th 1619 “Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully “Enforced” On or about “October” 9th 2012 (RICO) enterprise and all three “Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros) running concurrently in 2016 this undersigned date, and enterprise David Hittner ‘United States District Judge” having full conscious knowledge and professional legal expert in “Cheating, committing, (RICO) cover up and to conspiring

Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to further on or about October 9th 2012 FALSIFICATION OF Government decree, judgement order records and further violation Sec. 37.04. MATERIALITY all facts to aid a cover up scheme In connection with Co-defendant United States Of America, State Of Texas, Harris County Texas, City of Houston Texas, Annise Parker, Chief of Houston Police Department,

Law Office of Harry C Arthur, Marine Building LLC, AA Quick Bond, Mike Cox's Bail SVC, Lacey's Deli, Jonathan A Gluckman, Wayne Heller, The Ring Investigations Mark Thering, The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal, Mark Thering, Darrel Jordon, Daniel Perez-Garcia, Marquerite Hudig, Carl D Haggard, F.M. Poppy Northcut, Sandra Martinez and Allen J Guidry thereof Civil Action H-11-4254 Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, ” as further collectively Chief Defendant Vanessa D. Gilmore engaging in “Aggravated Perjury” and Chief Defendant “Melinda Harmon” and Chief Defendant U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett on August 3rd 2016 Hamilton v. Donald John Trump Sr. committed to same long road of cover up, hostile “enslavement” of the “pro se” U.S. Navy Vet Negro Slave Hamilton II in his person being under criminal (RICO) ““Aggravated Perjury”, Falsification of government records, and Materiality obstruction all facts derived thereof as defined by

PENAL CODE

TITLE 8. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER 37. PERJURY AND OTHER FALSIFICATION

Sec. 37.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Court record" means a decree, judgment, order, subpoena, warrant, minutes, or other document issued by a court of:

(A) this state;

(B) another state;

(D) a foreign country recognized by an act of congress or a treaty or other international convention to which the United States is a party;

(E) an Indian tribe recognized by the United States; or

(F) any other jurisdiction, territory, or protectorate entitled to full faith and credit in this state under the United States Constitution.

(2) "Governmental record" means:

(A) anything belonging to, received by, or kept by government for information, including a court record;

(B) anything required by law to be kept by others for information of government;

(C) a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, letter of patent, or similar document issued by government, by another state, or by the United States;

(D) a standard proof of motor vehicle liability insurance form described by Section 601.081, Transportation Code, a certificate of an insurance company described by Section 601.083 of that code, a document purporting to be such a form or certificate that is not issued by an insurer authorized to write motor vehicle liability insurance in this state, an electronic submission in a form described by Section 502.046(i), Transportation Code, or an evidence of financial responsibility described by Section 601.053 of that code;

(E) an official ballot or other election record; or

(F) the written documentation a mobile food unit is required to obtain under Section 437.0074, Health and Safety Code.

(3) "Statement" means any representation of fact.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 113, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 5, eff. May 21, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 823, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 393, Sec. 21, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1276 (H.B. 3672), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 161 (S.B. 1093), Sec. 16.004, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 37.02. PERJURY. (a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to deceive and with knowledge of the statement's meaning:

(1) he makes a false statement under oath or swears to the truth of a false statement previously made and the statement is required or authorized by law to be made under oath; or

(2) he makes a false unsworn declaration under Chapter 132, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 37.03. AGGRAVATED PERJURY. (a) A person commits an offense if he commits perjury as defined in Section 37.02, and the false statement:

(1) is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and

(2) is material.

(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 37.04. MATERIALITY. (a) A statement is material, regardless of the admissibility of the statement under the rules of evidence, if it could have affected the course or outcome of the official proceeding.

(b) It is no defense to prosecution under Section 37.03 (Aggravated Perjury) that the declarant mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 37.06. INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS. An information or indictment for perjury under Section 37.02 or aggravated perjury under Section 37.03 that alleges that the declarant has made statements under oath, both of which cannot be true, need not allege which statement is false. At the trial the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL RECORD. (a) A person commits an offense if he:

(1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false alteration of, a governmental record;

(2) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent that it be taken as a genuine governmental record;

(3) intentionally destroys, conceals, removes, or otherwise impairs the verity, legibility, or availability of a governmental record;

(4) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form with intent that it be used unlawfully;

(5) makes, presents, or uses a governmental record with knowledge of its falsity; or

(6) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form with knowledge that it was obtained unlawfully.

(b) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)(3) that the governmental record is destroyed pursuant to legal authorization or transferred under Section 441.204, Government Code. With regard to the destruction of a local government record, legal authorization includes compliance with the provisions of Subtitle C, Title 6, Local Government Code.

(c)(1) Except as provided by Subdivisions (2), (3), and (4) and by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor unless the actor's intent is to defraud or harm another, in which event the offense is a state jail felony.

(2) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record was:

(A) a public school record, report, or assessment instrument required under Chapter 39, Education Code, data reported for a school district or open-enrollment charter school to the Texas Education Agency through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) described by Section 42.006, Education Code, under a law or rule requiring that reporting, or a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, letter of patent, or similar document issued by government, by another state, or by the United States, unless the actor's intent is to defraud or harm another, in which event the offense is a felony of the second degree;

(B) a written report of a medical, chemical, toxicological, ballistic, or other expert examination or test performed on physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or relevance of the evidence to a criminal action;

(C) a written report of the certification, inspection, or maintenance record of an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, or other similar device used in the course of an examination or test performed on physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or relevance of the evidence to a criminal action; or

(D) a search warrant issued by a magistrate.

(3) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is a governmental record that is required for enrollment of a student in a school district and was used by the actor to establish the residency of the student.

(4) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is a written appraisal filed with an appraisal review board under Section 41.43(a-1), Tax Code, that was performed by a person who had a contingency interest in the outcome of the appraisal review board hearing.

(d) An offense under this section, if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is described by Section 37.01(2)(D), is:

(1) a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed under Subsection (a)(2) or Subsection (a)(5) and the defendant is convicted of presenting or using the record;

(2) a felony of the third degree if the offense is committed under:

(A) Subsection (a)(1), (3), (4), or (6); or

(B) Subsection (a)(2) or (5) and the defendant is convicted of making the record; and

(3) a felony of the second degree, notwithstanding Subdivisions (1) and (2), if the actor's intent in committing the offense was to defraud or harm another.

(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution for possession under Subsection (a)(6) that the possession occurred in the actual discharge of official duties as a public servant.

(f) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(5) that the false entry or false information could have no effect on the government's purpose for requiring the governmental record.

(g) A person is presumed to intend to defraud or harm another if the person acts with respect to two or more of the same type of governmental records or blank governmental record forms and if each governmental record or blank governmental record form is a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, or similar document issued by government.

(h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.13, the actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.

(i) With the consent of the appropriate local county or district attorney, the attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction with that consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under this section that involves the state Medicaid program.

(j) It is not a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2) that the record, document, or thing made, presented, or used displays or contains the statement "NOT A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT" or another substantially similar statement intended to alert a person to the falsity of the record, document, or thing, unless the record, document, or thing displays the statement diagonally printed clearly and indelibly on both the front and back of the record, document, or thing in solid red capital letters at least one-fourth inch in height.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1248, Sec. 66, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 113, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 565, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 6, eff. May 21, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 823, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 718, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 771, Sec. 3, eff. June 13, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 198, Sec. 2.139, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 257, Sec. 16, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1364 (H.B. 126), Sec. 1, eff. June 18, 2005.

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1085 (H.B. 3024), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 73 (H.B. 1813), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1130 (H.B. 2086), Sec. 31, eff. September 1, 2009.

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 510 (S.B. 124), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.

Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 690 (H.B. 644), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.

Sec. 37.13. RECORD OF A FRAUDULENT COURT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person makes, presents, or uses any document or other record with:

(1) knowledge that the document or other record is not a record of a court created under or established by the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States; and

(2) the intent that the document or other record be given the same legal effect as a record of a court created under or established by the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has previously been convicted under this section on two or more occasions.

(c) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.10, the actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 8, eff. May 21, 1997.

Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, whom also committed to mutable counts of “Aggravated Perjury”, on or about October 9th 2012 engaged in the “Official Capacity” as U.S. Judges as he did so criminally with full intent and perceived knowledge engaging in among other things concealing non-disclosure the fraudulent “enslavement” of the “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II in his person being “Slave Property” no citizenship of the State of Mississippi until

February 7th 2013 when the 13th amendment of the United States of America Constitution being legally ratified and (RICO) endeavor to keep this “Enslavement” secret by Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, whom also committed to mutable counts of “Aggravated Perjury”, on or about October 9th 2012 direct intent the non-existent 6th amendment and “Fourteenth Amendment” on behalf of a “enslave” Pro Se Plaintiff absent all Constitutional rights on or about

October 9th 2012 dating back to Birth into “Slavery Servitude” of the United States of America already being destroyed, conceal, hidden as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, stated as follows:

Plaintiff also raises the following claims, as set forth in his More Definite Statement. See Docket Entry No. 44. The Harris County District Attorney obstruction justice to insure a conviction against Plaintiff. The Houston Police Department assisted the District Attorney in obstruction justice by fabricating a police report.

Plaintiff claims his confinement in the Harris County Jail was caused by the Defendants’ violation of his constitutional rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment

Plaintiff claims that if he been protected by the Fourteenth the District Attorney and the Houston Police Department would not have been able to fabricate a police report and a grand jury indictment. Plaintiff also asserts that if the Sixth Amendment had been honored in the prosecution against him, he would not have been convicted. Signed David Hittner United States District Judge:

Pro Se Plaintiff fully assert, declare and affirmed Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, fully (RICO) under color of law”, conspired to conceal, fabricate further, aid and abetting, concert of actions pretended, and directly engaging in producing actual physical pro se slave Plaintiff Civil rights of constitution both Federal and State of Texas violated by a non-existent 6th and 14th amendment on behalf of a “enslavement” inmate “pro se”

Plaintiff property of “Mississippi” until freedom occurred on or about February 7th 2013 as described in attached exhibit (A) filed in support herein dated October 9th 2012 at that precise date 10/9/2012 “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II officially captured, denaturalization of all claimed

14th amendment citizenship after 1865 “Civil War” and denied (RICO) enterprise scheme of things “Lost” 13th Amendment of December 1865 freeing said “Negro Slave DNA Plaintiff since august 20th 1619 forced

“Slavery Servitude” of said defendant “United States of America et al” on or about the 7th day of February 2013 as records do indicate with the office of the Sectary of State of Mississippi, including the records at United States Secretary of State

As United States District Judge , fraudulent concealment of ongoing Enslavement against the claimed just judicial fiber directed at the defendant (USA) own rules of governing Laws In conscious disregards for

Fiduciary Duties of an acting sitting Official impartial United States District Government Federal Judge Signed at Houston Texas on or about October 9th 2012 Pro Se Slave Veteran “United States Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein “Actually” born into “Slavery Servitude” on or about the direct birth on November 8th 1961 as

“One” David Hittner ‘United States District Judge” United States Southern District of Texas Federal Courthouse Houston Texas Division, engaged further in “Aggravate Perjury” and actually accused the “Pro Se” Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II in his person of being charged with possession of cocaine…?

Being involved anywhere in this still 2016 (December) abduction to the Texas State Hospital, and everyone hiding the file, the evidence, the actual investigation into what exactly the grand mystery arrest involving “pro se Plaintiff no less and not allowed details, just hidden in a holding cell, the hiding out in a Texas State Hospital while all Slavery Servitude Attorney work product, files, computer, computer chips, all being destroyed by the (Government) whom

Pro Se Plaintiff since 2010 investigation into among other thing “Slavery” of the United States of America, and Texas Black Code Laws, which during the time of (RICO) arrest this all actually illegally “enslavement” physically ongoing direct at “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II in his person, First Presidential Negro (Obama) family, and the entire 44.5 Million plus Slaves of America, and

“Negro Immigrants coming to America to be “enslaved” with no 14th amendment in 2012 all being the same “Aggravated Perjury” RICO enslavement scheme of things since precisely August 20th 1619 involving “One” David Hittner ‘United States District Judge” United States Southern District of Texas Federal Courthouse Houston Texas Division, in The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act to continual Slavery Servitude ongoing in Texas on or about October 9th 2012 – February 7th 2013 for an additional 4 months and days counting later pursuant to the Civil War of 1865 passage of the 13th Amendment free said (Plaintiffs Slaves) collectively

When decision occurred in a (RICO) 148 years delinquent later defendant “United States of America et al” KKK “Mississippi Lynching Town USDA free Pro Se Slave Veteran “United States Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein February 7th 2013 as claimed

David Hittner, in 2012 preserved The 1890s: Black Codes Code for the State of Texas, approved August 26th, 1866, directed at the “enslaved Pro Se Plaintiff Hamilton II” herein in his person as all allegation are not far fetch but official as stated in 2012 being a (RICO) shame in 2016 as Slavery did not officially ending until 2013 when

Whites Only free Pro Se Plaintiff Hamilton and having 13th and 14th amendments rights destroyed, to full non-existed being “Enslaved” by The States of Texas and United States of America et al secret White Only Elite Society as claimed in this action, which sign on the 9th day of October 2012 by Judge David Hittner,

Aggravated Perjury committed wrongfully in that Mississippi free said (Slave) Negro Plaintiff Hamilton back in 1865 not until legally on or about February 7th 2013 and as “Such” enslave Pro Se Hamilton having no constitutional rights of both “United States of America” et al and State of Texas et al, when this “Fabrication, and perjury was produce on “October” 9th 2012, as on

November 8th 1961 Birth Certificate of Pro Se Plaintiff (Hamilton) II being required filed into this action which under rules of common law, one cannot be Born into “Slavery Servitude” in 1961 while having 14th amendment privileges on “October 9th 2012 as claimed by Chief Defendant David Hitner”, then free from “Slavery Servitude” 148 years later in 2013 after the passage of the 1865 Civil War establishment of equality for negro Race by the passage of 14th Amendment which is voided forever by United States of America Mississippi ratifying the (MIA) 13th amendment of the USA in 2013

As exhibit (A) dated October 9th 2012 by “David Hittner” United States of America District Judge engaging in conscious disregards for Fiduciary Duties of an acting sitting Official impartial United States District Government Federal Judge

Signed at Houston Texas on or about October 9th 2012 Pro Se Slave Veteran “United States Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein “Actually” born into “Slavery Servitude” on or about the direct birth on November 8th 1961 as

“One” David Hittner ‘United States District Judge” United States Southern District of Texas Federal Courthouse Houston Texas Division, engaged in The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act to continual Slavery Servitude ongoing directed at “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II in his person in Texas on or about October 9th 2012 – February 7th 2013 for an additional 4 months and days counting later legally “Enslavement” pursuant to the Civil War of 1865 passage of the missing 13th Amendment never freeing said (Plaintiffs Slaves) collectively

When decision occurred by accident in a (RICO) 148 years delinquent later defendant “United States of America et al” KKK “Mississippi Lynching Town USDA free Pro Se Slave Veteran “United States Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein February 7th 2013 official (52) enslavement years being an official

Slaves of Defendant (USA) Judicial Government Grand Non-Disclosure of the 13th Amendment never was ratified for 148 years later after the “Civil War” This Fraud upon the Court committed under color of Law by Judge David Hittner criminal in “Aggravated Perjury” producing false material government records, promoting, directed, and securing future ongoing

(RICO)18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor),

“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), and

Texas Black Codes Laws, with “Jim Crow Laws protect in this omission of material facts submitted by the court in direct conflict of actual Living event v. the fabrication fraudulent dismissal in favor of the “White Only” defendant (Texas) et al and all defendant(s) therein Chief Defendant continual onward with intent and deliberate conscious as a “senior Federal Judge for the District Court of Texas” did

Prima Facial Tort committed to major fraud against the United States, False Statements, Concealment—18 U.S.C. § 1001, having full knowledge of History of Pro Se Plaintiff and fully aware that President Barack Obama on file as (Plaintiff) being “Enslaved” in addition to 44.5 Million Negro race,

Further affirm David Hittner “aggravated perjury” being Rouge in further “Aiding & Abetting”, “Assisting or Encouraging”, “Assistant & Participating”, “Concert of Actions” all on behalf of all Defendant and Co-Defendant(s) described herein as described being officially “Kidnaped” by Texas to keeping the secret

“Slaver Servitude” still ongoing at the time said complaints were made dating to start date of spy and scheme in 2010, and the Mystery arrest being criminal conspire following filing Complaint against (Texas) and United States in 2011 with all parties herein involved still as of this undersigned notary seal date involved.

Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein reincorporates all and files a Notice of Motion for “Aggravated Perjury” charges against each identified Defendant herein being charged out and on file with the

“United States Attorney Office” for the District of Texas, and made entry into the records of these proceeding Civil Action H-16-1774, Louis Charles Hamilton II et al v. The Federal Reserve Bank, et al as stated as further:

with Motion to Strike, with accompanying Motion to Vacate and invalidate this fraudulent Public Record RICO Judgement,

Notice requesting “Oral Arguments” and official certified records of

Mississippi 13th Amendment being ratified on February 7th 2013 freeing the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II filed into this Civil Action.

Respectfully “Affirm”, “State” and fully 1000% “Declare” all absolute “Just” “Fair” and required relief in

“Law and Equity” being before the Lord “As of the undersigned “Sealed Date”

Subscribed and Sworn before Me this ________ day of _______________ 2016

________________________________

Public Notary

________________________________________

Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN),

2724 61st street Ste. I-B

Galveston, Texas. 77551

bluefinlch2@gmail.com

832-894-9465

832-344-7134

louishamilton2015@gmail.com

in direct violation of Sec. 37.03. knowingly making a false entry to hide “enslavement” of the “Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II official property of the State of Mississippi” fully (RICO) criminal violation of the 13^th Amendment of the United States of America et al while destroyed the 14^th amendment at the same time as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to further criminal

(RICO) acts on or about October 9th 2012 the enforcement of “Black Codes” Act to establish a Code of Criminal Procedure for the State of Texas, approved August 26th, 1866,

Directed at “pro se” Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property of the State of Mississippi within jurisdiction of United States of America et al

Until February 7^th 2013 And “pro se” Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property o The Knights of the Klu Klux Klansmen (1865 – 2016) “Slave Trade Dynasty” as

Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to on or about October 9th 2012 further (RICO), Obstruction of Justice, concealment, aid and abetting, concert of action Surrounding the continual 2016 (December) violations of The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,” False Imprisonment DNA Negro Slaves (Plaintiffs) past, present and future (RICO)“Slavery Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,

Violation under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... and “Honest Services Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346”, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud, and major fraud against the United States, False Statements, Concealment—18 U.S.C. § 1001, Further affirm “Aiding & Abetting”, “Assisting or Encouraging”, “Assistant & Participating”, “Concert of Actions” massive 2011

Religious prosecution, Custodial Interference, Child abduction/Child Theft, Theft of Body, grave robber, sachem of things in Utah. Which Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to further criminal (RICO) acts on or about October 9th 2012 Judicial duties performed in direct Fraud Non-Disclosure, Common law fraud, Fraud upon the court,

Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to on or about October 9th 2012 further (RICO), while committed to “Treason” in hate crimes of insurances human rights World Violation criminal acts of continual august 20^th 1619 continual in 2011 forced “enslavement” for unjust enrichment directed at the

Enslaved since date of birth November 8^th 1961 by “United States of America et al as described in said complaint be made fully physically continual in 2011 same forced “enslavement” for unjust enrichment by one Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, whom also committed to mutable counts of

The 13th amendment to the “United States of America” was destroyed, annihilate, wipe out, and fully obliterate, fully in law and equity” official in leaving (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally born between the exact dates of August 20th 1619 - February 7th 2013 “Slaves of The United States of America”, as so legally Born unto “Slavery Servitude”.

That august 20th 1619 “Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully “Enforced” On or about “October” 9th 2012 (RICO) enterprise and all three “Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros) running concurrently in 2016 this undersigned date, and enterprise David Hittner ‘United States District Judge” having full conscious knowledge and professional legal expert in “Cheating, committing, (RICO) cover up and to conspiring

PENAL CODE

TITLE 8. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER 37. PERJURY AND OTHER FALSIFICATION

Sec. 37.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Court record" means a decree, judgment, order, subpoena, warrant, minutes, or other document issued by a court of:

(A) this state;

(B) another state;

(C) the United States;

(D) a foreign country recognized by an act of congress or a treaty or other international convention to which the United States is a party;

(E) an Indian tribe recognized by the United States; or

(F) any other jurisdiction, territory, or protectorate entitled to full faith and credit in this state under the United States Constitution.

(2) "Governmental record" means:

(A) anything belonging to, received by, or kept by government for information, including a court record;

(B) anything required by law to be kept by others for information of government;

(C) a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, letter of patent, or similar document issued by government, by another state, or by the United States;

(E) an official ballot or other election record; or

(F) the written documentation a mobile food unit is required to obtain under Section 437.0074, Health and Safety Code.

(3) "Statement" means any representation of fact.

Amended by:

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1276 (H.B. 3672), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 161 (S.B. 1093), Sec. 16.004, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 37.02. PERJURY. (a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to deceive and with knowledge of the statement's meaning:

(1) he makes a false statement under oath or swears to the truth of a false statement previously made and the statement is required or authorized by law to be made under oath; or

(2) he makes a false unsworn declaration under Chapter 132, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 37.03. AGGRAVATED PERJURY. (a) A person commits an offense if he commits perjury as defined in Section 37.02, and the false statement:

(1) is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and

(2) is material.

(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

(b) It is no defense to prosecution under Section 37.03 (Aggravated Perjury) that the declarant mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.

(c) Whether a statement is material in a given factual situation is a question of law.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL RECORD. (a) A person commits an offense if he:

(1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false alteration of, a governmental record;

(2) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent that it be taken as a genuine governmental record;

(3) intentionally destroys, conceals, removes, or otherwise impairs the verity, legibility, or availability of a governmental record;

(4) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form with intent that it be used unlawfully;

(5) makes, presents, or uses a governmental record with knowledge of its falsity; or

(6) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form with knowledge that it was obtained unlawfully.

(2) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record was:

(D) a search warrant issued by a magistrate.

(d) An offense under this section, if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is described by Section 37.01(2)(D), is:

(1) a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed under Subsection (a)(2) or Subsection (a)(5) and the defendant is convicted of presenting or using the record;

(2) a felony of the third degree if the offense is committed under:

(A) Subsection (a)(1), (3), (4), or (6); or

(B) Subsection (a)(2) or (5) and the defendant is convicted of making the record; and

(3) a felony of the second degree, notwithstanding Subdivisions (1) and (2), if the actor's intent in committing the offense was to defraud or harm another.

(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution for possession under Subsection (a)(6) that the possession occurred in the actual discharge of official duties as a public servant.

(h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.13, the actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1364 (H.B. 126), Sec. 1, eff. June 18, 2005.

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1085 (H.B. 3024), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 73 (H.B. 1813), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1130 (H.B. 2086), Sec. 31, eff. September 1, 2009.

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 510 (S.B. 124), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.

Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 690 (H.B. 644), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.

Sec. 37.13. RECORD OF A FRAUDULENT COURT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person makes, presents, or uses any document or other record with:

(1) knowledge that the document or other record is not a record of a court created under or established by the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States; and

(2) the intent that the document or other record be given the same legal effect as a record of a court created under or established by the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States.

(c) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.10, the actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 8, eff. May 21, 1997.

February 7^th 2013 when the 13^th amendment of the United States of America Constitution being legally ratified and (RICO) endeavor to keep this “Enslavement” secret by Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, whom also committed to mutable counts of “Aggravated Perjury”, on or about October 9th 2012 direct intent the non-existent 6^th amendment and “Fourteenth Amendment” on behalf of a “enslave” Pro Se Plaintiff absent all Constitutional rights on or about

October 9^th 2012 dating back to Birth into “Slavery Servitude” of the United States of America already being destroyed, conceal, hidden as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, stated as follows:

Plaintiff claims his confinement in the Harris County Jail was caused by the Defendants’ violation of his constitutional rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment

Pro Se Plaintiff fully assert, declare and affirmed Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, fully (RICO) under color of law”, conspired to conceal, fabricate further, aid and abetting, concert of actions pretended, and directly engaging in producing actual physical pro se slave Plaintiff Civil rights of constitution both Federal and State of Texas violated by a non-existent 6^th and 14^th amendment on behalf of a “enslavement” inmate “pro se”

Plaintiff property of “Mississippi” until freedom occurred on or about February 7^th 2013 as described in attached exhibit (A) filed in support herein dated October 9^th 2012 at that precise date 10/9/2012 “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II officially captured, denaturalization of all claimed

“Slavery Servitude” of said defendant “United States of America et al” on or about the 7^th day of February 2013 as records do indicate with the office of the Sectary of State of Mississippi, including the records at United States Secretary of State

“Negro Immigrants coming to America to be “enslaved” with no 14^th amendment in 2012 all being the same “Aggravated Perjury” RICO enslavement scheme of things since precisely August 20^th 1619 involving “One” David Hittner ‘United States District Judge” United States Southern District of Texas Federal Courthouse Houston Texas Division, in The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act to continual Slavery Servitude ongoing in Texas on or about October 9th 2012 – February 7th 2013 for an additional 4 months and days counting later pursuant to the Civil War of 1865 passage of the 13th Amendment free said (Plaintiffs Slaves) collectively

Whites Only free Pro Se Plaintiff Hamilton and having 13^th and 14^th amendments rights destroyed, to full non-existed being “Enslaved” by The States of Texas and United States of America et al secret White Only Elite Society as claimed in this action, which sign on the 9th day of October 2012 by Judge David Hittner,

Aggravated Perjury committed wrongfully in that Mississippi free said (Slave) Negro Plaintiff Hamilton back in 1865 not until legally on or about February 7^th 2013 and as “Such” enslave Pro Se Hamilton having no constitutional rights of both “United States of America” et al and State of Texas et al, when this “Fabrication, and perjury was produce on “October” 9^th 2012, as on

November 8^th 1961 Birth Certificate of Pro Se Plaintiff (Hamilton) II being required filed into this action which under rules of common law, one cannot be Born into “Slavery Servitude” in 1961 while having 14th amendment privileges on “October 9^th 2012 as claimed by Chief Defendant David Hitner”, then free from “Slavery Servitude” 148 years later in 2013 after the passage of the 1865 Civil War establishment of equality for negro Race by the passage of 14th Amendment which is voided forever by United States of America Mississippi ratifying the (MIA) 13th amendment of the USA in 2013

As exhibit (A) dated October 9^th 2012 by “David Hittner” United States of America District Judge engaging in conscious disregards for Fiduciary Duties of an acting sitting Official impartial United States District Government Federal Judge

Slaves of Defendant (USA) Judicial Government Grand Non-Disclosure of the 13^th Amendment never was ratified for 148 years later after the “Civil War” This Fraud upon the Court committed under color of Law by Judge David Hittner criminal in “Aggravated Perjury” producing false material government records, promoting, directed, and securing future ongoing

(RICO)18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor),

“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), and

Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein reincorporates all and files a Notice of Motion for “Aggravated Perjury” charges against each identified Defendant David Hittner U.S. Federal Judge herein being charged out and on file with the

Rule 42. Consolidation; separate trials.

(a) Consolidation. When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.

(a)(1) A motion to consolidate cases shall be heard by the judge assigned to the first case filed. Notice of a motion to consolidate cases shall be given to all parties in each case. The order denying or granting the motion shall be filed in each case.

(a)(2) If a motion to consolidate is granted, the case number of the first case filed shall be used for all subsequent papers and the case shall be heard by the judge assigned to the first case. The presiding judge may assign the case to another judge for good cause.

(b) Separate trials. The court in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice may order a separate trial of any claim, cross claim, counterclaim, or third party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross claims, counterclaims, third party claims, or issues.

Exhibit (A) Order Chief Defendant United States District Judge “David Hittner” “Claimed”….? having considered the motion and the applicable law…?

Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff further states factual in law and (Negro Pro Se Plaintiff herein a forced born “Slave” of United States of America actually having the possession of (common sense) of “White Man” only laws and Constitution only as been express by this particular Chief Defendant United States District Judge “David Hittner” in 2012 further making “Racial Hate Target” of Human Rights Violations, ruler for whites supremacy of the Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen strong hold on the Federal Court House

As such Chief Defendant United States District Judge “David Hittner” being Human impossible in considered the “motion” for “consolidation” as dated on 25^th day of July 2016 when factual the (FRCP) requires first and foremost Defendant “United States of America” et al Republican Federal Judges over bearing power to enforce “Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,”, yet never follow the same (FRCP) Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; Pro Se Plaintiff being Born into Slavery Servitude of United States of America, “Initial Disclosure” of the continual (RICO) enterprise “enslavement” of 44.5 Plus Million Negro Race since the 1865 Civil War…?

Well into 2013 non-disclosure being made by United States Attorney office that in 2010 Hamilton v. United States of America et al 1:2010-CV-00808 as required under

General Provisions Governing Discovery

(a) Required Disclosures.

(1) Initial Disclosure.

(A) In General. Except as exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B) or as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party must, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties:

(i) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information—along with the subjects of that information—that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment;

(ii) a copy—or a description by category and location—of all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things that the disclosing party has in its possession, custody, or control and may use to support its claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment;

(iii) a computation of each category of damages claimed by the disclosing party—who must also make available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34 the documents or other evidentiary material, unless privileged or protected from disclosure, on which each computation is based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered; and

(iv) for inspection and copying as under Rule 34, any insurance agreement under which an insurance business may be liable to satisfy all or part of a possible judgment in the action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment.

(B) Proceedings Exempt from Initial Disclosure. The following proceedings are exempt from initial disclosure:

(i) an action for review on an administrative record;

(ii) a forfeiture action in rem arising from a federal statute;

(iii) a petition for habeas corpus or any other proceeding to challenge a criminal conviction or sentence;

(iv) an action brought without an attorney by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision;

(v) an action to enforce or quash an administrative summons or subpoena;

(vi) an action by the United States to recover benefit payments;

(vii) an action by the United States to collect on a student loan guaranteed by the United States;

(viii) a proceeding ancillary to a proceeding in another court; and

(ix) an action to enforce an arbitration award.

(C) Time for Initial Disclosures—In General. A party must make the initial disclosures at or within 14 days after the parties’ Rule 26(f) conference unless a different time is set by stipulation or court order, or unless a party objects during the conference that initial disclosures are not appropriate in this action and states the objection in the proposed discovery plan. In ruling on the objection, the court must determine what disclosures, if any, are to be made and must set the time for disclosure.

(D) Time for Initial Disclosures—For Parties Served or Joined Later. A party that is first served or otherwise joined after the Rule 26(f) conference must make the initial disclosures within 30 days after being served or joined, unless a different time is set by stipulation or court order.

(E) Basis for Initial Disclosure; Unacceptable Excuses. A party must make its initial disclosures based on the information then reasonably available to it. A party is not excused from making its disclosures because it has not fully investigated the case or because it challenges the sufficiency of another party's disclosures or because another party has not made its disclosures.

“Pro Se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II herein having stated after this discrepancy of United States of America et al failure to end the 1865 Civil War, and Honor the provision of the 13^th Amendment Chief Defendant David Hittner”, conspired with Co-Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore, on or about the 3^rd day of May 2016 as described in Plaintiffs Exhibit (B) attached herein (Order) of United States Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore official

Denied “Motion to Proceed” In Forma Pauperis stated: The Court finds that the Petitioner can make no rational argument in law or fact to support his claim for relief…signed “Vanessa D. Gilmore” signed 2^nd day of May.

Exhibit (C) From David J. Bradley, Clerk dated May 3^rd 2016 Re: Case 4:16-MC-00956

As stated: The Court denied your application to proceed as a pauper.

If you want to continue your complaint, you must pay the clerk the filing fee of $400.00

The Court will do nothing with your case until the fee has been paid

Yet Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein did (Pay) and as of this undersigned Notary Seal Date

United States Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore official Denied “Motion to Proceed” already under “aggravated perjury” circumstances after comply with “court” on or about 6/1/2016 as stated as follows:

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

U.S. Docket No. 4:16-MC-00956 Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712 before the Court, please find $400.00 U.S. Dollars as required by Court Order

In The United States District Court

For The Southern District of Texas

Houston Division

Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712

Pro Se Plaintiff

“Plaintiffs Slaves et al” U.S. Docket No. 4:16-MC-00956

Further appearances

“PLANTIFFS”

Vs.

The Federal Reserve Bank et al

Defendant(s) et al

Memorandum for filing fee

Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712 before the Court, please find $400.00 U.S. Dollars as required by Court Order requesting filing of the complaint as per rules of civil procedure further requesting require issuance of an Summons and Complaint against said defendant(s) collectively with, as filed

Order Freezing Assets and Other Emergency Relief,

Order to Show Cause, on “Emergency Application” of “PLAINTIFFS” collectively TRO “temporary restraining order” for Asset freezing orders of (Defendant)

The Federal Reserve Bank et al, The Federal Reserve System et al, The Federal Reserve et al,

The Fed et al Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 2200 N. Pearl St., Dallas, Texas 75201

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA 30309-4470

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 101 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 P.O. Box 7702

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Mo. 64198

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis, MO 63166-0442

Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Post Office Box 27622, Richmond, VA 23261

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis P.O. Box 291 Minneapolis, MN 55480-0291

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland P.O. Box 6387 Cleveland, Ohio 44101-1387

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-1413

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA Ten Independence Mall Philadelphia, PA 19106-1574

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 600 Atlantic Avenue | Boston, MA 02210-2204

Federal Reserve Bank of New York 33 Liberty Street New York, NY 10045

“Chief Defendant(s) Federal Reserve Bank et al” herein (RICO) enterprise files with the above Honorable U.S. District Court,

“Pro Se Plaintiff only have income of 630.00 U.S. Dollars per month, as the $400.00 is paid in full for the behalf of 44.5 Millions of abused Negro Slaves, from said (SSI) and nothing but the best for said

44.5 Million Still Negro American slaves, (Plaintiff) been living off next to nothing and actually living off next to nothing in process all Slaves Freedom from all defendant since

February 2016 all Plaintiffs Collectively being still (RICO) subjects enterprise in slave labor endeavor in 2016 (December) by Federal Reserve bank et al

“Pro Se Plaintiff requesting service of said legal document(s) and summons being process as required by law, served upon the defendant, as they are without a doubt in law and equity

100% Guilt as Charge, and a direct party of continual Slavery Servitude against the Plaintiff(s) collectively since December 23rd 1913 well into 2016 (December)

Plaintiffs requesting all other relief being fair, fully before the court in “Law and equity”.

On this ____ Day of ______________ 2016

________________________________________

Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN),

2724 61st street Ste. I-B

Galveston, Texas. 77551

bluefinlch2@gmail.com

832-894-9465

832-344-7134

louishamilton2015@gmail.com

Posted by Louis Hamilton at 12:31 PM

Pro Se Slave Negro (Hamilton) II herein fully Affirm and fully declare Chief Defendant United States District Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore committed to the same circumstances Fraud Upon The Court, “aggravated perjury”, fully to aid and abetting in cover up the “Enslavement” of the 44.5 Million Negro Plaintiff(s) collectively appearing before the “Court” to continue under color or law denied on the 2nd day of

May 2016 Order filed herein as exhibit (B) stating: The Court finds that the Petitioner can make no rational argument in law or fact to support his claim for relief…signed “Vanessa D. Gilmore” whom Order “pro se” Plaintiff to pay $400.00 US Dollars in order the defendant “Federal Reserve Bank” et al being process said complaint and served a summon in accordance’s with the Court orders

The plaintiff is responsible for having the summons and complaint served within the time allowed by Rule 4(m) as the $400.00 being paid then diverted to another ongoing (Hamilton) complaint in 2016 as the Court Clerk some almost on the phone was rude saying the money was to pay for a different action after the “Letter” stating the purpose of the $400.00 filing fee as required to (FRCP) Orders of Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore

Rule 4 – Summons

(a) Contents; Amendments.

(1) Contents. A summons must:

(A) name the court and the parties;

(B) be directed to the defendant;

(D) state the time within which the defendant must appear and defend;

(E) notify the defendant that a failure to appear and defend will result in a default judgment against the defendant for the relief demanded in the complaint;

(F) be signed by the clerk; and

(G) bear the court’s seal.

(2) Amendments. The court may permit a summons to be amended.

(b) Issuance. On or after filing the complaint, the plaintiff may present a summons to the clerk for signature and seal. If the summons is properly completed, the clerk must sign, seal, and issue it to the plaintiff for service on the defendant. A summons–or a copy of a summons that is addressed to multiple Defendants–must be issued for each defendant to be served.

(1) In General. A summons must be served with a copy of the complaint. The plaintiff is responsible for having the summons and complaint served within the time allowed by Rule 4(m) and must furnish the necessary copies to the person who makes service.

(2) By Whom. Any person who is at least 18 years old and not a party may serve a summons and complaint.

(3) By a Marshal or Someone Specially Appointed. At the plaintiff’s request, the court may order that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed by the court. The court must so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. §1915 or as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. §1916.

Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II files in aggravated perjury charges in Civil Action H-16-1774, Defendant “Federal Reserve Bank et al