U.S. Federal Judge Alfred H. Bennett committed to on or about 3rd
day of August, 2016 “Aggravated Perjury”, Treason, Obstruction of Justice and
aid and abetting the enemy of the United States of America in that pursuant to defendant “United States of
America et al FRCP Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing
Discovery, already the “Main Issue” surrounding “Fraud of this Defendant”
Donald John Trump Sr. and his family member Identified in Federal Complaint,
being factual, sound and very much Defendant “own” corruption, discovery sought
as “Public Records” already showing the
Fraud direct at “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II in his person surrounding the
scuttling of 6 Trillion U.S. Dollars as “outline and fully denied protection
from further abuse in direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1031 –“Fraud against
the United States”
18 U.S. Code § 1341 - Frauds and swindles
18 U.S. Code § 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television
18 U.S. Code § 1349 - Attempt and conspiracy
18 U.S. Code § 1347 - Health care fraud
18 U.S. Code § 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments
All direct at “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II status of being a defendant
(Military Veteran) being ripped off under such a RICO massive amount of 6
Million, plus already with the “Defendant” States of Texas” Con Man Defendant “Trump
University” having fleeced since approximately Millions” Documents obtained by
CNN and former state investigator, who went undercover at Trump University
courses, told CNN that the state was prepared to force Trump University to pay
$5.4 million for allegedly defrauding Texans who attended university workshops and
seminars in 2009 and 2010, But Abbott, then an ambitious attorney general with
his eyes set on the governor's office, killed the investigation because of a
friendly relationship with Trump, former Texas investigator John Owens told
CNN. He called Abbott's decision not to sue Trump "absolutely political,
"Trump claims attendees at his seminars where satisfied
customers. Gov. Abbott says he ran Trump University out of Texas. Neither
assertions are correct. Abbott paints himself as the consumers' advocate and
protector. The documents show those representations to be false," Owens
told CNN.
Defendant Trump (RICO) committed to bribery of a “public official
whom accepted donated $35,000 to the successful gubernatorial campaign of
then-Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott three years after a probe into the
university’s "possibly deceptive trade practices" was dropped by his
office when the university agreed to cease its Texas operations.
Defendant Donald Trump “personally pocketed $5m” from his Trump
University “scam”, just in New York (alone) stated by: New York’s attorney
general, which (Plaintiffs) Collectively affirm with -out fuss and false
allegation said 5 Million U.S. Dollars having been Defendant “Donald John Trump
Sr. and Donald John Trump Jr. “War Chest” funding for funding “Whites Supremacy
World Wide Terrorism, and Mainly “Treason” directed to undermined, undercut, at
President Barack Obama “Military Commander in Chief AGENDA” especially in (Syria) and (ISIS) as described
in the already filed complaint in Bob Casey Crooked Klansmen Strong hold
Federal Courthouse as (Plaintiffs) stated and still able to show addition funds
of approximately able to further show in
addition to massive million being collected off the usage of “Veterans Fraud
Fundraiser still be conducted as of this undersigned “Notary Seal Date”
Defendant Mr. Trump confused the Trump Foundation with his own
bank account because he occasionally treated it like one. Co-Defendant Melania
Trump used $20,000 of foundation funds to buy a six-foot painting of Mr. Trump
at a charity art auction. Mr. Trump bid $12,000 in foundation money to win a
football helmet signed by quarterback Tim Tebow. These examples appear to
violate IRS rules against charity officials engaging in “self-dealing.”
Donald Trump and Kids Named in $250M Tax Scam
Four Donald Trump-licensed real-estate developments are at the
center of a huge income tax evasion scheme, according to allegations in a
lawsuit unsealed Thursday afternoon by a judge in Manhattan.
The presumptive Republican nominee is not personally accused. He
is described as a “material witness” in the evasion of taxes on as much as $250
million in income. According to the court papers, that includes $100 million in
profits and $65 million in real-estate transfer taxes from a Manhattan high
rise project bearing his familiar name.
However, his status may change, according to the lawyers who filed
the lawsuit, Richard Lerner and Frederick M. Oberlander, citing Trump’s
testimony about Felix Sater, a convicted stock swindler at the center of the
alleged scheme.
Trump received tens of millions of dollars in fees and partnership
interests in one of the four projects, the Trump Soho New York, a luxury high
rise in lower Manhattan. His son Donald Junior and his daughter Ivanka also
were paid in fees and partnership interests, the lawyers said, and are also material
witnesses in the case.
Trump and Sater traveled extensively together and were
photographed and interviewed in Denver and Loveland, Colorado, Phoenix, Fort
Lauderdale, and New York. The two Trump children were also with Sater in
Moscow, Alan Garten, the Trump Organization general counsel, has said.
Trump has testified about Sater in a Florida lawsuit accusing the
two of them of fraud in a failed high-rise project. Trump testified that he had
a glancing knowledge of Sater and would not recognize him if he were sitting in
the room.
Sater controlled an investment firm named Bayrock, with offices in
Trump Tower, and sought to develop branded Trump Tower luxury buildings in
Moscow and other cities. Court papers show his salary in 2006 was $7 million,
but it alleges that was a pittance compared to his real income.
Sater then moved into the Trump Organization offices. He carried a
business card, issued by the Trump Organization, identifying him as a “senior
adviser” to Trump.
The four developments were all handled as partnerships.
Partnerships are not taxed and are rarely audited because the profits are
supposed to be reported as going to the partners personally. The lawsuit says
the profits simply were not reported when Sater and others took their
partnership profits and other income from the deals.
The state tax fraud lawsuit is known as a qui tam case in which
citizens file as private attorneys general on behalf of the government. In
effect Lerner and Oberlander are acting as prosecutors in the alleged tax
fraud.
Eric Schneiderman, the New York State attorney general, learned of
the case soon after it was filed in state court last August and declined to
intervene. His office confirmed that stance Thursday after the lawsuit was
unsealed.
The suit says Sater and other defendants owe at least $7 million
in New York state income taxes, a sum that would be tripled if they prevail.
If the federal government were to intervene the federal taxes
would come to about $35 million.
The tax fraud lawsuit included 212 pages of documents, among them
a flow chart that the plaintiff claims showed how the scheme worked. The
lawsuit alleges the tax fraud scheme as simple, telling the judge “there need
be no fear of complexity, for there is none.”
New York state tax law closely aligns with federal tax law in
defining income, deductions, and taxes due.
The case was unsealed after Sater filed an action in Israel
against a rabbi who says he was cheated in a $40 million stock swindle. That
was enough to persuade a federal judge to unseal another lawsuit against Sater,
Bayrock, and others earlier in July. And in turn that disclosure prompted the
state Supreme Court (trial court) judge in Manhattan to unseal the tax evasion lawsuit.
Sater secretly pleaded guilty to the stock swindle in 1998. The
$40 million fleeced from investors went to him, the Genovese and Gambino crime
families and others.
In 1998 Sater pleaded guilty in federal court, but the plea was
kept secret. Sater was sentenced in secret in 2009 to probation and a $25,000
fine with no jail time and no requirement to make restitution.
That was an extraordinarily light sentence, especially given
Sater’s violent past. In 1991 he admitted to shoving the broken stem of a
margarita glass into a man’s face and was sentenced to two years.
Court papers, testimony by Trump and a book by one of Sater’s
confederates—The Scorpion and the Frog, “The True Story of One Man’s Fraudulent
Rise and Fall on the Wall Street of the Nineties”—all tell how after his arrest
Sater became an operative for the Central Intelligence Agency, supposedly
buying missiles on their way to terrorists, which may explain the light
sentence.
As to Trump, every president starting with Richard Nixon and major
party candidate since has made public some or all of their tax returns. He has
not, even as Hillary Clinton has released her complete tax returns going back
more than three decades.
Trump has explained his refusal to make his income tax returns
public by claiming that the ones he has filed for 2012 and since are under
routine audit. Mark Everson, a former commissioner of Internal Revenue has said
there is no reason to hold the returns back, even assuming they are being
audited.
He has offered no explanation for not releasing his returns for
2011 and earlier, years on which he has said the audits are closed.
Documents made public by the New Jersey Casino Control Commission
show that despite living a lavish lifestyle, Trump did not pay income taxes in
1978, 1979, 1992, and 1994. He also paid no income taxes in 1984, by far his
most lucrative year in his career to that point, according to state and city
tax tribunal proceedings I reported on previously.
No comments:
Post a Comment