In The United States District Court
For The Eastern District of Texas
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
Notice of Motion “Aggravated Perjury Charges”
December 15, 2010 as U.S. Docket No. 1:2010-CV-00808
“PLANTIFFS” Defendant United States of
America et al
Vs.
“Chief Defendant” The Honorable Ron Clark
United States of America et al United States Attorney, “Eric H. Holder
Jr.”
Defendant(s) et al United States Attorney,
“John M. Bales”
Assistant United States
Attorney, “Andrea Parker”
CVS/Caremark and UPS
Comes Now Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Respectfully
Appearance (Pro Se Plaintiff) Louis Charles Hamilton II herein (USN) before the
Honorable Court, the special vulnerability of the victim being still “enslaved”
since August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 ‘United States District Court”
“Chief Defendant” The Honorable Ron Clark, United
States Attorney, “Eric H. Holder Jr.”
United States Attorney, “John M. Bales”, Assistant United States
Attorney, “Andrea Parker” CVS/Caremark and UPS “singularly” and “collectively”
each described defendant committed “Aggravated Perjury”, in direct violation of
Sec. 37.03. knowingly making a false entry to hide “enslavement” of the “Pro Se
Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II born secretly into “Slavery Servitude” of
The Defendant
United States of America et al official property of
the State of Mississippi” fully (RICO) criminal violation of the ratified
February 7th 2013 13th Amendment of the United States of America et
al while destroyed the 14th amendment in both Civil Actions December 15, 2010
as U.S. Docket No. 1:2010-CV-00808 in connection thereof United States Federal
Docket No. 1:2011 CV-OO240 Hamilton II vs. U.S. Attorney Office . CVS/Caremark
and UPS, officially
Hamilton v. United States of America et al Hamilton v. United States of
America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
Filed:
December 15, 2010 as 1:2010-CV-00808 Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Johnson Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO)
Act Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Eastern District Court Type: Other
Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 21 Report and Recommendations. It
is ORDERED that dft's 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED and pla's claims are
dismissed in their entirety w/prejudice, for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.
All pending motions not addressed herein are DENIED AS MOOT.
This is a final judgment disposing of all claims and parties. SO ORDERED.
Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/7/12. (pkb,)
Signed by
Judge Ron Clark on 3/7/12. However
Slavery Servitude of (RICO) enterprise Defendant “United States of America et
al end officially on or about when Mississippi, free said nigger(s) Slave
(PLANTIFFS) herein exactly February 7th 2013, as which
“Chief Defendant” The Honorable Ron Clark being official
“Republican Bigotry and Hatred' Judicial Fraud, to commit to being Fraudulent
in an official capacity to maintain “Slavery Servitude “Chief Defendant” The
Honorable Ron Clark, United States Attorney, “Eric H. Holder Jr.”
United States Attorney, “John M. Bales”, Assistant United
States Attorney, “Andrea Parker” with Co-Defendant CVS/Caremark and UPS
“singularly” and “collectively” conspire to officially destroy and RICO in Obstruction
of Justice aid and abetting as a Unit in concert of aggravated perjury committed
to the same against the “peace, Will, Dignity, and well-being of 44.5 Million
Negro Slaves Plaintiffs, whiles committed to the same “Aggravated Perjury”
direct in Treason Fashion” to further “enslave” a United States of America
Negro President Barack Obama and
Negro First
Presidential Family base on among other things direct (RICO) in Hate Crimes
Violation statue so officially seal on or about the 7th day of March
2012 as the evidence filed herein before the court marked and identified as exhibit
(A) herein SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/7/12. (pkb,)
So do dictate now officially in 2016 all to be the truth as
of this undersigned seal Notary date directed at the “pro se” Negro Slave Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN) #2712 SS in his person, his entire negro family, the
Presidential Family (Obama) with the President Barack Obama Birth Certificate
filed in the Original file December 15, 2010 as U.S. Docket No. 1:2010-CV-00808
as exhibit (A) herein
SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/7/12. (pkb,) that
the Birth Record being sentence to continual all acts complained of “Slavery
Servitude, Black Codes Laws, and Jim Crow Laws, all running currently And officially
direct at a Human Class-Action filed at a Abused Negro 1619 Slave Race itself,
being “all Negro Americans”, “Chief Defendant” The Honorable Ron Clark, United
States Attorney, “Eric H. Holder Jr.” United States Attorney, “John M. Bales”,
Assistant United States Attorney, “Andrea Parker” CVS/Caremark and UPS
“Singularly” and “Collectively” each described defendant
committed “Aggravated Perjury”, fraud of all material facts, and collectively
work as a “unit” to physically with Judge Ron Clark committed to fraud upon the
court in a (RICO) enterprise endeavor being in the professional legal capacity
of Chief District Judge official at The Jack Brooks Federal Building and.
United States Courthouse; 300 Willow Street; Suite 221; Beaumont Texas, 77701
And very professional legal expert United States Attorney, “Eric H.
Holder Jr.” United States Attorney, “John M. Bales”, Assistant United States
Attorney, “Andrea Parker” with Co-Defendant(s) CVS/Caremark and UPS conspired
to committed to the same”.
To wit: Signed by Chief Defendant Judge Ron Clark on or about
3/7/12, legal government documentation to engaged in The Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C.
§ 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or
forced labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,
18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering
statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), Chief Defendant Judge Ron Clark
direct with intent and deliberate conscious did Prima Facial Tort committed to
Judicial Fraud and Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, Judicial bias, and
having a direct interest in the out-come of said Hamilton v. United States of
America et al Judicial duties performed in direct
Violation under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of
Rights Under Color of Law ... and “Honest Services Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346”,
conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud, and major fraud against the United
States, False Statements, Concealment—18 U.S.C. § 1001, Further affirm “Aiding
& Abetting”, “Assisting or Encouraging”, “Assistant & Participating”,
“Concert of Actions” massive 2011
Civil conspire directed at (pro se) Hamilton being cover up
acts of killing of one human being by another “Homicide” as Pro Se Plaintiff
hidden and legally declared Dead in a
wrongful death(s), wrongful death of (Plaintiff unborn fetus), Religious
prosecution, Custodial Interference,
Child abduction/Child Theft, Theft of Body, grave robber, sachem of
things in Utah
We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case Filed:
December 15, 2010 as 1:2010cv00808 Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: United States of America, Andrew Johnson Cause Of Action:
Racketeering (RICO) Act, Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Hamilton v. United States of America et al Filed: March
9, 2011 as 1:2011cv00122 Defendant: United States of America, State Of Texas,
Harris County Texas Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II Cause Of Action:
Civil Rights
Court: Fifth
Circuit › Texas › Texas Eastern District Court Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations As furtherance against claimed rights of
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II herein
Chief Defendant Judge Ron Clark so did for 10 months and 6
days physically Sentence Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II herein
and other similarly the same being 44.5 Million Nigger Slaves of August 20th
1619 already described herein To be official continual “Nigger Slave Property”
of Defendant “United States of America et al” Signed by Judge Ron Clark on
3/7/12.
Notwithstanding United States Attorney, “Eric H. Holder Jr.”
United States Attorney, “John M. Bales”, Assistant United States Attorney,
“Andrea Parker” CVS/Caremark and UPS committed to the same fraudulent acts
actions conspire collectively and so did for 10 months and 6 days physically
Sentence Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II herein and other
similarly the same being
44.5 Million Nigger Slaves of August 20th 1619 already
described herein To be official continual “Nigger Slave Property” of Defendant
“United States of America et al” Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/7/12, falsie claiming
the (Plaintiffs) collectively having legal citizenship, of the 14th
amendment and 13th amendment back dating to (1865) December Freedom
However Slavery Servitude of (RICO) enterprise Defendant
“United States of America et al end officially on or about when Mississippi,
free said negro(s) Slave (PLANTIFFS) 44.5 Million no exception all officially as
Government records protrude now officially in the term herein exactly February
7th 2013, as which Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/7/12. Being in direct
conflict of freedom, and civil rights same a pure special whites, “secretly now
“enslaving” the (pro se) Plaintiffs and future family derive thereof from within
his person born November 8th 1961 to 148 years of a delinquent
13th
amendment and living in the same faith of a 14th amendment
destroyed, and magical powers of holding to air of empty lies and continual “enslavement”
in 2013 no less paying governmental taxes for “slaughter off and enslavement”
by the expert White Man” ever so smart, from 1865 civil war till future “required”
White Man” Judicial “enslavement” on or about 3/7/12 to continual the touch of Knights
of The Klu Klux Klansmen bigotry, forced wrongful deaths in massive population
violation “hate crimes “ and official enslavement” of a “entire” American Human
race violation and no less direct “treason” to the acting
Negro Race President
Barack Obama, and (Obama) Presidential First Family, all being enslaved, with
all described co-defendant committed United States Attorney, “Eric H. Holder
Jr.” United States Attorney, “John M. Bales”, Assistant United States Attorney,
“Andrea Parker” CVS/Caremark and UPS fraud upon the court to
Enslavement “Aggravated Perjury”, Obstruction of Justice,
concealment, aid and abetting, concert of action Surrounding the continual 2013 (February) 7th
violations of The Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations Act,” False Imprisonment DNA Negro Slaves
(Plaintiffs) past, present and future (RICO)“Slavery Servitude, 18 U.S.C. §
1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590
(trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary
servitude, or forced labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,18
U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO
statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), Conversion, Civil Conspirers, Collusion concert
of action in violation 18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank fraud, Fraud and Willful
Misrepresentation, 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Material Misrepresentation / Fraud,
That august 20th 1619 “Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws”
and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully “Enforced” On or about 3/7/2012 (RICO)
enterprise and all three “Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros)
running concurrently in 2016 this undersigned date, pursuant to “Elite Secret
Klansmen Whites Only” Judicial Government securing The 1790 Naturalization Act
reserves naturalized citizenship for whites only having “officially” denaturalization
(Pro Se Plaintiff), the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally born between
the exact dates of 1790 – 2099
That august 20th 1619 “Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws”
and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully “Enforced” On or about 3/7/2012 (RICO)
enterprise and all three “Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros)
running (Secretly) still concurrently in 2016 this undersigned notary seal date,
and enterprise Ron Clark ‘United States District Judge” having full conscious
knowledge and professional legal expert in “Cheating, committing, (RICO) cover
up and to conspiring with United States Attorney, “Eric H. Holder Jr.” United
States Attorney, “John M. Bales”, Assistant United States Attorney, “Andrea
Parker” CVS/Caremark and UPS committed to the same fraudulent acts actions
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Ron Clark, committed to
further on or about March 7th 2012 FALSIFICATION OF Government
decree, judgement order records and further violation Sec. 37.04. MATERIALITY all facts therein to further
(RICO) aid a cover up scheme In connection with Co-defendant collectively with
the “primary goal, conceal 44.5 million negro race still “enslaved” in the
aggravated perjury scheme of things, concealed under depravation under color or
law, by
Chief Federal Judge Ron Clark, conspire from past failure in “enslavement”
of Plaintiffs non-disclosure criminal actions of (Chief Defendant) U. S.
District Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr., (RICO) in 2005 to maintain ongoing “enslavement”,
of 44.5 Million Negro Slaves of 1865 past civil war, being in 2012 “Material
Facts” in Maintaining Slavery Servitude of (RICO) enterprise scheme of things
on behalf of Defendant “United States of America et al Defendant fraud to
always secured The 1790 Naturalization Act reserves naturalized citizenship for
whites only and enforced by Chief Defendant Ron Clark a ‘United States District
Judge” having full conscious knowledge and professional legal expert fiduciary
responsibility as such evidence before this legal matter being filed in support
and so served on the “Honorable Court as described, being “Truthful” Notary
sworn before the Honorable Court Justices having full conscious knowledge and
professional legal expert fiduciary responsibility to conspire
IN RE:
AFRICAN-AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION. Appeals of Deadria
Farmer-Paellmann, et al., and Timothy Hurdle, et al.Nos. 05-3265, 05-3266,
05-3305., to refrain from (RICO) in Slavery
officially being continual by “United States of America et al” Justices till
February 7th 2013 in a Fraud None- disclosure racket “, for and additional (75)
years Negro Plaintiff(s) collectively Slaves of defendant America grand scheme
involving the continual criminal acts of
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO)
18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to
peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor), “Slavery Servitude”
money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money
laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1),,, very 1000% 1790- 2016
(226) years control, in an ongoing future by the
“Republican Party Judicial
Branch of Government of Defendant all Said contain fully “on a invalid, null,
ineffective, nonviable, useless, worthless, constitution of the United States
of America destroyed 13th and 14th amendment fully void
the constitution as a whole and officially in 2016 (December) on behalf of secret
“enslavement”
44.5 Million Negro Race having no-citizenship after the day
of the 13th amendment ratification occurred on February 7th
2013 continual being official “Property
and No Citizenship/Slave Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393
(1857), being in direct acts of “Human Rights Violation Directed at 44.5
million (PLANTIFFS) herein officially
Chief Defendant U.S.
Federal Judge acting under color of law, committed to (RICO) ““Aggravated
Perjury”, Falsification of government records, and Materiality obstruction all
facts derived thereof as defined by
PENAL CODE
TITLE 8. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER 37. PERJURY AND OTHER FALSIFICATION
Sec. 37.01.
DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Court
record" means a decree, judgment, order, subpoena, warrant, minutes, or
other document issued by a court of:
(A) this state;
(B) another state;
(C) the United States;
(D) a foreign country
recognized by an act of congress or a treaty or other international convention
to which the United States is a party;
(E) an Indian tribe
recognized by the United States; or
(F) any other
jurisdiction, territory, or protectorate entitled to full faith and credit in
this state under the United States Constitution.
(2) "Governmental
record" means:
(A) anything belonging
to, received by, or kept by government for information, including a court
record;
(B) anything required
by law to be kept by others for information of government;
(C) a license,
certificate, permit, seal, title, letter of patent, or similar document issued
by government, by another state, or by the United States;
(D) a standard proof
of motor vehicle liability insurance form described by Section 601.081,
Transportation Code, a certificate of an insurance company described by Section
601.083 of that code, a document purporting to be such a form or certificate that
is not issued by an insurer authorized to write motor vehicle liability
insurance in this state, an electronic submission in a form described by
Section 502.046(i), Transportation Code, or an evidence of financial
responsibility described by Section 601.053 of that code;
(E) an official ballot
or other election record; or
(F) the written
documentation a mobile food unit is required to obtain under Section 437.0074,
Health and Safety Code.
(3)
"Statement" means any representation of fact.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1,
1974. Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg.,
ch. 113, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1991;
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 5, eff.
May 21, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch.
823, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts
1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 393, Sec. 21, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1276 (H.B. 3672), Sec. 2,
eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 161 (S.B. 1093), Sec. 16.004,
eff. September 1, 2013.
Sec. 37.02.
PERJURY. (a) A person commits an offense if, with intent
to deceive and with knowledge of the statement's meaning:
(1) he makes a false
statement under oath or swears to the truth of a false statement previously
made and the statement is required or authorized by law to be made under
oath; or
(2) he makes a false
unsworn declaration under Chapter 132, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
(b) An offense under
this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1,
1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg.,
ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec. 37.03. AGGRAVATED
PERJURY. (a) A person commits an offense if he commits
perjury as defined in Section 37.02, and the false statement:
(1) is made during or
in connection with an official proceeding;
and
(2) is material.
(b) An offense under
this section is a felony of the third degree.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1,
1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg.,
ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec. 37.04.
MATERIALITY. (a) A statement is material, regardless of the
admissibility of the statement under the rules of evidence, if it could have
affected the course or outcome of the official proceeding.
(b) It is no defense
to prosecution under Section 37.03 (Aggravated Perjury) that the declarant
mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.
(c) Whether a
statement is material in a given factual situation is a question of law.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1,
1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg.,
ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec. 37.06.
INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS. An
information or indictment for perjury under Section 37.02 or aggravated perjury
under Section 37.03 that alleges that the declarant has made statements under
oath, both of which cannot be true, need not allege which statement is
false. At the trial the prosecution need
not prove which statement is false.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1,
1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg.,
ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec. 37.10. TAMPERING
WITH GOVERNMENTAL RECORD. (a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) knowingly makes a
false entry in, or false alteration of, a governmental record;
(2) makes, presents,
or uses any record, document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with
intent that it be taken as a genuine governmental record;
(3) intentionally
destroys, conceals, removes, or otherwise impairs the verity, legibility, or
availability of a governmental record;
(4) possesses, sells,
or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form
with intent that it be used unlawfully;
(5) makes, presents,
or uses a governmental record with knowledge of its falsity; or
(6) possesses, sells,
or offers to sell a governmental record or a blank governmental record form
with knowledge that it was obtained unlawfully.
(b) It is an exception
to the application of Subsection (a)(3) that the governmental record is
destroyed pursuant to legal authorization or transferred under Section 441.204,
Government Code. With regard to the
destruction of a local government record, legal authorization includes
compliance with the provisions of Subtitle C, Title 6, Local Government Code.
(c)(1) Except as
provided by Subdivisions (2), (3), and (4) and by Subsection (d), an offense
under this section is a Class A misdemeanor unless the actor's intent is to
defraud or harm another, in which event the offense is a state jail felony.
(2) An offense under
this section is a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the
offense that the governmental record was:
(A) a public school
record, report, or assessment instrument required under Chapter 39, Education
Code, data reported for a school district or open-enrollment charter school to
the Texas Education Agency through the Public Education Information Management
System (PEIMS) described by Section 42.006, Education Code, under a law or rule
requiring that reporting, or a license, certificate, permit, seal, title,
letter of patent, or similar document issued by government, by another state,
or by the United States, unless the actor's intent is to defraud or harm
another, in which event the offense is a felony of the second degree;
(B) a written report
of a medical, chemical, toxicological, ballistic, or other expert examination
or test performed on physical evidence for the purpose of determining the
connection or relevance of the evidence to a criminal action;
(C) a written report
of the certification, inspection, or maintenance record of an instrument, apparatus,
implement, machine, or other similar device used in the course of an
examination or test performed on physical evidence for the purpose of
determining the connection or relevance of the evidence to a criminal action;
or
(D) a search warrant
issued by a magistrate.
(3) An offense under
this section is a Class C misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the
offense that the governmental record is a governmental record that is required
for enrollment of a student in a school district and was used by the actor to
establish the residency of the student.
(4) An offense under
this section is a Class B misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the
offense that the governmental record is a written appraisal filed with an
appraisal review board under Section 41.43(a-1), Tax Code, that was performed
by a person who had a contingency interest in the outcome of the appraisal
review board hearing.
(d) An offense under
this section, if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental
record is described by Section 37.01(2)(D), is:
(1) a Class B
misdemeanor if the offense is committed under Subsection (a)(2) or Subsection
(a)(5) and the defendant is convicted of presenting or using the record;
(2) a felony of the
third degree if the offense is committed under:
(A) Subsection (a)(1),
(3), (4), or (6); or
(B) Subsection (a)(2)
or (5) and the defendant is convicted of making the record; and
(3) a felony of the
second degree, notwithstanding Subdivisions (1) and (2), if the actor's intent
in committing the offense was to defraud or harm another.
(e) It is an
affirmative defense to prosecution for possession under Subsection (a)(6) that
the possession occurred in the actual discharge of official duties as a public
servant.
(f) It is a defense to
prosecution under Subsection (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(5) that the false entry or
false information could have no effect on the government's purpose for
requiring the governmental record.
(g) A person is
presumed to intend to defraud or harm another if the person acts with respect
to two or more of the same type of governmental records or blank governmental
record forms and if each governmental record or blank governmental record form
is a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, or similar document issued by
government.
(h) If conduct that
constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under
Section 32.48 or 37.13, the actor may be prosecuted under any of those
sections.
(i) With the consent
of the appropriate local county or district attorney, the attorney general has
concurrent jurisdiction with that consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an
offense under this section that involves the state Medicaid program.
(j) It is not a
defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2) that the record, document, or
thing made, presented, or used displays or contains the statement "NOT A
GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT" or another substantially similar statement intended
to alert a person to the falsity of the record, document, or thing, unless the
record, document, or thing displays the statement diagonally printed clearly
and indelibly on both the front and back of the record, document, or thing in
solid red capital letters at least one-fourth inch in height.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1,
1974. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg.,
ch. 1248, Sec. 66, eff. Sept. 1, 1989;
Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 113, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 565, Sec. 5, eff.
Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch.
900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts
1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 6, eff. May 21, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 823, Sec. 4, eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch.
659, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts
1999, 76th Leg., ch. 718, Sec. 1, eff.
Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th
Leg., ch. 771, Sec. 3, eff. June 13, 2001;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 198, Sec. 2.139, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 257, Sec. 16, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1364 (H.B. 126), Sec. 1, eff. June
18, 2005.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1085 (H.B. 3024), Sec. 2,
eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 73 (H.B. 1813), Sec. 1, eff.
September 1, 2009.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1130 (H.B. 2086), Sec. 31,
eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 510 (S.B. 124), Sec. 1, eff.
September 1, 2013.
Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 690 (H.B. 644), Sec. 3, eff.
September 1, 2015.
Sec. 37.13. RECORD OF
A FRAUDULENT COURT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person
makes, presents, or uses any document or other record with:
(1) knowledge that the
document or other record is not a record of a court created under or
established by the constitution or laws of this state or of the United
States; and
(2) the intent that
the document or other record be given the same legal effect as a record of a
court created under or established by the constitution or laws of this state or
of the United States.
(b) An offense under
this section is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the offense is a felony of
the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant
has previously been convicted under this section on two or more occasions.
(c) If conduct that
constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under
Section 32.48 or 37.10, the actor may be prosecuted under any of those
sections.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 8, eff. May 21,
1997.
No comments:
Post a Comment