In The United States District Court
For
The Southern District of Texas
Houston Division
Louis Charles Hamilton II Notice of
Motion for
Pro Se
Plaintiff “Aggravated
Perjury Charges”
Vs. Civil
Action H-11-4256
State of Texas, et al Chief
Defendant David Hittner
"United
States District Judge”
Defendants
Comes
Now Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Respectfully
Appearance (Pro Se Plaintiff) Louis Charles Hamilton II herein (USN) before the
Honorable Court, the special vulnerability of the victim being still “enslaved”
since August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 ‘United States District Court” Houston
Division Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to on or
about October 9th 2012
“Aggravated Perjury”, in direct violation of Sec.
37.03. knowingly making a false entry to hide “enslavement” of
the “Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II official property of the State
of Mississippi” fully (RICO) criminal violation of the 13th
Amendment of the United States of America et al while destroyed the 14th
amendment at the same time as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner,
committed to further criminal
(RICO) acts on or about October 9th 2012 the
enforcement of “Black Codes” Act to establish a Code of Criminal Procedure for
the State of Texas, approved August 26th, 1866,
Directed at “pro se”
Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property of
the State of Mississippi within jurisdiction of United States of America et al
Until February 7th
2013 And “pro se” Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property o The Knights of the
Klu Klux Klansmen (1865 – 2016) “Slave Trade Dynasty” as
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal
Judge David Hittner, committed to on or about October 9th 2012 further (RICO),
Obstruction of Justice, concealment, aid and abetting, concert of action Surrounding the continual 2016 (December)
violations of The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,” False
Imprisonment DNA Negro Slaves (Plaintiffs) past, present and future
(RICO)“Slavery Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590
(trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced
labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,
“Slavery Servitude” money
laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), Conversion, Civil
Conspirers, Collusion concert of action in violation 18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank
fraud, Fraud and Willful Misrepresentation, 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Material
Misrepresentation / Fraud,
“Fraudulent Void defendant
18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts, in connection with Chief Defendant U.S.
Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to further criminal (RICO) acts on or
about October 9th 2012 Judicial duties performed in direct
Violation under Title 18,
U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... and “Honest
Services Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346”, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud,
and major fraud against the United States, False Statements, Concealment—18
U.S.C. § 1001, Further affirm “Aiding & Abetting”, “Assisting or
Encouraging”, “Assistant & Participating”, “Concert of Actions” massive
2011
Civil conspire directed at
(pro se) Hamilton being cover up acts of killing of one human being by another
“Homicide” as Pro Se Plaintiff hidden and legally declared Dead in a wrongful death(s), wrongful death of (Plaintiff
unborn fetus),
Religious prosecution, Custodial
Interference, Child abduction/Child
Theft, Theft of Body, grave robber, sachem of things in Utah. Which Chief
Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to further criminal
(RICO) acts on or about October 9th 2012 Judicial duties performed in direct Fraud
Non-Disclosure, Common law fraud, Fraud upon the court,
Judicial Fraud and
Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, Judicial bias, intentional infliction
of emotional distress, aid and abetting, in the cover up several Federal Civil
Actions and having a direct interest in the out-come “Keeping 44.5 Million (Negro
DNA Race American still Slaves) in 2011 without any “Legal Citizenship of the
14th Amendment of the United States of America, while hiding such “enslavement”
in 2011 directed at the acting President of The United States of America
(Obama) and entire Negro Family enslaved by among others said
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal
Judge David Hittner, committed to on or about October 9th 2012 further (RICO),
while committed to “Treason” in hate crimes of insurances human rights World
Violation criminal acts of continual august 20th 1619 continual in
2011 forced “enslavement” for unjust enrichment directed at the
President Barack Obama and
his Negro (Obama) Presidential First Family and continual “Aggravated Perjury”,
in (RICO) endeavor 2011 forced “enslavement” for unjust enrichment directed at 44.5
Million Negro and the “Pro Se” Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein his
person
Enslaved since date of birth
November 8th 1961 by “United States of America et al as described in
said complaint be made fully physically continual in 2011 same forced
“enslavement” for unjust enrichment by one Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge
David Hittner, whom also committed to mutable counts of
“Aggravated Perjury”, on or
about October 9th 2012 engaged in the “Official Capacity” as U.S. Judges as he did
so criminally with full intent and perceived knowledge engaging in among other
things (RICO) The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) in
direct criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590
(trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced
labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,
18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,
“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. §
1961(1), directed at Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff USN
# 2712 SS in his person and indirectly 44.5 Million Still Negro American
slaves, (Plaintiff) collectively since abduction August 20th 1619 been living
off next to nothing in process still “Hidden Enslavement Property” no Legal
Citizenship in 2012 as Slaves have no civil rights
all “Aggravated Perjury”, Chief
Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, and defendant(s) collectively being Conquering controlling Judicial Republican
Party committed to Slave Trade still 1619 RICO Fraud herein 2012 cover up
“Enslavement False Imprisonment slave labor endeavor well into 2013 David Hittner ‘United States District
Judge” having full conscious knowledge and professional legal expert fiduciary
responsibility that:
The 1790 Naturalization Act
reserves naturalized citizenship for whites only was fully enforced against the
(Pro Se Plaintiff) the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million
Negros legally without legal citizenship after 1865 “civil war” trapped by this
continual 1790 (RICO) Naturalization Act.
Articles of Agreement
Relating to the Surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia. April 10, 1865, was
fully violated and that “Mississippi” never freed the (Pro Se Plaintiff) the
first Presidential Negro Family (Obama)
and 44.5 Million Negros legally without legal citizenship after 1865
“civil war” trapped by this continual collusion of the defendant (USA) The 1790
(RICO) Naturalization Act.
The 13th amendment to the
“United States of America” was destroyed, annihilate, wipe out, and fully
obliterate, fully in law and equity” official in leaving (Pro Se Plaintiff),
the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally
born between the exact dates of August 20th 1619 - February 7th 2013 “Slaves of
The United States of America”, as so legally Born unto “Slavery Servitude”.
The 14th amendment to the
“United States of America” was also destroyed, annihilate, wipe out, and fully
obliterate, fully in law and equity” official in leaving (Pro Se Plaintiff),
the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama)
And 44.5 Million Negros
legally born between the exact dates of February 7th 2013 – 2099 pursuant to
“Elite Secret Whites Only” Judicial Government The 1790 Naturalization Act
reserves naturalized citizenship for whites only having “officially”
denaturalization (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first
Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally born between
the exact dates of February 7th 2013 – 2099 “Leaving” (Pro Se Plaintiff), the first Presidential
Negro Family (Obama) and
44.5 Million Negros
“without” any legal citizenship, any just equal claim legal standing before any
Federal Court of Law, and “official property” of all “card-holders” of the
Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen, and United States of America et al
forevermore, Pursuant to: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
That august 20th 1619
“Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully
“Enforced” On or about “October” 9th 2012 (RICO) enterprise and all three
“Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros) running concurrently in 2016
this undersigned date, pursuant to “Elite Secret Klansmen Whites Only” Judicial
Government securing The 1790 Naturalization Act reserves naturalized
citizenship for whites only having “officially” denaturalization (Pro Se
Plaintiff), the first Presidential Negro Family (Obama) and 44.5 Million Negros legally born between
the exact dates of 1790 – 2099
That august 20th 1619
“Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully
“Enforced” On or about “October” 9th 2012 (RICO) enterprise and all three
“Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros) running concurrently in 2016
this undersigned date, and enterprise David Hittner ‘United States District
Judge” having full conscious knowledge and professional legal expert in
“Cheating, committing, (RICO) cover up and to conspiring
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal
Judge David Hittner, committed to further on or about October 9th 2012 FALSIFICATION
OF Government decree, judgement order records and further violation Sec. 37.04.
MATERIALITY all facts to aid a cover up scheme In connection with Co-defendant
United States Of America, State Of Texas, Harris County Texas, City of Houston
Texas, Annise Parker, Chief of Houston Police Department,
Law Office of Harry C
Arthur, Marine Building LLC, AA Quick Bond, Mike Cox's Bail SVC,
Lacey's Deli, Jonathan A Gluckman, Wayne Heller, The Ring
Investigations Mark Thering, The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal, Mark
Thering, Darrel Jordon, Daniel Perez-Garcia, Marquerite Hudig, Carl D Haggard,
F.M. Poppy Northcut, Sandra Martinez and Allen J Guidry thereof Civil Action H-11-4254 Chief Defendant U.S.
Federal Judge David Hittner, committed to (RICO) ““Aggravated Perjury”,
Falsification of government records, and Materiality obstruction all facts
derived thereof as defined by
PENAL
CODE
TITLE
8. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER
37. PERJURY AND OTHER FALSIFICATION
Sec.
37.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Court record" means a decree,
judgment, order, subpoena, warrant, minutes, or other document issued by a
court of:
(A) this state;
(B) another state;
(C) the United States;
(D) a foreign country recognized by an act of
congress or a treaty or other international convention to which the United
States is a party;
(E) an Indian tribe recognized by the United
States; or
(F) any other jurisdiction, territory, or
protectorate entitled to full faith and credit in this state under the United
States Constitution.
(2) "Governmental record" means:
(A) anything belonging to, received by, or kept
by government for information, including a court record;
(B) anything required by law to be kept by others
for information of government;
(C) a license, certificate, permit, seal, title,
letter of patent, or similar document issued by government, by another state,
or by the United States;
(D) a standard proof of motor vehicle liability
insurance form described by Section 601.081, Transportation Code, a certificate
of an insurance company described by Section 601.083 of that code, a document
purporting to be such a form or certificate that is not issued by an insurer
authorized to write motor vehicle liability insurance in this state, an
electronic submission in a form described by Section 502.046(i), Transportation
Code, or an evidence of financial responsibility described by Section 601.053
of that code;
(E) an official ballot or other election record;
or
(F) the written documentation a mobile food unit
is required to obtain under Section 437.0074, Health and Safety Code.
(3) "Statement" means any
representation of fact.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 113,
Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993,
73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 5, eff.
May 21, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch.
823, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts
1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 393, Sec. 21, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended
by:
Acts
2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1276 (H.B. 3672), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts
2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 161 (S.B. 1093), Sec. 16.004, eff. September 1,
2013.
Sec.
37.02. PERJURY. (a) A
person commits an offense if, with intent to deceive and with knowledge of the
statement's meaning:
(1) he makes a false statement under oath or
swears to the truth of a false statement previously made and the statement is
required or authorized by law to be made under oath; or
(2) he makes a false unsworn declaration under
Chapter 132, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A
misdemeanor.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.03. AGGRAVATED PERJURY. (a) A
person commits an offense if he commits perjury as defined in Section 37.02,
and the false statement:
(1) is made during or in connection with an
official proceeding; and
(2) is material.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of
the third degree.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.04. MATERIALITY. (a) A
statement is material, regardless of the admissibility of the statement under
the rules of evidence, if it could have affected the course or outcome of the
official proceeding.
(b) It is no defense to prosecution under Section
37.03 (Aggravated Perjury) that the declarant mistakenly believed the statement
to be immaterial.
(c) Whether a statement is material in a given
factual situation is a question of law.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.06. INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS. An information or indictment for perjury
under Section 37.02 or aggravated perjury under Section 37.03 that alleges that
the declarant has made statements under oath, both of which cannot be true,
need not allege which statement is false.
At the trial the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL
RECORD. (a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false
alteration of, a governmental record;
(2) makes, presents, or uses any record,
document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent that it be
taken as a genuine governmental record;
(3) intentionally destroys, conceals, removes, or
otherwise impairs the verity, legibility, or availability of a governmental
record;
(4) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a
governmental record or a blank governmental record form with intent that it be
used unlawfully;
(5) makes, presents, or uses a governmental
record with knowledge of its falsity; or
(6) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a
governmental record or a blank governmental record form with knowledge that it
was obtained unlawfully.
(b) It is an exception to the application of
Subsection (a)(3) that the governmental record is destroyed pursuant to legal
authorization or transferred under Section 441.204, Government Code. With regard to the destruction of a local government
record, legal authorization includes compliance with the provisions of Subtitle
C, Title 6, Local Government Code.
(c)(1) Except as provided by Subdivisions (2), (3),
and (4) and by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor
unless the actor's intent is to defraud or harm another, in which event the
offense is a state jail felony.
(2) An offense under this section is a felony of
the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the
governmental record was:
(A) a public school record, report, or assessment
instrument required under Chapter 39, Education Code, data reported for a
school district or open-enrollment charter school to the Texas Education Agency
through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) described by
Section 42.006, Education Code, under a law or rule requiring that reporting,
or a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, letter of patent, or similar
document issued by government, by another state, or by the United States,
unless the actor's intent is to defraud or harm another, in which event the
offense is a felony of the second degree;
(B) a written report of a medical, chemical,
toxicological, ballistic, or other expert examination or test performed on
physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or relevance of
the evidence to a criminal action;
(C) a written report of the certification,
inspection, or maintenance record of an instrument, apparatus, implement,
machine, or other similar device used in the course of an examination or test
performed on physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or
relevance of the evidence to a criminal action; or
(D) a search warrant issued by a magistrate.
(3) An offense under this section is a Class C
misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental
record is a governmental record that is required for enrollment of a student in
a school district and was used by the actor to establish the residency of the
student.
(4) An offense under this section is a Class B
misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental
record is a written appraisal filed with an appraisal review board under
Section 41.43(a-1), Tax Code, that was performed by a person who had a
contingency interest in the outcome of the appraisal review board hearing.
(d) An offense under this section, if it is shown
on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is described by
Section 37.01(2)(D), is:
(1) a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is
committed under Subsection (a)(2) or Subsection (a)(5) and the defendant is
convicted of presenting or using the record;
(2) a felony of the third degree if the offense
is committed under:
(A) Subsection (a)(1), (3), (4), or (6); or
(B) Subsection (a)(2) or (5) and the defendant is
convicted of making the record; and
(3) a felony of the second degree,
notwithstanding Subdivisions (1) and (2), if the actor's intent in committing
the offense was to defraud or harm another.
(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution
for possession under Subsection (a)(6) that the possession occurred in the
actual discharge of official duties as a public servant.
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under
Subsection (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(5) that the false entry or false information
could have no effect on the government's purpose for requiring the governmental
record.
(g) A person is presumed to intend to defraud or
harm another if the person acts with respect to two or more of the same type of
governmental records or blank governmental record forms and if each
governmental record or blank governmental record form is a license,
certificate, permit, seal, title, or similar document issued by government.
(h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under
this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.13, the
actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.
(i) With the consent of the appropriate local
county or district attorney, the attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction
with that consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under this
section that involves the state Medicaid program.
(j) It is not a defense to prosecution under
Subsection (a)(2) that the record, document, or thing made, presented, or used
displays or contains the statement "NOT A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT" or
another substantially similar statement intended to alert a person to the
falsity of the record, document, or thing, unless the record, document, or
thing displays the statement diagonally printed clearly and indelibly on both
the front and back of the record, document, or thing in solid red capital
letters at least one-fourth inch in height.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1248,
Sec. 66, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1991,
72nd Leg., ch. 113, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1991;
Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 565, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01,
eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th
Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 6, eff. May 21, 1997;
Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 823, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 2, eff.
Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch.
718, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 771, Sec. 3, eff.
June 13, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch.
198, Sec. 2.139, eff. Sept. 1, 2003;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 257, Sec. 16, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended
by:
Acts
2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1364 (H.B. 126), Sec. 1, eff. June 18, 2005.
Acts
2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1085 (H.B. 3024), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts
2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 73 (H.B. 1813), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts
2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1130 (H.B. 2086), Sec. 31, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts
2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 510 (S.B. 124), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts
2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 690 (H.B. 644), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.
Sec.
37.13. RECORD OF A FRAUDULENT
COURT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person
makes, presents, or uses any document or other record with:
(1) knowledge that the document or other record
is not a record of a court created under or established by the constitution or
laws of this state or of the United States;
and
(2) the intent that the document or other record
be given the same legal effect as a record of a court created under or
established by the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A
misdemeanor, except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if it is
shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has previously been
convicted under this section on two or more occasions.
(c) If conduct that constitutes an offense under
this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.10, the
actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.
Added
by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 8, eff. May 21, 1997.
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal
Judge David Hittner, whom also committed to mutable counts of “Aggravated
Perjury”, on or about October 9th 2012 engaged in the “Official Capacity” as
U.S. Judges as he did so criminally with full intent and perceived knowledge
engaging in among other things concealing non-disclosure the fraudulent “enslavement”
of the “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II in his person being “Slave Property” no
citizenship of the State of Mississippi until
February 7th 2013
when the 13th amendment of the United States of America Constitution
being legally ratified and (RICO) endeavor to keep this “Enslavement” secret by
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner, whom also committed to
mutable counts of “Aggravated Perjury”, on or about October 9th 2012 direct
intent the non-existent 6th amendment and “Fourteenth Amendment” on
behalf of a “enslave” Pro Se Plaintiff absent all Constitutional rights on or
about
October 9th 2012 dating back to
Birth into “Slavery Servitude” of the United States of America already being destroyed, conceal, hidden as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David
Hittner, stated as follows:
Plaintiff
also raises the following claims, as set forth in his More Definite Statement.
See Docket Entry No. 44. The Harris County District Attorney obstruction
justice to insure a conviction against Plaintiff. The Houston Police Department
assisted the District Attorney in obstruction justice by fabricating a police
report.
Plaintiff
claims his confinement in the Harris County Jail was caused by the Defendants’
violation of his constitutional rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment
Plaintiff
claims that if he been protected by the Fourteenth the District Attorney and
the Houston Police Department would not have been able to fabricate a police
report and a grand jury indictment. Plaintiff also asserts that if the Sixth
Amendment had been honored in the prosecution against him, he would not have
been convicted. Signed David Hittner United States District Judge:
Pro Se Plaintiff fully
assert, declare and affirmed Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge David Hittner,
fully (RICO) under color of law”, conspired to conceal, fabricate further, aid
and abetting, concert of actions pretended, and directly engaging in producing
actual physical pro se slave Plaintiff Civil rights of constitution both
Federal and State of Texas violated by a non-existent 6th and 14th
amendment on behalf of a “enslavement” inmate “pro se”
Plaintiff property of “Mississippi” until
freedom occurred on or about February 7th 2013 as described in
attached exhibit (A) filed in support herein dated October 9th 2012 at
that precise date 10/9/2012 “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II officially captured,
denaturalization of all claimed
14th amendment citizenship
after 1865 “Civil War” and denied (RICO) enterprise scheme of things “Lost”
13th Amendment of December 1865 freeing said “Negro Slave DNA Plaintiff since
august 20th 1619 forced
“Slavery Servitude” of said
defendant “United States of America et al” on or about the 7th day
of February 2013 as records do indicate with the office of the Sectary of State
of Mississippi, including the records at United States Secretary of State
As United States District
Judge , fraudulent concealment of ongoing Enslavement against the claimed just
judicial fiber directed at the defendant (USA) own rules of governing Laws In
conscious disregards for
Fiduciary Duties of an
acting sitting Official impartial United States District Government Federal
Judge Signed at Houston Texas on or about October 9th 2012 Pro Se Slave Veteran
“United States Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein
“Actually” born into “Slavery Servitude” on or about the direct birth on
November 8th 1961 as
“One” David Hittner ‘United
States District Judge” United States Southern District of Texas Federal
Courthouse Houston Texas Division, engaged further in “Aggravate Perjury” and
actually accused the “Pro Se” Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II in his person
of being charged with possession of cocaine…?
Being involved anywhere in
this still 2016 (December) abduction to the Texas State Hospital, and everyone hiding
the file, the evidence, the actual investigation into what exactly the grand
mystery arrest involving “pro se Plaintiff no less and not allowed details,
just hidden in a holding cell, the hiding out in a Texas State Hospital while
all Slavery Servitude Attorney work product, files, computer, computer chips,
all being destroyed by the (Government) whom
Pro Se Plaintiff since 2010
investigation into among other thing “Slavery” of the United States of America,
and Texas Black Code Laws, which during the time of (RICO) arrest this all
actually illegally “enslavement” physically ongoing direct at “pro se”
Plaintiff (Hamilton) II in his person, First Presidential Negro (Obama) family,
and the entire 44.5 Million plus Slaves of America, and
“Negro Immigrants coming to
America to be “enslaved” with no 14th amendment in 2012 all being
the same “Aggravated Perjury” RICO enslavement scheme of things since precisely
August 20th 1619 involving “One” David Hittner ‘United States
District Judge” United States Southern District of Texas Federal Courthouse
Houston Texas Division, in The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization
Act to continual Slavery Servitude ongoing in Texas on or about October 9th
2012 – February 7th 2013 for an additional 4 months and days counting later
pursuant to the Civil War of 1865 passage of the 13th Amendment free said
(Plaintiffs Slaves) collectively
When decision occurred in a
(RICO) 148 years delinquent later defendant “United States of America et al”
KKK “Mississippi Lynching Town USDA free Pro Se Slave Veteran “United States
Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein February 7th 2013 as
claimed
David Hittner, in 2012 preserved The 1890s: Black Codes Code
for the State of Texas, approved August 26th, 1866, directed at the “enslaved
Pro Se Plaintiff Hamilton II” herein in his person as all allegation are not
far fetch but official as stated in 2012 being a (RICO) shame in 2016 as
Slavery did not officially ending until 2013 when
Whites Only free Pro Se Plaintiff Hamilton and
having 13th and 14th amendments rights destroyed, to full
non-existed being “Enslaved” by The States of Texas and United States of America
et al secret White Only Elite Society as claimed in this action, which sign on
the 9th day of October 2012 by Judge David Hittner,
Aggravated Perjury committed wrongfully in
that Mississippi free said (Slave) Negro Plaintiff Hamilton back in 1865 not
until legally on or about February 7th 2013 and as “Such” enslave
Pro Se Hamilton having no constitutional rights of both “United States of
America” et al and State of Texas et al,
when this “Fabrication, and perjury was produce on “October” 9th
2012, as on
November 8th 1961
Birth Certificate of Pro Se Plaintiff
(Hamilton) II being required filed into this action which under rules of common
law, one cannot be Born into “Slavery Servitude” in 1961 while having 14th
amendment privileges on “October 9th 2012 as claimed by Chief
Defendant David Hitner”, then free from “Slavery Servitude” 148 years later in
2013 after the passage of the 1865 Civil War establishment of equality for
negro Race by the passage of 14th Amendment which is voided forever by United
States of America Mississippi ratifying the (MIA) 13th amendment of the USA in
2013
As exhibit (A) dated October
9th 2012 by “David Hittner” United States of America District Judge
engaging in conscious disregards for Fiduciary Duties of an acting sitting
Official impartial United States District Government Federal Judge
Signed at Houston Texas on or about October
9th 2012 Pro Se Slave Veteran “United States Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II herein “Actually” born into “Slavery Servitude” on or about
the direct birth on November 8th 1961 as
“One” David Hittner ‘United
States District Judge” United States Southern District of Texas Federal
Courthouse Houston Texas Division, engaged in The Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organization Act to continual Slavery Servitude ongoing directed at “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II
in his person in Texas on or about October 9th 2012 – February 7th 2013 for an
additional 4 months and days counting later legally “Enslavement” pursuant to
the Civil War of 1865 passage of the missing 13th Amendment never freeing said (Plaintiffs Slaves) collectively
When decision occurred by
accident in a (RICO) 148 years delinquent later defendant “United States of
America et al” KKK “Mississippi Lynching Town USDA free Pro Se Slave Veteran
“United States Navy #2712 Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein February
7th 2013 official (52) enslavement years being an official
Slaves of Defendant (USA)
Judicial Government Grand Non-Disclosure of the 13th Amendment never
was ratified for 148 years later after the “Civil War” This Fraud upon the
Court committed under color of Law by Judge David Hittner criminal in “Aggravated
Perjury” producing false material government records, promoting, directed, and
securing future ongoing
(RICO)18 U.S.C. § 1589
(forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery,
involuntary servitude, or forced labor),
“Slavery Servitude” money
laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery Servitude” money
laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), and
Texas Black Codes Laws, with
“Jim Crow Laws protect in this omission of material facts submitted by the
court in direct conflict of actual Living event v. the fabrication fraudulent
dismissal in favor of the “White Only” defendant (Texas) et al and all defendant(s)
therein Chief Defendant continual onward with intent and deliberate conscious as
a “senior Federal Judge for the District Court of Texas” did
Prima Facial Tort committed
to major fraud against the United States, False Statements, Concealment—18
U.S.C. § 1001, having full knowledge of History of Pro Se Plaintiff and fully
aware that President Barack Obama on file as (Plaintiff) being “Enslaved” in
addition to 44.5 Million Negro race,
Further affirm David Hittner
“aggravated perjury” being Rouge in further “Aiding & Abetting”, “Assisting
or Encouraging”, “Assistant & Participating”, “Concert of Actions” all on behalf
of all Defendant and Co-Defendant(s) described herein as described being
officially “Kidnaped” by Texas to keeping the secret
“Slaver Servitude” still ongoing at the time
said complaints were made dating to start date of spy and scheme in 2010, and
the Mystery arrest being criminal conspire following filing Complaint aginst
(Texas) and United States in 2011 with all parties herein involved still as of
this undersigned notary seal date involved.
Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN), herein reincorporates all and files a Notice of
Motion for “Aggravated Perjury” charges against each identified Defendant
herein being charged out and on file with the
“United States Attorney Office” for
the District of Texas, and made entry into the records of these proceeding
Civil Action H-11-4256, with Motion
to Strike, with accompanying Motion to Vacate and invalidate this fraudulent Public
Record RICO Judgement,
Notice requesting “Oral Arguments”
and official certified records of
Mississippi 13th Amendment
being ratified on February 7th 2013 freeing the Pro Se Plaintiff
Louis Charles Hamilton II filed into this Civil Action.
Respectfully “Affirm”, “State” and fully
1000% “Declare” all absolute “Just” “Fair” and required relief in
“Law and Equity” being before the
Lord “As of the undersigned “Sealed Date”
Subscribed and Sworn before Me this ________ day of _______________ 2016
Subscribed and Sworn before Me this ________ day of _______________ 2016
________________________________
Public Notary
________________________________________
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN),
2724 61st street Ste. I-B
Galveston, Texas. 77551
bluefinlch2@gmail.com
832-894-9465
832-344-7134
louishamilton2015@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment