20.
Chief Defendant(s) The Federal Reserve et al,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 2200 N. Pearl St., Dallas, Texas
75201
Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta, 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA 30309-4470
Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco 101 Market Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105 P.O. Box 7702
Federal Reserve Bank of
Kansas City 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Mo. 64198
Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis P.O. Box 442 St. Louis, MO 63166-0442
Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond Post Office Box 27622, Richmond, VA 23261
Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis P.O. Box 291 Minneapolis, MN 55480-0291
Federal Reserve Bank of
Cleveland P.O. Box 6387 Cleveland, Ohio 44101-1387
Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-1413
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF
PHILADELPHIA Ten Independence Mall Philadelphia, PA 19106-1574
Federal Reserve Bank of
Boston 600 Atlantic Avenue | Boston, MA 02210-2204
Federal Reserve Bank of New
York 33 Liberty Street New York, NY 10045
Defendant(s) et al
Pursuant to “United States of America” on rules of Governing Laws,
Collectively being 1000% in direct Human Right violation in a
nature involving “Prima facie tort” 1000% Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act...
18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking
with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor),
“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and
1957,
“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes,
RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)
Being 1000% in direct violation of the Defendant on governing
rules of Laws, there after the passage of the 13th Amendment of The United
States of America Constitution,
1865 and Being the absolute
Direct Destruction of the 14th Amendment There after direct at Slave
Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II USN SS # 2712
Pro Se Plaintiff and
President Negro Slave Barack Hussein (Water-Head) Obama II
Negro Slave Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama
Negro Slave Natasha Obama,
Negro Slave Malia Ann Obama
Negro Slave Chandra D. Hamilton (Daughter)
Negro Slave Natasha Hamilton (Daughter)
Negro Slave Aaron Michael Halvorsen (Hamilton II) (Son)
Negro Slave Craig Robinson
Negro Slave Marian Shields Robinson
Negro Slave Dred Scott
Negro Slave Harriet Tubman
Negro Slave Rev. Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.
Negro Slave Deadria Farmer-Paellmann
Negro Slave Malcolm X born Malcolm Little
Negro Slave Medgar Wiley Evers
Negro Slave Andrew Jackson Young, Jr.
Negro Slave Eric Marlon Bishop, “Jamie Foxx” (“Django”)
Negro Slave Samuel L. Jackson
Negro Slave Oprah Gail Winfrey
Negro Slave Caryn Elaine Johnson Whoopi Goldberg
Negro Slave Marion Hugh "Suge" Knight Jr
Negro Slave Veteran Jeffery Tavery
Negro Slave Veteran Robert Vaughan
Negro Slave Veteran Keno Miller
Negro Slave Veteran Avery Brown and
Co-Plaintiff Slave Negro US Veteran Exactly 1.8 (Million)
And all others “Current”42.7 Million of Negro Slaves of United
State of America similarly the same situated, in 2016
“Plaintiffs Slaves et al” Further appearances
“PLANTIFFS”
Defendant Collectively, and Individually being 1000% in direct
Human Right violation in a nature involving “Prima facie tort” 1000% from the
exact date of December 23rd 1913 to March- 30th 2016 Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Act... 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590
(trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced
labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957, “Slavery
Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) in a
none-stop force Conversion” scheme of things directly Being 1000% in direct violation of the
Defendant on governing rules of Laws, there after the passage of the 13th
Amendment of The United States of America Constitution, 1865 and Being the
absolute Direct Destruction of the 14th Amendment There after
The Federal Reserve System is the third central banking system in
United States history. The First Bank of the United States (1791–1811) and the
Second Bank of the United States (1817–1836) each had a 20-year charter.
Both banks issued currency,
made commercial loans, accepted deposits, purchased securities, maintained
multiple branches and acted as fiscal agents for the U.S. Treasury.
The U.S. Federal Government was required to purchase 20% of the
bank capital stock shares and to appoint 20% of the board members (directors)
of each of those first two banks "of the United States."
Therefore, each bank's majority control was placed squarely in the
hands of wealthy investors who purchased the remaining 80% of the stock.
These banks were opposed by state-chartered banks, who saw them as
very large competitors, and by many who insisted that they were in reality
banking cartels compelling the common man to maintain and support them.
President Andrew Jackson vetoed legislation to renew the Second Bank of the
United States, starting a period of free banking.
Jackson staked the
legislative success of his second presidential term on the issue of central
banking.
"Every monopoly and all exclusive privileges are granted at
the expense of the public, which ought to receive a fair equivalent.
The many millions which this act proposes to bestow on the
stockholders of the existing bank must come directly or indirectly out of the
earnings of the American people," Jackson said in 1832.
Jackson's second term in office ended in March 1837 without the
Second Bank of the United States's charter being renewed.
In 1863, as a means to help finance the Civil War, a system of
national banks was instituted by the National Currency Act. The banks each had
the power to issue standardized national bank notes based on United States
bonds held by the bank.
The Act was totally revised in 1864 and later named as the National-Bank
Act, or National Banking Act, as it is popularly known. The administration of
the new national banking system was vested in the newly created Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency and its chief administrator, the Comptroller of the
Currency.
The Office, which still
exists today, examines and supervises all banks chartered nationally and is a
part of the U.S. Treasury Department.
The Federal Reserve Act
National bank currency was considered inelastic because it was
based on the fluctuating value of U.S. Treasury bonds rather than the growing
desire for easy credit.
If Treasury bond prices
declined, a national bank had to reduce the amount of currency it had in
circulation by either refusing to make new loans or by calling in loans it had
made already.
The related liquidity problem was largely caused by an immobile,
pyramidal reserve system, in which nationally chartered rural/agriculture-based
banks were required to set aside their reserves in federal reserve city banks,
which in turn were required to have reserves in central city banks.
During the planting
seasons, rural banks would exploit their reserves to finance full plantings,
and during the harvest seasons they would use profits from loan interest
payments to restore and grow their reserves.
A national bank whose reserves were being drained would replace
its reserves by selling stocks and bonds, by borrowing from a clearing house or
by calling in loans.
As there was little in the way of deposit insurance, if a bank was
rumored to be having liquidity problems then this might cause many people to
remove their funds from the bank.
Because of the crescendo effect of banks which lent more than
their assets could cover, during the last quarter of the 19th century and the
beginning of the 20th century, the United States economy went through a series
of financial panics.
The National Monetary Commission
Prior to a particularly severe panic in 1907, there was a
motivation for renewed demands for banking and currency reform.[4] The
following year, Congress enacted the Aldrich-Vreeland Act which provided for an
emergency currency and established the National Monetary Commission to study
banking and currency reform.
Fed Reserve.JPG
The chief of the bipartisan National Monetary Commission was
financial expert and Senate Republican leader Nelson Aldrich. Aldrich set up
two commissions – one to study the American monetary system in depth and the
other, headed by Aldrich, to study the European central-banking systems and
report on them.
Aldrich went to Europe opposed to centralized banking but, after
viewing Germany's banking system, he came away believing that a centralized
bank was better than the government-issued bond system that he had previously
supported. Centralized banking was met with much opposition from politicians,
who were suspicious of a central bank and who charged that Aldrich was biased
due to his close ties to wealthy bankers such as
“ J.P. Morgan and his daughter's marriage to John D. Rockefeller,
Jr.”
In 1910, Aldrich and executives representing the banks of J.P.
Morgan, Rockefeller, and Kuhn, Loeb & Co., secluded themselves for ten days
at Jekyll Island, Georgia.
The executives included Frank A. Vanderlip, president of the
National City Bank of New York, associated with the Rockefellers; Henry
Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company; Charles D. Norton, president of
the First National Bank of New York; and Col. Edward House, who would later
become President Woodrow Wilson's closest adviser and founder of the Council on
Foreign Relations.
There, Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co. directed the
proceedings and wrote the primary features of what would be called the Aldrich
Plan. Warburg would later write that
"The matter of a
uniform discount rate (interest rate) was discussed and settled at Jekyll
Island.
" Vanderlip wrote in his 1935 autobiography From Farmboy to
Financier:
Despite my views about the value to society of greater publicity
for the affairs of corporations, there was an occasion, near the close of 1910,
when I was as secretive, indeed, as furtive as any conspirator. None of us who
participated felt that we were conspirators; on the contrary we felt we were
engaged in a patriotic work.
We were trying to plan a mechanism that would correct the
weaknesses of our banking system as revealed under the strains and pressures of
the panic of 1907.
I do not feel it is any
exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyl Island as the occasion
of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System.
… Discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort
would be wasted. If it were to be exposed publicly that our particular group
had gotten together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance
whatever of passage by Congress.
Yet, who was there in Congress who might have drafted a sound
piece of legislation dealing with the purely banking problem with which we were
concerned?
Despite meeting in secret, from both the public and the
government, the importance of the Jekyll Island meeting was revealed three
years after the Federal Reserve Act was passed, when journalist Bertie Charles
Forbes in 1916 wrote an article about the "hunting trip".
The 1911–12 Republican plan was proposed by Aldrich to solve the
banking dilemma, a goal which was supported by the American Bankers’
Association. The plan provided for one great central bank, the National Reserve
Association, with a capital of at least $100 million and with 15 branches in
various sections.
The branches were to be
controlled by the member banks on a basis of their capitalization.
The National Reserve Association would issue currency, based on
gold and commercial paper, that would be the liability of the bank and not of
the government.
The Association would also
carry a portion of member banks’ reserves, determine discount reserves, buy and
sell on the open market, and hold the deposits of the federal government. The
branches and businessmen of each of the 15 districts would elect thirty out of
the 39 members of the board of directors of the National Reserve Association
Aldrich fought for a private monopoly with little government
influence, but conceded that the government should be represented on the board
of directors.
Aldrich then presented what
was commonly called the "Aldrich Plan" – which called for
establishment of a "National Reserve Association" – to the National
Monetary Commission.
Most Republicans and Wall
Street bankers favored the Aldrich Plan, but it lacked enough support in the
bipartisan Congress to pass.
Because the bill was introduced by Aldrich, who was considered [by
whom?] the epitome of the "Eastern establishment", the bill received
little support. It was derided by southerners and westerners who believed that
wealthy families and large corporations ran the country and would thus run the
proposed National Reserve Association.
The National Board of Trade
appointed Warburg as head of a committee to persuade Americans to support the
plan.
The committee set up offices in the then-45 states and distributed
printed materials about the proposed central bank.
The Nebraskan populist and frequent Democratic presidential
candidate William Jennings Bryan said of the plan: "Big financiers are
back of the Aldrich currency scheme.
" He asserted that if it passed, big bankers would "then
be in complete control of everything through the control of our national
finances."
There was also Republican opposition to the Aldrich Plan.
Republican Sen. Robert M. LaFollette and Rep. Charles Lindbergh Sr. both spoke
out against the favoritism that they contended the bill granted to Wall Street.
"The Aldrich Plan is the Wall Street Plan…I have alleged that
there is a 'Money Trust'", said Lindbergh. "The Aldrich plan is a
scheme plainly in the interest of the Trust"
In response, Rep. Arsène
Pujo, a Democrat from Louisiana, obtained congressional authorization to form
and chair a subcommittee (the Pujo Committee) within the House Committee
Banking Committee, to conduct investigative hearings on the alleged
"Money Trust".
The hearings continued for a full year and were led by the subcommittee's
counsel, Democratic lawyer Samuel Untermyer, who later also assisted in
drafting the Federal Reserve Act. The "Pujo hearings" convinced much
of the populace that America's money largely rested in the hands of a select
few on Wall Street.
The Subcommittee issued a
report saying:
"If by a 'money trust' is meant an established and
well-defined identity and community of interest between a few leaders of
finance…which has resulted in a vast and growing concentration of control of
money and credit in the hands of a comparatively few men…the condition thus
described exists in this country today...
To us the peril is manifest...When we find...the same man a
director in a half dozen or more banks and trust companies all located in the
same section of the same city, doing the same class of business and with a like
set of associates similarly situated all belonging to the same group and
representing the same class of interests, all further pretense of competition
is useless.... "
Seen as a "Money Trust" plan, the Aldrich Plan was
opposed by the Democratic Party as was stated in its 1912 campaign platform,
but the platform also supported a revision of banking laws intended to protect
the public from financial panics and "the domination of what is known as the
"Money Trust." During the 1912 election, the Democratic Party took
control of the presidency and both chambers of Congress.
The newly elected president, Woodrow Wilson, was committed to
banking and currency reform, but it took a great deal of his political
influence to get an acceptable plan passed as the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.
Wilson thought the Aldrich
plan was perhaps "60–70% correct".
When Virginia Rep. Carter
Glass, chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency, presented his
bill to President-elect Wilson, Wilson said that the plan must be amended to
contain a Federal Reserve Board appointed by the executive branch to maintain
control over the bankers.
After Wilson presented the bill to Congress, a group of Democratic
congressmen revolted. The group, led by Representative Robert Henry of Texas,
demanded that the "Money Trust" be destroyed before it could
undertake major currency reforms.
The opponents particularly objected to the idea of regional banks
having to operate without the implicit government protections that large,
so-called money-center banks would enjoy.
The group almost succeeded
in killing the bill, but were mollified by Wilson's promises to propose
antitrust legislation after the bill had passed, and by Bryan's support of the
bill.
Enactment of the Federal Reserve Act (1913) After months of
hearings, amendments, and debates the Federal Reserve Act passed Congress in
December, 1913.
The bill passed the House by an overwhelming majority of 298 to 60
on December 22, 1913 and passed the Senate the next day by a vote of 43 to 25.
An earlier version of the
bill had passed the Senate 54 to 34, but almost 30 senators had left for
Christmas vacation by the time the final bill came to a vote. Most every
Democrat was in support of and most Republicans were against it
As noted in a paper by the American Institute of Economic
Research:
In its final form, the Federal Reserve Act represented a
compromise among three political groups. Most Republicans (and the Wall Street
bankers) favored the Aldrich Plan that came out of Jekyll Island.
Progressive Democrats demanded a reserve system and currency
supply owned and controlled by the Government in order to counter the
"money trust" and destroy the existing concentration of credit
resources in Wall Street.
Conservative Democrats proposed a decentralized reserve system,
owned and controlled privately but free of Wall Street domination. No group got
exactly what it wanted.
But the Aldrich plan more nearly represented the compromise
position between the two Democrat extremes, and it was closest to the final
legislation passed.
Frank Vanderlip, one of the Jekyll Island attendees and the
president of National City Bank, wrote in his autobiography:
Although the Aldrich Federal Reserve Plan was defeated when it
bore the name Aldrich, nevertheless its essential points were all contained in
the plan that was finally adopted.
Ironically, in October 1913, two months before the enactment of
the Federal Reserve Act, Frank Vanderlip proposed before the Senate Banking
Committee his own competing plan to the Federal Reserve System, one with a
single central bank controlled by the Federal government, which almost derailed
the legislation then being considered and already passed by the U.S. House of
Representatives.
Even Aldrich stated strong opposition to the currency plan passed
by the House.
However, the former point was also made by Republican
Representative Charles Lindbergh Sr. of Minnesota, one of the most vocal
opponents of the bill, who on the day the House agreed to the Federal Reserve
Act told his colleagues:
"But the Federal Reserve board have no power whatever to
regulate the rates of interest that bankers may charge borrowers of money.
This is the Aldrich bill in disguise, the difference being that by
this bill the Government issues the money, whereas by the Aldrich bill the
issue was controlled by the banks...Wall Street will control the money as
easily through this bill as they have heretofore."(Congressional Record,
v. 51, page 1447, Dec. 22, 1913)
Republican Congressman Victor Murdock of Kansas, who voted for the
bill, told Congress on that same day:
"I do not blind myself to the fact that this measure will not
be effectual as a remedy for a great national evil – the concentrated control
of credit...The Money Trust has not passed [died]...
You rejected the specific remedies of the Pujo committee, chief
among them, the prohibition of interlocking directorates. He [your enemy] will
not cease fighting...at some half-baked enactment...You struck a weak
half-blow, and time will show that you have lost. You could have struck a full
blow and you would have won."
In order to get the Federal Reserve Act passed, Wilson needed the
support of populist William Jennings Bryan, who was credited with ensuring
Wilson's nomination by dramatically throwing his support Wilson's way at the
1912 Democratic convention.
Wilson appointed Bryan as
his Secretary of State. Bryan served as leader of the agrarian wing of the
party and had argued for unlimited coinage of silver in his "Cross of Gold
Speech" at the 1896 Democratic convention.
Bryan and the agrarians wanted a government-owned central bank
which could print paper money whenever Congress wanted, and thought the plan
gave bankers too much power to print the government's currency. Wilson sought
the advice of prominent lawyer Louis Brandeis to make the plan more amenable to
the agrarian wing of the party; Brandeis agreed with Bryan.
Wilson convinced them that because Federal Reserve notes were
obligations of the government and because the president would appoint the members
of the Federal Reserve Board, the plan fit their demands.
However, Bryan soon became disillusioned with the system. In the
November 1923 issue of "Hearst's Magazine" Bryan wrote that "The
Federal Reserve Bank that should have been the farmer's greatest protection has
become his greatest foe."
Southerners and westerners learned from Wilson that the system was
decentralized into 12 districts and surely would weaken New York and strengthen
the hinterlands. Sen. Robert L. Owen of Oklahoma eventually relented to speak
in favor of the bill,
Arguing that the nation's
currency was already under too much control by New York elites, whom he alleged
had singlehandedly conspired to cause the 1907 Panic.
Large bankers thought the legislation gave the government too much
control over markets and private business dealings. The New York Times called
the Act the "Oklahoma idea, the Nebraska idea" – referring to Owen
and Bryan's involvement.
However, several Congressmen, including Owen, Lindbergh,
LaFollette, and Murdock claimed that the New York bankers feigned their
disapproval of the bill in hopes of inducing Congress to pass it. The day
before the bill was passed, Murdock told Congress:
"You allowed the special interests by pretended
dissatisfaction with the measure to bring about a sham battle, and the sham
battle was for the purpose of diverting you people from the real remedy, and
they diverted you. The Wall Street bluff has worked."
When Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913,
he said he felt grateful for having had a part "in completing a work ...
of lasting benefit for the country," knowing that it took a great deal of
compromise and expenditure of his own political capital to get it enacted. This
was in keeping with the general plan of action he made in his First Inaugural
Address on March 4, 1913, in which he stated:
We shall deal with our economic system as it is and as it may be
modified, not as it might be if we had a clean sheet of paper to write upon;
and step-by-step we shall make it what it should be, in the spirit of those who
question their own wisdom and seek counsel and knowledge, not shallow
self-satisfaction or the excitement of excursions we cannot tell.
While a system of 12 regional banks was designed so as not to give
eastern bankers too much influence over the new bank, in practice, the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York became
"first among equals". The New York Fed, for example, is
solely responsible for conducting open market operations, at the direction of
the Federal Open Market Committee.
Democratic Congressman Carter Glass sponsored and wrote the
eventual legislation,
And his home state capital
of Richmond, Virginia, was made a district headquarters. Democratic Senator
James A. Reed of Missouri obtained two districts for his state.
However, the 1914 report of
the Federal Reserve Organization Committee, which clearly laid out the
rationale for their decisions on establishing Reserve Bank districts in 1914,
showed that it was based almost entirely upon current correspondent banking relationships.
To quell Elihu Root's
objections to possible inflation, the passed bill included provisions that the
bank must hold at least 40% of its outstanding loans in gold. (In later years,
to stimulate short-term economic activity, Congress would amend the act to
allow more discretion in the amount of gold that must be redeemed by the Bank.)
Critics of the time (later
joined by economist Milton Friedman) suggested that Glass's legislation was
almost entirely based on the Aldrich Plan that had been derided as giving too
much power to elite bankers.
Glass denied copying Aldrich's plan. In 1922, he told Congress,
"No greater misconception was ever projected in this Senate Chamber."
Wilson named Warburg and other prominent experts to direct the new
system, which began operations in 1915 and played a major role in financing the
Allied and American war efforts.
Warburg at first refused
the appointment, citing America's opposition to a "Wall Street man",
but when World War I broke out he accepted. He was the only appointee asked to
appear before the Senate,
Whose members questioned him about his interests in the central
bank and his ties to Kuhn, Loeb, & Co.'s "money trusts".
Accord of 1951 between the Federal Reserve and the Treasury
Department
Main article: 1951 Accord
Post Bretton-Woods era
In July 1979, Paul Volcker was nominated, by President Carter, as
Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board amid roaring inflation. He tightened the
money supply, and by 1986 inflation had fallen sharply.
In October 1979 the Federal Reserve announced a policy of
"targeting" money aggregates and bank reserves in its struggle with
double-digit inflation.
In January 1987, with retail inflation at only 1%, the Federal
Reserve announced it was no longer going to use money-supply aggregates, such
as M2, as guidelines for controlling inflation, even though this method had
been in use from 1979, apparently with great success.
Before 1980, interest rates
were used as guidelines; inflation was severe. The Fed complained that the aggregates
were confusing. Volcker was chairman until August 1987, whereupon Alan
Greenspan assumed the mantle, seven months after monetary aggregate policy had
changed
2001 recession to present
From early 2001 to mid-2003 the Federal Reserve lowered its interest
rates 13 times, from 6.25 to 1.00%, to fight recession. In November 2002, rates
were cut to 1.75, and many interest rates went below the inflation rate.
On June 25, 2003, the federal funds rate was lowered to 1.00%, its
lowest nominal rate since July, 1958, when the overnight rate averaged 0.68%.
Starting at the end of June 2004, the Federal Reserve System raised the target
interest rate and then continued to do so 17 straight times.
In February 2006, Ben Bernanke was appointed by President George
W. Bush as the chairman of the Federal Reserve.
In March 2006, the Federal Reserve ceased to make public M3,
because the costs of collecting this data outweighed the benefits.[32] M3
includes all of M2 (which includes M1) plus large-denomination ($100,000 +) time
deposits, balances in institutional money funds, repurchase liabilities issued
by depository institutions,
And Eurodollars held by
U.S. residents at foreign branches of U.S. banks as well as at all banks in the
United Kingdom and Canada.
2008 subprime mortgage crisis
Main article: Federal Reserve responses to the subprime crisis
Due to a credit crunch caused by the sub-prime mortgage crisis in
September 2007, the Federal Reserve began cutting the federal funds rate. The
Fed cut rates by 0.25% after its December 11, 2007 meeting
And disappointed many individual investors who expected a higher
rate cut: the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by nearly 300 points at its
close that day.
The Fed slashed the rate 0.75% in an emergency action on January 22,
2008 to assist in reversing a significant market slide influenced by weakening
international markets.
The Dow Jones Industrial
Average initially fell nearly 4% (465 points) at the start of trading and then
rebounded to a more tolerable 1.06% (128 point) loss. On January 30, 2008,
eight days after the 75 points decrease, the Fed lowered its rate again, this
time by 50 points.
On August 25, 2009, President Barack Obama announced he would
nominate Bernanke to a second term as chairman of the Federal Reserve.
In October 2013, Janet Yellen was nominated to succeed Ben
Bernanke as the chairperson of the Federal Reserve.
In December 2013, the Fed raised its benchmark interest rates by a
quarter of a percentage point to between 0.25 and 0.50 percent, after 9 years
of an unchanged and stable very low interest rate.
“Corporations, Companies as Identified as follows:
their “White Controlling Class”, official 1000% slave owner(s) of
Plantations, industries, business, companies, corporations, shipping, raw
materials, rail road’s,
Main infrastructure power grid, agency, private/public social
infrastructure jointly from exploitation of said Free Force “Slave Labor”
enterprise for “Unjust enrichment”
1619-December 7th 2013 Engaged collectively as a “Unit” For “White Only”
prosperity in gains of “Slave Trade” 1000% “unjust enrichment”, in declaration
for preamble in declared Prosperity “Dred Scott”, Not Human Free Entity, but
the Property of Co-Defendants collectively herein “White Controlling Class”,
slave owner(s) of Plantations, industries, business, companies, corporations,
agency, private/public social infrastructure jointly from exploitation profits
off said Slave Labor in this “Grand 1619-1857 Twisted never ending ongoing
“Slave Régime”, collectively in collusion with “United States Supreme Court”
engaged in “Obstruction of Justice”, to assurances 1000% civil disorder
violation in favor of “Tortious Interference with Prospective Relationship” and
such present “White Supremacy Control/ Supporter” “Slave Regime” society being
officially in 2016 – 2099 just that… past,
present and future
All “Profiteering from the Abused Negro kidnapped Conquered Race,
2016 2099 by our “White Only“ Slave Regime” society being officially in 2016
just that… Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), after the
Civil War against, We Thee 44.5 plus Million and growing abused Negro race
having never no legal standing in deep dark ages Defendant (United States of
America) et al governing , “Law of
Equity” in fair proceeding over the “Judicial Proceeding” before the Deep Dark
ages defendant (United States of America) herein very own on in full collusion
with
“Chief Defendant(s)” The Federal
Reserve Bank et al herein engaged 1000% in fraud and non-disclosure conspire
with defendant primary “United States of America” et al and Defendant Congress,
corporation (Slave Trade) leaving The “Plaintiffs Negro Slaves Veteran et al”
being “Physical Activated” Live Duty
“Negro Race Slave”…? Military Personal”…? “supporting” defendant (USA) and defendant (Fed Bank) “Slavery Servitude”
money laundering against statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957 (RICO) “Taxes”
scheme of things since 1913 – 2013 when “Mississippi” official ratified the 13th
amendment free “pro se” Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II Military Naval
Veteran of the defendant (USA) in his person and
“Defendant” very own Government funded Para-Military “Knights of
the “Klu Klux Klansmen” hostile Killer “Conspirer” with, The Federal Reserve et
al , “Chief Defendant(s) et al” herein
and all described defendant(s) et al herein further upon which, “Massive MIA
apportions of “Plaintiffs Slaves et al” “Military / and none Military “Negro”
races and other similarly the same “White Americans” too Taxes since on or
about 1935,“Chief Defendant(s) Federal Reserve Bank et al” herein (RICO)
enterprise in financing forever in “Judicial Fraud” under color of law to
control the whites supremacy, enslavement 1619 – 2013
Against “NEGRO Slave PLANTIFFS” herein dignity, will, civil rights
and peace, to force and to maintain their collective “Defendant Parties” plight
in this monetary sham of The Fed et al “Chief Defendant(s) et al” herein (RICO)
enterprise 1913 ongoing non-reformed (RICO) slave régime 2016 by mutable counts
of (RICO) banking fraud direct at (44.5) million plus current “Slave Victim”
being still criminally (RICO) monetary taxes scheme of things against, peace,
will, knowledge, and dignity of secret placement of Negro race sealed forever, “Mummy-Tomb”,
“Mausoleum”, “Vault”, “Catacomb” fashion being a poor lost race of (America) in
this still legal state of massive monetary sham of The Federal Reserve Bank et
al, “Chief Defendant(s) et al” herein Fraud, Non-disclosure and “Judicial
Fraud” to continual grand scheme of things for
($$$) “White Only” “Unjust enrichment of “PLANTIFFS Negro just
taxes” in this ongoing “False Imprisonment” from the exact dates of now
continual in the future of February 7th 2013
Upon which We Thee continue abused (Negro) Race, affirm,
state and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation,
argument, conflict and disharmony, fully cause of action as follows:
Pursuant to Dred Scott v.
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), and the 1000% in house whole sale “drunken
bootleg stale white only back wood inbreed rot gut liquor destruction of
The 13th Amendment to the Constitution officially falsely and
quite fraudulently declared that
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,
Shall exist within the
United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
" Formally abolishing slavery in the United States,
The 13th Amendment was
passed by the Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the states on
December 6, 1865
The “Dark Ages” Defendant “United States of America” and there
secret white controlling society” imposed “Slavery Servitude”, and “Jim Crow
Laws” at the same precise time frame against
We Thee continue abused (Negro) Race of (America) from the exact time
frame of “1865”- February 7th 2013 “Exactly each and every year (394) years in
the exact time frame of 1619- February 7th 2013 the “Deep Dark Ages” Defendant
“United States of America” herein 100% provide their Co-Defendants collectively
herein “White Controlling Class”,
official 1000% slave owner(s) of Plantations, industries, business, companies,
corporations, shipping, raw materials, rail roads,
Main infrastructure power grid, agency, private/public social
infrastructure jointly from exploitation
of said Free Force “Slave Labor” enterprise for “Unjust enrichment”
1619-December 7th 2013 Engaged collectively as a “Unit” “Spoliation of
Evidence”, Conversion, and (RICO) Money laundering For unjust enrichment”, in declaration for
Prosperity “Dred Scott”, Not Human Free Entity, but the
Property of Co-Defendants
collectively herein “White Controlling Class”, slave owner(s) of
Plantations, industries,
business, companies, corporations, agency, private/public social infrastructure
jointly from exploitation profits off said Slave Labor in this “Grand 1619-1857
Twisted Never ending ongoing “Slave Régime”, collectively in collusion with
The Deep Dark, Dark Ages defendant “United States of America” et
al, upon which “United States Supreme Court” engaged in “Obstruction of
Justice”, Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), In this
“Grand Scheme of “White Only” prosperity in now the official date of 2015-2099
Twisted Never ending (RICO) ongoing “Slave Régime” in the
Absolute “non-best interest”, “state of being never protected”,
“100% un safe keeping”, “no sanctuary from harm in America”, “no safeguarding
future of life and 100% theft of (Negro) race prosperity”, No (Negro) race Equal protection as “White
Pure Race Citizens” for “We Thee Abused (American) Negro Race besides 1000%
hostile kidnaping, abduction, whipping, and lynching, 100s of 100s of years of
forced “slavery servitude”, drowned, branded, Sold as (Negro) property,
oppression, destruction of homes, business, hospitals, and churches, starved,
and untimely deaths due to being a substandard negro pursuant 100% “Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S.
393 (1857), Death by Defendant Para-Military “Knight of The Klu Klux Klan”
still under a state of continual hostile
“siege”, “abuse” and “death” thereof for being (Negro) race“ in (America)Being
further imposed by “false imprisonment” of The Vagrancy Act of 1866, imposed by
Jim Crow laws and imposed by Black codes laws” as when the Defendant “United
States of America”…On rules of governing laws, and there secret “White
Controlling Society being legally in their
official 1000% “best interest” in the official
“Government Spondsored destruction, mutilation, alteration and
absolute 1000% concealment of any and all evidence of the pervious
The Bureau helped solve everyday problems of the newly freed
slaves, such as obtaining clothing, food, water, health care, communication
with family members, and jobs.
It distributed 15 million rations of food to African Americans,
and set up a system where planters could borrow rations in order to feed
freedmen they employed, Most of the assistant commissioners, realizing that
African Americans would not receive fair trials in the civil courts, tried to
handle black cases in their own Bureau courts.
Southern whites objected that this was unconstitutional. From 1868
through the early 1870s the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) functioned as a loosely
organized group of political and social terrorists.
The Klan's goals included
the political defeat of the Republican Party and the maintenance of absolute
white supremacy in response to newly gained civil and political rights by
southern blacks after the Civil War (1861-65).
They were more successful in achieving their political goals than
they were with their social goals during the Reconstruction era.
Origin
The KKK was formed as a social group in Tennessee in 1866. The
name probably came from the Greek word kuklos, meaning "circle."
The Ku Klux Klan was a loosely organized group of political and
social terrorists during the Reconstruction, whose goals included political
defeat of the Republican Party and the maintenance of absolute white supremacy
in response to newly gained civil and political rights by southern blacks after
the Civil War.
Ku Klux Klan
Klan was an alliterative version of "clan," thus Ku Klux
Klan suggested a circle, or band, of brothers. With the passage of the Military
Reconstruction Acts in March 1867, and the prospect of freedmen voting in the
South, the Klan became a political organization.
Former Confederate general
Nathan Bedford Forrest probably served as the Grand Wizard, or overall leader,
of the Klan and certainly played a significant role in its organized spread in
early 1868.
In Georgia conservative whites, frustrated with their political
failures during 1867, began to look for new ways to defeat their Republican
enemies and control the recently enfranchised freed (Negro) people.
For many, the KKK and its
public political wing, the Young Men's Democratic Clubs, offered a chance to
take action.
In February and March 1868, General Forrest visited Atlanta from
Tennessee several times and met with prominent Georgia conservatives.
Forrest probably helped organize a statewide Klan structure during
these visits. By the summer of 1868, the Klan was widespread across Georgia
The Ku Klux Klan in Action
The Klan's organized terrorism began most notably on March 31,
1868, when Republican organizer George Ashburn was murdered in Columbus,
Georgia.
Most Ku Klux Klan action was designed to intimidate black voters
and white supporters of the Republican Party. Founded in Tennessee in 1866, the
Klan was particularly active in Georgia from 1868 to the early 1870s.
Ku Klux Klan Cartoon
Over the following months Klan-inspired violence spread throughout
Georgia's Black Belt and into the northwestern corner of the state. Most Klan
action was designed to intimidate black voters and white supporters of the
Republican Party.
Klansmen might parade on horseback at night dressed in outlandish
costumes, or they might threaten specific Republican leaders with violence.
Increasingly during 1868 these actions became violent, ranging from whippings
of black women perceived as insolent to the assassination of Republican
leaders.
It is impossible to untangle local vigilante violence from
political terrorism by the organized Klan, but it is clear that attacks on
blacks became common during 1868.
Freedmen's Bureau agents
reported 336 cases of murder or assault with intent to kill on freedmen across
the state from January 1 through November 15 of 1868.
The political terrorism was effective. While Republican
gubernatorial candidate Rufus Bullock carried the state in April 1868 elections,
by November Democratic presidential candidate Horatio Seymour was in the lead.
In some counties the
contrast was incredible.
In John Reed's Oglethorpe
County, 1,144 people had voted Republican in April, while only 116 dared to
vote Republican in November when Reed's armed Klansmen surrounded the polls.
In Columbia County armed Klansmen not only intimidated voters but
even cowed federal soldiers sent to guard the polling place.
Not surprisingly, while
1,222 votes had been cast in Columbia County for Republican governor Rufus
Bullock in April, only one vote was cast for Republican presidential candidate
Ulysses Grant in November 1868.
Similar political terrorism
and control of the polling places help account for Georgia's quick
"redemption" and return to conservative white Democratic control by
late 1871.
Klan like violence was also used to control freed people's social
behavior, but with less success. Black churches and schools were burned,
teachers were attacked, and freed people who refused to show proper deference
were beaten and killed,
Thus such “intentional
destruction” and “spoliation of evidence”, and the seizure of (Negro) personal
property, by 1000% Direction and
leadership role of
The “Deep Dark Ages” Defendant “United States of America” herein
100% provide their Co-Defendants collectively herein approval of violent
wrongful acts of deprivation and hostile control plunder to furtherance’s
having advantages
We Thee continue abused
(Negro) Race of (America) from the exact time frame of “1865”- February 7th
2013 “Exactly each and every year (394) years in the exact time frame of 1619-
February 7th 2013 the “Deep Dark Ages” Defendant “United States of America”
herein 100% provide their Co-Defendants collectively herein “White Controlling
Class”, official 1000% slave owner(s) of Plantations, industries, business,
companies, corporations, shipping, raw materials, rail roads, Main
infrastructure power grid, agency, private/public social infrastructure jointly from exploitation of said Free Force
“Slave Labor” enterprise for “Unjust enrichment” 1619-December 7th 2013 Engaged
collectively as a “Unit” For unjust
enrichment”, in declaration for Prosperity “Dred Scott”, Not Human Free Entity,
but the Property of Co-Defendants collectively herein “White Controlling
Class”, slave owner(s) of Plantations, industries, business, companies,
corporations, agency, private/public social infrastructure jointly from
exploitation profits off said Slave Labor in this “Grand 1619-1857 Twisted
Never ending ongoing “Slave Régime”, collectively in collusion with The Deep
Dark, Dark Ages defendant “United States of America” et al, upon which “United
States Supreme Court” engaged in “Obstruction of Justice”, Pursuant to Dred
Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), In this “Grand Scheme of “White Only”
prosperity in now the official date of 2015-2099 Twisted Never ending
“Spoliation of Evidence (RICO) ongoing “Slave Régime”
No comments:
Post a Comment