In The United States District Court
For
The Southern District of Texas
Houston Division
Louis Charles Hamilton II Notice of
Motion for
Pro Se
Plaintiff “Aggravated
Perjury Charges”
Vs. U.S. Docket No.
4:2016-CV-01354
United States of America et al Judge Melinda Sue (Furche)
Harmon
‘United
States District Judge”
Comes
Now Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Respectfully
Appearance (Pro Se Plaintiff) Louis Charles Hamilton II herein (USN) before the
Honorable Court, the special vulnerability of the victim being still “enslaved”
since August 20th 1619 – February 7th 2013 ‘United States District Court” Houston
Division Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon committed
to on or about August 11th 2016
“Aggravated Perjury”, in direct violation of Sec.
37.03. Knowingly making a false entry in official government court
records to hide “enslavement” of the “Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton
II in his person official property of the State of Mississippi” since date of
birth November 8th 1961 until “Mississippi” ratified the 13th
amendment on or about the 7th Day of February 7th 2013 fully
(RICO) criminal violation of the 13th Amendment of the United States
of America et al by a 148 years later (delinquent) in freeing all Negro Slaves
from the 1865 “Civil War”
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal
Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon further committed to on or about August 11th
2016 conceal, hide, and further aid in the direct continual Destroyed 14thamendment
granting the Negro Race the same citizenship as the pure claimed “Whites Only” at
the same time as Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon
committed to further a criminal
(RICO) acts by this “Aggravated Perjury” on or
about on August 11th 2016 for the further non-disclosure in the continual enforcement of “Black Codes” Act
to establish a Code of Criminal Procedure for the State of Texas, approved
August 26th, 1866, Jim Crow Laws, and Further the Enslavement of 44.5 Million
Negro Race, and
Directed at “pro se”
Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property of
the State of Mississippi within jurisdiction of United States of America et al
Until February 7th
2013 And “pro se” Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II” in his person official Slave Property o The Knights of the
Klu Klux Klansmen (1865 – 2016) “Slave Trade Dynasty” as upon information and
belief Chief Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon a active member
of The Texas Knights of The Klu Klux Klansmen, as
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal
Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon
committed to on or about
August 11th 2016 “Aggravated Perjury” to continue further Whites
Supermacy” of the Republican Party over 44.5 Million enslave (Plaintiffs)
herein still under grips of a White World Slave Trade in 2013 – 2016 No less
Judge Harmon direct this
(RICO), Obstruction of Justice, concealment, aid and abetting, concert of
action Surrounding the monetary
compensation in excess of 6 Trillion U.S. Dollars
As Plaintiff(s) Slave Negros
now continual 2016 (December) being Human Rights violations of The Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,” False Imprisonment, suffrage from
no-citizenship all 44.5 Million DNA Negro Slaves (Plaintiffs) past, present and
future
Still a part of Chief
Defendant United States of America, and Third Party Federal Reserve Bank
fraudulent in (Human) violation (RICO)“Slavery Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1589
(forced labor), 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery,
involuntary servitude, or forced labor),“Slavery Servitude” money laundering
statutes,18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,
“Slavery Servitude” money
laundering statutes, RICO statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1), Conversion, Civil
Conspirers, Collusion concert of action in violation 18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank
fraud, Fraud and Willful Misrepresentation, 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Material
Misrepresentation / Fraud,
“Fraudulent Void defendant
18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts, in connection with Chief Defendant U.S.
Federal Judge Melinda Harmon, committed to further criminal (RICO) acts on or
about August 11th 2016 Judicial duties performed in direct
Violation under Title 18,
U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law ... and “Honest
Services Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346”, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud,
and major fraud against the United States, False Statements, Concealment—18
U.S.C. § 1001, Further affirm “Aiding & Abetting”, “Assisting or
Encouraging”, “Assistant & Participating”, “Concert of Actions” massive 1619
- 2016
Civil conspire directed at
(pro se) Hamilton in his person being cover up acts of killing of one human
being by another “Homicide” as Pro Se Plaintiff hidden and legally declared
Dead in a wrongful death(s), wrongful
death of (Plaintiff unborn fetus),
Religious prosecution, Custodial
Interference, Child abduction/Child
Theft, Theft of Body, grave robber, sachem of things in Utah. Which Chief
Defendant U.S. Federal Judge Melinda Harmon, committed to further criminal
(RICO) acts on or about August 11th 2016 Judicial duties performed
in direct Fraud Non-Disclosure, Common law fraud, Fraud upon the court,
Judicial Fraud and
Obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, Judicial bias, intentional infliction
of emotional distress, aid and abetting, in the cover up several Federal Civil
Actions and having a direct interest in the out-come “Keeping 44.5 Million (Negro
DNA Race American still Slaves) in 2016 without any “Legal Citizenship of the
14th Amendment of the United States of America, while hiding such “enslavement”
in 2016 having occurred directed at the
acting President of The United States of America (Obama) and entire
Negro Family enslaved by among others said “pro
se” Plaintiff Hamilton in his person as Chief Defendant Melinda Harmon United
States District Judge conceal the defendant “United States of America” et al
from being a “party” to the very on civil action and respond to the summon and
complaint, as Chief Defendant Melinda Harmon United States District Judge
conceal the defendant “United States of America” official Government records
And further conceal the
States of Mississippi Records with the Sectary of State that protrude, to show precisely
when Mississippi free all 44.5 Million Negro Slaves since date of individual
births after Civil War of 1865 – February 7th 2013 which as now 44.5 Million Negros just been
declared further no legal citizenship base on this “Aggrivated Perjury”
on this 11th day of August
2016 signed by “Melinda Sue Harmon”, United States of America Federal Judge as
stated as follows: “The Court has liberally construed Plaintiff’s pleading with
appropriate deference, but concludes the claims should be dismissed as
frivolous.
The allegation are
irrational, incomprehensible, and lacking an arguable basis in law, apparently
claiming that Plaintiffs are literally enslaved African American Veterans even
though slavery was abolished in this country by the Thirteenth Amendment of the
Constitution. Accordingly, the court “Orders that this case is dismissed pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 1915 € (2) (B) (1)
Chief Defendant U.S. Federal
Judge Melinda Harmon, committed to on or about August 11th 2016 further
(RICO), while committed to “Treason” in hate crimes of insurances of human
rights World Violation criminal acts directed at the entire 44.5 Million Negro
Race of continual timeline of August 20th 1619 continual in 2016 forced
“enslavement” and now in 2016 August 11th denied 14th amendment
rights of 44.5 Million in the “Aggravated Perjury” scheme of things for “Whites
Supremacy” fraudulent in denial
Mississippi official Government records 13th amendment ratified in
2013 not as implied in exhibit (A) Attached herein Melinda Harmon, United
States District Judge” deliberate
“Aggravated Perjury” with deliberate
conscious and criminal action of a profession in law to precisely in leaving
out the material factual surrounding the exact dates of the (MIA) 13th
amendment being ratified 1865 v. 2013 which the complaint, and all evidenced in
support thereof, Identified the February 7th 2013 being the legal
date of freedom for 44.5 plus Million Negro’s Slaves, as “Mississippi public government
records, and all World Media reports, to include Internet fully soundly and
expert support this Legal in law and equity conclusion “Pro Se Plaintiff (Hamilton) born November 8th
1961 into Slavery Servitude” of the Defendant United States of America, yet the
government News miss the Orders to dismissed this case
as Chief Defendant “Judge
Melinda Harmon” happy and glee with her “whites Only” Texas Klansmen fully in
1960s participated in celebration when Martin Luther King was gun down in cool
blood because he did not want to be “gun down” in cold blood to die a Nigger
Slave” in 1960s from the missing 13th Amendment and being Property
of Chief Defendant Judge Melinda Harmon (Family) from Port Arthur Texas 77640
Zip code (Furche) official Card holders Within the ranks since “pro se”
Plaintiff very on youth watching the hostile killers the Knights of The Klu
Klux Klansmen Republican Party as this is the Normal…?
Chief Defendant Federal Judge
Melinda Harmon Goal to continue drunken white freaks engrossed in bigotry “Enslavement”
of a Negro race, and committed to “Aggravated Perjury”, and Treason of a United
States of America Negro Race President (Obama) being forced by no less the Republican
Party Justices to be “Enslaved” as acting President of (USA) and Commander in
Chief since 2009 being enslaved in his person and (Obama) Presidential Negro
Race First family in 2009 having no legal citizenship, in 2016 of the destroyed
defendant 14th amendment as Chief Defendant Federal Judge Melinda
Harmon further (RICO) for exactly (90) days
100% Obstruction of Justice
from the exact date of filing complaint before the “court” Hamilton et al v.
United States of America et al Filed: May 11, 2016 as 4:2016mc01057 Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Jeffery Tavery, Robert Vaughan and others upon
which as of this undersigned notary seal date the (MIA) Federal Court
Summons and Complaint being
never process nor has it ever left the federal courthouse building meaning
never no legal court services as required in this Class Action been served or
produced upon the actual Defendant:
United States of America et al "Chief Defendant, United States of America
Congress, United States of America Supreme Court Cause Of Action,
Just Chief Defendant Federal
Judge Melinda Harmon further (RICO) for exactly (90) days in hiding the
defendant “United States of America et al and (Mississippi) being a party to
this particular action notwithstanding the official and all government records
already filed for be scuttled and hidden in being produced to further not have rightfully
under court order to proceed, justly, correctly with a Jury Trial, as the
massive “Aggravated Perjury” with Judicial Justice Judge Harmon insitue and
fully ensuring under leadership “Hate Crimes Statue Violation directed to
continual keeping said “Enslave” 44,5 Million Negro race (Plaintiffs) unequal
to the white race, and without just compensation as outline in said complaint
in 2016,
Court further treatment each
and every one of the (Plaintiffs) as “Stupid”, Subhuman race, worthless and Meaningless,
deplorable and substandard race that of the Judge being Pure as procived and
Supeior as Plaintiff in his person to be so stupid as to except “whites supremacy,
way of life in 2016 no less as Mississippi
officially free “pro se” Plaintiff in his person 2/7/2013 from a (RICO) scheme
of unjust enrichment since 1619 offically directed at the
President Barack Obama and
his Negro (Obama) Presidential First Family as Chief Defendant (Big Ugly Bitch
Balls) continual her official “Aggravated
Perjury”, in (RICO) endeavor 2016 cover up of a forced “enslavement” 148 years
additional RICO scheme of things for unjust enrichment directed at 44.5 Million
Negros and the “Pro Se” Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein his person now
as of this undersigned date still no
14th Amendment
Citizenship which is destroyed with the 13th Amendment, back in 1865
Civil War as being violated when “Mississippi” Join the Union in 2013 148 years
later as “pro se” Plaintiff (Hamilton) II officially
Enslaved since date of birth
November 8th 1961 by “United States of America et al as described in
said complaint
That august 20th 1619
“Slavery Servitude”, “Black Code Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws” where fully
“Enforced” On or about “November 8th 1961 date of the Birth of the
Pro Se Plaintiff in his person United States of America (RICO) enterprise
criminal all three “Human Right Violations directed at all (Negros) race unjustly
and still “official” Judge Melinda Harmon” aggravated Perjury” continual running
concurrently in 2016 this undersigned date, the enslavement acts of “Slavery
Servitude”, “Black Code Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws” and having full conscious
knowledge and professional legal expert in “Cheating, committing, (RICO) cover
up and to conspiring further on or about August 11th 2016
FALSIFICATION OF Government decree, judgement
order records and
further violation Sec.
37.04. MATERIALITY all facts to aid a
cover up scheme In connection with Chief Defendant United States Of America, Supreme
Court, and Congress right in front of the “Plaintiffs” bold, and aggressively thereof in Civil Action A-16-1354 Chief Defendant
U.S. Federal Judge Melinda Sue (Furche) Harmon, committed
to (RICO) ““Aggravated Perjury”, Falsification of government records, and
Materiality obstruction all facts derived thereof as defined by
PENAL
CODE
TITLE
8. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER
37. PERJURY AND OTHER FALSIFICATION
Sec.
37.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Court record" means a decree,
judgment, order, subpoena, warrant, minutes, or other document issued by a
court of:
(A) this state;
(B) another state;
(C) the United States;
(D) a foreign country recognized by an act of
congress or a treaty or other international convention to which the United
States is a party;
(E) an Indian tribe recognized by the United
States; or
(F) any other jurisdiction, territory, or
protectorate entitled to full faith and credit in this state under the United
States Constitution.
(2) "Governmental record" means:
(A) anything belonging to, received by, or kept
by government for information, including a court record;
(B) anything required by law to be kept by others
for information of government;
(C) a license, certificate, permit, seal, title,
letter of patent, or similar document issued by government, by another state,
or by the United States;
(D) a standard proof of motor vehicle liability
insurance form described by Section 601.081, Transportation Code, a certificate
of an insurance company described by Section 601.083 of that code, a document
purporting to be such a form or certificate that is not issued by an insurer
authorized to write motor vehicle liability insurance in this state, an
electronic submission in a form described by Section 502.046(i), Transportation
Code, or an evidence of financial responsibility described by Section 601.053
of that code;
(E) an official ballot or other election record;
or
(F) the written documentation a mobile food unit
is required to obtain under Section 437.0074, Health and Safety Code.
(3) "Statement" means any
representation of fact.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 113,
Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993,
73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 5, eff.
May 21, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch.
823, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts
1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 393, Sec. 21, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended
by:
Acts
2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1276 (H.B. 3672), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts
2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 161 (S.B. 1093), Sec. 16.004, eff. September 1,
2013.
Sec.
37.02. PERJURY. (a) A
person commits an offense if, with intent to deceive and with knowledge of the
statement's meaning:
(1) he makes a false statement under oath or
swears to the truth of a false statement previously made and the statement is
required or authorized by law to be made under oath; or
(2) he makes a false unsworn declaration under
Chapter 132, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A
misdemeanor.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.03. AGGRAVATED PERJURY. (a) A
person commits an offense if he commits perjury as defined in Section 37.02,
and the false statement:
(1) is made during or in connection with an
official proceeding; and
(2) is material.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of
the third degree.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.04. MATERIALITY. (a) A
statement is material, regardless of the admissibility of the statement under
the rules of evidence, if it could have affected the course or outcome of the
official proceeding.
(b) It is no defense to prosecution under Section
37.03 (Aggravated Perjury) that the declarant mistakenly believed the statement
to be immaterial.
(c) Whether a statement is material in a given
factual situation is a question of law.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.06. INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS. An information or indictment for perjury
under Section 37.02 or aggravated perjury under Section 37.03 that alleges that
the declarant has made statements under oath, both of which cannot be true,
need not allege which statement is false.
At the trial the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec.
37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL
RECORD. (a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false
alteration of, a governmental record;
(2) makes, presents, or uses any record,
document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent that it be
taken as a genuine governmental record;
(3) intentionally destroys, conceals, removes, or
otherwise impairs the verity, legibility, or availability of a governmental
record;
(4) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a
governmental record or a blank governmental record form with intent that it be
used unlawfully;
(5) makes, presents, or uses a governmental
record with knowledge of its falsity; or
(6) possesses, sells, or offers to sell a
governmental record or a blank governmental record form with knowledge that it
was obtained unlawfully.
(b) It is an exception to the application of
Subsection (a)(3) that the governmental record is destroyed pursuant to legal
authorization or transferred under Section 441.204, Government Code. With regard to the destruction of a local
government record, legal authorization includes compliance with the provisions
of Subtitle C, Title 6, Local Government Code.
(c)(1) Except as provided by Subdivisions (2), (3),
and (4) and by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class A
misdemeanor unless the actor's intent is to defraud or harm another, in which
event the offense is a state jail felony.
(2) An offense under this section is a felony of
the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the
governmental record was:
(A) a public school record, report, or assessment
instrument required under Chapter 39, Education Code, data reported for a
school district or open-enrollment charter school to the Texas Education Agency
through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) described by
Section 42.006, Education Code, under a law or rule requiring that reporting,
or a license, certificate, permit, seal, title, letter of patent, or similar
document issued by government, by another state, or by the United States,
unless the actor's intent is to defraud or harm another, in which event the
offense is a felony of the second degree;
(B) a written report of a medical, chemical,
toxicological, ballistic, or other expert examination or test performed on
physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or relevance of
the evidence to a criminal action;
(C) a written report of the certification,
inspection, or maintenance record of an instrument, apparatus, implement,
machine, or other similar device used in the course of an examination or test
performed on physical evidence for the purpose of determining the connection or
relevance of the evidence to a criminal action; or
(D) a search warrant issued by a magistrate.
(3) An offense under this section is a Class C
misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental
record is a governmental record that is required for enrollment of a student in
a school district and was used by the actor to establish the residency of the
student.
(4) An offense under this section is a Class B
misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the governmental
record is a written appraisal filed with an appraisal review board under
Section 41.43(a-1), Tax Code, that was performed by a person who had a
contingency interest in the outcome of the appraisal review board hearing.
(d) An offense under this section, if it is shown
on the trial of the offense that the governmental record is described by
Section 37.01(2)(D), is:
(1) a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is
committed under Subsection (a)(2) or Subsection (a)(5) and the defendant is
convicted of presenting or using the record;
(2) a felony of the third degree if the offense
is committed under:
(A) Subsection (a)(1), (3), (4), or (6); or
(B) Subsection (a)(2) or (5) and the defendant is
convicted of making the record; and
(3) a felony of the second degree,
notwithstanding Subdivisions (1) and (2), if the actor's intent in committing
the offense was to defraud or harm another.
(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution
for possession under Subsection (a)(6) that the possession occurred in the
actual discharge of official duties as a public servant.
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection
(a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(5) that the false entry or false information could have
no effect on the government's purpose for requiring the governmental record.
(g) A person is presumed to intend to defraud or
harm another if the person acts with respect to two or more of the same type of
governmental records or blank governmental record forms and if each
governmental record or blank governmental record form is a license,
certificate, permit, seal, title, or similar document issued by government.
(h) If conduct that constitutes an offense under
this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.13, the
actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.
(i) With the consent of the appropriate local
county or district attorney, the attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction
with that consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under this
section that involves the state Medicaid program.
(j) It is not a defense to prosecution under
Subsection (a)(2) that the record, document, or thing made, presented, or used
displays or contains the statement "NOT A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT" or
another substantially similar statement intended to alert a person to the
falsity of the record, document, or thing, unless the record, document, or
thing displays the statement diagonally printed clearly and indelibly on both
the front and back of the record, document, or thing in solid red capital
letters at least one-fourth inch in height.
Acts
1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1248,
Sec. 66, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1991,
72nd Leg., ch. 113, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1991;
Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 565, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01,
eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, 75th
Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 6, eff. May 21, 1997;
Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 823, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 659, Sec. 2, eff.
Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch.
718, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 771, Sec. 3, eff.
June 13, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch.
198, Sec. 2.139, eff. Sept. 1, 2003;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 257, Sec. 16, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended
by:
Acts
2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1364 (H.B. 126), Sec. 1, eff. June 18, 2005.
Acts
2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1085 (H.B. 3024), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts
2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 73 (H.B. 1813), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts
2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1130 (H.B. 2086), Sec. 31, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts
2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 510 (S.B. 124), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts
2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 690 (H.B. 644), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.
Sec.
37.13. RECORD OF A FRAUDULENT
COURT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person
makes, presents, or uses any document or other record with:
(1) knowledge that the document or other record
is not a record of a court created under or established by the constitution or
laws of this state or of the United States;
and
(2) the intent that the document or other record
be given the same legal effect as a record of a court created under or
established by the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A
misdemeanor, except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if it is
shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has previously been
convicted under this section on two or more occasions.
(c) If conduct that constitutes an offense under
this section also constitutes an offense under Section 32.48 or 37.10, the
actor may be prosecuted under any of those sections.
Added
by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, Sec. 8, eff. May 21, 1997.
No comments:
Post a Comment